The Computer Model of a Sense of Humor theory was suggested by Suslov in
1992.Investigation of the general scheme of the information
processing show a possibility of a specific malfunction, conditioned by
the necessity of a quick deletion from consciousness of a false version.
This specific malfunction can be identified with a humorous effect on
the psychological grounds: it exactly corresponds to
incongruity-resolution theory. However, an essentially new ingredient, a
role of timing, is added
to a well known role of ambiguity. In biological systems, a sense of
humor inevitably develops in the course of evolution, because its
biological function consists in quickening the transmission of the
processed information into consciousness and in a more effective use of
brain resources. A realization of this algorithm in neural networks
justifies naturally Spencer’s hypothesis on the mechanism of laughter:
deletion of a false version corresponds to zeroing of some part of the
neural network and excessive energy of neurons is thrown out to the
motor cortex, arousing muscular contractions. The theory treats on the
equal footing the humorous effect created by the linguistic means
(verbal humor), as well as created visually (caricature, clown
performance) or by tickling. The theory explains naturally different
susceptibility of people to humor, absence of humorous effect from a
trite joke, a role of intonation in telling jokes, nervous laughter,
etc. According to this theory, the humor has a pure biological origin,
while its social functions arose later. This conclusion corresponds to
the known fact that already monkeys (as pointed by Charles Darwin) and
even rats (as found recently) possess the sense of humor.
A practical realization of this algorithm needs extensive databases,
whose creation in the automatic regime was suggested recently
Advertisement below
|
|
| Liveleak on Facebook | |
|
LIKE Liveleak.com |
-
George Carlin - Pro Life is Anti-Woman
-
Jon Stewart on Letterman about Bush and More.....
-
Computer humor
-
Super Mario Bro's in Real Life (Highway Edition)
-
my life
-
Under the Doghouse - Episode 7 - Your Socks are Still Scary
-
Under the Doghouse - Episode 10 - Rubix Cubed
-
Under the Doghouse - Episode 6 - Are the Twizzlers Corrupting Me
-
Under the Doghouse - Episode 8 - Keep a Fine Machine Like That Running
-
Frank Caliendo on Huckabee For a Few Laughs
-
Pookat - Bathroom Humor
-
Under the Doghouse - Episode 5 - I'd Sell My Body to Get Some Fruit




All those technical words to tell us that a fart is funny.
Did cavemen laugh at farts?
Posted Oct-28-2012 ByRhemis (977.38) 
Rhemis View Channel Send Message
(1)
@Rhemis ROFLMAO!
Posted Oct-28-2012 Bynutsflipped (2051.00) 
nutsflipped View Channel Send Message
(1)
caveman could only laugh at farts
Posted Oct-28-2012 Byparastoned (520.50) 
parastoned View Channel Send Message
(0)
@parastoned
Then I am a caveman.
Posted Oct-29-2012 ByRhemis (977.38) 
Rhemis View Channel Send Message
(1)
No computer could ever replace Joan Rivers or Don Rickles.
Posted Oct-28-2012 Bygrunt (481.70) 
grunt View Channel Send Message
(1)
Holy fuck, even Sheldon Cooper would get a headache reading this shit.
.
Posted Oct-28-2012 ByFrameSync (433.54) 
FrameSync View Channel Send Message
(1)
i wonder what kinda drugs were u in when u made this sketch
Posted Oct-28-2012 Bykuffyou1980 (164.10)

kuffyou1980 Send Message
(1)
@kuffyou1980 Junji Ito.
Posted Oct-29-2012 Bykajidono (686.36)

kajidono View Channel Send Message
(0)
Cool piece.
Posted Oct-28-2012 Bydaleastor (872.66) daleastor View Channel Send Message
(1)
Wtf is this
Posted Oct-28-2012 BySalmonellalover629 (542.70) 
Salmonellalover629 View Channel Send Message
(1)
Sorry to say but this looks like someone just took almost 90% of the words opened up a thesaurus and replaced them just to explain sense of humor to make it far more complex than what it really needs to be. But I guess that is what you do when you are bored at times.
Posted Oct-29-2012 ByCrippled Wizard (16.40) 
Crippled Wizard View Channel Send Message
(1)
Of course. Elementary.
Posted Oct-29-2012 ByIntellectual (755.34) Intellectual View Channel Send Message
(0)
Error. Does not compute.
Posted Oct-29-2012 ByFifty One Fifty (71.34) 
Fifty One Fifty View Channel Send Message
(0)
Paragraphs are overrated...
Posted Nov-20-2012 ByWahn Doh (1.00) 
Wahn Doh View Channel Send Message
(0)
interesting
Posted Dec-1-2012 Bycbravo (241.70) 
cbravo View Channel Send Message
(0)