Josh Mittledorf – Op Ed News August 5, 2008
The standard way to demolish a steel-framed building is to apply cutter charges to the supporting beams. The cutter charges consist of finely-powdered aluminum mixed with iron oxide, with added sulfur. This mixture contains both fuel and oxidant – it needs no air – and it burns hot enough to melt steel. The trade name for this product is “Thermate.”
Girder from the WTC, note the neat diagonal cut
There is a science to placing the charges in such a way that the building falls inward. It requires a great deal of expertise to keep a tall building from toppling over sideways.
Many scientists and engineers have looked at the way the WTC towers fell and remarked that it had the appearance of controlled demolition. The buildings collapsed symmetrically, and fell straight down. The speed of the fall indicated that the buildings were collapsing unimpeded. They must have had the “legs” simultaneously pulled out from under them, because a layered collapse from the top down would have taken several minutes, whereas the observed collapse took place in less than 20 seconds.
Another anomaly in the WTC collapse was the violent explosions. Firemen reported earthshaking blasts from the basement before collapse, and the impact areas in the upper floors of the buildings exploded just at the onset of collapse. Jet fuel burns but cannot explode.
In an article published this week in the journal Environmentalist, chemical engineer Kevin Ryan collects evidence from EPA documents that suggest there was both Thermate and high-explosives in the debris from the WTC collapse. Ryan was formerly employed by Environmental Health Labs, a division of Underwriters Labs, before he was fired for raising these and other questions.
Fires at the WTC site persisted for weeks after 9/11, despite firefighters’ use of water and chemical extinguishers to smother the flames. This suggests that it was a fuel-oxidant mixture that was burning. Pools of red-hot molten iron could not have been caused by burning jet fuel or building materials, because these burn at a much lower temperature than steel melts.
Ryan’s evidence consists in traces of 1,3-diphenylpropane as well as sulfur and particulate matter, reported by the EPA to have appeared in spikes continuing as late as March, 2002. Ryan believes that these came from brief, intense fires ignited by the molten steel when it came in contact with yet-unburned plastic building materials during the clean-up process.
Josh Mitteldorf was educated to be an astrophysicist, and has branched out from there to mathematical modeling in a variety of areas. He has taught mathematics, statistics, and physics at several universities. He is an avid amateur pianist, and father of two adopted Chinese girls. This year, his affiliation is with the University of Arizona, where he studies the evolution of aging.
More neatly cut girders in the ruins of the WTC.

Click to view image: '209738-wtc_ruined_cut_girder.jpg'

Click to view image: '209738-wtc_ruins_diagonal_cut.jpg'
Advertisement below
|
|
| Liveleak on Facebook | |
|
LIKE Liveleak.com |
-
Kid Loses Half of his Brain in Shooting
-
Emergency Official Witnessed Dead Bodies In WTC 7
-
60lbs of High Explosives
-
Sex Crimes and the Vatican - Part 1 of 2 (banned in Italy)
-
Picture of iraqi man in 1925 in Al Anbar
-
UK Change Of Direction from usa to europe & said the prsent of usa troops in middle east making it
-
Breaking shipping bands on some high explosives rounds
-
Sex Crimes and the Vatican - Part 2 of 2 (banned in Italy)
-
Iraqi police show video of teenage girl in suicide vest
-
Reports of Hutaree militia in Utah appear overblown
-
Crazy man breaks door of the car in carwash



Bingo!!!
Posted Aug-5-2008 ByAmerikai (237.88) 
Amerikai View Channel Send Message
(-1)
If any of you Tina's used a cutting torch you would know that the torch blows the melted steel away from the cut and not puddle on the cut like this. One second thought, please stay away from welding equipment, you might light your tampons on fire.
Posted Aug-5-2008 Bybuttkracken (659.18) buttkracken View Channel Send Message
(2)
i dont give a fuck what your beliefs are, you have to admit this seems odd. how in the hell in the mass of twisted and burning debris can you have multiple perfectly straighht cuts, defies logic. I am also tired of this shit but the more you read the mor eit DOESNT make sense.
Posted Aug-5-2008 ByOil4Freedom (10.16) Oil4Freedom View Channel Send Message
(1)
Angular cuts were made by demolition steel workers during cleanup. See picture:
%UF_5893d69%
Posted Aug-5-2008 ByCriticalThinker (3951.02)

CriticalThinker View Channel Send Message
(1)
Easy. It was done after as part of cleanup. They had to cut up big pieces into smaller pieces to they could remove the debris.
People who believe otherwise are delusional or fail to check out facts.
There is no evidence of thermite or thermate.
There were not pools of molten iron.
Posted Aug-5-2008 ByMongoMaxamillion (60.46) MongoMaxamillion View Channel Send Message
(-1)
I'm going to have to call bullshit on that one. While I believe that 9/11 was an organized "inside job", you are correct in saying that these pictures were taken after beams had been cut during the removal of the wreckage.
This is where your correctness ends. There ARE videos of the construction foreman at ground zero telling a reporter that the guy driving the backhoe cannot dig any deeper due to red hot molten metal in the debris pile.
Don't say there isn't any thermite or the More..
Posted Aug-6-2008 Bymorgnthehated (15.42) 
morgnthehated View Channel Send Message
(0)
There were hot spots in the debri, but no pools of molten metal like truthers would have you believe. The pictures truthers show that they say indicate large pools of molten metal were debunked as nothing but lights shining down a hole.
I do not need a chemistry degree to analyze that the data truthers show proving thermate is weak. All the compounds they say show indications of thermate are all compounds used in the contruction of the building. The proportions are all wrong for thermate, and More..
Posted Aug-6-2008 ByMongoMaxamillion (60.46) MongoMaxamillion View Channel Send Message
(-1)
I'm sorry if it sounded like the cleanup crews knew thermate was there, not what I had intended as I was reffering to the pools of molten metal that I have seen in several different sources, one the mentioned video and two a sattelite photo taken over the area.
If you have information that this is incorrect, I'd like to know the source of it so I can confirm it on my own. So my question to you sir is where did you get the information that NO pools of molten metal were found? That is contrary More..
Posted Aug-6-2008 Bymorgnthehated (15.42) 
morgnthehated View Channel Send Message
(0)
Amen to the cutting of the beams after the collapse. If you enlarge the photo you can plainly see the the ridges made in the steel by a cutting torch or plasma cutter. anyone who has ever cut steel in this manner can easilly see that but Im sure the disbelievers will have a theory on that as well. Have this idiots ever seen what it takes to actually drop a building even as small as 10 stories.The entire interior must be removed such as non load bearing walls and the amount of explosives needed t More..
Posted Aug-5-2008 By1966feb24 (30.32) 1966feb24 View Channel Send Message
(1)
Which part of 'END OF DEBATE' did you not understand
END
Part of Speech: noun
Definition: A concluding or terminating.
Synonyms: cease, cessation, close, closing, closure, completion, conclusion, consummation, ending, end of the line, finish, period, stop, stopping point, termination, terminus, wind-up, wrap-up
DEBATE
Part of Speech: noun
Synonyms: argument, argumentation, controversy, dialectic, discussion, disputation, dispute, dissension, forensic, forensics, moot, moot court More..
Posted Aug-6-2008 By24038462 (2048.94) 
24038462 View Channel Send Message
(0)
P.S. One more thing to lower the chances of terrorist attacks...
No more US support of Israel!
Posted Aug-10-2008 Bymorgnthehated (15.42) 
morgnthehated View Channel Send Message
(0)
Thermite is fun to put on car hoods.
Posted Aug-5-2008 ByRemi7777 (57.74) Remi7777 View Channel Send Message
(0)
i was there you fuckin morons no one blew it up it just burned. thre was so much burning fuel that rained down i even saw one of the jet engine on the street that had hit a woman. fire balls flew in all direction hundreds of feet. sorry to all you lovers of bullshit that wished the government had anything to do with it. it just got hot from burning jet fuel.
hey, i know, why dont you cry about how they lied about the air quality and allowed us to work down at ground zero with out our respirato More..
Posted Aug-22-2008 Byspikedaddy (10.30) spikedaddy View Channel Send Message
(0)
these photo's clearly show thermal expansion ...just ask the NIST...hehe
Posted Nov-23-2008 Bygobolopski (35.62) 
gobolopski View Channel Send Message
(0)
i think they use I beams for support in most any building with steel framing... and that looks like square tube
Posted Aug-5-2008 ByShaggyjm100 (38.86) Shaggyjm100 View Channel Send Message
(0)
Not to say that the terrorist did not also placed explosives in the building too. What do you think of that theory? Huh huh?
Posted Aug-5-2008 ByPlox (673.92) 
Plox View Channel Send Message
(0)
*yawns*
Posted Aug-5-2008 ByHowlingWilderness (84.82) HowlingWilderness View Channel Send Message
(0)
The picture is shortly after the collapse, therefore the smoke and the firemen. I won't go into the white hot steel weeks after 9/11, or the fused concrete/steel chunk in lower floors.
Posted Aug-5-2008 Bybuttkracken (659.18) buttkracken View Channel Send Message
(0)