Nice one J20. I love your honest style! That was a good comparison between The US invading Iraq and the UK 'not' invading Ireland. Imagine if we had of done anyway, who's side do you think the US would take? It probably would have cause instability within the US! I don't know!
May I remind you that Britain and Australia have forces fighting in Iraq right now... And the entire NATO force (from Canada to Greece) is in Afghanistan (the root of the 9/11 attacks)... In other words, if comparable attacks occured in another country, they would react in a similar manner (especially Britain)...
Its a silly question though to ask on a your say seems as we know the answer , would they ****. America should be left to defend themselves so we can see how far they get before there all blown to pieces.
More 9/11's pls , im getting tired of the yanks tbh.
haha @ all these republicans going DURR I DONNO DURR I DONNO yes u do. we all know no other country would do anything even close to this shit that the bush administration managed to pull off.
Quoted comment by Tyler420: haha @ all these republicans going DURR I DONNO DURR I DONNO yes u do. we all know no other country would do anything even close to this shit that the bush administration managed to pull off.
I thought he was asking if the USA would go to war over someone else getting attacked.. maybe im wrong?
One problem and big flaw with this we got involved in your european balkan conflit in the 90s..
What did that have to do with us?
We helped Kuwait.
We helped south korea
We helped south vietnam.
Go back and see the history of your nations helping us in say the KOREAN conflict, the vietnam conflict in which south korean, australian troops and others helped us..
If North korea attacked south korea would the USA HELP
yes we would
If an attack happened on japan by china would the USA intervene and help japan yes it would.
Your throwing in alot of variables.. Would it happen as fast as we acted after 911 maybe not.. But would it happen I believe it would.
The CIA used some known terrorists who were under surveilance to attack on Sept 11. Under surveilance by the secret services of several countries all of which had reported it to the USA. So it's a bit wrong to say terroridsts did 911, because the US government did it.
Quoted comment by drquick: The CIA used some known terrorists who were under surveilance to attack on Sept 11. Under surveilance by the secret services of several countries all of which had reported it to the USA. So it's a bit wrong to say terroridsts did 911, because the US government did it.
do not confuse the FBI and cia and there sources..
you do realize the larger the government the more BS you deal with
Comments - sort by newest to oldest
i agree. america would help send u some pocket change tho!
Posted Jun-21-2007 by "Tyler420" (R)
hmmm how much you been drinking tonight ?
Posted Jun-21-2007 by "IckieJim" (R)
Nice one J20. I love your honest style! That was a good comparison between The US invading Iraq and the UK 'not' invading Ireland. Imagine if we had of done anyway, who's side do you think the US would take? It probably would have cause instability within the US! I don't know!
Posted Jun-21-2007 by "red_coats_are_comin" (R)
Spelling terrible today!
Posted Jun-21-2007 by "red_coats_are_comin" (R)
May I remind you that Britain and Australia have forces fighting in Iraq right now... And the entire NATO force (from Canada to Greece) is in Afghanistan (the root of the 9/11 attacks)... In other words, if comparable attacks occured in another country, they would react in a similar manner (especially Britain)...
Posted Jun-21-2007 by "nmbs1" (R)
Its a silly question though to ask on a your say seems as we know the answer , would they ****. America should be left to defend themselves so we can see how far they get before there all blown to pieces.
More 9/11's pls , im getting tired of the yanks tbh.
Posted Jun-21-2007 by "Morb1dlord" (R)
To answer your question: I have no ******* clue.
Posted Jun-21-2007 by "Smegma" (R)
haha @ all these republicans going DURR I DONNO DURR I DONNO yes u do. we all know no other country would do anything even close to this shit that the bush administration managed to pull off.
Posted Jun-21-2007 by "Tyler420" (B)
lets speculate on the falkland islands for a bit as well.
Posted Jun-21-2007 by "moe howard" (R)
I thought he was asking if the USA would go to war over someone else getting attacked.. maybe im wrong?
Posted Jun-21-2007 by "Smegma" (R)
One problem and big flaw with this we got involved in your european balkan conflit in the 90s..
What did that have to do with us?
We helped Kuwait.
We helped south korea
We helped south vietnam.
Go back and see the history of your nations helping us in say the KOREAN conflict, the vietnam conflict in which south korean, australian troops and others helped us..
If North korea attacked south korea would the USA HELP
yes we would
If an attack happened on japan by china would the USA intervene and help japan yes it would.
Your throwing in alot of variables.. Would it happen as fast as we acted after 911 maybe not.. But would it happen I believe it would.
Posted Jun-21-2007 by "Dat1111" (R)
"What If" Is for children!!!!! Respond to the REAL world. Jack***
Posted Jun-21-2007 by "PocketAces"
pocketaces the INTELLECTUALS ask WHAT IF u stupid moron.
Posted Jun-21-2007 by "Tyler420"
The CIA used some known terrorists who were under surveilance to attack on Sept 11. Under surveilance by the secret services of several countries all of which had reported it to the USA. So it's a bit wrong to say terroridsts did 911, because the US government did it.
Posted Jun-21-2007 by "drquick"
do not confuse the FBI and cia and there sources..
you do realize the larger the government the more BS you deal with
Posted Jun-21-2007 by "Dat1111"