Safe Mode: On
US Navy moves to let women serve on submarines

The US Navy has cited cramped quarters as a reason for barring women

The US defence department has decided to allow women to serve aboard submarines, according to officials.

Defence Secretary Robert Gates has approved the recommendation and sent letters to Congress informing them of the plan.
Congress now has 30 days to approve the measure.

The move comes as the US Army's chief of staff said it was time to revisit rules restricting women in combat roles.
Women are still barred from traditional frontline roles in the armed forces.

General George Casey told Congress on Tuesday that he supports a reconsideration of the role of women in combat.
"I believe it's time that we take a look at what women are actually doing in Iraq and Afghanistan. And then we look at our policies," he said.

Separate quarters

Fifteen per cent of the US Navy personnel are female, and women have worked alongside men on surface ships and aircraft since 1993.
It was thought the very cramped conditions in submarines precluded both sexes working together.

It is expected it will take a year before the first women can be trained for American submarine duties.
The vessels will also need to be modified to give men and women separate quarters.


Click to view image: '4daa9268cded-2n1tdmt.jpg'

Added: Feb-24-2010 Occurred On: Feb-24-2010
By: gregory_peckory
In:
Iraq, Afghanistan, News
Tags: submarines, women, US Navy, separate quarters,
Location: Washington, District of Columbia, United States (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 6881 | Comments: 37 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 1 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • "What's long, hard, and full of seapersons..."

    This has gone too far! I guess he wasn't content with fking up the country and our military... now he's fking up our jokes too!

    Posted Feb-24-2010 By 

    (8)

  • Bad idea.

    The forces of political correctness win another one at the expense of our military.

    Posted Feb-24-2010 By 

    (6)

    • Comment of user 'willy_lump' has been deleted by author!
    • Valid reasons. Got any?

      Posted Feb-24-2010 By 

      (1)

    • Yep. Tell you what man, my current girlfriend was a Marine, and she's not one to fuk around with. I doubt she'd have had any trouble on a sub if she had joined up for sub service instead of the MEN's department of the Navy:P

      Posted Feb-24-2010 By 

      (1)

    • Yeah. Mamma's boy. Probably pees sitting down.

      Posted Feb-24-2010 By 

      (-3)

    • Hah! Hey now, it's easier to pee sittin down when I'm pinching a loaf. Damn fen, you're always so b!tchy. I think you'd be so much happier in life if you'd just come out of the damn closet. We all know you're gayer than cum in a mustache anyway. Go with it bro!

      Posted Feb-24-2010 By 

      (3)

  • Another retarded idea from the Left. Women should not be allowed in combat. They're a huge distraction (like gays) and should not be allowed. Trading military effectiveness to appease limousine liberals and feminazis is dumb.

    Posted Feb-24-2010 By 

    (6)

    • A huge distraction, huh? So women and gays are too much for our military to deal with? Do you think they're not intelligent enough or well trained enough to deal with them? When you served (I assume you served because you're always so passionate about these issues), did your homophobia and sexist disposition keep you from performing your duties as a soldier?

      New Zealand, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Norway, Israel, Switzerland and I believe the UK (in limited combat roles) all al More..

      Posted Feb-24-2010 By 

      (1)

  • Here comes the Dyke Fleet

    Posted Feb-24-2010 By 

    (5)

  • Well there goes the concept of silent running, try getting a woman to shut up for any length of time. Jokes ladies...

    Posted Feb-24-2010 By 

    (4)

  • Comment of user 'gregory_peckory' has been deleted by author!
  • Better pass out double doses of birth control or some of those women will be coming back from tours pregnant.

    Posted Feb-24-2010 By 

    (3)

  • Maybe its the end of the world. In nuclear war they will be the only ones left to repopulate the world. I don't know, just a thought :)

    Posted Feb-24-2010 By 

    (3)

  • Male hormones and female hormones, trapped away for 6 mo.s has nothing to do with women not being capable, humans lust for each other its biological - at lease surface ships make stops in ports weeks at sea.., as far as libs or whoever the final decision is up to the military so BOOO HOOO demo bashers..

    Posted Feb-24-2010 By 

    (3)

  • 6 months isolation at a time? thats gonna make breaking up real hard. Hope they get issued rubbers, they gon' need em.

    Posted Feb-24-2010 By 

    (3)

  • Oh boy...Submarine races.

    Posted Feb-24-2010 By 

    (2)

  • Comment of user 'SacredVow' has been deleted by author!
  • Comment of user 'Minime0Yeah' has been deleted by moderator!
  • The biggest obstacle to this idea has always been and will always be the wives of those men going on station.

    Posted Feb-24-2010 By 

    (1)

  • Semen for the new seamen.

    Posted Feb-24-2010 By 

    (0)