Liberals claim President Bush shouldn't have started this war. They complain about his prosecution of it. One liberal recently claimed Bush was the worst president in U.S. history.
Let's clear up one point: We didn't start the war on terror. Try to remember, it was started by terrorists BEFORE 9/11.
Let's look at the "worst" president and mismanagement claims.. and let's label all wars according to "FRONTLINE LOGIC"
WW2> FDR's war!
FDR led us into World War II. Germany never attacked us: Japan did. From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost, an average of 112,500 per year.
Korea> Truman's war!
Truman finished that war and started one in Korea, North Korea never attacked us. From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost, an average of 18,333 per year.
Vietnam> kennedy's war!
John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in 1962. Vietnam never attacked us. Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire. From 1965-1975, 58,000 lives were lost, an average of 5,800 per year.
Bosnia> Clinton's war!
Clinton went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent, Bosnia never attacked us. He was offered Osama bin Laden's head on a platter three times by Sudan and did nothing. Osama has attacked us on multiple occasions.
In the 6&1/2 years since terrorists attacked us, president bush has liberated two countries, crushed the taliban, crippled al-qaida, put nuclear inspectors in lybia, iran and north korea without firing a shot, and captured a terrorist who slaughtered at least 300,000 of his own people. We lost 4,000 soldiers; roughly the number of americans killed in drowning accidents in a year. Bush did all this abroad while not allowing another terrorist attack at home.
Cheney should be dropped out of an airplane 3,ooo feet above Iraq. If he falls on a couple of insurgents, at least his life served some useful purpose.
Quoted comment by SgtRockOfEasyCo: Oh.. how rich this is.. LoL
What a crock of shit.
Liberals claim President Bush shouldn't have started this war. They complain about his prosecution of it. One liberal recently claimed Bush was the worst president in U.S. history.
Let's clear up one point: We didn't start the war on terror. Try to remember, it was started by terrorists BEFORE 9/11.
Let's look at the "worst" president and mismanagement claims.. and let's label all wars according to "FRONTLINE LOGIC"
WW2> FDR's war!
FDR led us into World War II. Germany never attacked us: Japan did. From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost, an average of 112,500 per year.
Korea> Truman's war!
Truman finished that war and started one in Korea, North Korea never attacked us. From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost, an average of 18,333 per year.
Vietnam> kennedy's war!
John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in 1962. Vietnam never attacked us. Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire. From 1965-1975, 58,000 lives were lost, an average of 5,800 per year.
Bosnia> Clinton's war!
Clinton went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent, Bosnia never attacked us. He was offered Osama bin Laden's head on a platter three times by Sudan and did nothing. Osama has attacked us on multiple occasions.
In the 6&1/2 years since terrorists attacked us, president bush has liberated two countries, crushed the taliban, crippled al-qaida, put nuclear inspectors in lybia, iran and north korea without firing a shot, and captured a terrorist who slaughtered at least 300,000 of his own people. We lost 4,000 soldiers; roughly the number of americans killed in drowning accidents in a year. Bush did all this abroad while not allowing another terrorist attack at home.
Worst president in history? Come on!
This isn't bushes war.. it's MY war!
Rediculous! This isnt YOUR war by any means. Just sit there in your comfy computer chair and let the teenagers get recruited to do what you cant.
Bush is indeed THE WORST PRESIDENT IN AMERICAN HISTORY!!!!!
Deal with the failures of your hero. Stop defending the indefensable as our Soldiers sit in the middle of a civil war.
4000 killed is more than those killed on 9-11 ... unbelievable how you ignore this.
No shots fired? a million dead and 4 million sitting in refugee camps? all because of your idiot hero Bush who is more than fine with dropping our Soldiers in Iraq and leaving them there till he is out of office.
Yup! Thats a complete Failure!!!
But you keep believing in your fantasy world. Are you by chance religious too?
Quoted comment by revpeterpopoff: Cheney should be dropped out of an airplane 3,ooo feet above Iraq. If he falls on a couple of insurgents, at least his life served some useful purpose.
Combine truth, lies, opinion and conjecture and spin it for all it's worth.
Now.
Count the number of appearances by NYT reporters.
Now count the number of appearances by NYT reporters.
Now count the number of appearances by NYT reporters, pundits, and paid NYT "analysts" in that video.
When you count them, please also include a brief analysis on why resentful military leaders and politicians with an axe to grind might engage in a literary 69 with a NYT "reporter".
Now count the number of appearances by non-NYT reporters, pundits and UNPAID individuals with NO axe to grind.
Why is it that there is NO attempt to ask any news source (other than the NYT) what it going on over there?
Why is it that this "documentary" makes NO attempt to interview ANYONE who's judgment, morals or intelligence is thrown into question by the makers of this trash?
I'll tell you why.
Because if given even 10% of the time devoted to those who attack them, they would be able to defend and explain what REALLY went on.
Watch this video.
See who and what they use for sources.
Then ask yourself...Why are the ONLY sources they use people and and institutions with an axe to grind.....
This "documentary" uses the NYT for 90% of it's "news" stories. Don't believe me, just make your own count.
Is there ANY opportunity for response by non-biased media? Do they invite ANY refutation?
Quoted comment by RabidMarsupial2: Libtard propaganda at it's finest.
Combine truth, lies, opinion and conjecture and spin it for all it's worth.
Now.
Count the number of appearances by NYT reporters.
Now count the number of appearances by NYT reporters.
Now count the number of appearances by NYT reporters, pundits, and paid NYT "analysts" in that video.
When you count them, please also include a brief analysis on why resentful military leaders and politicians with an axe to grind might engage in a literary 69 with a NYT "reporter".
Now count the number of appearances by non-NYT reporters, pundits and UNPAID individuals with NO axe to grind.
Why is it that there is NO attempt to ask any news source (other than the NYT) what it going on over there?
Why is it that this "documentary" makes NO attempt to interview ANYONE who's judgment, morals or intelligence is thrown into question by the makers of this trash?
I'll tell you why.
Because if given even 10% of the time devoted to those who attack them, they would be able to defend and explain what REALLY went on.
Watch this video.
See who and what they use for sources.
Then ask yourself...Why are the ONLY sources they use people and and institutions with an axe to grind.....
This "documentary" uses the NYT for 90% of it's "news" stories. Don't believe me, just make your own count.
Is there ANY opportunity for response by non-biased media? Do they invite ANY refutation?
Of course not.
Dance, Lie and Spin!!!!
gee... you make them sound like Fox news... nope! You are just spreading Republiturd propaganda...
Quoted comment by SgtRockOfEasyCo: Oh.. how rich this is.. LoL
What a crock of shit.
Liberals claim President Bush shouldn't have started this war. They complain about his prosecution of it. One liberal recently claimed Bush was the worst president in U.S. history.
Let's clear up one point: We didn't start the war on terror. Try to remember, it was started by terrorists BEFORE 9/11.
Let's look at the "worst" president and mismanagement claims.. and let's label all wars according to "FRONTLINE LOGIC"
WW2> FDR's war!
FDR led us into World War II. Germany never attacked us: Japan did. From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost, an average of 112,500 per year.
Korea> Truman's war!
Truman finished that war and started one in Korea, North Korea never attacked us. From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost, an average of 18,333 per year.
Vietnam> kennedy's war!
John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in 1962. Vietnam never attacked us. Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire. From 1965-1975, 58,000 lives were lost, an average of 5,800 per year.
Bosnia> Clinton's war!
Clinton went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent, Bosnia never attacked us. He was offered Osama bin Laden's head on a platter three times by Sudan and did nothing. Osama has attacked us on multiple occasions.
In the 6&1/2 years since terrorists attacked us, president bush has liberated two countries, crushed the taliban, crippled al-qaida, put nuclear inspectors in lybia, iran and north korea without firing a shot, and captured a terrorist who slaughtered at least 300,000 of his own people. We lost 4,000 soldiers; roughly the number of americans killed in drowning accidents in a year. Bush did all this abroad while not allowing another terrorist attack at home.
Worst president in history? Come on!
This isn't bushes war.. it's MY war!
Rediculous! This isnt YOUR war by any means. Just sit there in your comfy computer chair and let the teenagers get recruited to do what you cant.
Bush is indeed THE WORST PRESIDENT IN AMERICAN HISTORY!!!!!
Deal with the failures of your hero. Stop defending the indefensable as our Soldiers sit in the middle of a civil war.
4000 killed is more than those killed on 9-11 ... unbelievable how you ignore this.
No shots fired? a million dead and 4 million sitting in refugee camps? all because of your idiot hero Bush who is more than fine with dropping our Soldiers in Iraq and leaving them there till he is out of office.
Yup! Thats a complete Failure!!!
But you keep believing in your fantasy world. Are you by chance religious too?
LMAO AT THE LIBS and ANDYBLEW
Yeah, he's an idiot and idiots are funny in schadenfreude sort of way, but he is also a fool. And I mean a fool in the medieval sense of the word. That is, someone determined to remain deliberately obtuse despite repeated opportunities to redeem themselves. In the middle ages "fools" were considered dangerous. Nowadays, they are less so, unless you consider the ability to produce other fools a danger....
Andy just spouts out whatever spin sounds "good". He ignores the FACT that Saddam was a viscous murdering thug who built and used NBC weapons, violated EVERY SINGLE AGREEMENT that left him in power after first gulf war, tried to hide his WMD's and fully intended to go right back to making them once sanctions were lifted, had PROVEN TIES TO AL-QUAEDA, slaughtered his own people in wholesale lots, and on and on and on...
We've lost 4000 brave men and women during this war. They've lost their lives in an attempt to drag Iraq from a bestial & brutal Stalinist state into something the arab world has never known: 1 man, 1 vote....This may take 2 more years. It may take 20. Do you REALLY want to abandon a society brutalized first by Saddam and his thugs, then by Baathists who call themselves the "resistance", then by Shia fanatics, then by Al-Quada Sunni fanatics? Why is it that libtard "compassion" stops the INSTANT that the U.S. any sort of strategic or political interest in the country involved.
This idiot Andy hates the U.S. so much that he has the NERVE to state "a million dead". That is an outright lie. He knows it. I know it. Put up the study, Andy. I'll hand you the quote from it's AUTHOR acknowledging it's bullshit.
But yes. People have died. Men, women, kids..99% by the head chopping, suicide bombing, fanatical murderous scum who have been preaching and acting on their barbaric version of Islam for at LEAST the last undred years Remember...THESE are the people Andy wants us to hand Iraq over to. He doesn't give a DAMN about what would happen to the "Iraqi people", he doesn't give a DAMN whether Sunni fanatics start chopping the heads off men for wearing their beards too short. He doesn't give a DAMN if 10yr girls are sold as chattel and 15yr old girls are stoned to death as an "honor" killing.
Many Iraqis are, or have been, refugees. If some head chopping, suicide bombing, murderous scum came to my door and threatened to slit my four year old daughters throat if I went back to work at the local power station, I'd run like hell too. Many are coming home now voluntarily since the surge HAS been such a brilliant success. Some have simply run out of money and are coming home because they are broke. (Once again, the Islamic world, floating on an ocean of petrodollars, has shown SOOOooooo much concern for their brethren).
Bush has not, I will admit, done everything perfectly. What he DID do was to confront the inevitable. He inherited the looming disaster that Slick Willy dumped on him, and actually FACED it. Clinton was nothing more than a modern day Chamberlain, and we are STILL paying the price for his cowardice, stupidity, and political narcissism.
The ONLY thing that rescues Clinton from the title of "Worst President Ever" is that the economic policies of Reagan and Bush allowed that posturing buffoon to ride a wave of economic prosperity that he and his yapping little hilldog would NEVER allowed to take shape if they had had their way.
No, the title of "Worst President Ever" has to go to the man who created 17% interest rates. The man who created 19% unemployment. The man who watched the Russians stack up 700,000 troops on the Afghan border and then sold them half our grain crop at 60% of market value WITH THE REMAINING 40% PAID FOR BY THE U.S. TAXPAYER because he "wanted to encourage good relations" and they "promised" they weren't going to invade. He was SO "Shocked" when the Russians treated him like the stupid little ***** he is and invaded Afghanistan. Couldn't trust the Russians? Who would have EVER imagined?! Anyone and everyone other than a dipshit Georgia peanut farmer.....Duuhhhhhhhh......
And then of course there is Jimmy's BRILLIANT handling of the "Iran hostage crisis" although after 444 days the word "crisis" no longer fit. If he'd been re-elected it would have been a 1896 day "crisis". Once the U.S. military that he had worked so hard to gut failed in it's attempted rescue of the hostages, Jimmy just sat back, twiddled his thumbs, and said "Well Golly Gee whiz, Ahhm jist so-ah puzzl-ed..mebee ah shoulda jest lusted in mah haht tah git they-ahl reah-lee-ahsd.
Once Jimmy came to power every punk-ass wannabe Stalin in Central America, South America, the Caribbean, Africa, Asia and anywhere else on the damn planet pinned a red star on his forehead, raised his/her fist in the communist salute, shouted "power to the people" and came grinning to the Soviet Union for money, guns, and training..and got it..all secure in the sure and certain knowledge that Jimmy's response would be..."Well Golly Gee whiz, Ahhm jist so-ah puzzl-ed"
And now..
That stupid little peanut farmer...
Who's EVERY SINGLE political calculation was WRONG..
Who FED the Russian troops in Afghanistan...
Who was as completely and utterly clueless about the U.S. economy as he was about the world in general...
NOW this worthless puke has the NERVE to spout out his "opinion" on the arab/israili conflict.....
When this idiot went to Camp David with Sadat and Begin, all he had to do was STFU and let them work it out. By some MIRACLE he didn't **** it up. It's the ONLY thing he DIDN'T **** up during his entire presidency. But incredibly, amazingly, this fool has completely forgotten the FACT that hasn't got the political acumen that allah grants to even the lowliest of earthworms, and is now getting rave reviews from the same kind of head-chopping, suicide bombing savages that used to get their kicks by taking American hostages in Iran!!!!
It must be some sort of congenital idiocy. No way could any rational person be able to sustain such a delusional world view without a WHOLE lot of help from a damaged gene pool.
Congrats, Jimmy...
I'd always poo-poo-d any suggestion that the American people would vote for a vegetable. In a way, I was right. They just elected a man who's brain consisted largely of peanut DNA.
So Andy...
If you can trump the cowardly, bumbling disasters that were Jimmy and/or Willy by comparing them to George's hard fought attempts to rectify the mess Willy left him, go right ahead!
But so far, all I see are the usual libtard fantasies lies, and bullshit.
This was an excellent two-part series showing the crimes of Bush and co....to bad most Americans are too stupid to realize that they've been duped and robbed of 7 trillion dollars.
But then again, they elected this war criminal coward twice so they got what they deserved.
Quoted comment by SgtRockOfEasyCo: Oh.. how rich this is.. LoL
What a crock of shit.
Liberals claim President Bush shouldn't have started this war. They complain about his prosecution of it. One liberal recently claimed Bush was the worst president in U.S. history.
Let's clear up one point: We didn't start the war on terror. Try to remember, it was started by terrorists BEFORE 9/11.
Let's look at the "worst" president and mismanagement claims.. and let's label all wars according to "FRONTLINE LOGIC"
WW2> FDR's war!
FDR led us into World War II. Germany never attacked us: Japan did. From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost, an average of 112,500 per year.
Korea> Truman's war!
Truman finished that war and started one in Korea, North Korea never attacked us. From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost, an average of 18,333 per year.
Vietnam> kennedy's war!
John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in 1962. Vietnam never attacked us. Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire. From 1965-1975, 58,000 lives were lost, an average of 5,800 per year.
Bosnia> Clinton's war!
Clinton went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent, Bosnia never attacked us. He was offered Osama bin Laden's head on a platter three times by Sudan and did nothing. Osama has attacked us on multiple occasions.
In the 6&1/2 years since terrorists attacked us, president bush has liberated two countries, crushed the taliban, crippled al-qaida, put nuclear inspectors in lybia, iran and north korea without firing a shot, and captured a terrorist who slaughtered at least 300,000 of his own people. We lost 4,000 soldiers; roughly the number of americans killed in drowning accidents in a year. Bush did all this abroad while not allowing another terrorist attack at home.
Worst president in history? Come on!
This isn't bushes war.. it's MY war!
What do you mean you didn't start this war? Ofcourse you did, 60 years of imperialist foreign policy, invading other countries, assasinations, meddling in the politics of other countries, activily armind Sadam against the Iranians, actively arming and training the Muhajadeen and supplying them with Stinger missiles during the Russian invasion of Afghanistan.
During that training, you also trained and equipeed a dude named Osama Bin Laden.
So, as sure as 9/11 is a tragedy and an incredibly criminal act against innocent people, when you piss off enough people continually around the world, someone will eventually bite you on the a$$.
So all this, they attacked us is just shite, you've been screwing people and countries all over the world for decades and then seen surprised when you get hit back.
And by the way, your little friend Osama Bin Laden is still running around the neighbourhood and you still haven't caught the little ba$tard!
Good work!
Iraq and Sadam had NOTHING TO DO with 9/11, got that?
Quoted comment by SgtRockOfEasyCo: Oh.. how rich this is.. LoL
What a crock of shit.
Liberals claim President Bush shouldn't have started this war. They complain about his prosecution of it. One liberal recently claimed Bush was the worst president in U.S. history.
Let's clear up one point: We didn't start the war on terror. Try to remember, it was started by terrorists BEFORE 9/11.
Let's look at the "worst" president and mismanagement claims.. and let's label all wars according to "FRONTLINE LOGIC"
WW2> FDR's war!
FDR led us into World War II. Germany never attacked us: Japan did. From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost, an average of 112,500 per year.
Korea> Truman's war!
Truman finished that war and started one in Korea, North Korea never attacked us. From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost, an average of 18,333 per year.
Vietnam> kennedy's war!
John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in 1962. Vietnam never attacked us. Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire. From 1965-1975, 58,000 lives were lost, an average of 5,800 per year.
Bosnia> Clinton's war!
Clinton went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent, Bosnia never attacked us. He was offered Osama bin Laden's head on a platter three times by Sudan and did nothing. Osama has attacked us on multiple occasions.
In the 6&1/2 years since terrorists attacked us, president bush has liberated two countries, crushed the taliban, crippled al-qaida, put nuclear inspectors in lybia, iran and north korea without firing a shot, and captured a terrorist who slaughtered at least 300,000 of his own people. We lost 4,000 soldiers; roughly the number of americans killed in drowning accidents in a year. Bush did all this abroad while not allowing another terrorist attack at home.
Worst president in history? Come on!
This isn't bushes war.. it's MY war!
Rediculous! This isnt YOUR war by any means. Just sit there in your comfy computer chair and let the teenagers get recruited to do what you cant.
Bush is indeed THE WORST PRESIDENT IN AMERICAN HISTORY!!!!!
Deal with the failures of your hero. Stop defending the indefensable as our Soldiers sit in the middle of a civil war.
4000 killed is more than those killed on 9-11 ... unbelievable how you ignore this.
No shots fired? a million dead and 4 million sitting in refugee camps? all because of your idiot hero Bush who is more than fine with dropping our Soldiers in Iraq and leaving them there till he is out of office.
Yup! Thats a complete Failure!!!
But you keep believing in your fantasy world. Are you by chance religious too?
LMAO AT THE LIBS and ANDYBLEW
Yeah, he's an idiot and idiots are funny in schadenfreude sort of way, but he is also a fool. And I mean a fool in the medieval sense of the word. That is, someone determined to remain deliberately obtuse despite repeated opportunities to redeem themselves. In the middle ages "fools" were considered dangerous. Nowadays, they are less so, unless you consider the ability to produce other fools a danger....
Andy just spouts out whatever spin sounds "good". He ignores the FACT that Saddam was a viscous murdering thug who built and used NBC weapons, violated EVERY SINGLE AGREEMENT that left him in power after first gulf war, tried to hide his WMD's and fully intended to go right back to making them once sanctions were lifted, had PROVEN TIES TO AL-QUAEDA, slaughtered his own people in wholesale lots, and on and on and on...
We've lost 4000 brave men and women during this war. They've lost their lives in an attempt to drag Iraq from a bestial & brutal Stalinist state into something the arab world has never known: 1 man, 1 vote....This may take 2 more years. It may take 20. Do you REALLY want to abandon a society brutalized first by Saddam and his thugs, then by Baathists who call themselves the "resistance", then by Shia fanatics, then by Al-Quada Sunni fanatics? Why is it that libtard "compassion" stops the INSTANT that the U.S. any sort of strategic or political interest in the country involved.
This idiot Andy hates the U.S. so much that he has the NERVE to state "a million dead". That is an outright lie. He knows it. I know it. Put up the study, Andy. I'll hand you the quote from it's AUTHOR acknowledging it's bullshit.
But yes. People have died. Men, women, kids..99% by the head chopping, suicide bombing, fanatical murderous scum who have been preaching and acting on their barbaric version of Islam for at LEAST the last undred years Remember...THESE are the people Andy wants us to hand Iraq over to. He doesn't give a DAMN about what would happen to the "Iraqi people", he doesn't give a DAMN whether Sunni fanatics start chopping the heads off men for wearing their beards too short. He doesn't give a DAMN if 10yr girls are sold as chattel and 15yr old girls are stoned to death as an "honor" killing.
Many Iraqis are, or have been, refugees. If some head chopping, suicide bombing, murderous scum came to my door and threatened to slit my four year old daughters throat if I went back to work at the local power station, I'd run like hell too. Many are coming home now voluntarily since the surge HAS been such a brilliant success. Some have simply run out of money and are coming home because they are broke. (Once again, the Islamic world, floating on an ocean of petrodollars, has shown SOOOooooo much concern for their brethren).
Bush has not, I will admit, done everything perfectly. What he DID do was to confront the inevitable. He inherited the looming disaster that Slick Willy dumped on him, and actually FACED it. Clinton was nothing more than a modern day Chamberlain, and we are STILL paying the price for his cowardice, stupidity, and political narcissism.
The ONLY thing that rescues Clinton from the title of "Worst President Ever" is that the economic policies of Reagan and Bush allowed that posturing buffoon to ride a wave of economic prosperity that he and his yapping little hilldog would NEVER allowed to take shape if they had had their way.
No, the title of "Worst President Ever" has to go to the man who created 17% interest rates. The man who created 19% unemployment. The man who watched the Russians stack up 700,000 troops on the Afghan border and then sold them half our grain crop at 60% of market value WITH THE REMAINING 40% PAID FOR BY THE U.S. TAXPAYER because he "wanted to encourage good relations" and they "promised" they weren't going to invade. He was SO "Shocked" when the Russians treated him like the stupid little ***** he is and invaded Afghanistan. Couldn't trust the Russians? Who would have EVER imagined?! Anyone and everyone other than a dipshit Georgia peanut farmer.....Duuhhhhhhhh......
And then of course there is Jimmy's BRILLIANT handling of the "Iran hostage crisis" although after 444 days the word "crisis" no longer fit. If he'd been re-elected it would have been a 1896 day "crisis". Once the U.S. military that he had worked so hard to gut failed in it's attempted rescue of the hostages, Jimmy just sat back, twiddled his thumbs, and said "Well Golly Gee whiz, Ahhm jist so-ah puzzl-ed..mebee ah shoulda jest lusted in mah haht tah git they-ahl reah-lee-ahsd.
Once Jimmy came to power every punk-ass wannabe Stalin in Central America, South America, the Caribbean, Africa, Asia and anywhere else on the damn planet pinned a red star on his forehead, raised his/her fist in the communist salute, shouted "power to the people" and came grinning to the Soviet Union for money, guns, and training..and got it..all secure in the sure and certain knowledge that Jimmy's response would be..."Well Golly Gee whiz, Ahhm jist so-ah puzzl-ed"
And now..
That stupid little peanut farmer...
Who's EVERY SINGLE political calculation was WRONG..
Who FED the Russian troops in Afghanistan...
Who was as completely and utterly clueless about the U.S. economy as he was about the world in general...
NOW this worthless puke has the NERVE to spout out his "opinion" on the arab/israili conflict.....
When this idiot went to Camp David with Sadat and Begin, all he had to do was STFU and let them work it out. By some MIRACLE he didn't **** it up. It's the ONLY thing he DIDN'T **** up during his entire presidency. But incredibly, amazingly, this fool has completely forgotten the FACT that hasn't got the political acumen that allah grants to even the lowliest of earthworms, and is now getting rave reviews from the same kind of head-chopping, suicide bombing savages that used to get their kicks by taking American hostages in Iran!!!!
It must be some sort of congenital idiocy. No way could any rational person be able to sustain such a delusional world view without a WHOLE lot of help from a damaged gene pool.
Congrats, Jimmy...
I'd always poo-poo-d any suggestion that the American people would vote for a vegetable. In a way, I was right. They just elected a man who's brain consisted largely of peanut DNA.
So Andy...
If you can trump the cowardly, bumbling disasters that were Jimmy and/or Willy by comparing them to George's hard fought attempts to rectify the mess Willy left him, go right ahead!
But so far, all I see are the usual libtard fantasies lies, and bullshit.
Oh yes, i almost forgot about ole jimmy, and his hand wringing for nearly a year @ a half, while over 50 hostages suffered head chopping terror, by the minute.
A particular brand of terror only found in the islamic hub of the middle east, and muslim controlled satellite holdings throughout the world.
Carter bugled several, desperate, ill conceived, last minute, "operation" attempts at rescue.. when he should have had the balls to step up to khomeini's doorstep under banner of war. Iran's slogan at the time was: "America can't do a damn thing." Jimmy proved them right... as holder of the worst president in history award.
Carter's milquetoast foreign affairs policies are a major reason we are at war today. Liberals have no clue as to the underlying danger in the world stage.. and how many would~be bullies are vying for dominance of any particular region.(islam lays claim to the entire world)
.. as per your coded message, RM2, you don't have to worry about me.. i only go for the throats of rabid, preachy, atheists... and those who love them.
LoL
Comments - sort by newest to oldest
Oh.. how rich this is.. LoL
What a crock of shit.
Liberals claim President Bush shouldn't have started this war. They complain about his prosecution of it. One liberal recently claimed Bush was the worst president in U.S. history.
Let's clear up one point: We didn't start the war on terror. Try to remember, it was started by terrorists BEFORE 9/11.
Let's look at the "worst" president and mismanagement claims.. and let's label all wars according to "FRONTLINE LOGIC"
WW2> FDR's war!
FDR led us into World War II. Germany never attacked us: Japan did. From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost, an average of 112,500 per year.
Korea> Truman's war!
Truman finished that war and started one in Korea, North Korea never attacked us. From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost, an average of 18,333 per year.
Vietnam> kennedy's war!
John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in 1962. Vietnam never attacked us. Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire. From 1965-1975, 58,000 lives were lost, an average of 5,800 per year.
Bosnia> Clinton's war!
Clinton went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent, Bosnia never attacked us. He was offered Osama bin Laden's head on a platter three times by Sudan and did nothing. Osama has attacked us on multiple occasions.
In the 6&1/2 years since terrorists attacked us, president bush has liberated two countries, crushed the taliban, crippled al-qaida, put nuclear inspectors in lybia, iran and north korea without firing a shot, and captured a terrorist who slaughtered at least 300,000 of his own people. We lost 4,000 soldiers; roughly the number of americans killed in drowning accidents in a year. Bush did all this abroad while not allowing another terrorist attack at home.
Worst president in history? Come on!
This isn't bushes war.. it's MY war!
Posted Mar-26-2008 by "SgtRockOfEasyCo" (R)
Cheney should be dropped out of an airplane 3,ooo feet above Iraq. If he falls on a couple of insurgents, at least his life served some useful purpose.
Posted Mar-26-2008 by "revpeterpopoff" (R)
What a crock of shit.
Liberals claim President Bush shouldn't have started this war. They complain about his prosecution of it. One liberal recently claimed Bush was the worst president in U.S. history.
Let's clear up one point: We didn't start the war on terror. Try to remember, it was started by terrorists BEFORE 9/11.
Let's look at the "worst" president and mismanagement claims.. and let's label all wars according to "FRONTLINE LOGIC"
WW2> FDR's war!
FDR led us into World War II. Germany never attacked us: Japan did. From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost, an average of 112,500 per year.
Korea> Truman's war!
Truman finished that war and started one in Korea, North Korea never attacked us. From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost, an average of 18,333 per year.
Vietnam> kennedy's war!
John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in 1962. Vietnam never attacked us. Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire. From 1965-1975, 58,000 lives were lost, an average of 5,800 per year.
Bosnia> Clinton's war!
Clinton went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent, Bosnia never attacked us. He was offered Osama bin Laden's head on a platter three times by Sudan and did nothing. Osama has attacked us on multiple occasions.
In the 6&1/2 years since terrorists attacked us, president bush has liberated two countries, crushed the taliban, crippled al-qaida, put nuclear inspectors in lybia, iran and north korea without firing a shot, and captured a terrorist who slaughtered at least 300,000 of his own people. We lost 4,000 soldiers; roughly the number of americans killed in drowning accidents in a year. Bush did all this abroad while not allowing another terrorist attack at home.
Worst president in history? Come on!
This isn't bushes war.. it's MY war!
Rediculous! This isnt YOUR war by any means. Just sit there in your comfy computer chair and let the teenagers get recruited to do what you cant.
Bush is indeed THE WORST PRESIDENT IN AMERICAN HISTORY!!!!!
Deal with the failures of your hero. Stop defending the indefensable as our Soldiers sit in the middle of a civil war.
4000 killed is more than those killed on 9-11 ... unbelievable how you ignore this.
No shots fired? a million dead and 4 million sitting in refugee camps? all because of your idiot hero Bush who is more than fine with dropping our Soldiers in Iraq and leaving them there till he is out of office.
Yup! Thats a complete Failure!!!
But you keep believing in your fantasy world. Are you by chance religious too?
Posted Mar-26-2008 by "AndyBIue" (B)
I hope his heart gives out soon.
Posted Mar-26-2008 by "AndyBIue" (B)
Libtard propaganda at it's finest.
Combine truth, lies, opinion and conjecture and spin it for all it's worth.
Now.
Count the number of appearances by NYT reporters.
Now count the number of appearances by NYT reporters.
Now count the number of appearances by NYT reporters, pundits, and paid NYT "analysts" in that video.
When you count them, please also include a brief analysis on why resentful military leaders and politicians with an axe to grind might engage in a literary 69 with a NYT "reporter".
Now count the number of appearances by non-NYT reporters, pundits and UNPAID individuals with NO axe to grind.
Why is it that there is NO attempt to ask any news source (other than the NYT) what it going on over there?
Why is it that this "documentary" makes NO attempt to interview ANYONE who's judgment, morals or intelligence is thrown into question by the makers of this trash?
I'll tell you why.
Because if given even 10% of the time devoted to those who attack them, they would be able to defend and explain what REALLY went on.
Watch this video.
See who and what they use for sources.
Then ask yourself...Why are the ONLY sources they use people and and institutions with an axe to grind.....
This "documentary" uses the NYT for 90% of it's "news" stories. Don't believe me, just make your own count.
Is there ANY opportunity for response by non-biased media? Do they invite ANY refutation?
Of course not.
Dance, Lie and Spin!!!!
Posted Mar-26-2008 by "RabidMarsupial2" (R)
The most recent exposure of the NYT as the liars they are can be found here:
http://www.northstarwriters.com/dc159.htm
Posted Mar-26-2008 by "RabidMarsupial2" (R)
Combine truth, lies, opinion and conjecture and spin it for all it's worth.
Now.
Count the number of appearances by NYT reporters.
Now count the number of appearances by NYT reporters.
Now count the number of appearances by NYT reporters, pundits, and paid NYT "analysts" in that video.
When you count them, please also include a brief analysis on why resentful military leaders and politicians with an axe to grind might engage in a literary 69 with a NYT "reporter".
Now count the number of appearances by non-NYT reporters, pundits and UNPAID individuals with NO axe to grind.
Why is it that there is NO attempt to ask any news source (other than the NYT) what it going on over there?
Why is it that this "documentary" makes NO attempt to interview ANYONE who's judgment, morals or intelligence is thrown into question by the makers of this trash?
I'll tell you why.
Because if given even 10% of the time devoted to those who attack them, they would be able to defend and explain what REALLY went on.
Watch this video.
See who and what they use for sources.
Then ask yourself...Why are the ONLY sources they use people and and institutions with an axe to grind.....
This "documentary" uses the NYT for 90% of it's "news" stories. Don't believe me, just make your own count.
Is there ANY opportunity for response by non-biased media? Do they invite ANY refutation?
Of course not.
Dance, Lie and Spin!!!!
gee... you make them sound like Fox news... nope! You are just spreading Republiturd propaganda...
LOL
Posted Mar-26-2008 by "AndyBIue" (B)
Original comment.
Posted Mar-26-2008 by "piehunter" (R)
Seeing as this upsets the Bushbots so much I will be happy to upload it.
Posted Mar-26-2008 by "loweyes" (R)
What a crock of shit.
Liberals claim President Bush shouldn't have started this war. They complain about his prosecution of it. One liberal recently claimed Bush was the worst president in U.S. history.
Let's clear up one point: We didn't start the war on terror. Try to remember, it was started by terrorists BEFORE 9/11.
Let's look at the "worst" president and mismanagement claims.. and let's label all wars according to "FRONTLINE LOGIC"
WW2> FDR's war!
FDR led us into World War II. Germany never attacked us: Japan did. From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost, an average of 112,500 per year.
Korea> Truman's war!
Truman finished that war and started one in Korea, North Korea never attacked us. From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost, an average of 18,333 per year.
Vietnam> kennedy's war!
John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in 1962. Vietnam never attacked us. Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire. From 1965-1975, 58,000 lives were lost, an average of 5,800 per year.
Bosnia> Clinton's war!
Clinton went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent, Bosnia never attacked us. He was offered Osama bin Laden's head on a platter three times by Sudan and did nothing. Osama has attacked us on multiple occasions.
In the 6&1/2 years since terrorists attacked us, president bush has liberated two countries, crushed the taliban, crippled al-qaida, put nuclear inspectors in lybia, iran and north korea without firing a shot, and captured a terrorist who slaughtered at least 300,000 of his own people. We lost 4,000 soldiers; roughly the number of americans killed in drowning accidents in a year. Bush did all this abroad while not allowing another terrorist attack at home.
Worst president in history? Come on!
This isn't bushes war.. it's MY war!
Rediculous! This isnt YOUR war by any means. Just sit there in your comfy computer chair and let the teenagers get recruited to do what you cant.
Bush is indeed THE WORST PRESIDENT IN AMERICAN HISTORY!!!!!
Deal with the failures of your hero. Stop defending the indefensable as our Soldiers sit in the middle of a civil war.
4000 killed is more than those killed on 9-11 ... unbelievable how you ignore this.
No shots fired? a million dead and 4 million sitting in refugee camps? all because of your idiot hero Bush who is more than fine with dropping our Soldiers in Iraq and leaving them there till he is out of office.
Yup! Thats a complete Failure!!!
But you keep believing in your fantasy world. Are you by chance religious too?
LMAO AT THE LIBS and ANDYBLEW
Yeah, he's an idiot and idiots are funny in schadenfreude sort of way, but he is also a fool. And I mean a fool in the medieval sense of the word. That is, someone determined to remain deliberately obtuse despite repeated opportunities to redeem themselves. In the middle ages "fools" were considered dangerous. Nowadays, they are less so, unless you consider the ability to produce other fools a danger....
Andy just spouts out whatever spin sounds "good". He ignores the FACT that Saddam was a viscous murdering thug who built and used NBC weapons, violated EVERY SINGLE AGREEMENT that left him in power after first gulf war, tried to hide his WMD's and fully intended to go right back to making them once sanctions were lifted, had PROVEN TIES TO AL-QUAEDA, slaughtered his own people in wholesale lots, and on and on and on...
We've lost 4000 brave men and women during this war. They've lost their lives in an attempt to drag Iraq from a bestial & brutal Stalinist state into something the arab world has never known: 1 man, 1 vote....This may take 2 more years. It may take 20. Do you REALLY want to abandon a society brutalized first by Saddam and his thugs, then by Baathists who call themselves the "resistance", then by Shia fanatics, then by Al-Quada Sunni fanatics? Why is it that libtard "compassion" stops the INSTANT that the U.S. any sort of strategic or political interest in the country involved.
This idiot Andy hates the U.S. so much that he has the NERVE to state "a million dead". That is an outright lie. He knows it. I know it. Put up the study, Andy. I'll hand you the quote from it's AUTHOR acknowledging it's bullshit.
But yes. People have died. Men, women, kids..99% by the head chopping, suicide bombing, fanatical murderous scum who have been preaching and acting on their barbaric version of Islam for at LEAST the last undred years Remember...THESE are the people Andy wants us to hand Iraq over to. He doesn't give a DAMN about what would happen to the "Iraqi people", he doesn't give a DAMN whether Sunni fanatics start chopping the heads off men for wearing their beards too short. He doesn't give a DAMN if 10yr girls are sold as chattel and 15yr old girls are stoned to death as an "honor" killing.
Many Iraqis are, or have been, refugees. If some head chopping, suicide bombing, murderous scum came to my door and threatened to slit my four year old daughters throat if I went back to work at the local power station, I'd run like hell too. Many are coming home now voluntarily since the surge HAS been such a brilliant success. Some have simply run out of money and are coming home because they are broke. (Once again, the Islamic world, floating on an ocean of petrodollars, has shown SOOOooooo much concern for their brethren).
Bush has not, I will admit, done everything perfectly. What he DID do was to confront the inevitable. He inherited the looming disaster that Slick Willy dumped on him, and actually FACED it. Clinton was nothing more than a modern day Chamberlain, and we are STILL paying the price for his cowardice, stupidity, and political narcissism.
The ONLY thing that rescues Clinton from the title of "Worst President Ever" is that the economic policies of Reagan and Bush allowed that posturing buffoon to ride a wave of economic prosperity that he and his yapping little hilldog would NEVER allowed to take shape if they had had their way.
No, the title of "Worst President Ever" has to go to the man who created 17% interest rates. The man who created 19% unemployment. The man who watched the Russians stack up 700,000 troops on the Afghan border and then sold them half our grain crop at 60% of market value WITH THE REMAINING 40% PAID FOR BY THE U.S. TAXPAYER because he "wanted to encourage good relations" and they "promised" they weren't going to invade. He was SO "Shocked" when the Russians treated him like the stupid little ***** he is and invaded Afghanistan. Couldn't trust the Russians? Who would have EVER imagined?! Anyone and everyone other than a dipshit Georgia peanut farmer.....Duuhhhhhhhh......
And then of course there is Jimmy's BRILLIANT handling of the "Iran hostage crisis" although after 444 days the word "crisis" no longer fit. If he'd been re-elected it would have been a 1896 day "crisis". Once the U.S. military that he had worked so hard to gut failed in it's attempted rescue of the hostages, Jimmy just sat back, twiddled his thumbs, and said "Well Golly Gee whiz, Ahhm jist so-ah puzzl-ed..mebee ah shoulda jest lusted in mah haht tah git they-ahl reah-lee-ahsd.
Once Jimmy came to power every punk-ass wannabe Stalin in Central America, South America, the Caribbean, Africa, Asia and anywhere else on the damn planet pinned a red star on his forehead, raised his/her fist in the communist salute, shouted "power to the people" and came grinning to the Soviet Union for money, guns, and training..and got it..all secure in the sure and certain knowledge that Jimmy's response would be..."Well Golly Gee whiz, Ahhm jist so-ah puzzl-ed"
And now..
That stupid little peanut farmer...
Who's EVERY SINGLE political calculation was WRONG..
Who FED the Russian troops in Afghanistan...
Who was as completely and utterly clueless about the U.S. economy as he was about the world in general...
NOW this worthless puke has the NERVE to spout out his "opinion" on the arab/israili conflict.....
When this idiot went to Camp David with Sadat and Begin, all he had to do was STFU and let them work it out. By some MIRACLE he didn't **** it up. It's the ONLY thing he DIDN'T **** up during his entire presidency. But incredibly, amazingly, this fool has completely forgotten the FACT that hasn't got the political acumen that allah grants to even the lowliest of earthworms, and is now getting rave reviews from the same kind of head-chopping, suicide bombing savages that used to get their kicks by taking American hostages in Iran!!!!
It must be some sort of congenital idiocy. No way could any rational person be able to sustain such a delusional world view without a WHOLE lot of help from a damaged gene pool.
Congrats, Jimmy...
I'd always poo-poo-d any suggestion that the American people would vote for a vegetable. In a way, I was right. They just elected a man who's brain consisted largely of peanut DNA.
So Andy...
If you can trump the cowardly, bumbling disasters that were Jimmy and/or Willy by comparing them to George's hard fought attempts to rectify the mess Willy left him, go right ahead!
But so far, all I see are the usual libtard fantasies lies, and bullshit.
P.S. (imanagnostic...shhhhhh....donttellanyonetheyllkillmeyouknowhowtheyare!)
Posted Mar-26-2008 by "RabidMarsupial2" (R)
This was an excellent two-part series showing the crimes of Bush and co....to bad most Americans are too stupid to realize that they've been duped and robbed of 7 trillion dollars.
But then again, they elected this war criminal coward twice so they got what they deserved.
Posted Mar-26-2008 by "Phrank" (R)
What a crock of shit.
Liberals claim President Bush shouldn't have started this war. They complain about his prosecution of it. One liberal recently claimed Bush was the worst president in U.S. history.
Let's clear up one point: We didn't start the war on terror. Try to remember, it was started by terrorists BEFORE 9/11.
Let's look at the "worst" president and mismanagement claims.. and let's label all wars according to "FRONTLINE LOGIC"
WW2> FDR's war!
FDR led us into World War II. Germany never attacked us: Japan did. From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost, an average of 112,500 per year.
Korea> Truman's war!
Truman finished that war and started one in Korea, North Korea never attacked us. From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost, an average of 18,333 per year.
Vietnam> kennedy's war!
John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in 1962. Vietnam never attacked us. Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire. From 1965-1975, 58,000 lives were lost, an average of 5,800 per year.
Bosnia> Clinton's war!
Clinton went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent, Bosnia never attacked us. He was offered Osama bin Laden's head on a platter three times by Sudan and did nothing. Osama has attacked us on multiple occasions.
In the 6&1/2 years since terrorists attacked us, president bush has liberated two countries, crushed the taliban, crippled al-qaida, put nuclear inspectors in lybia, iran and north korea without firing a shot, and captured a terrorist who slaughtered at least 300,000 of his own people. We lost 4,000 soldiers; roughly the number of americans killed in drowning accidents in a year. Bush did all this abroad while not allowing another terrorist attack at home.
Worst president in history? Come on!
This isn't bushes war.. it's MY war!
What do you mean you didn't start this war? Ofcourse you did, 60 years of imperialist foreign policy, invading other countries, assasinations, meddling in the politics of other countries, activily armind Sadam against the Iranians, actively arming and training the Muhajadeen and supplying them with Stinger missiles during the Russian invasion of Afghanistan.
During that training, you also trained and equipeed a dude named Osama Bin Laden.
So, as sure as 9/11 is a tragedy and an incredibly criminal act against innocent people, when you piss off enough people continually around the world, someone will eventually bite you on the a$$.
So all this, they attacked us is just shite, you've been screwing people and countries all over the world for decades and then seen surprised when you get hit back.
And by the way, your little friend Osama Bin Laden is still running around the neighbourhood and you still haven't caught the little ba$tard!
Good work!
Iraq and Sadam had NOTHING TO DO with 9/11, got that?
Good.
Glad I could clear that up for you.
Posted Mar-26-2008 by "Phrank" (R)
What a crock of shit.
Liberals claim President Bush shouldn't have started this war. They complain about his prosecution of it. One liberal recently claimed Bush was the worst president in U.S. history.
Let's clear up one point: We didn't start the war on terror. Try to remember, it was started by terrorists BEFORE 9/11.
Let's look at the "worst" president and mismanagement claims.. and let's label all wars according to "FRONTLINE LOGIC"
WW2> FDR's war!
FDR led us into World War II. Germany never attacked us: Japan did. From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost, an average of 112,500 per year.
Korea> Truman's war!
Truman finished that war and started one in Korea, North Korea never attacked us. From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost, an average of 18,333 per year.
Vietnam> kennedy's war!
John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in 1962. Vietnam never attacked us. Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire. From 1965-1975, 58,000 lives were lost, an average of 5,800 per year.
Bosnia> Clinton's war!
Clinton went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent, Bosnia never attacked us. He was offered Osama bin Laden's head on a platter three times by Sudan and did nothing. Osama has attacked us on multiple occasions.
In the 6&1/2 years since terrorists attacked us, president bush has liberated two countries, crushed the taliban, crippled al-qaida, put nuclear inspectors in lybia, iran and north korea without firing a shot, and captured a terrorist who slaughtered at least 300,000 of his own people. We lost 4,000 soldiers; roughly the number of americans killed in drowning accidents in a year. Bush did all this abroad while not allowing another terrorist attack at home.
Worst president in history? Come on!
This isn't bushes war.. it's MY war!
Rediculous! This isnt YOUR war by any means. Just sit there in your comfy computer chair and let the teenagers get recruited to do what you cant.
Bush is indeed THE WORST PRESIDENT IN AMERICAN HISTORY!!!!!
Deal with the failures of your hero. Stop defending the indefensable as our Soldiers sit in the middle of a civil war.
4000 killed is more than those killed on 9-11 ... unbelievable how you ignore this.
No shots fired? a million dead and 4 million sitting in refugee camps? all because of your idiot hero Bush who is more than fine with dropping our Soldiers in Iraq and leaving them there till he is out of office.
Yup! Thats a complete Failure!!!
But you keep believing in your fantasy world. Are you by chance religious too?
LMAO AT THE LIBS and ANDYBLEW
Yeah, he's an idiot and idiots are funny in schadenfreude sort of way, but he is also a fool. And I mean a fool in the medieval sense of the word. That is, someone determined to remain deliberately obtuse despite repeated opportunities to redeem themselves. In the middle ages "fools" were considered dangerous. Nowadays, they are less so, unless you consider the ability to produce other fools a danger....
Andy just spouts out whatever spin sounds "good". He ignores the FACT that Saddam was a viscous murdering thug who built and used NBC weapons, violated EVERY SINGLE AGREEMENT that left him in power after first gulf war, tried to hide his WMD's and fully intended to go right back to making them once sanctions were lifted, had PROVEN TIES TO AL-QUAEDA, slaughtered his own people in wholesale lots, and on and on and on...
We've lost 4000 brave men and women during this war. They've lost their lives in an attempt to drag Iraq from a bestial & brutal Stalinist state into something the arab world has never known: 1 man, 1 vote....This may take 2 more years. It may take 20. Do you REALLY want to abandon a society brutalized first by Saddam and his thugs, then by Baathists who call themselves the "resistance", then by Shia fanatics, then by Al-Quada Sunni fanatics? Why is it that libtard "compassion" stops the INSTANT that the U.S. any sort of strategic or political interest in the country involved.
This idiot Andy hates the U.S. so much that he has the NERVE to state "a million dead". That is an outright lie. He knows it. I know it. Put up the study, Andy. I'll hand you the quote from it's AUTHOR acknowledging it's bullshit.
But yes. People have died. Men, women, kids..99% by the head chopping, suicide bombing, fanatical murderous scum who have been preaching and acting on their barbaric version of Islam for at LEAST the last undred years Remember...THESE are the people Andy wants us to hand Iraq over to. He doesn't give a DAMN about what would happen to the "Iraqi people", he doesn't give a DAMN whether Sunni fanatics start chopping the heads off men for wearing their beards too short. He doesn't give a DAMN if 10yr girls are sold as chattel and 15yr old girls are stoned to death as an "honor" killing.
Many Iraqis are, or have been, refugees. If some head chopping, suicide bombing, murderous scum came to my door and threatened to slit my four year old daughters throat if I went back to work at the local power station, I'd run like hell too. Many are coming home now voluntarily since the surge HAS been such a brilliant success. Some have simply run out of money and are coming home because they are broke. (Once again, the Islamic world, floating on an ocean of petrodollars, has shown SOOOooooo much concern for their brethren).
Bush has not, I will admit, done everything perfectly. What he DID do was to confront the inevitable. He inherited the looming disaster that Slick Willy dumped on him, and actually FACED it. Clinton was nothing more than a modern day Chamberlain, and we are STILL paying the price for his cowardice, stupidity, and political narcissism.
The ONLY thing that rescues Clinton from the title of "Worst President Ever" is that the economic policies of Reagan and Bush allowed that posturing buffoon to ride a wave of economic prosperity that he and his yapping little hilldog would NEVER allowed to take shape if they had had their way.
No, the title of "Worst President Ever" has to go to the man who created 17% interest rates. The man who created 19% unemployment. The man who watched the Russians stack up 700,000 troops on the Afghan border and then sold them half our grain crop at 60% of market value WITH THE REMAINING 40% PAID FOR BY THE U.S. TAXPAYER because he "wanted to encourage good relations" and they "promised" they weren't going to invade. He was SO "Shocked" when the Russians treated him like the stupid little ***** he is and invaded Afghanistan. Couldn't trust the Russians? Who would have EVER imagined?! Anyone and everyone other than a dipshit Georgia peanut farmer.....Duuhhhhhhhh......
And then of course there is Jimmy's BRILLIANT handling of the "Iran hostage crisis" although after 444 days the word "crisis" no longer fit. If he'd been re-elected it would have been a 1896 day "crisis". Once the U.S. military that he had worked so hard to gut failed in it's attempted rescue of the hostages, Jimmy just sat back, twiddled his thumbs, and said "Well Golly Gee whiz, Ahhm jist so-ah puzzl-ed..mebee ah shoulda jest lusted in mah haht tah git they-ahl reah-lee-ahsd.
Once Jimmy came to power every punk-ass wannabe Stalin in Central America, South America, the Caribbean, Africa, Asia and anywhere else on the damn planet pinned a red star on his forehead, raised his/her fist in the communist salute, shouted "power to the people" and came grinning to the Soviet Union for money, guns, and training..and got it..all secure in the sure and certain knowledge that Jimmy's response would be..."Well Golly Gee whiz, Ahhm jist so-ah puzzl-ed"
And now..
That stupid little peanut farmer...
Who's EVERY SINGLE political calculation was WRONG..
Who FED the Russian troops in Afghanistan...
Who was as completely and utterly clueless about the U.S. economy as he was about the world in general...
NOW this worthless puke has the NERVE to spout out his "opinion" on the arab/israili conflict.....
When this idiot went to Camp David with Sadat and Begin, all he had to do was STFU and let them work it out. By some MIRACLE he didn't **** it up. It's the ONLY thing he DIDN'T **** up during his entire presidency. But incredibly, amazingly, this fool has completely forgotten the FACT that hasn't got the political acumen that allah grants to even the lowliest of earthworms, and is now getting rave reviews from the same kind of head-chopping, suicide bombing savages that used to get their kicks by taking American hostages in Iran!!!!
It must be some sort of congenital idiocy. No way could any rational person be able to sustain such a delusional world view without a WHOLE lot of help from a damaged gene pool.
Congrats, Jimmy...
I'd always poo-poo-d any suggestion that the American people would vote for a vegetable. In a way, I was right. They just elected a man who's brain consisted largely of peanut DNA.
So Andy...
If you can trump the cowardly, bumbling disasters that were Jimmy and/or Willy by comparing them to George's hard fought attempts to rectify the mess Willy left him, go right ahead!
But so far, all I see are the usual libtard fantasies lies, and bullshit.
P.S. (imanagnostic...shhhhhh....donttellanyonetheyllkillmeyouknowhowtheyare!)
Oh yes, i almost forgot about ole jimmy, and his hand wringing for nearly a year @ a half, while over 50 hostages suffered head chopping terror, by the minute.
A particular brand of terror only found in the islamic hub of the middle east, and muslim controlled satellite holdings throughout the world.
Carter bugled several, desperate, ill conceived, last minute, "operation" attempts at rescue.. when he should have had the balls to step up to khomeini's doorstep under banner of war. Iran's slogan at the time was: "America can't do a damn thing." Jimmy proved them right... as holder of the worst president in history award.
Carter's milquetoast foreign affairs policies are a major reason we are at war today. Liberals have no clue as to the underlying danger in the world stage.. and how many would~be bullies are vying for dominance of any particular region.(islam lays claim to the entire world)
.. as per your coded message, RM2, you don't have to worry about me.. i only go for the throats of rabid, preachy, atheists... and those who love them.
LoL
.
Posted Mar-26-2008 by "SgtRockOfEasyCo" (R)