Is this for real? According to Stacy Hebert who read it on Bloomberg, some 4-year-old children have had "baby root canal" and metal crowns put in their teeth without the knowledge nor consent of the parents, all because it's profitable for Morgan Stanley.



First of all baby teeth don't have roots, so how could root canals be done on them? And since when do dentists put metal crowns on baby teeth? And how could they have had the crowns made without prior dental appointment?



Having researched the subject, I have learned that unnecessary surgery without informed consent is tantamount to assault and battery, and when done on a minor it is even more serious.



Is Stacy off her rocker? Apparently not. Here is the Bloomberg article:



http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-05-17/dental-abuse-seen-driven-by-private-equity-investments.html