Safe Mode: On
The Global Warming Fiasco Continues. (AKA: Stories not found on CNN)

I have always said Global Warming long ago left the realm of true science, and has become a quasi-religion. You just have to have faith. It did not matter the facts, and you were not allowed to bring up opposing views. (your carreer would suffer)
Well Surprise Surprise,
In todays news, two more stories that back that up. On top of the long list of embarrassing global warming stores comes two more today. You will not find these on CNN or MSNBC. But I found them.

"New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism"
http://blogs.forbes.com/jamestaylor/2011/07/27/new-nasa-data-blow-gaping-hold-in-global-warming-alarmism/
-also-
Charles Monnett, A leading global warming scientist, feature in "An Inconvenient Truth" is being investigated for "credibility" reasons. Go figure...
http://blogs.forbes.com/patrickmichaels/2011/07/29/drowning-polar-bears-and-the-return-of-ursus-bogus/


Added: Jul-29-2011 
By: wharris
In:
World News
Tags: global warming, discredited, religion, sham
Views: 6202 | Comments: 77 | Votes: 1 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • Actually, the whole "blowing a hole in global warming" story was twisted and biased. Something like the article actually said that were not warming the planet as much as we thought. Here's another side of the story. I'm not saying I'm for or against global warming, but people are really taking the whole "global warming is bullshit" thing too far.

    http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/29/no-new-data-does-not-blow-a-gaping-hole-in-global-warming-alarmism/

    Posted Jul-29-2011 By 

    (2) | Report

    • @stevecore If you believe the facts that the earth has been cooling over the last 10 years then it is BS.

      Posted Jul-29-2011 By 

      (-1) | Report

    • @bigair Uh, what facts?

      http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/

      Posted Jul-29-2011 By 

      (3) | Report

    • @stevecore "but people are really taking the whole "global warming is bullshit" thing too far"

      Every single other doomsday hysteria before global warming was bullshit, this one is just more of the same. It's hardly even talked about anymore, and that's how all of these the-sky-is-falling scenarios end, every one of them, people just stop talking about them.

      Posted Jul-29-2011 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @ST0N3PONY
      It's possible that someday a doomsday claim will be made that isn't B.S. but because of all the B.S. that came before it won't be believed.
      Heck, even global warming may be it.
      I certainly have my very strong doubts but can't be sure.
      Once something becomes political the truth is the first thing to hit the floor in full arrest.
      I don't believe anybody anymore.

      Posted Jul-29-2011 By 

      (2) | Report

    • @ST0N3PONY yes, every government secret met w/ the expert climatologists and hatched this plan in order to impose a carbon tax and more federal legislations. lol at conspiracy nuts.

      Posted Jul-29-2011 By 

      (1) | Report

  • Comment of user 'boossers' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
  • Click.. the.. link.

    And then... slap yourself in the face. http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

    Posted Jul-30-2011 By 

    (2) | Report

  • fuck it we cant help irt

    Posted Jul-29-2011 By 

    (1) | Report

  • I love that polar bear. Fuck all these pollution mongers.

    Posted Jul-29-2011 By 

    (1) | Report

  • "Please Sir! Please Sir!"

    (hand up)

    "Polar bears can swim can't they?"

    Yes, it's BS.

    Posted Jul-29-2011 By 

    (1) | Report

  • People, IT'S GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE. Get it right. And yes, it is happening. Anyone notice that the storm season was stronger & longer this spring???

    Posted Jul-29-2011 By 

    (0) | Report

    • @Nlewek No one denies that the climate changes... What people disagree with is the significance of effect humans have on this cycle. The most likely candidate is often overlooked, the sun's activity.

      Posted Jul-29-2011 By 

      (5) | Report

    • @camy011 the suns activity is the first place they look, I am lost why you and others even comment about climate change.

      Posted Sep-17-2011 By 

      (-1) | Report

  • I've been in this global warming game since 1980 and have a reasonable set of credentials.

    First, global warming is a fact since the little ice-age. What's not a fact is human caused global warming. Just some theories that don't match reality all that well.

    Second, Roy Spencer is an expert on satellite microwave temperature sensing. He's the guy who announces each month how 'hot' the earth is. So if you hear 'last year was the hottest on record' He will have said that. He's also an 'Anthropoge More..

    Posted Jul-30-2011 By 

    (-1) | Report

    • @DEADBEEF Then how come he had to pay to get this paper published in in a freebie online 'journal' started two years ago and not accredited by the ISI? And he is a creationist? Someone with reasonable credentials would address that, which is why I'm guessing you didn't.

      Posted Jul-30-2011 By 

      (2) | Report

    • @kiddkidd

      I think you kind of missed my second point where I said he had an agenda.

      Also, pointing out he is a creationist is an ad-hom that has zero relevance to the science.

      Attack his ideas on the topic rather than giving discredit to yourself by playing the man, not the ball.

      Posted Jul-30-2011 By 

      (1) | Report

    • @DEADBEEF not another one who cries ad hom. anyway, just so you can't ignore the topic, let's forget spencer is a creationist, which in itself is the opposite of science. let's forget that. just concentrate on this:

      how come he had to pay to get this paper published in in a freebie online 'journal' started two years ago and not accredited by the ISI? if you know anything about science then you know that is not the way science works.

      Posted Jul-30-2011 By 

      (1) | Report

    • @kiddkidd
      The journal is the Remote Sensing Journal - it's the professional publication journal of satellite sensing - precisely the subject Spencer was addressing.

      Posted Jul-30-2011 By 

      (-2) | Report

    • @Cadae and it is open access where authors pay to get published. not reputable.

      Posted Jul-31-2011 By 

      (1) | Report

  • GW is one of the biggest hoaxes to hit American politics. It is very narcicistic to think, even if the earth is warming a little bit, that mankind had anything to do with it. After all, what happened to warm the planet after the last ice age? And to think, as recently as the 70's we were told that the earth is cooling. GMAFB. Liberalism at it's finest.

    Posted Jul-29-2011 By 

    (-3) | Report