The International Security Assistance Force confirmed that its helicopters clashed with the al Qaeda-linked Haqqani Network near the Pakistani border, but would not confirm the aircraft crossed into Pakistan to conduct attacks.
Ten Haqqani Network fighters fighters were killed during a clash this morning along the border between Afghanistan and Pakistan, a US military official told The Long War Journal, but current reports indicate the helicopters did cross into Pakistan to engage Taliban fighters. The military official said that ISAF is still gathering information on the clash.
The fighting took place near Combat Outpost Narizah, an Afghan base just eight miles from the Pakistani border in Khost province, the official said. Khost is a stronghold of the Haqqani Network, an Afghan Taliban subgroup based in North Waziristan, Pakistan.
The statement played down reports from earlier today that indicated US helicopters killed five insurgents as they fled into Pakistan's tribal agency of Kurram, which borders Khost. In another report, a Pakistani security official claimed that US helicopters crossed the border and struck a local checkpoint manned by members of "noble tribal families."
Combat Outpost Narizah was the scene of two major clashes over the weekend that resulted in US helicopters pursuing Haqqani Network fighters into Pakistan's Taliban-controlled tribal agency of North Waziristan. Initial reports indicated that more than 30 Haqqani Network fighters were killed in the two cross-border engagements, but later reports state than between 50 to 60 may have been killed.
Pakistan objects to weekend's cross-border raids from Afghanistan
ISAF has maintained that it legitimately attacked Taliban forces as part of an existing policy of hot pursuit of fighters.
US forces pursued the Taliban into Pakistan "after following the proper rules of engagement under inherent right of self defense," Master Sergeant Matthew Summers, an ISAF spokesman, told The Long War Journal on Sept. 26.
But a spokesman at Pakistan's Foreign Office rejected reports that such an agreement between ISAF and Pakistan exists, and said the incursions are a violation ISAF's mandate.
“These incidents are a clear violation and breach of the UN mandate under which ISAF operates,” spokesman Abdul Basit said in a statement released by the Foreign Office, according to AFP.
“There are no agreed 'hot pursuit' rules," Basit continued. "Any impression to the contrary is not factually correct. Such violations are unacceptable. In the absence of immediate corrective measures, Pakistan will be constrained to consider response options."
Background on agreement on cross-border activities between ISAF and Pakistan
Although the Pakistani Foreign Office denied the existence of any agreement that permits ISAF forces to enter Pakistan while in hot pursuit of Taliban fighters, the details of such an agreement have been known for years. In August 2007, The Associated Press released the text of the agreement.
The agreement between ISAF and Pakistan stipulated the following: US forces must be engaged with the Taliban or al Qaeda as they cross into Pakistan; US forces should not penetrate more than six miles into Pakistani territory; and US forces may enter Pakistan if they have identified the location of Osama bin Laden, Ayman al Zawahri, or Mullah Omar.
The US has pursued Taliban fighters across the border multiple times. Two of the most high-profile incidents occurred in 2008. The first took place in June 2008, when US troops pursued a Taliban force from Kunar into Pakistan's tribal agency of Mohmand, and killed 11 fighters. The Pakistani government claimed that the US killed Frontier Corps troops, but the US released video of the incident showing the Taliban being targeted as they fled from Kunar into Mohmand. Pakistan's paramilitary Frontier Corps is known to support the Taliban in Afghanistan.
The second incident took place in Khyber in November 2008, when US forces launched rocket attacks and ground strikes into the Tirah Valley, a known haven for al Qaeda, the Taliban, and the Lashkar-e-Islam. Seven people were reported killed and three were wounded in the strikes.
The US also launches covert airstrikes using unmanned Predators and Reapers against al Qaeda and the Taliban in Pakistan's tribal areas. The Pakistani government officially protests the covert strikes but quietly approves. Three such strikes have been launched inside Pakistan over the past three days; all have taken place in North Waziristan.
Click to view image: 'c156736b41bc-ah64d_isaf.jpg'
By: jumpingforJoy
In: Afghanistan, Middle East
Tags: ISAF, helos, engage, Haqqani, Network, fighters, on, the, Pakistani, border
Marked as: approved
Views: 11301 | Comments: 21 | Votes: 1 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
Advertisement below
|
|
| Liveleak on Facebook | |
|
LIKE Liveleak.com |
-
Technology Battle Well Underway on the US Border with Mexico.
-
The Internet Declares War On The Church Of Scientology.
-
For The Soldiers On The Ground
-
Anderson Cooper on the War on the Mexican Border
-
Flying Baby Bites Australian Man on the Ass
-
President Calderon’s Eyes On The Wrong Border?
-
Hidden Cameras on the Arizona Border: Drugs, Guns and 850 Illegal Aliens
-
Israel Is Spying In And On The U.S
-
Coldstream Guards on the Afghan frontline
-
Hidden Cameras on the Arizona Border: Coyotes, Bears, and Trails
-
Afghanistan: Large Group of Haqqani Network Fighters Attempt to Storm U.S. Combat Outpost in Khost, American Soldiers Promptly Cut Them to Shreds…





They "clashed", in other words the helicopters swooped in and stomped them unmercifully and then left.
Posted Sep-28-2010 ByST0N3PONY (5011.42) 
ST0N3PONY View Channel Send Message
(2)
hmmm very interesting comment.... NOT
Posted Sep-27-2010 Bypneal (596.92) pneal View Channel Send Message
(1)
NATO did similar misadventure during 2008 , 5 days after similar event US forces were attacked by Pakistani border patrol personals and later issue was settled by declaring cross fire as flares . ISI / Army will take revenge for sure ..
Posted Sep-27-2010 Bylife4pakistan (1094.98) life4pakistan View Channel Send Message
(0)
looks like them anti-aircraft guns werent working too well then. What did you take the money America has been giving you guys for aid and upgrade your weapons system.
Posted Sep-28-2010 Bybarogers619 (1089.46) barogers619 View Channel Send Message
(0)
The two female gunners from the VVipers add to their death count....silly Taliban....you're being shaheed by women!!
Posted Sep-28-2010 ByLoPull (506.62) 
LoPull View Channel Send Message
(0)
Finally ! Maybe the U.S. has given up on trying to cajole the Pakistani government into controlling their border areas. I hope we see more and more of this.
Posted Sep-27-2010 Bymarinemom (5356.28) 
marinemom View Channel Send Message
(-1)
next time send some c130 transport aircrafts too to pickup the ashes of your helis , nuking your gay ass army isnt a tough task for our army ...
Posted Sep-27-2010 Bylife4pakistan (1094.98) life4pakistan View Channel Send Message
(0)
We'll send some c130s...c130 spectre gunships!
Posted Sep-27-2010 Bydeltaboy2006 (66.72) 
deltaboy2006 View Channel Send Message
(0)
hahaha we have enough anti-aircraft guns to shoot tiny fuckers down ..
Posted Sep-27-2010 Bylife4pakistan (1094.98) life4pakistan View Channel Send Message
(2)
nevermind
Posted Sep-27-2010 ByjumpingforJoy (3896.96) jumpingforJoy Send Message
(-1)
drop a couple nukes while were over there
Posted Sep-27-2010 Bynatej740 (19200.50) natej740 View Channel Send Message
(-2)
Who is "we"? I doubt the good people of Brazil have "their" back. Feel free to head over there and help out the Haqqani fighters... I am sure they need their ranks refilled after that cross-border strike :-)
Posted Sep-28-2010 ByLaRondelle (253.52) LaRondelle View Channel Send Message
(3)
Send us to hell? You're going to try and force us to live in the middle east?
Posted Sep-28-2010 ByST0N3PONY (5011.42) 
ST0N3PONY View Channel Send Message
(3)
Lol good one.
If ISAF upsets retarded cocksuckers like our friend from Brazil they are obviously doing something right. :D
Posted Sep-28-2010 Byaidem (73.44) aidem View Channel Send Message
(1)
it isnt about who allows what. it is about what the United States wants to do. Who is going to make this broader war and who is there enemy? And yes it is to benefit one side, the side that wants to live as freely as possible. Nuclear!! hahaha. Sure if the country that nukes any US citizen wants to be destroyed then they will drop it. The only problem is you have to find a country with a nuke that has nothing left to look forward to but death. Unfortunately that counts out Brazil since they dont More..
Posted Sep-28-2010 Bybarogers619 (1089.46) barogers619 View Channel Send Message
(-2)