If offensive slurs are a problem for the left, why does Al Sharpton have a primetime slot on MSNBC? ~by John Nolte
If offensive slurs are a problem for the left, why does Al Sharpton have a primetime slot on MSNBC?
The left has started a war against Rush Limbaugh -- a war it cannot win.
Limbaugh said something for which he later apologized, and rather than
accept that apology, the left and its media allies decided to exploit
the situation, turning it into a crusade to take an opposing voice off
Even the White House has jumped on this neo-fascist bandwagon. Not the Obama campaign. The White House. The People's House.
This is, pure and simple, a crusade to censor political speech disguising
itself as something else, and it's a crusade led by Media Matters for
America, the Obama political machine, and the mainstream media.
And as a result….
Today, Obama sits at 41% in
opinion polls -- his lowest approval rating ever. Part of this poll
collapse most certainly has to do with a stagnant economy and gas
prices, but a lot of it has to do with the fact that Obama has started a stupid war against a nonexistent war on women (which is really Obama's war against the Catholic Church and religious
liberty), and the fact that he has once again been found hanging out with another divisive, radical racialist.
As a result, Obama now looks like a Chicago political thug and nothing
like a President of the United States. This was especially apparent when
he tried to draw Limbaugh into this war on women nonsense.
Obviously, Obama's crusade is backfiring, and will continue to fail. In their fever to bring Rush down, Obama and the left have made a huge tactical error in setting a standard of which
they themselves are the worst violators -- especially in the fever swamps of MSNBC.
It's been MSNBC that's grabbed Media Matters' anti-Rush talking points and run with them 24/7 on the network.
Yet their own Ed Schultz is the creator of the original Slut-gate, when he used that word to describe conservative talk show host Laura Ingraham. And let us never forget Keith
Olbermann's dehumanizing rant against Michelle Malkin, while he was still with the once-legendary Peacock Network. (Much more about MSNBC hosts' attacks on women here.)
Breaking today at the American Spectator is more bad news for a network devoting so much of its airtime to creating a rule that says someone should be pulled off the air for anything he or
she has said that might be considered offensive.
Using MSNBC's own standards, should the man who once said the following be allowed to hold a primetime MSNBC slot?
David Dinkins, you wanna be the only ***** on television, only ***** in the
newspaper, only ***** that can talk. Don't cover them, don't talk to
them, 'cause you got the only ***** problem. 'Cause you know if a black
man stood up next to you, they would see you for the whore that you
That's MSNBC's Al Sharpton--many years ago, but just as shocking today. I can
already hear the excuse -- that it's okay for him to use the N-word
because he's black. But I wonder what CNN's Roland Martin will think of
White folks was in the cave when we were building empires. We learned to
admire them, but they knew to admire us. We built pyramids without a
____, ____ new architecture ____. We talked philosophy and astrology and
mathematics before Socrates and them Greek homos ever got around to it.
Just a few weeks ago, Roland Martin was suspended from CNN after GLAAD took
offense to a few Super Bowl tweets few but GLAAD could ever find
offensive -- tweets that never even broached the subject of
"Homo," of course is an anti-gay slur, especially within the context you hear in Sharpton's words.
But that's not all! How about a side order of "Chinaman" to go with that "homo":
You the best chicken ____ in the universe. Gonna buy some Colonel Sanders
chicken. Then the Chinaman come in and throw some hot ___ [cough] ___.
Then the Korean sells us watermelon. ___ watermelon all my life.
They're gonna cut it up and put it in a bucket with a rubber band around
it, and then we're gonna buy it like it's somethin we didn't know what
And finally we have this:
"___uh, white interloper I said I was wrong. uh, uh, cracker, though I
think cracker is a certain personification of a certain type of person
down south, just like redneck. I mean, you know some people misinterpret
cracker meaning all whites, it's not true. But the confusion means you
shouldn't use it. I mean, sometimes being flippant you say things you
shouldn't say, cause it gets in the way of your message and people
don't really understand what you're saying."
"White interloper." I don’t even know what that means, but "cracker" is a slur against white Southerners -- end of story.
We're all grown-ups here, and I think we all know that "homo," "*****," and "cracker" trump "slut" any day of the week.
True, Sharpton said these things long before he was on MSNBC. But his history
was well known, and the lack of outrage from the left when he was
elevated to primetime highlights the hypocrisy of their anti-Rush
censorship crusade. MSNBC President Phil Griffin knew that Sharpton said
this sort of stuff regularly--that, in fact, such bigotry and radical
rhetoric was an integral part of the Sharpton persona. He hired him
nonetheless. One has to wonder if Brian Williams, Matt Lauer, and Tom
Brokaw are proud.
Over to you, MSNBC!
ADDED: More Slut-gate hypocrisy here featuring the White House and Letterman!
Tags: sharpton, obama, racists, liars, democRATs, KKK, left-wing news media, propaganda
Location: United States (load item map)
Views: 4289 | Comments: 8 | Votes: 2 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 1 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
|Liveleak on Facebook|