Report: Welfare government’s single largest budget item in FY 2011 at approx. $1.03 trillion
http://dailycaller.com/2012/10/18/report-welfare-governments-single-largest-budget-item-in-fy-2011-at-approx-1-03-trillion
The government spent approximately $1.03 trillion on 83 means-tested federal welfare programs in fiscal year 2011 alone — a price tag that makes welfare that year the government’s largest expenditure, according to new data released by the Republican side of the Senate Budget Committee.
The total sum taxpayers spent on federal welfare programs was derived from a new Congressional Research Service (CRS) report on federal welfare spending — which topped out at $745.84 billion for fiscal year 2011 — combined with an analysis from the Republican Senate Budget Committee staff of state spending on federal welfare programs (based on “The Oxford Handbook of State and Local Government Finance”), which reached $282.7 billion in fiscal year 2011.
The data excludes spending on Social Security, Medicare, means-tested health care for veterans without service-connected disabilities, and the means-tested veterans pension program.
According to the CRS report, which focused solely on federal spending for federal welfare programs, spending on federal welfare programs increased $563.413 billion in fiscal year 2008 to $745.84 billion in fiscal year 2011 — a 32 percent increase.
Further, spending on the 10 largest federal welfare programs has doubled as a share of the federal budget in the last 30 years: In inflation-adjusted dollars, according to Republican staff on the Senate Budget Committee, the amount spent on these programs has increased 378 percent in that 30 year time frame.
CRS reports that food assistance programs — the third largest welfare category behind health and cash assistance — experienced the greatest increase in spending, with 71 percent more spending in 2011 than in 2008. The agency explained that this spending increase was largely due to the growth in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or food stamps.
CRS further noted that the largest expenditure category, health, was 37 percent higher in fiscal year 2011 than fiscal year 2008. In that same period, cash aid increased 12 percent, education assistance increased 57 percent, housing and development assistance increased 2 percent, social services increased 3 percent, employment and training remained the same (though fluctuated in intervening years), and energy assistance was 67 percent higher in fiscal year 2011 than fiscal year 2008.
The total federal spending on federal welfare programs vastly outpaced fiscal year 2011 spending on such federal expenditures as non-war defense ($540 billion), Social Security ($725 billion), Medicare ($480 billion), and departments such as Justice ($30.5 billion), Transportation ($77.3 billion) and Education ($65.486 billion) — a fact that alarmed the ranking member of the Senate Budget Committee, Alabama Sen. Jeff Sessions, who requested the report from CRS.
“These astounding figures demonstrate that the United States spends more on federal welfare than any other program in the federal budget,” Sessions wrote The Daily Caller in an email. “It is time to restore — not retreat from — the moral principles of the 1996 welfare reform. Such reforms, combined with measures to promote growth, will help both the recipient and the Treasury.”
When state spending on federal welfare programs — specifically Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program — was thrown into the mix, the amount spent on federal welfare increased 28 percent, from $798.813 billion in fiscal year 2008 to $1.028.54 trillion in fiscal year 2011.
“No longer should we measure compassion by how much money the government spends, but by how many people we help to rise out of poverty,” Sessions continued. “Welfare assistance should be seen as temporary whenever possible, and the goal must be to help more of our fellow citizens attain gainful employment and financial independence. This is about more than rescuing our finances. It’s about creating a more optimistic future for millions of struggling Americans.”
With food assistance spending increasing the most out of every category, Sessions, who has been sounding the alarm on the expanding food stamp rolls, noted that the Obama administration has allowed for the food stamp increase through misleading promotion and a disregard for self-reliance.
“The administration ludicrously argues that every five dollars in food stamp spending results in nearly 10 dollars in economic benefit. They insist that communities ‘lose out’ when more people don’t sign up for benefits,” Sessions noted. “[The United States Department of Agriculture] even awarded a recruitment worker for overcoming people’s ‘mountain pride.’ Is this a hopeful vision for the future? Do these priorities make our country stronger and our economy more secure?”
Update: In early October the Alabama senator sent a letter to the United States Department of Agriculture, which oversees nutrition assistance programs like SNAP, requesting that it “eliminate all materials, training and recruitment efforts that” could be construed as pressuring eligible people to accept benefits. The deadline for USDA to respond to Sessions is Thursday. Senate Budget Committee Republican aides tell TheDC that given their past missed deadlines and current unresponsiveness, it is highly unlikely USDA will respond today. USDA has not responded to TheDC’s request for comment on the letter.
http://dailycaller.com/2012/10/18/report-welfare-governments-single-largest-budget-item-in-fy-2011-at-approx-1-03-trillion
By: XyBerFuNK
In: Politics
Tags: Democrat, Cloward-Piven, Bankrupting America, Lies, Tyrant in Chief, communism, maoism, socialism, democrat socialist, tyranny, bankruptcy, welfare state, Obama disaster, Barry Soetoro, obama-drones, statism, progressives, democrat party, obamaphone
Location: Washington, District of Columbia, United States (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 1506 | Comments: 45 | Votes: 4 | Favorites: 1 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
Advertisement below
|
|
| Liveleak on Facebook | |
|
LIKE Liveleak.com |
-
Cloward-Piven
-
The Cloward-Piven Strategy
-
Infographic: Corporate Tax Cheats Are Bankrupting America
-
Bolton: “Obama is simply not qualified to be Commander-in-Chief”
-
Welfare spending jumps 32% during Obama’s presidency
-
Obama Plays Voters’ Psychiatrist-in-Chief on Trail
-
The sickly, stagnant, misleading Obama September jobs report
-
Communist and Democrat Party Merge on Platform and Support for Obama
-
Narcissist in Chief Selfishly Shortens Soldiers' Holiday
-
Our Bystander-in-Chief
-
Is Washington Bankrupting America?
-
Megyn Kelly at the Commander in Chief's Ball With the Troops



Thing is, the Liberals are proud of this.
Posted Oct-19-2012 Bywharris (2246.22) 
wharris View Channel Send Message
(6)
The Dept. of Education gets more than the DOJ, and they want more money...lol. I was reading a report that said a recent study showed that half of college graduates couldn't calculate the change from $3.00 for a sandwich costing $1.95 and a cup of soup costing .60 cents. College graduates. I think we need to not only look at where the money is going, but also how it's being used, and to what effect. In business they call it a cost/benefit analysis.
If we are not getting a return on our investme More..
Posted Oct-19-2012 Bysafetychuck2 (4089.62)

safetychuck2 View Channel Send Message
(3)
@safetychuck2 Yeah, welfare here is designed to get you off it, meetings constantly, phone follow ups, they will actually put you in school or help to get a job, the idea is to use it as a crutch until you can get off, although not everyone has any intention of getting off it.
Posted Oct-19-2012 ByRegging (75.58) 
Regging View Channel Send Message
(2)
@Regging You can BS those phone follow ups for years....
Welfare system is really being abused, i know people who have jobs and are on welfare. They spend there welfare check on weed, and the food stamps on munchies.
Posted Oct-19-2012 Byrpgmw3 (350.50) 
rpgmw3 View Channel Send Message
(1)
@safetychuck2 because DOE doesnt teach. Most of there budget is administrative. It needs to be eliminated and let the states handle their own education. Every state is not the same so why do we all follow the same rules?
Posted Oct-19-2012 Bynapolean420 (124.06) 
napolean420 View Channel Send Message
(1)
@rpgmw3 That's what I mean, in Canada here they are a lot more interactive with you, checking up, etc. but there is still tons of people who would rather not work. Lots of people, especially immigrants, who just use it and stay at home bitching that they might have to do something for it. They even talked about community service for people on welfare for a long time, but people complained that they might have to work then.
Posted Oct-19-2012 ByRegging (75.58) 
Regging View Channel Send Message
(2)
@napolean420 I agree. Their influence on the education system has been a failure.
Posted Oct-19-2012 Bysafetychuck2 (4089.62)

safetychuck2 View Channel Send Message
(1)
@Joe in JT
Actually QE3 is a program that has been buying government bonds and for the first time govenrment guaranteed morgages, fanni and freddi. The securities purchased in these programs have value and also have maturity dates that will pay the principle back at par value. The purpose is to keep rates low and to free up the morgage market for refinance to lower monthly payments by morgage holders resulting in additional fund that will thereby stimulate the economy.
Posted Oct-19-2012 Bymcgrande (117.20) 
mcgrande View Channel Send Message
(0)
@Joe in JT cheap money..not for you and me...but for people can draw from the discount window.
Posted Oct-20-2012 Byabsu69 (2105.14) absu69 View Channel Send Message
(-1)
Though Liberalism and Communism both look good on paper, both will continue to fail for the same reasons.........Hypocrisy and Fraud.
The "Tit" is running dry Libtards because you just refuse to let go. Sad little leach's the lot of you.
Posted Oct-19-2012 Bynonconforme (789.04) 
nonconforme View Channel Send Message
(2)
@nonconforme Liberalism is what this country was founded on. Neo liberalism is just as bad as neoconservationism.
Posted Oct-20-2012 Byabsu69 (2105.14) absu69 View Channel Send Message
(-1)
@absu69
These days it's refered to as classical liberalism. Huge difference between that and modern liberalism.
Posted Oct-21-2012 ByWolfBite120 (717.80) 
WolfBite120 View Channel Send Message
(0)
@WolfBite120 why did you thumb me down? I knew that its classical liberalism( which i am a proponent of).
Posted Oct-21-2012 Byabsu69 (2105.14) absu69 View Channel Send Message
(0)
Isn't it interesting that the budget deficit and the welfare bill are approximately the same sum.
Posted Oct-19-2012 ByNotJim (1005.90) 
NotJim View Channel Send Message
(2)
I'm glad to see that they didn't count service-connected disabled Veteran's services in this. Payments to Veterans ARE NOT WELFARE, considering they EARNED it serving and fighting for our country. Most of the welfare services go to people who think they are owed something and have done nothing to earn it.
Posted Oct-19-2012 BybigEcod (173.60) 
bigEcod View Channel Send Message
(2)
@bigEcod dude...a lot of people are struggling and need these programs to supplement their income. They ask for them. They don't think they are "entitled". I know a lot of people with children that work and have trouble paying the bills and making sure the family has hot meals.
Posted Oct-20-2012 Byabsu69 (2105.14) absu69 View Channel Send Message
(1)
...im sure this isn't a problem...
Posted Oct-19-2012 Bydiablokid (528.80) 
diablokid View Channel Send Message
(1)
Has anyone wondered why during the greatest downturn since the great depression there are no cities burning? Has anyone notice what the result of austerity has resulted in in Europe? Riots, demonstrations, destruction of the social fibre, hoplessness, hunger and political change. Perhaps the reason for the swelling in welfare has something to do with the loss of jobs and a living wage. Being a free market believer I would suggest the bloated programs that feed children, provide medical attention More..
Posted Oct-19-2012 Bymcgrande (117.20) 
mcgrande View Channel Send Message
(0)
@mcgrande Those programs are a big part of the reason for a shit economy. Pay people to lounge around and you will see more lounging.
Posted Oct-19-2012 Bylonewolf6972 (676.16) lonewolf6972 View Channel Send Message
(1)
@lonewolf6972
Sorry,that is not correct, the application process is difficult for an educated person and the requirements are extreme. Why pay a farmer not to grow crops or better provide members of congress and their families free medical insurance for life, you hear life and not take care of the children, the future, the untainted our hope?
Posted Oct-19-2012 Bymcgrande (117.20) 
mcgrande View Channel Send Message
(1)
@mcgrande this is true...its also state by state.
Posted Oct-20-2012 Byabsu69 (2105.14) absu69 View Channel Send Message
(0)
Because it is in the governments best interest to keep the population healthy?
But what I find very strange is that USA is the country with the highest health expenditure per capita in the world, yet it is the most privatized and widely criticized by other western countries with universal health care.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_total_health_expenditure_(PPP)_per_capita
http://www.businessinsider.com/best-healthcare-systems-in-the-world-2012-6?op=1
Posted Oct-19-2012 Bydeathspasm (111.46) 
deathspasm View Channel Send Message
(0)
@deathspasm agreed...i dont understand it. I actually wouldnt mind single payer.
Posted Oct-20-2012 Byabsu69 (2105.14) absu69 View Channel Send Message
(-1)
A lesson in irony.
The Food Stamp Program, administered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, is actually proud of the fact it is distributing the greatest amount of free meals and food stamps ever.
Meanwhile, the National Park Service, administered by the U.S. Department of the Interior, asks us to "Please Do Not Feed the Animals." Their stated reason for the policy is because the animals will grow dependent on handouts and will not learn to take care of themselves.
This ends today' More..
Posted Oct-19-2012 Bythe_dude1234 (251.32) the_dude1234 View Channel Send Message
(0)
Fuck'em....the poor look fat to me....cut the losers off.
Posted Oct-19-2012 Byniltomega (743.58) 
niltomega View Channel Send Message
(-1)
Well lets elect the same dip shits that got us into this mess to fix it... That little girl is way better off with Democrats in charge then the snake oil salesmen of the GOP. Obama2012.
Posted Oct-19-2012 Byggppgg (896.50) 
ggppgg View Channel Send Message
(-2)
@ggppgg She'll always be poor and dependent with Dems in charge.
Posted Oct-19-2012 Bylonewolf6972 (676.16) lonewolf6972 View Channel Send Message
(1)
America is going down the tubes, finally!
Posted Oct-19-2012 Bywastedawayishe (28.70) wastedawayishe View Channel Send Message
(-6)
@wastedawayishe well the liberals dont want you to be all alone down there in the tubes.
Posted Oct-19-2012 Bynapolean420 (124.06) 
napolean420 View Channel Send Message
(2)
@napolean420 finally!
Posted Oct-19-2012 Bywastedawayishe (28.70) wastedawayishe View Channel Send Message
(-1)
Romney plans to raise that welfare by 2 trillion in defense spending.
Posted Oct-19-2012 Byjaydenfre (316.62) jaydenfre View Channel Send Message
(-7)
@jaydenfre
that was weak.
Weak in thought, and in execution.
just weak.
Posted Oct-19-2012 Bywharris (2246.22) 
wharris View Channel Send Message
(8)
@jaydenfre
Two wrongs don't make a right. Either support dramatic spending cuts across the board or shut the fuck up.
Posted Oct-19-2012 ByWolfBite120 (717.80) 
WolfBite120 View Channel Send Message
(0)
@WolfBite120 Invest in the country in ways that get a return for the investment and stop blowing sh!t up.That's a clear choice.
Posted Oct-19-2012 Byjaydenfre (316.62) jaydenfre View Channel Send Message
(-2)
@jaydenfre
Welfare isn't an investment, it is wealth redistribution that rewards laziness.
Posted Oct-19-2012 ByWolfBite120 (717.80) 
WolfBite120 View Channel Send Message
(0)
@WolfBite120 Welfare to to blow things up isn't needed=welfare.Wealth distribution is how the economy works numbnuts,wealth distribution is how Romney got wealthy.Wealth distribution is how this country was founded.
Posted Oct-19-2012 Byjaydenfre (316.62) jaydenfre View Channel Send Message
(0)