Safe Mode: On
Feds: Fire took down building next to twin towers - WTC7

GAITHERSBURG, Md. - Federal investigators said Thursday they have solved a mystery of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks: the collapse of World Trade Center building 7, a source of long-running conspiracy theories.

The 47-story trapezoid-shaped building sat north of the World Trade Center towers, across Vesey Street in lower Manhattan in New York. On Sept. 11, it was set on fire by falling debris from the burning towers, but skeptics long have argued that fire and debris alone should not have brought down such a big steel-and-concrete structure.

Scientists with the National Institute of Standards and Technology say their three-year investigation of the collapse determined the demise of WTC 7 was actually the first time in the world a fire caused the total failure of a modern skyscraper.

"The reason for the collapse of World Trade Center 7 is no longer a mystery," said Dr. Shyam Sunder, the lead investigator on the NIST team.

Investigators also concluded that the collapse of the nearby towers broke the city water main, leaving the sprinkler system in the bottom half of the building without water.

The building has been the subject of a wide range of conspiracy theories for the last seven years, partly because the collapse occurred about seven hours after the twin towers came down. That fueled suspicion that someone intentionally blew up the building in a controlled demolition.

Critics like Mike Berger of the group 9/11 Truth said he wasn't buying the government's explanation.

"Their explanation simply isn't sufficient. We're being lied to," he said, arguing that there is other evidence suggesting explosives were used on the building.

Sunder said his team investigated the possibility that an explosion inside the building brought it down, but found there was no large boom or other noise that would have occurred with such a detonation. Investigators also created a giant computer model of the collapse, based partly on news footage from CBS News, that they say shows that internal column failure brought down the building.

Investigators also ruled out the possibility that the collapse was caused by fires from a substantial amount of diesel fuel that was stored in the building, most of it for generators for the city's emergency operations command center.

The 77-page report concluded that the fatal blow to the building came when the 13th floor collapsed, weakening a critical steel support column that led to catastrophic failure.

"When this critical column buckled due to lack of floor supports, it was the first domino in the chain," said Sunder.

The NIST investigators issued more than a dozen building recommendations as a result of their inquiry, most of which repeat earlier recommendations from their investigation into the collapse of the two large towers.

In both instances, investigators concluded that extreme heat caused some steel beams to lose strength, causing further failures throughout the buildings until the entire structure succumbed.

The recommendations include building skyscrapers with stronger connections and framing systems to resist the effects of thermal expansion, and structural systems designed to prevent damage to one part of a building from spreading to other parts.

No one was killed in the collapse of building 7 because it had been fully evacuated. A new, slightly taller World Trade Center 7 opened in 2006.

A spokesman for the leaseholder of the World Trade Center, developer Larry Silverstein, praised the government's work.

"Hopefully this thorough report puts to rest the various 9/11 conspiracy theories, which dishonor the men and women who lost their lives on that terrible day," said Silverstein spokesman Dara McQuillan.

In discussing the findings, the investigator Sunder acknowledged that some may still not be convinced, but insisted the science behind their findings is "incredibly conclusive."

"The public should really recognize the science is really behind what we have said," he said, adding: "The obvious stares you in the face."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080821/ap_on_go_ot/attacks_collapse


Click to view image: '216792-wtc7.jpg'

Added: Aug-22-2008 
By: Dat1111
In:
News
Tags: 911, WTC7, explained, conspiracy debunked, scientific basis, Fire, structural damage, collapse, truth movement, debunked, Alqaeda, Operation iraqi freedom, war on terror
Marked as: approved
Views: 10016 | Comments: 73 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 1 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 1 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • Comment of user 'japaneseDREAM' has been deleted by moderator!
  • Hemp is an herb , Bush is a dope .

    Posted Aug-22-2008 By 

    (3)

  • So wait, if "Scientists with the National Institute of Standards and Technology say their three-year investigation of the collapse determined the demise of WTC 7 was actually the first time in the world a fire caused the total failure of a modern skyscraper." then i guess that means the first two collapses weren't due to fire? Can you say, epic fuckup?

    Posted Aug-22-2008 By 

    (2)

    • Comment of user 'johndinfidel' has been deleted by moderator!
    • good call

      Posted Aug-22-2008 By 

      (0)

    • I think that's semantics. Or bad writing on the part of a scientist/engineer. I don't think the official cause of the WTC buildings collapse is listed as "fire" but a littiny of items.

      Remove tin-foil hat in 3, 2, 1...

      Posted Aug-22-2008 By 

      (-3)

    • WTC 7 wasn't hit.

      Posted Aug-22-2008 By 

      (0)

    • Comment of user 'johndinfidel' has been deleted by moderator!
  • Comment of user 'SpacePatrolDelta' has been deleted by author!
  • Fire eh?

    The whole structure perfectly collapsed -with a perfect wig and perfectly flattened. Looking at the vid of #7 collapsing, I have a hard time understanding that conclusion. Odd.

    Posted Aug-22-2008 By 

    (2)

    • We the sheep believe them. The media and the gov tell us nothing but the truth. LMFAO, right! What a fucken joke. All 3 buildings were controlled demo.

      Posted Aug-22-2008 By 

      (2)

  • The final scientific conclusion: The dog ate my WTC 7.

    Posted Aug-22-2008 By 

    (2)

  • Yep, you can certainly say "Major cockup"

    Although it was really obvious in the first place, anyone who still thinks that Muslims did this is a bucktooth hillbilly

    Not all republicans breed with their sisters, but all incest is committed by republicans LMAO

    Posted Aug-22-2008 By 

    (2)

  • Look around at all the shit being "solved" and "taken care of" just as the reign of the most heinous and dishonest presidential administration in the history of the United States is, thankfully, drawing to a conclusion.

    Posted Aug-22-2008 By 

    (1)

  • I'll wait for DAVID RAY GRIFFIN to read over the 77 page report....

    Nothing in the NEWS... even fox news....

    very strange... you have to search the fox website to get the little article..... why not the big fanfare that this GREAT ACIEVEMENT should require...

    LOL

    CHECH OUT THIS PIECE....

    WTC7 beams vaporized...? NYTIMES 11/2001

    http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E02E3DE143DF93AA15752C1A9679C8B63&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all

    Posted Aug-22-2008 By 

    (1)

  • why you idiots honestly believe the government has your best interests at heart is beyond me

    Posted Aug-22-2008 By 

    (1)

  • Comment of user 'smigg2' has been deleted by moderator!
  • Too late for posting, 2 wars are made because of this.

    Posted Aug-22-2008 By 

    (0)

  • 8 years to figure that out ?

    Posted Aug-22-2008 By 

    (0)

  • Is there any footage of this building falling ?

    Posted Aug-22-2008 By 

    (0)

  • amerikunz like killing people

    Posted Aug-22-2008 By 

    (0)