Japan's New Aircraft Carriers
August 23, 2007:
Japan launched the first of its new helicopter-carrying destroyers, the Hyuga, amid great fanfare. This vessel, officially 13,500 tons, will be able to carry helicopters. Plans are for them to mostly carry SH-60 helicopters, but the Hyuga will give Japan its first real power projection capability since 1945.
Japan plans to build at least two Hyuga-class vessels, which can carry up to 11 helicopters, displace 13,500 tons, and are equipped with a Mk41 VLS, giving them the ability for fire air-defense missiles like the Standard and the ESSM, and a vertically-launched ASROC, but also the Tomahawk cruise missile, if Japan wished to do so. It also has two triple 12.75-inch torpedo mounts.
The name of the lead ship is probably the first clue that this ship is more than meets the eye. The HIJMS Hyuga was a battleship commissioned in 1918, and which served in World War II. After the battle of Midway in 1942, the Hyuga was converted into a hybrid battleship/aircraft carrier. The new Hyuga looks like a carrier, and her mission sounds like that of a carrier.
This ship in the same weight range of the European "Harrier carriers" (the British Invincibles, the Italian Garibaldi, the Spanish Principe de Asturias, and the Thai Chakri Narubet-classes). While this ship is currently planned to carry helicopters only, European experience (particularly from the British) has shown that this can be an effective platform for fixed-wing aircraft, like the F-35B. That makes the designation of "helicopter carrying destroyer" technically true, but in reality a useful fiction. In essence, they could act as small aircraft carriers or as a landing platform helicopter like HMS Ocean if transport helicopters are used.
Such looseness with designations is nothing new for Japan. In its older incarnation as the Imperial Japanese Navy, there were numerous instances of these involving surface units. The most glaring were the heavy cruisers of the Mogami-class. Supposedly light cruisers displacing 8,500 tons (and fifteen 155-millieter guns), these were really heavy cruisers of over 13,000 tons (with ten eight-inch guns). The claims that those ships were compliant with naval arms limitation treaties were on the disingenuous side.
Another instance involved the super-battleships Yamato and Musashi. The guns had been called "special 40-centimeter", leading many Allied intelligence officers to believe the vessels used sixteen-inch guns. As it is known now, the main battery consisted of nine eighteen-inch (40-centimeter) guns.
In essence, Japan will have a ship about the size of the vessels that were the centerpiece of the British response to a crisis halfway around the world 25 years ago, with a flight deck and an offset island. They performed well, too – just ask Argentina. The Hyuga means that Japan is back in the power projection business. – Harold C. Hutchison
16DDH Hyuga Class
By: n3t1z3n_k4n3
In: News
Tags: 16DDH, Hyuga, JMSDF, Helicopter Carrier, Aircraft Carrier
Marked as: approved
Views: 17145 | Comments: 20 | Votes: 2 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
Advertisement below
|
|
| Liveleak on Facebook | |
|
LIKE Liveleak.com |
-
Aircraft carrier: take offs and landings
-
The Aircraft Carrier! Pt-2/6
-
HMS Queen Elizabeth, New British aircraft carrier preview.
-
The Aircraft Carrier! Pt-1/6
-
The Aircraft Carrier! Pt-3/6
-
Gerald R. Ford class aircraft carrier
-
Aircraft Carrier Abort Landing
-
Awesome Cockpit View of Jet Landing on Aircraft Carrier
-
Charles De Gaulle aircraft carrier and the Rafale M.
-
F-14 Abort Landing On Aircraft Carrier
-
Aircraft Carrier Cable Snap-Back



what he said?
Posted Aug-30-2007 ByHarakti (-22.90) Harakti Send Message
(0)
recycled Toyota's!!
Posted Aug-30-2007 ByPHACEOFF (15.18) PHACEOFF Send Message
(0)
This ship is neither large enough or capable enough to be referred to with the words "power projection." It is at best an escort carrier/anti-submarine platform with exceptional capability in that regard. It is at least 10,000 tons shy of displacing the British "Invincible" class. What kind of power are you going to project with a handful of helicopters?
Posted Aug-30-2007 Bymduncan36 (11.96) 
mduncan36 View Channel Send Message
(0)
awesome..!
Posted Aug-30-2007 Byuziman2 (36.54) 
uziman2 Send Message
(0)
I thought this would be about boobs at first, damn.
Posted Aug-30-2007 Byxdeathfromabove81x (36.80) 
xdeathfromabove81x View Channel Send Message
(0)
Nice but not very big for a carrier.. more like a pocket carrier.
Posted Aug-31-2007 ByPenguinister (493.10) 
Penguinister View Channel Send Message
(0)
They need to get rid of the american bases they are hosting on their soil. US soldiers frequently rape japanese schoolgirls.
Posted Aug-30-2007 ByExedore (27.12) 
Exedore View Channel Send Message
(0)
Perhaps we should get rid of whoever rapes the most.
Posted Aug-30-2007 ByJaguarSabyr (41.92) 
JaguarSabyr View Channel Send Message
(0)
Nice Carrier,
Posted Aug-30-2007 ByHAPPYSNAPPER (381.04) HAPPYSNAPPER View Channel Send Message
(0)
Posted Aug-30-2007 ByPowerCorrupts (14.42) 
PowerCorrupts Send Message
(0)
knowing the japanese it prolly transforms into a fighter jet with seizure inducing lights.
cool shit though
Posted Aug-30-2007 Bytardmonkey (115.84) 
tardmonkey View Channel Send Message
(0)
Posted Aug-30-2007 Bytardmonkey (115.84) 
tardmonkey View Channel Send Message
(0)
The subject of rape aside, I really think in today's nuclear world, "power projection" isn't attained by building large ships. It's in whomever has the most nukes. A small yield weapon could destroy a fleet of these things.
Real "power projection" is in intelligence.
Posted Aug-30-2007 ByBrentaubrey (687.06) 
Brentaubrey View Channel Send Message
(0)
its the best they can do. japan legally is prohibited from building any aircraft carriers after world war II, even though they are now one of americas strongest allies. in saying that, its been well known for a few years that japan have the best destroyers in the world. they dont really need any aircraft carriers anyway being as they dont need them. theyre also prohibited from attack any other country unless in self defence, which means they can just rely on their land based aircraft
Posted Aug-30-2007 BysniperNZSAS (41.48) 
sniperNZSAS View Channel Send Message
(0)