Safe Mode: On
Judge Rules Advertising Underage Kids For Sex Is Free Speech

No wonder The ron paul ''constitution supporters'' want him in office....lol

July 27, 2012 Q13 News

Credits: Moxnews

Loading the player ...
Embed CodeSwitch Player
Plays: 660 (Embed: 0)

Added: Jul-28-2012 Occurred On: Jul-28-2012
By: highsociety
In:
Other News
Tags: Judge, ron, Rules, Advertising, paul, Underage Kids, For, Sex Is, Free, Speech
Views: 1480 | Comments: 44 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 1 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • Comment of user 'Zardoz003' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
  • Yup, it's free speech.

    It's SPEECH. As in, NOT DEED.

    We either have free speech or we don't, and if we do, we have to tolerate what we do not like. Even that which we do not like AT ALL.

    Posted Jul-28-2012 By 

    (4) | Report

  • Comment of user 'oldboy6o4' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
    • @oldboy6o4 IT was a joke lighten up lmao....but as you know i am anti politician can't trust none of them look how rand the flipper turned out for you his quote " i support mitt romney" enough said for me.

      Posted Jul-28-2012 By 

      (-1) | Report

    • Comment of user 'oldboy6o4' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
    • @oldboy6o4 happens to me sometimes as well now pass the kush lol lets get ....

      Posted Jul-28-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • Comment of user 'oldboy6o4' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
  • ron paul hater, how does that have to do with anything, go suck romneys cunt

    Posted Jul-28-2012 By 

    (2) | Report

    • @nowhereman1 I am anti politician period don't like liars representing me but i was just joking and you say suck flippers cunt sounds like your huggin ron pauls nuts real heavy over there.

      By the way rand said "I support flip romney".

      Posted Jul-28-2012 By 

      (-3) | Report

    • @highsociety i love how every american whos pro rom, or republican says im into right wing commie or obama supporter, yet im not even part of your country so how can i be a supporter when im not a member of any party lol

      Posted Jul-28-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @nowhereman1 So what are you doing sticking your nose in our business then?

      Just asking ....also im independent not a repubic hair man.

      Posted Jul-28-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @highsociety so whats the deal with that, does that mean your not a left or right, then who do you vote for?

      becaause our cable gets every news outlet you have from fox to msnbc, pretty much everything, and that includes KING and LA news etc.

      Posted Jul-28-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @nowhereman1 I vote for me the 2 party system is horse pucky....

      Posted Jul-29-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

  • Fail.. You are a JACKASS for trying to relate the constitution and Ron Paul to this BS. Chances are, you relate to this more...

    Posted Jul-28-2012 By 

    (1) | Report

  • This ruling does not mean that the judge supports or condones the child sex trade. The law was about requiring age verification to enter an online escort site. The ruling means that the language of the legislation needs to be more carefully tailored to achieve its purpose because, as it is written, it appears likely to be overturned after a trial.

    Tagging with with Ron Paul is weird and misleading.

    -Carry on.

    Posted Jul-28-2012 By 

    (1) | Report

  • Highsociety, you are a huge jackass. You only make yourself look like more of a shithead than you are (which is impressive) by blaming your own pathetic existence on others. I hope you get cancer

    Posted Jul-28-2012 By 

    (1) | Report

    • @Chickenfried uh oh, a pedophile is angry with you highsociety.

      You're actually defending this judge?

      Posted Jul-28-2012 By 

      (-2) | Report

    • @Anti-Liberal The issue is not the content. Prostituting kids is illegal and should be, this is a conservative issue tho. Should government be allowed to arrest someone simply because of words on the internet that no one can yet tell are true or even the person they say it is? How about that big government? Should Obama be allowed to throw you in prison because one of his friends say to typed something up?

      If someone is actually found to be doing what they say they are on the website, that's il More..

      Posted Jul-28-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @Anti-Liberal I was joking but now i am starting to think some of these LLer's are pedophiles....lol

      Posted Jul-28-2012 By 

      (-2) | Report

    • @Chickenfried I was joking but with a name like fried chicken sounds like high blood pressure is headed your way.

      Posted Jul-28-2012 By 

      (-1) | Report

  • ha doesnt mean you cant arrest them for doing it just means you cant prevent them from advertising

    Posted Jul-29-2012 By 

    (0) | Report

  • Don't they shoot horses when they go lame?

    Posted Jul-28-2012 By 

    (0) | Report

  • highsociety, you are the lowest degenerate ive ever heard of!!

    for you to put this on ron paul and his supporters is absolutely ridiculous!! why dont you try and blame the judge that said it is ok to rape little children, no instead you play childish word games with people. this is obviously not protected under the 1st ammendment, and for you to side with those pedophiles is pretty telling as to what kind of person you are!!

    Posted Jul-28-2012 By 

    (0) | Report

    • @jake3223 The judge didn't say it was OK to rape little children.

      Posted Jul-28-2012 By 

      (2) | Report

    • @forqalso

      he sided with the pedophiles "right" to advertise for child sex trafficking. how is that not saying its ok to have sex with children???

      you have a very warped view of reality, if you dont think there are really people out there that want this sort of thing, i point you towards the Penn State scandal!!

      Posted Jul-28-2012 By 

      (-2) | Report

    • @jake3223 I was just joking don't take it that serious and the ruling sounds sick to me but free speech means you have to take the good with the bad.

      Posted Jul-28-2012 By 

      (-1) | Report

    • @jake3223 No, dumbass, he sided with the First Amendment. I think it's a great idea to allow advertisements for child sex trafficking. If the cops can't catch them with a public on-line ad, then what way is easier?

      Posted Jul-28-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @jake3223 because if you never know who is actually posting on the internet, and if you can arrest people simply because you found words or an IP address on the internet that can trace back to someone, the government or private citizens can throw anyone in jail with a little bit of know-how.

      Posted Jul-28-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

  • There are a lot of Judges in this country. The judges that happen to be pedophiles aren't hard to spot are they?

    Posted Jul-28-2012 By 

    (0) | Report

  • highsociety is one of our resident militant anti-Ron Paul trolls. These pathetic smear posts are the best they can come up with since they have no dirt on the man himself. Just another dipshit grasping at straws.

    Posted Jul-28-2012 By 

    (0) | Report

    • @WolfBite120 I am anti politician period i don't take lies as well as others.

      Was just a joke have some bath salts to relax.

      Posted Jul-28-2012 By 

      (-3) | Report

    • @highsociety Generally hating politicians is a good rule of thumb, but I fear you care more about sensationalism than actual reason.

      Posted Jul-28-2012 By 

      (1) | Report

    • @86mang75 I only care about networking,(like on LL)fishing,hunting,researching ancient history,buying silver/gold,running my 2 companies,friends,family,and waking up the brain dead sheep to reality everything else you my think or take in from my post that wasn't clear i apologize.

      Posted Jul-28-2012 By 

      (-1) | Report

  • How is this a Ron Paul or constitution supporter thing?

    Posted Jul-28-2012 By 

    (0) | Report

  • unfuckinbelieveable.........

    Posted Jul-28-2012 By 

    (-1) | Report

  • WTF!!

    Seriously HOPE other charges were filed !

    all for free speech. but DAM

    Posted Jul-28-2012 By 

    (-1) | Report

  • Thats not speech. Thats offering services. The judge should be castrated

    Posted Jul-28-2012 By 

    (-1) | Report

    • @AK551 If it were a paid advertisement on a billboard or something, that would be one thing, but in this case, there is no line drawn to assure that you're arresting the real people responsible and not someone a hacker just set up, which is actually becoming a big problem. Because of all our internet laws hackers are able to get peoples house raided by swat for things they didn't do and people have been actually dying as a result.

      I thought we didnt like big government on this site.

      Posted Jul-28-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

  • Must be a catholic

    Posted Jul-28-2012 By 

    (-3) | Report