"Should Israel decide to launch a strike on Iran, its pilots would have
to fly more than 1,000 miles across unfriendly airspace, refuel in the
air en route, fight off Iran's air defenses, attack multiple underground
sites simultaneously — and use at least 100 planes.That is the
assessment of American defense officials and military analysts close to
the Pentagon, who say that an Israeli attack meant to set back Iran's
nuclear program would be a huge and highly complex operation...".* The
Young Turks host Cenk Uygur breaks it down, including the over-hyped
nuclear capability of Iran and why it would be a bad idea for the US to
get involved in another war.
By: Surfsock
In: World News, Iran, Other Middle East
Tags: Israel, Iran, Zionist, USA, jews, war mongering,
Location: Israel (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 5472 | Comments: 113 | Votes: 6 | Favorites: 2 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
Advertisement below
|
|
| Liveleak on Facebook | |
|
LIKE Liveleak.com |
-
Israel's Crimes against Palestinians: War Crimes, Crimes Against Humanity, Genocide
-
Israel trying to spread the war into Iran
-
George Galloway Discusses Israel & Iran
-
The Secret Dealings of Israel, Iran and the United States, (Yale University Press).
-
Oxford Research Group Concludes Israeli Attack On Iran Would Start Long War
-
USA CIA War against soviet union
-
War With Iran - George Galloway vs. war mongering parrot
-
Wikileaks Exposes Truth: Arab States Fear Iran, Not Israel/Iran scientist (dead) = Stuxnet expert/nukemissiles can hit EU
-
Will next Israeli leader attack Iran?
-
Why do Palestinians want to destroy Israel and drive Israeli Jews into the sea?
-
Israel, Iran And The Neocons
-
Will US assault on Iran start a world war?






As an American, I say let Iran have nuclear energy for power! Israel, fight your own battles.
Posted Feb-22-2012 Bynetwrok (120.90) 
netwrok View Channel Send Message
(8)
@netwrok
I agree with this statement.
Posted Feb-23-2012 Byiamtherapist (83.40) 
iamtherapist View Channel Send Message
(0)
I dont take serious anything this young Turd has to say.
We have missiles too besides planes.
He never talks about the precedent if Iran got nukes.....every other Arab Islamic nation will follow suit!
It might not be a good idea to attack Iran....It would be an even worse idea to let them get nukes.
Posted Feb-23-2012 ByFreejay (3781.36) 
Freejay View Channel Send Message
(2)
@Freejay Israel got nukes, so why shouldnt Iran get it? Maybe you will stop terrorising the region if they do get the nukes..
Posted Feb-23-2012 Bytwista (57.74) 
twista View Channel Send Message
(0)
@twista
Who is Israel terrorizing?
Who has Israel threatened to wipe out?
And Israel isnt run by religious extremist fanatics
Posted Feb-23-2012 ByFreejay (3781.36) 
Freejay View Channel Send Message
(1)
@Freejay The palestinians. You are worse than Nazi-Germany.
Posted Feb-23-2012 Bytwista (57.74) 
twista View Channel Send Message
(0)
@twista i think you are the first person that i've ever heard say that iran should have nukes. israel aside, no one in that entire region wants iran to have nukes. they are too fucking crazy.
Posted Feb-23-2012 Byuschairforcesgt (541.30) 
uschairforcesgt View Channel Send Message
(0)
the Young Turks, lol
Posted Feb-22-2012 Bynation_of_zion (146.22) nation_of_zion View Channel Send Message
(2)
@nation_of_zion Nation of Zion! lol.
Posted Feb-23-2012 Byradioactive (142.50) 
radioactive View Channel Send Message
(0)
I LOVE Cenk, my favorite lib D-Bag.
His arrogance and smugness has drawn me in from day one. I only wish he still had a network show on MSNBC so I had some evening entertainment again.
Posted Feb-22-2012 ByFutureman (210.12) 
Futureman View Channel Send Message
(2)
@Futureman LOL
Posted Feb-22-2012 Bylonewolf6972 (669.96) lonewolf6972 View Channel Send Message
(0)
@Futureman
You're not drawn to O'reilly or anyone else on FOX
Posted Feb-22-2012 ByAxisofEvil (553.98) 
AxisofEvil View Channel Send Message
(0)
@AxisofEvil No. I wake up to Morning Joe and end with Ed. I couldn't care less about FOX.
/Know your enemy.
Posted Feb-23-2012 ByFutureman (210.12) 
Futureman View Channel Send Message
(0)
I would love to Israel go down. Too many reasons to list.
Posted Feb-22-2012 Byniltomega (710.88) 
niltomega View Channel Send Message
(1)
you don't fight off defense air forces, you attack them! The day that whole area is a glowing pit will be a bad day for the world but a great day for humanity.
Posted Feb-22-2012 ByOgrish D Ogre (80.00) 
Ogrish D Ogre View Channel Send Message
(1)
Just wrap it up by next week. I payed $4.25 a gal. At $5.00 Gallon I will steal someone's bike to go to work.
Posted Feb-22-2012 Bybuttkracken (659.58) buttkracken View Channel Send Message
(1)
what an idiot.. This guy is using Norway as an example for who Irael would attack and the U.S would stand by Israel side. I don´t think so. This is a small country , but Norway has been mentioned as the nr 1 ally of the u.s during ww2 - along side with greatbritain. The role Norway has as a peacekeeping nation - Humanitarian nation. If all the countries Norway has helped would forget our position in the world? I don´t think so. This guy talks to much without thinking first.
Posted Feb-23-2012 Bynomoraghead (12.54) 
nomoraghead View Channel Send Message
(1)
Young Turks = Armenian Genocide!
Posted Feb-22-2012 Byculliganator (86.66) 
culliganator View Channel Send Message
(1)
whatever AIPAC decides, US go with it.
Posted Feb-22-2012 BySteelBeast (196.12) 
SteelBeast View Channel Send Message
(1)
Israel Nukes Iran, USA first strikes China and Russia, Russia second strikes any survivors
NWO takes over and makes slaves of the remaining humans.
Posted Feb-23-2012 ByXjamesX (448.44) 
XjamesX View Channel Send Message
(1)
NEOCONSERVATIVE
1: a former liberal espousing political conservatism
2: a conservative who advocates the assertive promotion of democracy and United States national interest in international affairs including through military means
First Known Use of NEOCONSERVATIVE
1952
sounds like bs to me.. otherwise i dont have a problem with this report by cenk.. even tho he is an ageing hippie liberal douche
Posted Feb-22-2012 ByTreeGoat (95.30) 
TreeGoat View Channel Send Message
(0)
@TreeGoat This is actually the first time I actually agree with this douche, until the point where he got political and started to trash the right, as if all conservatives are warmongers.
Posted Feb-23-2012 Bymikedelta12 (360.90) 
mikedelta12 View Channel Send Message
(0)
This is not just about Iran. This is Russia and China playing a dangerous game of nuclear proliferation. They believe that having nuclear buffer nations (North Korea, Pakistan, and Iran) strenghtens their military position against us because it divides our focus. I believe they will offer nuclear technology to a South American nation next (i.e. Venezuela). Using these locations as a potential proxy attack position in the future or at least threaten such.
We should not engage Iran at this ti More..
Posted Feb-23-2012 Bymabutoo (194.56) 
mabutoo View Channel Send Message
(0)
Love the sub titles
Posted Feb-22-2012 ByBanAngelos (41.40) 
BanAngelos View Channel Send Message
(0)
@BanAngelos
Looks like they are using Dragon Dictate or equivalent.
Why? It's obviously useless.
Posted Feb-22-2012 ByDEADBEEF (4144.86) 
DEADBEEF View Channel Send Message
(0)
@Rastafelix hmm i think they'd be cutting it close especially with the bomb load.
Posted Feb-22-2012 Byfebreze (10.60) 
febreze View Channel Send Message
(0)
@febreze
Mid air/flight refuel, its been around for decades............
Posted Feb-23-2012 Bydankmofo (476.74) 
dankmofo View Channel Send Message
(0)
@Rastafelix The f-16 block 60 with CFT's has an unrefuelled combat radius(6000lbs ordinance) of 450mi. The 4 main targets in Iran are between 700 and 1100 miles. Which reans that arial refuelling has to take place over the Meditterranian, Jordan, Iraq or Saudi Arabia. The Med is still too far away from the targets to be of much benifit. The other options are very dubious diplomatically. Therefore without US assistance its beyond the capibilities of the F-16. The f-15e may be able to reach the t More..
Posted Feb-23-2012 Bymikedelta12 (360.90) 
mikedelta12 View Channel Send Message
(0)
@dankmofo obviously i thought the issue here was getting a sufficient number of the air refueling planes in the air........ .... .....
Posted Feb-23-2012 Byfebreze (10.60) 
febreze View Channel Send Message
(0)
@febreze The IAF actually has 8 KC-707s. Thats more than enough refuelling capacity. The real problem is refuelling close enough to the targets so that the warplanes can deliver an adequate ordinance load. The only feasible place seems to be Saudi Arabia, which may be diplomatically difficult to secure refueling rights.
Posted Feb-23-2012 Bymikedelta12 (360.90) 
mikedelta12 View Channel Send Message
(0)