Once considered the best in the nation, California's state parks are falling apart due to chronic underfunding and mismanagement. The park system has a backlog of $1 billion in deferred maintenance and, last year, 150 of California's parks closed part-time or suffered service reductions.
What's the solution? Supporters of Prop 21 believe that the answer lies in a new car tax. If Prop 21 passes in November, California drivers will have to pony up an additional 18 bucks when they register their cars. In exchange, California drivers will be able to use state parks during the day without paying an entrance fee.
Does it make sense to tax drivers to subsidize park users? What's the alternative?
Reason.TV went to Sedona, Arizona and met with Warren Meyer of Recreation Resource Management. As Meyer explained, California doesn't need a car tax to save its parks. Instead, California should contract with private park management companies that can manage parks more efficiently than public agencies while actually paying rent to the government for the right to do so.
By: jbpnw
In: Other
Tags: prop 21, california parks, fees, gov vs. private run, arizona
Marked as: approved
Views: 5893 | Comments: 6 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 1 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
Advertisement below
|
|
| Liveleak on Facebook | |
|
LIKE Liveleak.com |
-
Government Jobs vs. Private Sector Jobs
-
California Based Company; PayPal Hiring 2000 Employees in Arizona
-
NM Gov. Urges Obama to Fight AZ Law
-
Why Libertarian? - Mark Grannis
-
Federal Pay Gap
-
Rep. Stark "The Federal Government Can Do Most Anything In This Country"
-
Mexican Gov't To Run Pro-illegal Alien Ads On American T.V.
-
Flight from Phoenix to Sacramento diverted, hole in the jet’s fuselage
-
We've Become a Nation of Takers, Not Makers
-
California's Vote For The Legalization Of Pot Is One Month Away.
-
Public Schools vs. Private Education



