Safe Mode: On
F22 Raptor Exposed - Why the F22 Was Cancelled

Wasteful F22 Raptor Program Terminated. On the Rachel Maddow Show.

The F22 Raptor Fighter Jet Program is has been a Grand Failure says Official Pentagon Officials. The F22 Raptor was Cancelled last year due to to Production Short Falls.


Added: Aug-4-2012 Occurred On: Aug-4-2012
By: Furia
In:
Other Entertainment
Tags: F22, Raptor, Exposed, -, Why, the, F22, Was, Cancelled
Location: United States (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 2312 | Comments: 67 | Votes: 1 | Favorites: 3 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • I did audits for the military and it scared me strait how much waste fraud and abuse occurs everyday. Eyes wide shut. I know now this country is doomed.

    Posted Aug-5-2012 By 

    (6)

  • This woman is not very bright. An expensive leading-edge military technology? How shocking. Government budget estimates inaccurate? How shocking.

    Maddow is a partisan hack joke -- and people call Fox "Faux News."

    Posted Aug-4-2012 By 

    (4)

  • Vulnerable to small arms fire from the ground? Yeah...so what? This thing has a classified combat ceiling of at least 60,000 feet. It isn't tasked with flying anywhere near groundfire.

    Can't talk with other aircraft? It's a stealth plane. Any radio emissions would defeat its very stealthy purpose.

    Dog fighting plane-to-plane? This is a very stealthy AMBUSH aircraft vectored to targets by AWACS. It kills enemy aircraft before they even know it's there.

    Rachel Maddow knows fuck all about this p More..

    Posted Aug-5-2012 By 

    (4)

  • Even though I'm not disagreeing with what she's saying, I just can't listen to this cunt anymore. She and Olbermann have lost all veracity with me. All I can think about when I watch her smug face is the enjoyment I would get from seeing it get hit. With a baseball bat. No, a crowbar. The hooked end.

    Posted Aug-4-2012 By 

    (3)

  • This guy has a point.

    Posted Aug-5-2012 By 

    (3)

  • Yeah, repeatedly underfunding the program, which she fully supported, was a great idea. I mean, the F-35 was going to be so much cheaper that it didn't make any sense to spend money on the F-22. In other news, F-35 program now more expensive than F-22 program.

    Posted Aug-4-2012 By 

    (2)

  • Comment of user 'Americanalltheway' has been deleted by author!
  • Everyone knows why it was cancelled, it was too expensive for the few improvements it had over the F35 Joint Strike Fighter. Also it is still having oxygen delivery issues but it still beats the shit out of a lot of other fighters.

    Posted Aug-4-2012 By 

    (2)

    • @Sp33dyD3m0n

      Actually it hasnt beat the shit out of ANY other plane. And never will....

      Posted Aug-4-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @CatJuggler You might need to expand upon that. Why wouldn't it? We just sent a squadron 200 miles from Iran in April. Plus some are in Japan.

      Posted Aug-4-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @Sp33dyD3m0n

      "Might" being the key word in your statement.

      And to this date, Aug 5, it has not fired a single round at any other plane, or hostile target, and target drones dont count....

      Posted Aug-5-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @CatJuggler Well of course it hasn't been to combat, it's brand new. Plus you don't send this aircraft into a fight when other planes could do the job just as easily. Who doesn't love the F/A-18 Super Hornet?! Send that baby in to do the work, keep the F-22 in storage for when overwhelming firepower AND stealth are needed. Like a first strike scenario...

      Posted Aug-5-2012 By 

      (0)

  • I don't watch any videos of Rachel Maddow. It will be all lies and filled with obama propaganda.

    Posted Aug-4-2012 By 

    (2)

  • You know its funny, the same liberals who constantly blast defense department technological projects never seem to take issue with our empire of overseas bases. Bases which have cost us upwards of $250 billion. Perhaps because they are used by liberal presidents to launch attacks in the name of "peace" in countries which pose no threat to the United States (think Somalya, Libya, Yemen, and now Syria). Our interventionalist foreign policy is by far the most counter productive and c More..

    Posted Aug-4-2012 By 

    (2)

    • @WolfBite120
      Wow! Just wow! How selective. How convenient. "THe bad guys did it! But it wasn't bad when the whole thing got started."! Rubbish.
      Don't pay attention to the cost of military expenditure? 'Liberal presdents that launch attacks, etc.. Really?

      Again, wow! Through what lens do you view the world? >.<!

      Posted Aug-4-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @rmg03c

      I think you're missing my point. Everyone knows that neocons are warmongers. I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy among the so-called anti-war left.

      Posted Aug-5-2012 By 

      (-1)

    • @WolfBite120
      I have obviously failed to grasp your 'point' for the reasons I mentioned prior...Your statement was absurd to say the least! Clear me up, what was your point exactly?

      Posted Aug-5-2012 By 

      (1)

  • When you have a senate majority which refuses to pass a budget every year to itemize crap like this, crap like this will continue to happen! Thanks Harry (whos actions speak louder than his words) Reid!

    Posted Aug-4-2012 By 

    (2)

  • 'Raptor' is a boss nomenclature, unsuitable for such a lemon... they should have changed it to Madcow and then ditched it with fanfare.

    Posted Aug-4-2012 By 

    (1)

  • This bitch sure is cocky regarding a topic she knows fuck all about.

    Posted Aug-4-2012 By 

    (1)

  • The military/industrial complex at it's best.

    Posted Aug-4-2012 By 

    (1)

  • Does this mean they are bringing back the F-15 ?!!!
    [please excuse the wishful thinking on my part]

    Posted Aug-4-2012 By 

    (1)