Safe Mode: On
Judge orders CSIS to stop listening to calls between terror suspects and lawyers

A Federal Court judge issued an order late Thursday to Canada's spy agency to cease intercepting telephone conversations between terrorism suspects and their defence lawyers, and delete any conversations its agents inadvertently record.

Carolyn Layden-Stevenson's order came after documents she released in a Toronto court earlier in the day revealed that the Canadian Security Intelligence Service had been monitoring the calls to ensure the suspects don't breach stringent bail conditions.

"The CSIS analyst … listens to all intercepted communications, including solicitor-client communications if any," Layden-Stevenson wrote.

Lawyers defending terrorism suspects expressed outrage at the spy service's actions.

"I was flabbergasted when I was informed," said Matt Webber, an Ottawa lawyer for Mohamed Harkat, a suspected Algerian terrorist released from custody in May 2006.

"My client's consent never for a moment contemplated the invasion of solicitor-client privilege."

Layden-Stevenson's summary pertains to phone tapping that occurred in the case of Mohammad Mahjoub, an Egyptian detained as a threat to public safety because of his alleged ties to al-Qaeda.

Mahjoub, who spent more than six years in custody without charge or trial, was released in April 2007 on strict bail conditions that included monitoring by security agents.

Lawyers decry 'outrageous' privilege violation
To secure his release and so authorities could ensure his communications did not pose a threat to national security, he agreed to having his phone calls tapped.

However, lawyers who act for the men under a national security certificate called it "shocking" their confidential communications with their clients would be monitored.

"From my perspective, as I'm sure from every lawyer's perspective, it was implicit that they would not be listening to solicitor-client calls," Webber said.

The lawyers recently became aware about what they called an "outrageous" violation of lawyer-client privilege and demanded answers.

During a secret hearing in Ottawa on Wednesday, a senior agent with the spy service revealed the tapping was being done on behalf of the Canada Border Services Agency.

Layden-Stevenson's two-page summary was of the agent's testimony.

"The witness testified that CSIS was acting at the request of CBSA as their agent to monitor the communications over the telephone lines of Mr. Mahjoub and (his wife)."

The agencies found no threats or other issues in what they heard, she said.

In all, five foreigners have been detained as risks to public safety under a controversial national security certificate.

Four have been released on stringent bail conditions, while one remains in detention.

Layden-Stevenson also said if the men's bail terms are changed to specifically refer to the interception of solicitor-client communications, the spy and border agencies could end the monitoring, or delete the interception as soon as they realized what they were listening to.

Webber said he was in contact with the Department of Justice to try to ensure the situation was fixed.

"The fact that the eavesdropping even occurred is a serious enough situation that it needs to be immediately rectified," he said.
N.B
Photo from 2006 of Mohamed Harkat (centre)with his lawyer Matt Webber
Source:http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2008/12/18/csis-terror-wiretaps.html


Click to view image: '8ca324757d30-mohamed_harkat.jpg'

Added: Dec-18-2008 Occurred On: Dec-17-2008
By: CoolQcumber
In:
News
Tags: Terrorism, CSIS, Canada, Spy, Detainee, Lawyer, Wiretap, Federal, Judgement
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 9743 | Comments: 20 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • are we talking about people that would cut our kids head off given a chance. FUCK THEM........

    Posted Dec-19-2008 By 

    (3)

  • And I might add that assreamer would not be so quick to give terrorists the benefit of the doubt if it resulted in the death of one of HIS loved ones.

    Posted Dec-19-2008 By 

    (3)

  • Comment of user 'easyrob33' has been deleted by author!
    • the point is lost upon you

      they're being listened to by the same people trying to put them away

      if you and your lawyer are trying to defend you in court would you want the prosecutor listening to everything the two of you are saying? would it be fair? of course not

      Posted Dec-19-2008 By 

      (-4)

    • I don't think the point is lost on him I think it's lost on you, in most situations I'd agree with you, but this is an entirely different situation: as condition of their release they consented to having their phone conversations tapped. Guess they should talk to their lawyers in person. I personally think they should have their kneecaps drilled out. If the public wants to continue to castrate intelligence services or law enforcement agencies then these people will continue to operate within More..

      Posted Dec-19-2008 By 

      (5)

    • Comment of user 'popehat' has been deleted by moderator!
    • Agreed.

      Posted Dec-19-2008 By 

      (1)

    • Send him back to Algeria. I think that would be fair.
      He'd probably get a "fairer" trial there.

      Speaking of "fair",... I dont think its fair ...
      Canadian tax payers should have to sponsor a terrorists legal team! Put the burden on his family. That sounds "fair"!

      Posted Dec-19-2008 By 

      (1)

  • terrorist should have no rights to start with.
    its liberal bullshit like this that brands Canada a harbor of terrorists.

    Posted Dec-19-2008 By 

    (1)

    • Comment of user 'Doyle2' has been deleted by moderator!
    • Terrorists intentionally target innocent civilians.
      Last time I checked north american aboriginals werent running around planting bombs and wearing suicide belts.
      Despite this reality, you have chosen not to define terrorism,...
      One mans freedom fighter is another mans terrorist. Bullshit. Ask the Norwegian freedom fighters if they intentionally targeted "innocent" civilians. The IRA, they're terrorists, they targeted civilians, they planted bombs. Hezbollah, they're terrorist More..

      Posted Dec-19-2008 By 

      (2)

  • They have already been charged, so the time for investigations is long past, client attorney privilege is a right here, no matter what the crime.

    Posted Dec-19-2008 By 

    (-1)

    • "Mahjoub, who spent more than six years in custody without charge or trial, was released in April 2007 on strict bail conditions that included monitoring by security agents."
      "In all, five foreigners have been detained as risks to public safety under a controversial national security certificate"

      Posted Dec-19-2008 By 

      (2)

    • I'm all for locking up the terrorists,so why don't they charge them?Lack of real evidence perhaps.

      Posted Dec-19-2008 By 

      (0)

    • The investigation doesn't end with charges. I've had numerous investigations that were ongoing even after charges were laid.

      I do however agree that while every effort should be made to track and investigate terrorsts, we should not corrupt our own judicial system to do it.

      Posted Dec-19-2008 By 

      (1)