Safe Mode: On
Sodom & Gomorrah - the Physical Evidences.

2 Peter 2:6 And turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrha into ashes condemned them with an overthrow, making them an ensample unto those that after should live ungodly;

A historical and scientific fact backed by archeological, physical, and testimonial evidences.

The Jewish historian Flavious Josephus writes in the first century about Sodom & Gomorrah, he being himself much closer to the event in time.......

"God then cast a thunderbolt upon the city, and set it on fire, with its inhabitants; and laid waste the country with the like burning, as I formerly said when I wrote the Jewish War. But Lot's wife continually turning back to view the city as she went from it, and being too nicely inquisitive what would become of it, although God had forbidden her so to do, was changed into a pillar of salt; for I have seen it, and it remains at this day." (Flavius Josephus. Antiquities of the Jews. Book 1, chapter 11, section 4

What were the inhabitants of the city of Sodom and Gomorrah like? Chapter 19 of the book of Jasher on that subject:

http://www.sacred-texts.com/chr/apo/jasher/19.htm

Here comes Mr. Infidel Critic. He denies the evidences of the Bible; evidences which so clearly prove its authenticity, that we are obliged to believe him to be either blasphemous or senseless, in that he does so, and we leave him his choice between the two.

But he dares to deny the truth of Holy Scripture, and will have it that all the miracles whereby it is attested are untrue and false. Do you think that one who had risen from the dead would persuade such a man as that to believe?

What? when God's whole creation having been ransacked by the hand of science, has only testified to the truth of revelation—when the whole history of buried cities and departed nations has but preached out the truth that the Bible was true—when every strip of land in the far-off East has been an exposition and a confirmation of the prophecies of Scripture; if men are yet unonvinced, do ye suppose that one dead man rising from the tomb would convince them?

No; I see the critical blasphemer already armed for his prey. Hark to him; "I am not quite sure that you ever were dead, sir, you profess to be risen from the dead; I do not believe you. You say you have been dead, and have gone to heaven; my dear man you were in a trance. You must bring proof from the parish register that you were dead." The proof is brought that he was dead. "Well, now you must prove that you were buried." It is proved that he was buried, and it is proved that some sexton in old times, did take up his dry bones and cast his dust in the air." That is very good now I walls you to prove that you are the identical man that was buried." "Well I am, I know I am; I tell you as an honest man I have been to heaven, and I have come back again."

"Well then," says the infidel, "it is not consistent with reason; it is ridiculous to suppose that a man who was dead and buried could ever come to life again, and so I don't believe you, I tell you so traight to your face." That is how men would answer him; and instead of having only the sin of denying many miracles men would have to add to it the guilt of denying another but they would not be so much as a tithe of an inch nearer to conviction; and certainly, if the wonder were done in some far-off land, and only reported to the rest of the world,

I can suppose that the whole infidel world would exclaim, "Simple childish tales and such traditions have been current elsewhere; but we are sensible men, we do not believe them." Although a churchyard should start into life, and tand up before the infidel who denies the truth of Christianity; I declare I do not believe there would be enough evidence in all the churchyards in the world to convince him.

Infidelity would still cry for something more. It is like the horse-leech; it crieth, "Give, give!" Prove a point to an infidel, and he wants it proved again; let it be as clear as noon day to him from the testimony of many witnesses, yet doth he not believe it. In fact, he doth believe it; but he pretendeth not to do so, and is an infidel in spite of himself.

But certainly the dead man's rising would be little worth for the conviction of such men.But remember, my dear friends, that the most numerous class of unbelievers are a set of people who never think at all. There are a great number of people in this land that eat and drink, and everything else except think at least, they think enough to take their shop shutters down of a morning, and put them up at night; they think enough to know a little about the rising of the funds, or the rate per cent. of interest, or something like how articles are selling or the price of bread; but their brains seem to be given them for nothing at all, except to meditate upon bread and cheese.

Excerpt from: "A Preacher from the Dead" by Charles Spurgeon - 1857

http://www.spurgeon.org/sermons/0143.htm

There is nothing new under the sun

Loading the player ...
Embed Code
Plays: 881 (Embed: 0)

Added: Aug-26-2012 Occurred On: Aug-25-2012
By: TheLastDay
In:
Religion
Tags: sodom & gomorrah, sodom and gomorrah, homosexuals, homoexuality, homo, sodomites, sodom
Location: Israel (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 2289 | Comments: 54 | Votes: 3 | Favorites: 3 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • yeah ....but why do Adam and Eve have belly buttons in all their pictures?

    Posted Aug-26-2012 By 

    (1)

  • "He denies the "evidences" of the Bible;"

    LOL that's like saying the story in a Superman comic is evidence of law enforcement in the USA... AND there's proof! Look pictures!

    You seem to like the word "sodom" in your tags too... hmmmm.

    Posted Aug-26-2012 By 

    (1)

  • Comment of user 'Anti-Authoritaria' has been deleted by author!
    • @Anti-Authoritaria I have read that a lot of the fossil record has been found in sedimentary rock. Sedimentary rock is formed by water.

      Posted Aug-26-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @John Coleman and tectonics moves the rock from the floor up!

      Posted Aug-26-2012 By 

      (0)

    • Comment of user 'Anti-Authoritaria' has been deleted by author!
  • 3000 year old myths or science ? Hm let me think ? Think I'll go with science seeing as religion has never achieved anything useful ever.

    Posted Aug-26-2012 By 

    (1)

    • @lpankhurst The one useful thing science has achieved is proving the truths of scripture.

      Posted Aug-26-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @lpankhurst Just like the scientific proof that was once stated that the earth was round, or is the center of our solar system, we will never fly or many other scientific proofs?!?

      Posted Aug-26-2012 By 

      (0)

  • So... was that a flashbang grenade the two angels set off and blinded the fags?

    Posted Aug-26-2012 By 

    (1)

  • But the final evidence was the gigantic pile of empty ky jelly containers they found.

    Posted Aug-26-2012 By 

    (0)

  • OK.. so lets say a meteor shower hits earth back in the stupid ages. What do people.. who think the earth is flat and the sun revolves around it, think.. OMG it's unexplainable.. GOD did it. The bible may have some truth to it.. like ok a few cities here and kablewy, now none. Doesn't mean an all powerful god decided to smash the shit out of everything, rather then just release a sickness and target only those who pissed him off. Or if he was super smart, he would just reverse time and not allow More..

    Posted Aug-26-2012 By 

    (0)

    • @Aariss People have never been more stupid than they are today.

      Posted Aug-26-2012 By 

      (1)

    • Comment of user 'brokenrob' has been deleted by author!
    • @TheLastDay People have also never been smarter then they are today.

      Posted Aug-27-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @Aariss Smarter? I think you are confusing intellect with education, much of which amounts to brainwashing.

      Even stupid people can be brainwashed.

      Posted Aug-27-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @brokenrob What discoveries have you made, other than allowing yourself to be brainwashed by the Devil to embrace Atheism?

      You are the very barometer of ultimate human stupidity.

      Posted Aug-27-2012 By 

      (0)

  • Just watch Ron Wyatts movies about this

    Posted Aug-26-2012 By 

    (0)

  • I don't want to watch 16 minutes, but I'm positive there's indespitable proof in the video.

    Posted Aug-26-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Comment of user 'Humanfuse' has been deleted by author!
  • Comment of user 'brokenrob' has been deleted by author!
    • @brokenrob Genesis tells a couple of creation stories at least.

      I mean in the first verse it implies a destruction of everything that was, a making void or erasure and we are not even 20 words in to the first chapter.

      The book then tells of the creation or population of the world in general. Animals are created first with aquatic life leading the fray. after creating mankind god rests, then we are told the story of the creation of a specific garden and the domestication of many animals and it More..

      Posted Aug-26-2012 By 

      (0)

    • Comment of user 'brokenrob' has been deleted by author!
    • @brokenrob Apparently your superhuman logical abilities failed when applied to Derringer's simple explanation of those verses.

      So much for your supposed logic.

      1 Corinthians 1:25 Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men; and the weakness of God is stronger than men.

      Posted Aug-26-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @brokenrob I believe I just explained that? It is more an issue of translation then anything else?

      Understanding when mankind was being spoken of and when the specific forefather of Abraham was being spoken of. Mankind was created after the animals for the most part. then Adam and Eve the actual people and fore-bearers of the Hebrew people were placed in a very specific place called Eden. Supposedly surrounded by rivers with common names but that do not appear to intersect in this modern age? More..

      Posted Aug-26-2012 By 

      (0)

    • Comment of user 'brokenrob' has been deleted by author!
  • Comment of user 'Matchill' has been deleted by item owner!
  • This is just bizarre, another religious nuthead giving us a video of "historical and scientific fact backed by archeological, physical, and testimonial evidences."
    I guess after uploading the vid there will be another one on crationism, against darwinism and evolution. As long as they can see support of their book, it's ok, but they'd condemn Galileo once again if the got the chance.

    What's next? The bones of the heard of pigs Jesus allowed the demons to possess? The sandels he walked More..

    Posted Aug-26-2012 By 

    (0)

    • @Uac_mitun_ahau What's next is you at Christ's judgement bar and your eternal damnation.

      Posted Aug-26-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @Uac_mitun_ahau
      No one would condemn Galileo....only corrupt organized religions did that. Christians except fact from science. Just not unprovable theories like evolution. The only thing that evolves ......is the definition of Evolution. Christianity has never changed and still stands strong with evidence.

      Posted Aug-26-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @TheLastDay Yeah, right, that's what YOU like to believe, who hast taken the word of YOUR LORD so much to YOUR heart.
      I guess you'd throw the torch if I was at the stake.

      Posted Aug-27-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @tymatthews Unprovable theories like evolution?
      You can't single out evolution because you don't like the implications and go all pro-science all the same.

      You haven't realised that the concept of evolution isn't a truth, something religions offer without any proof for them, but a theory which stands untill it is disproven by fact.

      So, you can legitimatly refute evolution by just proving it doesn't hold up as a theory. By providing proof against it.

      The scientific community hasn't done so sin More..

      Posted Aug-27-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @tymatthews "Christians except fact from science." LOL.
      You didn't want to say "Christians ACCEPT fact from science.", huh?

      Posted Aug-27-2012 By 

      (0)

  • Comment of user 'andrewelilomax' has been deleted by item owner!
  • They were nuked

    Posted Aug-26-2012 By 

    (0)