Safe Mode: On
Renewable Electrical Generation Surges Under Obama

Electrical generation from renewable energy sources such as wind, solar and geothermal has grown dramatically under the Obama administration says Ken Bossong, Executive Director of the SUN DAY Campaign.

Bossong
cites two new government studies that show a near doubling of non-hydro
renewable energy sources contributing to U.S. electrical generation
since president Obama took office.The latest issue of the Electric Power Monthly from the Energy Information Administration (EIA) analyzes data through June 2012.
The report shows that from January 1 to June 30, 2012 non-hydro
renewable energy sources (geothermal, biomass, solar, and wind) provided
5.76 percent of net electrical generation, an increase of 10.97 percent
for the same period last year. Utility scale solar increased 97.2
percent from one year ago, wind generation grew 16.3 percent and
geothermal by 0.2 percent. Biomass declined by 0.8 percent.For
the first half of 2012, wind contributed 3.84 percent of net electrical
generation with biomass following at 1.4 percent, geothermal at 0.45
percent and finally solar with 0.09 percent – noting that this figure
does not take into account the significant growth in small solar systems
such as rooftop PV solar and other non-utility-scale solar projects.
Another 7.86 percent of net generation came from conventional
hydropower, which declined 14.3 percent from the same period in 2011.During
the last full year of the Bush administration, non-hydro renewable
energy sources contributed 3.06 percent to net electrical generation,
averaging 10,508 gigawatt-hours of output per month. Since then average
monthly electrical generation has grown 78.70 percent from non-renewable
sources with an output of 18,777 gigawatt-hours as of mid-2012.
Electrical output from solar has grown by 285.19 percent in the period
from 2008 to mid-2012, wind by 171.72 percent, and geothermal by 13.53
percent. Biomass has dropped by 0.56 percent.The second government study come from the Energy Infrastructure Update from the Office of Energy Projects
at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). According to the
latest data 38 percent of all new electrical generating capacity for the
first half of 2012 came from 229 renewable energy projects (“capacity”
does not mean actual generation). Fifty new wind projects accounted for
2,367 Megawatts (MW) of capacity, solar has 111 projects for 588 MW, 59
biomass projects contribute 271 MW, 5 geothermal projects for 87 MW,
and finally 4 water power projects at 11MW.Electrical generating
capacity from new renewable sources were more than double than new
capacity from coal, with only 2 new coal projects coming online,
contributing 1,608 MW of capacity. Renewable energy sources now
contribute 14.76 percent of total installed generating capacity in the
United States:

  • Hydro: 8.66%
  • Wind: 4.30%
  • Biomass: 1.23%
  • Geothermal: 0.31%
  • Solar:
    0.26% (again, this figure accounts only for utility-scale projects, not
    the significant contribution from smaller PV solar systems)
Overall,
natural gas leads with 41.83 percent and coal with 29.66 percent of
total installed capacity. Nuclear power stands steady at 9.16 percent
with the final 0.07 percent coming from waste heat.“The
numbers speak for themselves – notwithstanding politically-inspired
criticism, the pro-renewable energy policies pioneered by the Obama
Administration have proven their worth through dramatic growth rates
during the past three and one-half years,” said Bossong. “The
investments in sustainable energy made by the federal government as well
as individual states and private funders have paid off handsomely
underscoring the short-sightedness of proposals to slash or discontinue
such support.”


Added: Sep-6-2012 Occurred On: Sep-6-2012
By: echo4250
In:
Politics, Science and Technology, Nature
Tags: solar, wind, work
Marked as: approved
Views: 1082 | Comments: 27 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • “Renewable Electrical Generation Surges Under Obama”
    That is a very idiotic statement, it makes it sound like Obama is doing something good.

    The fact of the matter is , it is at the American tax payers expense. And companies like Solyndra received $535 million from Oabma and went bankrupt. It is a expensive scam at our expense at a time when we cannot afford frivolous spending

    Posted Sep-6-2012 By 

    (7)

  • Morons. Do you realize that all current renewable energy systems are being subsidized by the tax payer and the american government because it cannot sustain itself. The breakeven point exceeds the expected lifespan of the equipment.

    Its a freaking joke.

    Posted Sep-6-2012 By 

    (6)

  • hydroelectric power is the most useful, we need to turn waves into energy, very possible, most practical, safest.

    Posted Sep-6-2012 By 

    (5)

  • Pure propaganda!

    This is an election year, there should be way more opportunities for cheaper fuels then we already have, stop with the bullshit!!

    Not one solar panel in my neighborhood, not one!! I'm in California!

    97% in solar increase Right!!

    Manufacturing causes pollution, send the manufacturing jobs to third world countries so it MAKES America look like the leader in green tech!

    More big suv's on the road sucking up gas!

    24-40 miles per gallon, really? we can't have 70-100 mpg becau More..

    Posted Sep-6-2012 By 

    (4)

    • @kingrasta Funny how something from an Independent source is propaganda,but posts from "the Blaze and Brietbart.com" are gospel to you fools.

      Posted Sep-6-2012 By 

      (-6)

    • @echo4250
      Independent, really come on man!!

      The "Blaze" reports what others write, yes? Kind of like Drudge? They are a "portal" like Huffington Post, yes?

      Posted Sep-6-2012 By 

      (2)

    • @echo4250

      How is a guy who works in the solar industry "objective"

      Kenneth Bossong: he serves as the Executive Director of the SUN DAY Campaign and is the coordinator of the Sustainable Energy Coalition, a U.S. NGO comprised of 60 business, environmental, consumer, and energy policy organizations "promoting" energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies.

      Did you see the word PROMOTING?

      You lose dude!!! Copy and paste some more bullshit articles!

      Posted Sep-6-2012 By 

      (3)

    • @kingrasta The numbers don't lie.if you cannot face the truth,that is a personality defect,can't help you there.

      Posted Sep-6-2012 By 

      (-1)

    • @kingrasta Yes,an aggregate.

      Posted Sep-7-2012 By 

      (0)

  • Funny thing about punishing traditional and subsidizing alternative energy.

    In fact, it's name "alternative" exists because it is an alternative to that which is viable in a free market. People would not normally choose methods of electricity that were 50-500% more expensive and were dependent upon the cycles of nature (wind, sunshine, etc.) for their output.

    What proponents of alternative energy haven't thought through is that when the subsidy is removed and freedom is allowed, the More..

    Posted Sep-6-2012 By 

    (3)

  • Not sure what the deal is currently but when wind generators started popping up in West Texas land owners were getting paid $2500/month lease money per windmill.

    Posted Sep-6-2012 By 

    (2)

    • @TMoray1
      That's a pretty good deal, and for people who don't have the option of payed set up, if you have the funds to get started you could make money producing your own energy enough to pay off the initial costs in a few years and then never have another electric bill.
      Unfortunately, it's to fucking expensive to get started for most people to do that though.

      Posted Sep-6-2012 By 

      (2)

    • @lucidx1 There's a difference of opinion on whether the wind gens payout or wear out first. I suspect some of them are just putting the electricity to the ground and the owners are collecting money from the taxpayers.

      Posted Sep-6-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @TMoray1
      Yeah, I know about this, I assume wind quantity plays a roll in it to some extent too, but also I'm talking about other sources as well like solar and putting water wheels in your river if the state lets you.

      Posted Sep-6-2012 By 

      (1)

    • @lucidx1 I like solar but it only works in the day time. :^] Seriously though, the expense of batteries is a deal killer.

      Posted Sep-6-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @lucidx1 it's to fucking expensive

      Thats the only true statement you made.

      Posted Sep-6-2012 By 

      (0)

  • Sounds great but at what cost per Kwh?

    Posted Sep-6-2012 By 

    (2)

  • What a load of CRAP. The only thing that surged under obama is unemployment. Who ever wrote this should just go back to smoking his joint.

    Posted Sep-6-2012 By 

    (2)

  • “The
    investments in sustainable energy made by the federal government as well
    as individual states and private funders have paid off handsomely
    underscoring the short-sightedness of proposals to slash or discontinue
    such support.”

    Paid off handsomely for Obamas friends.

    Posted Sep-6-2012 By 

    (2)

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zRFI-Xrg1XI

    Posted Sep-6-2012 By 

    (1)

  • If you guys want to learn about PV, (Photovoltaics)a great place to learn and get certified as a PV know it all, go here http://www.nabcep.org/.

    The DOE has tons of info also.

    Posted Sep-6-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Well,not exactly.

    Posted Sep-7-2012 By 

    (0)