Safe Mode: On
Flight 93 Eyewitness Says No 757 Crashed in Shanksville

Susan McIlwain was an eyewitness to the crash in Shanksville, PA on 9/11, and she did NOT see a Boeing 757. She describes a small white plane, not a large jet airliner. The FBI tried to change her story, and told her that there was a white Leer Jet in the area taking pictures. The question is asked, Can the public stand the truth?

Loading the player ...
Embed Code
Plays: 453 (Embed: 0)

Added: Oct-10-2012 Occurred On: Sep-11-2012
By: kingloui
In:
Conspiracy
Tags: 9/11
Location: Shanksville, Pennsylvania, United States (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 935 | Comments: 36 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • Whether or not it got shot down is irrelevant. There are some things the public can't handle, therefore we should not be made aware of. The plane was going for the White House. If the passengers didn't take it down, it sure as fuck would have been shot down. Sucks for those on board and their families, but it is the truth. Something that most of you can't handle.

    Posted Oct-10-2012 By 

    (2)

    • @BadViralz you wouldnt happen to have a real copy of the passenger list hanging around would you?

      Posted Oct-10-2012 By 

      (-2)

    • @BadViralz It just didnt crash.... if it got shot down it would have been seen in the air exploding... and debris would be scattered for miles instead of there being NONE and some kind of impact crater..

      Posted Oct-10-2012 By 

      (0)

  • So the govt. sends an easily visible plane flying low for all to see to shoot down an airline? Hmmm....

    Posted Oct-10-2012 By 

    (1)

  • That was a pretty large debris field for it to have been a small aircraft. You suppose it just happened to be carrying jet engines as cargo? There are questions surrounding what happened to flight 93, but to say it was a small aircraft isn't borne up through just a minimal effort of investigation.

    Posted Oct-10-2012 By 

    (1)

  • Everytime someone posts one of these 911 conspiracy videos the ignorant factor of Liveleak goes up 2 steps. Stop posting this trash, it takes an ignorant mf to believe this chit.

    Posted Oct-10-2012 By 

    (1)

  • Duh if you don't know that 9/11 stinks from outer space your nose doesn't work.

    Posted Oct-10-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Really?

    Posted Oct-10-2012 By 

    (0)

  • can you turn that bullshit music down.... FUCK YOU!

    Posted Oct-10-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Is she insulting the dead people from 9-11 by telling the truth?

    Posted Oct-10-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Damn!

    I forgot my tinfoil hat.

    Posted Oct-10-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Kingloui, how many more 9/11 vids are you going to post?

    Apart from the fact that all the technical issues 9/11 theorist have brought up have all been debunked. Just thinking logical should make it clear that a conspiracy on a scale this large is impossible. All the people that have died during the attack on 9/11, if they were all fake how come no family members from people who's names and picture have been used have every come forward to say something is wrong. You telling me 10,000 and proba More..

    Posted Oct-10-2012 By 

    (0)

  • More from the conspiracy idiots.

    Posted Oct-10-2012 By 

    (0)

  • She's out of her mind and there is no confirmation to support her claims. There are actually more anomalies "against" her claims that anything else. There has been no talk of reopening any investigation involving United Flight 93 or of investigating any of the so called claims from Susan McIlwain.

    Posted Dec-31-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Damn, you're a one trick spam conspiracy nut.

    Feel free to fuck off right over to youtube.

    Posted Oct-10-2012 By 

    (-1)

    • @WingSP117 Truth doesn't fear nor run from debate, yet there are those who absolutely REFUSE to debate this. First, they claimed it was too early to talk about it, then, like a goddamn switch, they suddenly started saying jee, get over it already. Still no rational discussion among government representatives, not those who created (fabricated) the report.

      Posted Oct-10-2012 By 

      (-1)

    • @Steve15425 What the fuck are you talking about? Not surprised a conspiracy nut would have a 425lb pedophile as his avatar.

      Posted Oct-10-2012 By 

      (2)

    • @WingSP117 Dont you have to admit there are a striking string of inconsistencies?

      Posted Oct-10-2012 By 

      (-1)

    • @WingSP117 lmao :) Nice try pal.

      The discussion WILL continue.

      Posted Oct-10-2012 By 

      (-3)

    • @tymoss Yeah, after 11 years people still post new conspiracies on the same subject changing stories and editing witness accounts to fit their own agenda.

      Truthers aren't a new breed of nut, but they're still as arrogant as ever.

      Posted Oct-10-2012 By 

      (1)

  • I've called for a new investigation but so far, my demands have been ignored. Why? People would rather investigate who Clinton is sucking off, but refuse to investigate the world's worst terrorist tragedy?

    Posted Oct-10-2012 By 

    (-1)

  • Yeah some dumb soccer mom knows whats up about passenger jets right?

    Let's go ask the families of those who died on the plane if their dead loved ones were part of a giant conspiracy. Then tell them that all those phone call from the plane its self were fabricated.

    Grow up fucktards.

    Posted Oct-10-2012 By 

    (-1)