Safe Mode: On
An Argument for Personal Firearms

Found this on teh internet.

It's a well reasoned point of view, worth a read.

----------------------------

The Gun Is Civilization


Human beings only have two ways to deal with one another:
reason and force.

If you want me to do something for you, you have a choice of either convincing me via argument, or force me to do your bidding under threat of force. Every human interaction falls into one of those two categories, without exception. Reason or force, that’s it.

In a truly moral and civilized society, people exclusively interact through persuasion. Force has no place as a valid method of social interaction, and the only thing that removes force from the menu is the personal firearm, as paradoxical as it may sound to some.

When I carry a gun, you cannot deal with me by force. You have to use reason and try to persuade me, because I have a way to negate your threat or employme


Added: Mar-30-2012 Occurred On: Mar-30-2012
By: Vfor
In:
Weapons, Citizen Journalism
Tags: gun control, personal firearms, gun law
Views: 1264 | Comments: 60 | Votes: 8 | Favorites: 4 | Shared: 14 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 3
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • Comment of user 'T0M65' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
  • Good post.

    Posted Mar-30-2012 By 

    (1) | Report

  • Seen this around a while back. It is well said and exactly right. I would post some further information about the evolution of the wording of the Second Amendment, but the computer it was on shit the bed, and it would be in piss poor format if I did (Fs in historical place of S, I don't know how to properly format it for LiveLeak, etc.).

    If I can find it online I'll provide a link here.

    Posted Mar-30-2012 By 

    (0) | Report

  • you found this on teh internet LMFAO

    Posted Mar-30-2012 By 

    (0) | Report

  • Comment of user 'RugOutFromUnderYou' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
  • Well said, Major!

    Posted Mar-30-2012 By 

    (0) | Report

  • When seconds count, police arrive within minutes.

    Posted Mar-30-2012 By 

    (0) | Report

  • Major, that is well put and spot on; only fools believe that the populace should be disarmed, as only the law abiding will give up their arms.

    The robber, rapist or murderer doesn’t care about doing these things to you, or the penalties that they might have to face.

    Anyone who would do these things doesn't care about another charge, not that it will matter to you after being robbed, raped or killed.

    Posted Mar-31-2012 By 

    (0) | Report

  • profound

    Posted Jun-24-2012 By 

    (0) | Report

  • This is silly.

    My Seventy eight year old mother with parkinson like tremors and weak eyesight cannot handle a gun & is not on equal footing with a 19 year old.
    A gun for her would be a false sense of security.

    The idea that there is only two ways to get people to do things,by force or convincing, is naive.

    Many people around the world & this country do distasteful, objectionable things every day & NOBODY is holding a gun to there heads. Nor are they convinced this is the best opt More..

    Posted Mar-30-2012 By 

    (-2) | Report

    • @Peckerhead "trust me"is the worst way to convince me,and I would rather die making that grab than die lying on the floor with my hands tied behind my back.and nobody is forcing your mother to pack heat

      Posted Mar-30-2012 By 

      (3) | Report

    • @Peckerhead

      i don't see how people can buy this. espescially a marine should know that guns absolutely don't level anything. or what would they train to fight for?

      Posted Mar-30-2012 By 

      (-2) | Report

    • @Peckerhead You overlook those good samaritans who would protect and (yes give their life) to save granny! Criminals want unarmed prey.
      Also a person is either forced to do something or do so by choice.

      Posted Mar-30-2012 By 

      (1) | Report

    • @screwnuts it goes without saying that a gun owner trains with the weapon and becomes proficient.

      Posted Mar-30-2012 By 

      (1) | Report

    • @allank Why are so many debates these days always put in the most extreme terms?

      Is there a reason why you think all muggings lead to abduction & the victims death? As a matter of fact not all thefts are committed with violence.

      If you want to make that grab go ahead...talk is big on the internets.

      How does a gun help with white collar crime, embezzlement,fraud or identity theft where your losses are bound to be many times more than the contents of your pockets...and much more likley.

      More..

      Posted Mar-30-2012 By 

      (1) | Report

  • this is wrong on so many levels. as a marine he should most definitely know that guns don't level the playingfield. they favor the first attacker and the reckless. plus you need not only to be trained to employ a gun right and save, you also need to be able to move swiftly when a possible danger comes on to you. a granny can't shoot as fast as i can. and so on...

    good thing he got the preliminaries wrong too. reason and force are not the only options we have. there's the possibility to avoid ea More..

    Posted Mar-30-2012 By 

    (-3) | Report

    • @screwnuts

      8 million people in your entire country, culturally homogeneous for the most part, few Africans/Muslims/illegal aliens.

      Posted Mar-30-2012 By 

      (2) | Report

    • @pachaKamaq

      "...the general forms of courtesy we accept."

      You not only live in a different country, you live in a different world. There are no longer any previously recognized forms of civility, much less 'courtesies' in the U.S., except in small towns and rural areas, if that much.

      Posted Mar-30-2012 By 

      (2) | Report

    • @pachaKamaq
      You're right!
      They don't seem to get away with as much nonsense in Switzerland, for some reason.

      Posted Mar-30-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @pachaKamaq @joe prole @Cheapshot911

      so, you agree, that gunlaws don't change anything, but you don't agree that equality and wealth promote security?
      or would you say that the gentlemans arguments actually have a good point?

      as far as i'm concerned, i think this major doesn't have a point. i'm not against guns however, for i love to shoot myself.

      Posted Mar-30-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @screwnuts Spoken like a true liberal pusscake.

      Try leaving your country for a bit before you start discussing the social impact of weapons in North America.
      We've got teenage kids here in Canada that would shoot your smug attitude right out the back of that bag of shit you call a head.

      Kind of changes your perspective on gun control.

      I really don't know who is worse, right wing gun nuts or pedantic liberal cocksuckers like you.

      the only thing that is clear, is you know Jack and shit about More..

      Posted Mar-30-2012 By 

      (-1) | Report

  • If some “pacifist” society renounced the retaliatory use of force, it would be left helplessly at the mercy of the first thug who decided to be immoral. Such a society would achieve the opposite of its intention: instead of abolishing evil, it would encourage and reward it.

    The Virtue of Selfishness - “The Nature of Government,”
    Ayn Rand.

    EXCELLENT Post!

    Posted Jun-15-2013 By 

    (0) | Report