Safe Mode: On
Happening Now! Hosted Chat: The Death Penalty. In LL Chat.

The Death Penalty: Tonight 7:00pm EST (12am GMT).



Yes, it's also a bit of a grim one but none the less a subject that seems to split the common opinion in more ways than one. We'll not only be focusing on the death penalty itself but also reflecting on its effectiveness, the point of such a penalty, and even the methodology and mechanics of it.

If you'd like to join in this hosted chat simply make sure you are logged into your LiveLeak account then hit the CHAT button on the lower nav bar. This will take you to our chat landing page where you can enter a room of your choosing. Once you are in chat you will see the Hosted Chat room where this will be taking place.

About our hosted chats. One member described the last like a radio talk show where you could chat via a "message board" at the same time. We try to make sure as many people as possible get their thoughts aired either on mic or via having their question / point read out. We do have some very simple rules for our hosted chats to ensure things don't degenerate into madness. They are:

1) When you get in to the room do NOT simply jump on your mic. If you wish to make a point on Mic then send a PM to either the host (myself in this instance) or any mod in the room and you will be called to the mic when it's your turn.

2) If you have a point you'd like to make via text because you either don't have a mic or you're uncomfortable speaking then simply send it via PM to the host and it will be addressed. Don't get annoyed if it takes a while though, the private messages tend to fly in at an alarming rate.

Apart from that normal LiveLeak rules apply. The last two hosted chats have been both interesting and entertaining so I hope you guys can join us for this next one. Also I'm always interested in hearing about any topics you'd like to see raised in a hosted chat so if you have any ideas please send me a private message here through the main site.

See you tonight!
H





Added: Nov-18-2012 Occurred On: Nov-18-2012
By: LL_Hayden
In:
Other
Tags: LiveLeak, hosted chat, chat, death penalty
Marked as: approved
Views: 28598 | Comments: 280 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 58 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • I believe in an eye for an eye. If you commit murder you should forfeit your life in return as punishment. Sure it may be expensive to execute some one but it's even more expensive to house them and feed them for the rest of their lives not to mention medical bills if they become ill that the state has to cover, that money could be put in to different areas of the state to better the public who didn't screw up and become a criminal. Prisons are already cramped as it is here in the states and More..

    Posted Nov-18-2012 By 

    (10)

    • @Orbas Eye for an eye? If you commit murder you should forfeit your life in return as punishment? The US Army wouldn't have any soldiers left for playing world police.

      Posted Nov-18-2012 By 

      (4)

    • @scorcher93 I like that, World Police I've never looked at it that way before but they do seem to be like that...

      Posted Nov-18-2012 By 

      (3)

    • @scorcher93 This is about the death penalty, not your opinion on the US military. I wouldn't expect someone who lost to it twice to think too highly of it anyways.

      Posted Nov-18-2012 By 

      (-3)

    • @scorcher93 thats not murder, thats taking out the trash

      murder generally has a personal goal in mind, with pre-meditation regarding the ending of someones life

      i do love the irony, a german being critical of the united states human rights record and order in the world, lol

      Posted Nov-18-2012 By 

      (1)

    • @indigenous Countries bitch at us when we don't help them and bitch at us when we do.

      Posted Nov-18-2012 By 

      (2)

  • chances are if you end up on the gurney then you deserve to die, no point in rehabilitation when it gets that bad, you take a life you give your own, why lethal injection is used is beyond me. a bullet to the head in plain room with a drain in the middle for clean up is the way to go.

    Posted Nov-18-2012 By 

    (5)

    • @BONGOS better than housing the piece of shit for 80 years anywho although i do like a slow rot. but at least this way its not wasting my community's tax money lol.

      Posted Nov-18-2012 By 

      (0)

  • The death penalty is the right thing to do in most cases, however, one needs to consider the people that have spent many years in prison, only to fine out by DNA testing that the person was wrongfully convicted. In many cases they were convicted on someones word or I witness testimony. If not for that, I would pull the switch myself!!
    T

    Posted Nov-18-2012 By 

    (4)

    • @Thank01 If the case is 100%, kill them.

      Posted Nov-18-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @miaru have you ever thought about the fact that your justice system thought all of these cases to be 100%, or else they wouldn't have applied the death penalty?

      Posted Nov-18-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @keen Sure. That's why I wrote 100%. Our system allows for the death penalty in cases where the case proof is far from convincing. Just a bunch of asshole jurors who think they got it right. That needs to be tightened. The cases you're talking about have had their share of doubts. When a case is clear cut, those animals should be killed.

      Posted Nov-18-2012 By 

      (0)

  • I wish more countries would have the death penalty. you kill someone and you d'nt really have a reason to do so, you should pay with your own life.

    Posted Nov-18-2012 By 

    (3)

    • @BURP
      One day you might evolve into a mature thinking civilised person.

      Posted Nov-18-2012 By 

      (-8)

    • @floydy1 So whoever doesn't agree with your point of view can't be civilised or mature. Great, look who's mature now

      Posted Nov-18-2012 By 

      (4)

    • @BURP
      I shall change my words.
      One day you might evolve into a FULLY mature thinking civilised person

      Posted Nov-18-2012 By 

      (-2)

    • @floydy1 wow, a really well thought out and reasoned response if ever there was one. NOT

      Posted Nov-18-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @tsmith
      Sometimes the purity of a response is overlooked or misunderstood. Many times the reader doesn't get it until they either mature or have personal experience. When it finally dawns, it's a wonderful uplifting and liberating feeling. With this in mind, I wish you luck for the future.

      Posted Nov-18-2012 By 

      (0)

  • I'm 100% for the death penalty.

    1) Don't have to support scum with taxpayer money for decades while they serve out a life sentence.

    2) Prevention. Sure exterminating one murdering scumbag won't stop others but it sure as hell will stop that one.

    Sanctity of life is inane. It's only evoked for murderers, but the victims don't seem to qualify.

    Typical Liberal hypocrite propaganda.

    Posted Nov-18-2012 By 

    (3)

    • @aggravator Shows us that you really have no idea what you are talking about. It is vastly more expensive to have the death penalty. Type that into google and you will see. Death penalty for uncivilized nations.

      Posted Nov-18-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @floydy1 The lack of death penalty is for uncivilized nations.

      Posted Nov-18-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @floydy1 It's only more expensive because they keep pandering to the Libtard lawyer's appeals. That, of course takes years and is very expensive. Injection within 4 hours of the guilty verdict is the way to go.

      Posted Nov-18-2012 By 

      (2)

    • @aggravator
      No, you need to put people in prison.
      The death penalty is barbaric and that is why it is outlawed in Europe which is the most advanced part of the world when it comes to being civilised. Let's face it, the USA does not have the death penalty in 17 states and even in most of those that do, they are carried out so infrequently. It's just a matter of time before it is banned in all states. I mean, people still murder don't they, even when they know the death penalty exists. A quest More..

      Posted Nov-18-2012 By 

      (-1)

    • Comment of user 'PimeTaradox' has been deleted by author!
  • the death penalty would be fine with me if it didnt take upwards of 3 decades to carry it out

    Posted Nov-18-2012 By 

    (3)

    • @stalebiscuit That's because of those who oppose it. They hobble its effectiveness as a deterrent, then say it doesn't deter.

      Posted Nov-18-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @Thetruthisalwaysthetruth im aware. japan has it on lock, the judge sets a date of execution that cant be stayed by frivolous appeals process. im all for appealing anything, but i dont think the appeals process should stay the execution. in this day and age, if you are found guilty, beyond all shadow of a doubt, and your crimes bad enough, then the death penalty should be a final thing

      Posted Nov-18-2012 By 

      (0)

  • I would be ALL for the death penalty. However, because of all the stupid regulations and human decency, it costs more to execute someone than it does to imprison them for life. They should just have one death penalty, throw them in a windowless hole until they starve to death.

    Posted Nov-18-2012 By 

    (2)

    • @Jmills It DOES NOT cost more to execute in the United States prison system. A prisoner costs $40,000+ a year to house. The injection for the procedures costs less than $1,000. The costs come from all the appeals and rights that we give to convicted killers and of course California spends the most on this....liberals can't run a fucking budget to save their lives. Fuck, they could save more money if we just used a $0.25 bullet.

      Posted Nov-18-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @SG6578

      you contradict yourself but "it is cheaper to imprison killers for life than to execute them"
      http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29552692/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/t/execute-or-not-question-cost/#.UKQCLob5mUk

      Posted Nov-18-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @Jmills bullet costs .30 cents.....

      Posted Nov-18-2012 By 

      (0)

  • Yes, I'm all for it.

    Posted Nov-18-2012 By 

    (2)

  • I bet someone will be jacking off to this.

    Posted Nov-18-2012 By 

    (2)

  • Sorry, can't take another marriage discussion. Just seeing the honeymoon bed is depressing.

    Posted Nov-18-2012 By 

    (2)

  • I'll never understand how people can think that it's perfectly okay to abort a fully formed and viable infant, yet will go to the mat to prevent a murderer from receiving justice.

    Posted Nov-18-2012 By 

    (2)

    • @999YDStare You can't get an abortion after the first trimester. Lmao @ your silly comment. Like the kids walking and talking

      Posted Nov-18-2012 By 

      (4)

    • @Codeiner Yes you can. And don't be absurd with your "walking and talking" comment. We're talking about an infant. I'm not being hyperbolic in my comments about this, I don't expect any in return.

      Posted Nov-18-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @999YDStare

      An infant is from age 0 to 1 or 2 years old.

      So your comment doesnt make sence.

      Also abortion is from 0 weeks to 11/12 weeks after impregnation and that you call an Embryo.

      After 11 weeks it becomes a Fetus and aborting a Fetus is illegal.

      Aborting an infant is not possible because you become an infant after birth ahhahah retard

      Posted Nov-18-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @666HoboFromHell666 You're wrong about the legality in weeks. A mother can have a second term abortion commonly in the US. Proponents of abortion constantly push to legalize the late term abortion procedure. Our current president allowed legislation to pass without voting in Illinois that allows live-born babies to die by withholding aid.

      And spare me the difference in terms between infant and fetus. The difference between the two after viability is simply a few layers of the mother skin.

      Posted Nov-18-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @Codeiner Obama overturned the ban on partial birth abortion, so your mom could have aborted you.

      Posted Nov-18-2012 By 

      (0)

  • Comment of user 'NSAID2' has been deleted by author!
  • death penalty should be relegated to history, but the rub is if someone harmed a family member, I would with clear conscience and full acceptance of the legal consequences, take that motherfuckers life myself.

    It's a tough one.

    Posted Nov-18-2012 By 

    (2)

    • @dirtyarris Then you take your life from your family. Let the state do the dirty work.

      Posted Nov-18-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @corectmeifiamwrong rather that than live with myself knowing I didn't end the cunt.

      Posted Nov-18-2012 By 

      (1)

    • @dirtyarris I see your point and might agree with you depending on what part of family was taken or left. But you would really need to think about self destruction with regards to yourself.

      I think a jury selected to try you would be more lenient if you limited your time with the perp to just removing half a dozen parts from here or there with pliers and then stuck him with an IV to keep him stable till paramedics arrived while you smoked a cigarette.

      Posted Nov-18-2012 By 

      (1)

    • @corectmeifiamwrong LMAO I like your thinking

      Posted Nov-21-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @dirtyarris Reminded me of this story earlier this year.
      http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/20/us/father-not-charged-in-killing-of-man-molesting-his-daughter-5.html?_r=0

      Posted Nov-21-2012 By 

      (0)

  • I hope they botch it and he dies miserably...

    Posted Nov-18-2012 By 

    (1)

  • Isn't a well placed .50 cal through the noggin the best bang for taxpayer buck? all these other means look expensive

    Posted Nov-18-2012 By 

    (1)