Former governor Rod Blagojevich's defense team asked Thursday to issue a trial subpoena to the President of the United States of America.
The motion, intended to be heavily redacted, was improperly edited -- the full document was easily viewable if the text is copied and pasted to another document (an error first revealed on Capitol Fax).
Below, the six revelations the redacted portions were meant to conceal.
****************
****************
1. Obama may have lied about conversations with convicted fraudster Tony Rezko
Blagojevich's lawyers allege that Rezko admitted breaking the law by contributing "a large sum of cash" to a public official. Blagojevich's attorneys say that public official is Obama. Obama said that Rezko never relayed a request from a lobbyist to hold a fundraiser in favor of favorable legislative action. But the point may be moot: regardless of Obama talking/not talking to Rezko, Blagojevich's attorneys say that Obama refused the request regardless.
Redacted portion: However, the defense has a good faith belief that Mr. Rezko, President Obama’s former friend, fund-raiser, and neighbor told the FBI and the United States Attorneys a different story about President Obama. In a recent in camera proceeding, the
government tendered a three paragraph letter indicating that Rezko “has stated in interviews with the government that he engaged in election law violations by personally contributing a large sum of cash to the campaign of a public official who is not Rod Blagojevich. … Further, the public official denies being aware of cash contributions to his campaign by Rezko or others and denies having
conversations with Rezko related to cash contributions. … Rezko has also stated in interviews with the government that he believed he transmitted a quid pro quo offer from a lobbyist to the public official, whereby the lobbyist would hold a fundraiser for the official in exchange for favorable official action, but that the public official rejected the offer. The public official denies any such conversation. In addition, Rezko has stated to the government that he and the public official had certain conversations about gaming legislation and administration, which the public official denies having had.
Redacted footnote: The defense has a good faith belief that this public official is Barack Obama.
2. Obama may have overtly recommended Valerie Jarret for his Senate seat
Blagojevich's defense team basically alleges that Obama told a certain labor union official that he (Obama) would support Valerie Jarrett's candidacy for the Senate seat. Jarrett, referred to as "Senate Candidate B", is now a senior advisor to the president.
Redacted portion: Yet, despite President Obama stating that no representatives of his had any part of any deals, labor union president told the FBI and the United States Attorneys that he spoke to labor union official on November 3, 2008 who received a phone message from Obama that evening. After labor union official listened to the message labor union official told labor union president “I’m the one”. Labor union president took that to mean that labor union official was to be the one to deliver the message on behalf of Obama that Senate Candidate B was his pick. (Labor union president 302, February 2, 2009, p. 7).
Labor union official told the FBI and the United States Attorneys “Obama expressed his belief that [Senate Candidate B] would be a good Senator for the people of Illinois and would be a candidate who could win re-election. [Labor union official] advised Obama that [labor union official] would reach out to Governor Blagojevich and advocate for [Senate Candidate B] ... [Labor union official] called [labor union president] and told [labor union president] that Obama was aware that [labor union official] would be reaching out to Blagojevich.” (Labor union official 302, February 3, 2009 p. 3).
3. A supporter of President Obama may have offered quid pro quo on a Jarrett senate appointment
Redacted portion: Supporter of Presidential Candidate Obama is mentioned in a phone call on November 3, 2008, having offered “fundraising” in exchange for Senate Candidate B for senator (Blagojevich Home Phone Call # 149).
4. Obama maintained a list of good Senate candidates
Redacted portion: President-elect Obama also suggested Senate Candidate A to Governor Blagojevich. John Harris told the FBI and the United States Attorneys that he spoke to President’s Chief of Staff on November 12, 2008. Harris took notes of the conversation and wrote that President’s Chief had previously worked as Blagojevich's press secretary. Obama agreed of Staff told Harris that Senate Candidate A was acceptable to Obama as a senate pick. (Harris handwritten notes, OOG1004463) President’s Chief of Staff told the FBI that “he could not say where but somewhere it was communicated to him that” Senate Candidate A was a suggested candidate viewed as one of the four “right” candidates “by the Obama transition team.”
5. Rahm Emanuel allegedly floated Cheryl Jackson's name for the Senate seat
Redacted portion: President’s Chief of Staff told the FBI that he had a conversation discussing the Senate seat with Obama on December 7, 2008 in Obama’s car. President’s Chief of Staff told the FBI “Obama expressed concern about Senate Candidate D being appointed as Senator.
[President’s Chief of Staff] suggested they might need an expanded list to possibly include names of African Americans that came out of the business world. [President’s Chief of Staff] thought he suggested Senate Candidate E who was the head of the Urban League and with President’s Chief of Staff’s suggestion.
6. Obama had a secret phone call with Blagojevich
Redacted portion: President-elect Obama also spoke to Governor Blagojevich on December 1, 2008 in Philadelphia. On Harris Cell Phone Call # 139, John Harris and Governor’s legal counsel discuss a conversation Blagojevich had with President-elect Obama. The government claims a conspiracy existed from October 22, 2008 continuing through December 9, 2008.6 That conversation is relevant to the defense of the government’s theory of an ongoing conspiracy. Only Rod Blagojevich and President Obama can testify to the contents of that conversation. The defense is allowed to present evidence that corroborates the defendant’s testimony.
Source: http://www.nbcchicago.com/blogs/ward-room/The-Six-Secrets-You-Need-to-Know-From-the-Blagojevich-Filing-91848634.html#ixzz0mKw4PeaH
Click to view image: '874df0afb646-20071105rosie.jpg'
By: Songun
In: News
Tags: Blagojevich, blagogate, impeachment, valarie jarrett
Marked as: approved
Views: 6726 | Comments: 59 | Votes: 2 | Favorites: 2 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
Advertisement below
|
|
| Liveleak on Facebook | |
|
LIKE Liveleak.com |
-
Could Obama Take the Stand?
-
Illinois senate votes to oust Governor Blagojevich
-
Blagojevich: Jesse Jackson Jr. Offered me $1,000,000 for Senate Appointment
-
'Who Is Valerie Jarrett (part 2)'
-
Burris did bribe Blago for Senate Seat...
-
Did the Obamas cost Chicago an Olympics?
-
Obama Actually Endorsed Blagojevich TWICE.
-
Ship of Fools (part 1/16): Valarie Jarrett
-
Obama Lied; Knew About Blagojevich Plot
-
Blagojevich Says He Thought of Oprah for Senate!
-
Rham Emanuel talked directly to Blago...



Something tells me there's absolutely no way in Hell this is going to turn into another Watergate, whatever the truth is. The media will white-wash, ignore or downplay every fact of the matter.
Posted Apr-27-2010 ByRepost_Police (324.22) 
Repost_Police View Channel Send Message
(18)
You could be right about that but only time will tell.One thing I do know is that some of libs are very worried about this.
This is the last paragraph from the leftist "FireDogLake" website on this subject:
"When Republicans failed to dig up anything in their Whitewater witch hunt against Bill Clinton that could be used as an excuse to impeach the president, they went after him on his extramarital affairs. In that case, Clinton was smart enough to have avoided being caught in il More..
Posted Apr-27-2010 BySongun (4253.64) Songun Send Message
(7)
Except Fox News.
Posted Apr-27-2010 ByFOODDOC (69.74) 
FOODDOC View Channel Send Message
(4)
i see nothing wrong with that.
Posted Apr-27-2010 ByEva_Destruction (2727.44) 
Eva_Destruction View Channel Send Message
(0)
there's so many other reasons this scandal is just another. It will be kind of like a company firing that new whiz-kid they hired, who seemed to show much promise at first.
Posted May-3-2010 ByRepost_Police (324.22) 
Repost_Police View Channel Send Message
(0)
Papa Bama ain't gonna to like this one bit!
Posted Apr-27-2010 Byaussite (1797.30) 
aussite View Channel Send Message
(10)
A Liberal Prez a Liberal Congress and a Liberal media.
Add it all up and you get, "Untouchable."
Obama could murder Baby's or rig an election and get away with it.
Wait a minute.
Posted Apr-27-2010 ByDave556 (1948.86) 
Dave556 View Channel Send Message
(10)
Possibly,but who knows what might happen when the GOP regains the majority after the midterm elections.
Posted Apr-27-2010 BySongun (4253.64) Songun Send Message
(2)
Nothing...you're Republicans in the end...nothing will happen....except you'll spend more money than you did under Bush.
Posted Apr-27-2010 ByLoPull (506.62) 
LoPull View Channel Send Message
(-13)
Lo Pull, be sensible. The O has spent 2.8 Bush years in his first year and is projecting to blow the deficit up to 20 trillion, if we don't collapse first. Go Ron Paul, Peter Schiff.
Posted Apr-27-2010 ByGiant_Baba (116.60) Giant_Baba Send Message
(1)
Watch the charges on Blago get dropped. Nothing to see here, move along.
Posted Apr-27-2010 ByRob99 (76.70) 
Rob99 View Channel Send Message
(7)
IMPEACH NOW
Posted Apr-27-2010 ByAwsomeSauce (744.78) 
AwsomeSauce Send Message
(4)
I always suspected that Obama is somehow involved in the Blago case and perhaps deeper than that, after all, Obama is a Chicago politician, so anything could be expected from that.
Posted Apr-27-2010 ByJihadslayer (174.10) Jihadslayer Send Message
(4)
does anyone really think this guy will ever tell the truth?
Posted Apr-27-2010 ByAmusing (5220.18) Amusing View Channel Send Message
(2)
Come November I foresee racist impeachment proceedings beginning.
Posted Apr-27-2010 ByjumpingforJoy (3897.26) jumpingforJoy Send Message
(1)
They wouldn't be racist impeachement proceedings if Obama were white though right.
If impeachment proceedings are initiated by a black person, then what, is it still racist, or only if it's white people doing the impeaching.
Careful how you answer this one, you don't want to spew hy[pocrisy or double standard slime on yourself.
Posted Apr-27-2010 ByDave556 (1948.86) 
Dave556 View Channel Send Message
(2)
Anything that is done against a person of color or a minority group is racism.
Posted Apr-27-2010 ByjumpingforJoy (3897.26) jumpingforJoy Send Message
(3)
I think Dave might not have realized that you were being sarcastic.
Posted Apr-27-2010 BySongun (4253.64) Songun Send Message
(0)
I heard he already went down a few time.
Posted Apr-27-2010 ByWestern-Horseman (318.14) 
Western-Horseman View Channel Send Message
(0)
This kinda matter will be shush shushed or made up excuses etc, it could be called even in the name of national security. So doubt Obama will appear anywhere or he will be tried for anything. It would just lead too many heads rolling.
Posted Apr-27-2010 ByKaljapullo (58.50) 
Kaljapullo View Channel Send Message
(0)
I love the many excuses the Teabaggers try to employ to impeach Obama. None of them are ever credible
Posted Apr-27-2010 Bynovocane (15.36) novocane View Channel Send Message
(0)
How would you know?You sound like you have your mind made up already?How credible is that?
Are their voices on tape credible?Lol
Posted Apr-27-2010 BySongun (4253.64) Songun Send Message
(1)
I do, I do and very.
and probably not, Its easy to misinterpret a voice of someone when your only intention in life is to make them fail
Posted Apr-27-2010 Bynovocane (15.36) novocane View Channel Send Message
(-1)
What are you talking about?You need to sharpen your crayons and draw a picture if you can't be more clear than that.
Posted Apr-27-2010 BySongun (4253.64) Songun Send Message
(2)
I'm saying that its easy for a bunch of paranoid individuals to assume that the president is doing something illegal every time a new video or sound bite comes out. Its simply a desire to see the enemy (aka Obama) screw up, even when he isn't. Th
Posted Apr-27-2010 Bynovocane (15.36) novocane View Channel Send Message
(-1)
Thanks for the clarification.
Did you complain when the attacks on President Bush were posted daily?Did you complain about the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq when President Bush was in office?Did you complain about the prison at Guantanamo during the Bush years?
Why aren't you complaining about those things now?
Posted Apr-27-2010 BySongun (4253.64) Songun Send Message
(1)
Well, as long as a majority of the sheeple thinks Obama is the Messiah, then he will remain in power.
Posted Apr-27-2010 ByMicrotek1234 (1127.50) Microtek1234 View Channel Send Message
(0)
The majority never thought that.He campaigned as a fiscal moderate and has revealed himself to be an outright socialist.Independent voters have abandoned him.
Hardcore liberals and blacks are the only ones who will stand by him no matter what.
I also dispute the assertion that he won the majority of the vote(even though his Wall Street were 8 to 1,and his foreign donations are still to be investigated).And let's never forget about ACORNs voter fraud operations...or how the Democrats managed th More..
Posted Apr-27-2010 BySongun (4253.64) Songun Send Message
(1)
lol, funny how suddenly Blago is credible...
Posted Apr-27-2010 Bysteveaustin1971 (377.72) steveaustin1971 View Channel Send Message
(0)
Yeah.. I believe everything he says too.
lol
Posted Apr-27-2010 Bydb1709 (112.80) db1709 View Channel Send Message
(1)