Safe Mode: On
Obama and GM Cook the Books

Obama and GM Cook the Books


A billion here, a billion there, and before you know it . . .

Would
you hire President Obama as your financial adviser? Three years ago his administration invested more than $100 billion in taxpayer money to bail out General Motors. On Tuesday, the entire company, not just what the government owns, was worth less than $34 billion. By anyone’s
definition, that investment is a glaring failure. Yet over the last few days the Obama campaign, in a $25 million marketing blitz, has flooded the airwaves with ads in battleground states, claiming the bailout should be counted a rousing success.

Unfortunately, assertions that “all loans have been repaid to the federal government,” that the
bailout “saved more than one million American jobs,” that “U.S. automakers are hiring hundreds of thousands of new workers,” that GM is again the “number-one automaker” — all are based on creative accounting.

The money the government spent adds up quickly: $50 billion in TARP bailout funds, a special exemption waiving payment of $45.4 billion in taxes on future profits, an exemption for all product liability on cars sold before the bailout, $360 million in stimulus funds, and the $7,500 tax credit for those who buy the Chevy Volt. GM’s share of other programs is harder to quantify
but includes, for example, some of the $15.2 billion that went to Cash for Clunkers. Those costs are in addition to the billions taken from GM’s bondholders by the Obama administration.

A look at the accounting shows the trouble with contentions that much of the TARP money is getting paid back. The Obama administration compares the $50 billion in direct bailout funds with the price it will eventually be able to get for selling the GM stock it owns. But that
assumes that the stock price won’t reflect government subsidies, including GM’s exemption from paying $45 billion in taxes. By the Obama administration’s logic, if the stimulus grants to TARP recipients were simply large enough, all the TARP money could be paid.

Claims that GM paid back its TARP loan are true but misleading. President Obama clearly wants to create the impression that all the money given to the auto companies has been paid back. But the $6.7 billion loan to GM was just a tiny fraction of the money given to it. As TARP special inspector general Neil Barofsky explained, GM used “other TARP money” to pay off the loan.

So what about President Obama’s boast in a White House speech in late April that the bailout “saved probably a million jobs” and that “GM is now the number-one automaker again in the world”?
The “million jobs” contention is quite a stretch. Before filing for bankruptcy in July 2009, GM had
91,000 employees in the United States. You can reach a 400,000 total by assuming that all of GM’s jobs, as well as all the jobs of its parts suppliers and car dealers, would have been lost. Last year, employment in the entire automotive industry in the U.S. (counting Ford, Toyota, and other companies and their suppliers, in addition to GM and Chrysler) was only 717,000.

Obama’s economic advisers told him during an April 2009 meeting that job losses in the auto
industry would be only a fraction — 10 to 20 percent — of these claimed numbers, even for the much weaker Chrysler. The advisers reported the obvious: Bankruptcy would not kill all jobs at GM and, even with cutbacks, suppliers would pick up other work. But Obama keeps using
numbers that his own advisers told him were wrong.

Even saving 20 percent of 400,000 comes at quite a cost — at least $780,000 per job. How many workers would have been willing to quit working for GM for a $400,000 severance payment?

The “number-one automaker” assertion is no more accurate. Obama’s sales totals include 1.2 million mostly cheap commercial vehicles built by China’s Wuling, a company in which GM owns a small stake, and it excludes sales by vehicle makers in which Volkswagen owns a majority share. Fortune magazine lists GM’s revenue as smaller than Toyota’s and Volkswagen’s.

The only real winners from the GM bailout were unions, which were protected from pay cuts, from losing their right to overtime pay after less than 40 hours a week, and from cuts to their extremely
generous benefits. They faced only minor tweaks in their inefficient union work rules.

As for “hundreds of thousands of new workers,” the truth is closer to a tenth of that.

Having just $34 billion to show after a $100 billion-plus investment would get a chief executive of any private company fired. Unfortunately, Obama does not seem to understand how this money has been wasted.

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/300075/obama-and-gm-cook-books-john-lott-jr


Added: Aug-15-2012 Occurred On: Aug-15-2012
By: XyBerFuNK
In:
Politics
Tags: Soetoro, liar, crook, socialism, unions, failure, disaster
Location: United States (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 2005 | Comments: 40 | Votes: 3 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • These big taxpayer supported unions should enjoy their last few years existence, they, like barry, will be part of americs's past soon enough.

    Posted Aug-15-2012 By 

    (3)

  • GM stock is currently trading at $20.14 per share.

    It needs to be north of $52.00 before anybody gets paid.

    Atta Boy, Barry!

    Posted Aug-15-2012 By 

    (2)

  • All democrats should be required, by law, to have their 401K accounts in GM stock. And no more bailouts.

    Posted Aug-15-2012 By 

    (2)

  • Comment of user 'Americanalltheway' has been deleted by author!
  • Thanks for showing more of Obama's lies. Toyota has been the No. 1 automaker, except for a brief period when 20,000 people were killed in the tsunami. Toyota is now No. 1 again.

    Posted Aug-15-2012 By 

    (0)

  • could they really call it the;Chevy - Electoral - Vote?
    theLAB

    Posted Aug-16-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Brought to you by the Republican Banking and Wall Street Committee for Fuking the Public,, you Democrats suck just as bad. The Tea party is corporate owned for deregulation,, I’m sick of all your bullshit,,, I feel like we’re all getting repeatedly gang raped.

    Posted Aug-15-2012 By 

    (-3)

  • Just so y'all know, the above article has already been debunked as (gasp) another filthy Republican lie. The numbers above don't factor in the money that would have been lost if GM and Chrysler went under - it's a *lot* more than 25 bil.

    Imagine if a million auto workers suddenly stopped paying their taxes because they have no jobs, and begin taking money from unemployment insurance or welfare. Now compound it with the bankruptcy of industries worth over 3 trillion dollars, and the effect of th More..

    Posted Aug-15-2012 By 

    (-7)

    • @hellgremlin Uhm hey dummy.... Wake up call...

      The company would not have shut the doors and fired everyone you moron...

      Bankruptcy laws are in place (and have been for years and years) to protect companies in situations like these... Maybe the Cadillac health plans and super benefits and bloated salaries of the union jack-offs may have been reduced a little... So the fuck what? Maybe a few worthless sacks of shit in paper management who ruined the company in the first place would have been le More..

      Posted Aug-15-2012 By 

      (2)

    • @hellgremlin It's called Bankruptcy,,,,read about it. You don't close a business...you reorganize it. People are so freaking stupid in the country.

      Posted Aug-15-2012 By 

      (2)

    • @tymatthews Oh, I've read about this fancy "bankruptcy" thing, in them fancy economics books...

      Saaaaay, when Enron went tits up, how did its jobs get reorganized? :)

      (trick question, they all got shitcanned)

      Posted Aug-15-2012 By 

      (-1)

    • @hellgremlin There is no debunk...you live in a fact free world. Get your shit together, stupid.

      Posted Aug-15-2012 By 

      (1)

    • @XyBerFuNK Why would I need to attend a local community college when I am already a honor grad with a diploma, and a rather well paying career?

      Oh, right. I R LIBERAL, I R DUM. I KNOE NOFING.

      Posted Aug-15-2012 By 

      (-1)