Safe Mode: On
Raiding the Treasury to Bribe the Irresponsible

Raiding the Treasury to Bribe the Irresponsible
by Frank Salvato

A little publicized political story, if played out to the satisfaction
of California Democrats (read: Progressives), would not only set the
stage for a politically motivated raid on the US Treasury, it would
afford President Obama, his administration and political operatives
plausible deniability in any “coincidental” benefit to Mr. Obama’s
re-election campaign. And if you don’t think that has David Axelrod,
Valerie Jarrett and David Plouffe salivating, you haven’t been paying
attention for the past three years.

According to a report by TheHill.com:
“A long list of California Democrats is urging President
Obama to name a new housing regulator using a controversial recess
appointment.
“In a letter to the president, more than two dozen House members said
the temporary head of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), Edward
DeMarco, simply hasn’t done enough to help struggling homeowners avoid
foreclosure. The lawmakers are pushing the president to name a permanent
director ‘immediately.’
“‘FHFA has consistently and erroneously interpreted its mandate far
too narrowly and as such has failed to take adequate action to help
homeowners,’ the lawmakers wrote. ‘Installing a permanent director of
the FHFA will allow the FHFA to move forward to make key decisions that
will help keep families in their homes and improve our economy.’”

Okay, let’s first examine the FHFA. According to their website:
“The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) was created on
July 30, 2008, when the President signed into law the Housing &
Economic Recovery Act of 2008. The Act gave FHFA the authorities
necessary to oversee vital components of our country’s secondary
mortgage markets – Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Home Loan
Banks…FHFA’s mission is to provide effective supervision, regulation and
housing mission oversight of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal
Home Loan Banks to promote their safety and soundness, support housing
finance and affordable housing, and support a stable and liquid mortgage
market…”
The reason the California congressional delegation is pushing for a
permanent replacement for Mr. DeMarco has little to do with the
well-being of California’s citizens whose mortgages are both underwater
or in foreclosure. It has everything to do with 2012 being an election
year. The California delegation’s letter to President Obama urging the
so-called “recess appointment” of a new FHFA director presents as a gift
to the Obama re-election effort. I say “so-called recess appointment”
because the US Senate is in pro-forma session and it is unconstitutional
for the president to make recess appointments when either house of
Congress is in session. I and the rest of the Conservative and
Republican rank-and-file are still waiting for congressional Republicans
to do something about the initial round of “recess appointments.” Of
course, one needs a spine to stand-up to a bully, so we probably
shouldn’t hold our collective breath.I say that the letter presented to the President and his team is a
gift because it is a win-win situation that indirectly provides enormous
benefit to his re-election campaign.
Should Mr. Obama make an unconstitutional recess appointment to fill
the FHFA directorship, the director would be able to take action, almost
immediately, to mandate the re-negotiation of any and/or all of the
mortgages held by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Home Loan
Banks. That mandate could literally include the forgiveness of sizable
portions of monies due to those organizations by mortgage holders who
are either underwater, on the bubble of foreclosure or both. This is,
effectively, an exercise in debt forgiveness…without the tax liability
for the borrower.

Debt forgiveness, by definition, is:
“…a reduction in loan value where a loan is discounted
from its original principal or charged off as a bad debt…Under IRS rules
[the amount of the reduction] is reportable as income to the borrower
for loans discounted or charged off.”
Because this move by the FHFA would be recognized as a mandated
re-negotiation of the loan, the borrower wouldn’t be subjected to the
IRS rules pertaining to debt forgiveness. That leaves this question: How
would Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Home Loan Banks recoup
the monies lost in mortgage re-negotiations? If you answered, “from the
federal government” or “from the US taxpayers,” give yourself a gold
star. The mandated re-negotiated mortgages would literally facilitate a
raid on the US Treasury by the Obama Administration under the guise of
affordable housing and the “correcting” of the mortgage industry.

Now, here’s the part that makes David Axelrod, Valerie Jarrett and David Plouffe drool.
Being the narcissistic political opportunist that Barack Obama has
demonstrated himself to be, any of the so-called “political strategist”
talking heads seen blathering on nightly on your cable news channel of
choice could tell you that as soon as the first reduced mortgage bills
are sent to the “rescued” (read: bailed-out, or, better yet, bribed)
voters…er, excuse me, borrowers, Mr. Obama will be on television, radio,
in print and on the Internet trumpeting how his administration “saved”
or “thwarted the foreclosure of” hundreds of thousands – if not millions
– of family homes.

I can hear it now:
“This morning, the Director of the Federal Housing
Finance Agency, initiated a plan to save the homes of millions of
Americans who were tricked, deceived or otherwise forced into signing on
to home mortgages unfairly by the greed merchants of the Wall Street
One-Percent. Exacting social justice on these filthy Capitalists, the
FHFA director has ordered the heads of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the
Federal Home Loan Banks to renegotiate any and all home mortgages that
are either underwater or on the brink of foreclosure. While I had
nothing to do directly with this decision, I did, in my infinite wisdom,
appoint the director and, therefore, am due your support in my bid for
re-election to the presidency of the United States. Thank you very much
and goodnight. Be sure to tip your bartenders and waitresses on your way
out. They work hard. You’ve been great.”

Sir Alex Fraser Tytler, a Scottish lawyer, writer and Professor of
Universal History, and Greek & Roman Antiquities at the University
of Edinburgh, is quoted as saying:
“A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of
government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can
vote themselves largess of the public treasury. From that time on the
majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits
from the public treasury, with the results that a democracy always
collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship…”
To clarify, the United States of America is not a Democracy, we are a
Constitutional Republic with a democratic electoral system, that
understood, Tytler’s axiom still holds true. Once the voting public
realizes that they can elect pillagers to office who have no problem
achieving full political cowardice in their sycophancy to special
interest voting blocs, the gates to the Treasury are no longer secure
and the Republic is doomed.

It is for this reason that two events simply must take place.
First, congressional Republican leadership must – immediately
– cease being the gaggle of spineless political geldings that they have
been since Mr. Obama took office. They must challenge, in every way,
shape and form the unconstitutional (read: illegal) recess appointment
of Richard Cordray atop the newly established Consumer Financial
Protection Bureau and Mr. Obama’s recent appointments to the National
Labor Relations Board. This opposition should include consideration of a
radical move: organizing a congressional walk-out, ala the tactics of
the Democrat lawmakers in Wisconsin and Indiana, who brought those state
legislatures to a halt over the legitimate limitations imposed on
public-sector labor unions in those states by the duly elected.

And second, Republicans simply must become more aggressive
with branding issues, with messaging. This would be a perfect
opportunity to get ahead of the message; to frame the issue before the
Progressive “history re-writing machine” gets a chance to sell the
American public a bill of goods that is fundamentally Socialist in
nature (redistribution of wealth is a Socialist tool to placate the
masses). Sadly, if the same message wizards in the GOP hierarchy execute
their status quo they will once again find themselves on the defensive
and operating from a disadvantaged position, just as with the tax-cut
extension issue, the deficit issue, the entitlement reform issues, the
budget issue, etc.
Should the Republican leadership – both in Congress and at the RNC –
refuse to take this battle on with the intention of winning without
compromise, we can all be sure that Mr. Obama and his team of
Progressive anti-Capitalists will “fundamentally transform” the raiding
of the US Treasury – disguised as an affordable housing initiative –
into a dedicated voting bloc come November 2012. If the Republican
leadership – both elected and at the Party level – allow this to happen
then the subsequent demise of the Republic becomes the GOP’s legacy to
the human race.
http://biggovernment.com/fsalvato/2012/01/15/raiding-of-the-treasury-to-bribe-the-irresponsible/#more-407436


Added: Jan-15-2012 Occurred On: Jan-15-2012
By: dfaugust2k
In:
Politics
Tags: thieves, liars, democRATs, obama
Location: United States (load item map)
Views: 2159 | Comments: 6 | Votes: 1 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE