
Administration fails to set up voting offices at about half of military installations.
by Ed Lasky
Original Link:
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/09/obama_screws_our_soldiers_-_again.html
Secondary links at bottom of post.
------------------------
Investors Business Daily [1] reports in "Obama to Soldiers Overseas: No Voting for You":
------------------------
Military: The administration thanks the troops for their service by failing to comply with a law requiring that it help soldiers deployed overseas cast ballots in their home states.
The administration has taken various states to court to block voter ID laws on the grounds it will disenfranchise voters. But it has no qualms about the disenfranchisement of military voters overseas through its failure to comply with and enforce the Military and Overseas Voter Empowerment (MOVE) Act, passed by Congress in 2009 and signed into law by President Barack Obama.
The law acknowledges the difficulties caused by time and distance for deployed soldiers in exercising the right to vote they put their lives on the line to protect. One of the key provisions required each military branch to create an installation voting assistance office (IVAO) for every military base outside an immediate combat zone.
Last week, however, the Pentagon's inspector general reported that attempts to locate and contact IVAO offices at overseas military installations failed about half the time.
"Results were clear. Our attempts to contact IVAOs failed about 50% of the time," the inspector general reported. "We concluded the Services had not established all the IVAOs as intended by the MOVE Act because, among other issues, the funding was not available."
The estimated cost of establishing functioning IVAOs at all overseas military bases not in combat zones is estimated at between $15 million and $20 million a year. We wasted $530 million on Solyndra but can't afford a relative pittance to ensure our soldiers are not disenfranchised.
------------------------
Soldiers, who risk their lives, are prevented from exercising their right to vote because Barack Obama knows they will support Republicans. Meanwhile, back in America, Barack Obama and Eric Holder stir up racial animosity with fictitious claims that Republicans are racists and want to impose Jim Crow laws in order to prevent minorities from voting. Large majorities of Americans agree with the need for Voter ID laws to ensure the integrity of the vote.
But when was the last time Barack Obama cared about integrity?
The Inspectors General have once again reported that behind the scenes Barack Obama is failing to fulfill his responsibilities as President and Commander-in-Chief. This is his modus operandi, of course. There is a litany of his deliberate failures that have been found by Inspectors Generals that have somehow escaped the attention of most of the media.
For example:
There's an inspector general's report [2] that the number of green jobs generated by Obama's green schemes has been a figment of his and his campaign-spinners' imagination; that the drilling moratorium in the Gulf [3] that has been subject to much scandal (the experts behind the report that was used to justify the ban denied that they had called for such a halt) was engineered at the last minute at the behest of Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar; one IG has found that the Obama team and GM have been conspiring to create a rosy image [4] (cooking the books) behind the purported success of the auto bailout, according to the IG reviewing the bailout; and the inspector general monitoring the tens of billions of taxpayer dollars wasted on green energy programs found that the money was directed to projects linked to big Obama and Democrat donors - the inspector general said that they were steered to friends and family [5][6]. Solyndra is just one example.
This desire to escape scrutiny of his actions is also shown by the manifold ways he has broken his promise [7] to run a "transparent" administration by his and the media's assault on Darrell Issa, the Republican Congressman who heads up Government Oversight and Government Reform Committee, whose dogged pursuit of the truth had led to an almost unprecedented media attack against him (see "Liberal Operatives have launched an anti-Issa Crusade). Obama only likes to grade himself. And, he likes to surround himself with sycophants who will boost his ego [8] (as if it needed boosts).
But the media could care less about our soldiers. Very few journalists have ever served in the military. Furthermore, these facts would tarnish the image and hurt the reelection prospects of Barack Obama.
Screw the soldiers-there is an election at stake!
------------------------
Footnotes:
[1] Obama To Soldiers: No Voting for You!
http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/090712-624998-obama-ignores-military-absentee-voting-problems.htm?p=full
[2] Green energy jobs far short of Obama goal
http://washingtonexaminer.com/article/1314901
[3] Gulf Oil Drilling Ban Draws New Scrutiny
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/gulf-oil-drilling-ban-draws-224300494.html
[4] Obama Pushes False GM Success Story
http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/043012-609777-general-motors-not-really-repaying-taxpayer-bailout.htm
[5] Mitt Romney Visits Solyndra Amid Attack on Obama Jobs Record
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/05/mitt-romney-visits-solyndra-amid-attack-on-obama-jobs-record/
[6] Romney campaigns in front of shuttered Solyndra
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/06/romney_campaigns_in_front_of_shuttered_solyndra.html
[7] And You Thought the Tea Party Was Bad? This Is Just the Beginning…
http://www.ijreview.com/2012/06/9333-and-you-thought-the-tea-party-was-bad-this-is-just-the-beginning/
[8] Obama's Team of Idolizers Has Drunk the Kool-Aid
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2012/08/28/obama039s_team_of_idolizers_has_drunk_the_kool-aid_288536.html
By: copperdog3
In: Politics
Tags: Obama, vote, franchise, disenfranchisement, voter ID, military, Republican, Overseas, green energy, GM, Solyndra, Tea Party, Kool-Aid
Location: United States (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 2200 | Comments: 53 | Votes: 3 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
Advertisement below
|
|
| Liveleak on Facebook | |
|
LIKE Liveleak.com |
-
Krauthammer: Tea Party Success A "Tribute" To Obama's "Radical" Agenda
-
NPR Spreads False Claim About Black Voters 'Targeted' by Voter ID Laws
-
NAACP To Take Voter ID Laws To UN
-
America's Battle Royal Obama's OWS vs.The Tea Party !!!
-
Federal Appeals Court Upholds Arizona Voter ID Law
-
NAACP Requires Photo I.D. to See Holder Speak in State Being Sued Over Voter ID
-
DOJ Rejects Texas Voter ID Law
-
Undercover Voter ID Investigation: You Will Never Guess Which Liberal Groups Are Demanding ID
-
Texas Senate Passes Voter ID Bill
-
Voter ID Will Allow Romney to Win Pa.
-
South Carolina Voter ID Law Is Blocked as Discriminatory
-
Obama’s bin Laden leaks angered military



I can't tell if this article is about the military's failure to help troops vote or "green" jobs? The source links are nice and all but it just seems like you pulled a bunch of random crap together and made up a story with it.
Posted Sep-9-2012 ByRoach1983 (1254.06) Roach1983 View Channel Send Message
(2)
@Roach1983 I think the point was that the cost to ensure our troops can vote doesn't compare to the money we've wasted on green energy jobs....that never really became jobs.
Posted Sep-9-2012 Bygammyland (509.12) gammyland View Channel Send Message
(2)
@Roach1983
Voter laws, intimidation, and election fraud are the story. The point is that while the big O and company are b.tching and moaning about voter ID laws, they are actively denying a law passed by Congress and signed by the big O himself that facilitates military voting. If the military was an "urban" neighborhood in south Chicago, do you think we'd be having this conversation?
The rest is a clear demonstration of the big O's duplicity and willingness to corrupt the system. More..
Posted Sep-9-2012 Bycopperdog3 (1040.04) 
copperdog3 View Channel Send Message
(0)
@gammyland
Yep. What you said.
Posted Sep-9-2012 Bycopperdog3 (1040.04) 
copperdog3 View Channel Send Message
(0)
@copperdog3 Perhaps, but unless I missed it I don't see anything to actually imply Obama is doing it on purpose. All but one of the sources are moot to the title and implied topic of the post.
The actual report this is referring to says congress is at fault for not funding the project, while the Senator who wrote the law is blaming the pentagon.
Posted Sep-9-2012 ByRoach1983 (1254.06) Roach1983 View Channel Send Message
(-1)
@Roach1983
The secondary sources are links embedded in the primary source I listed. I just don't trust the LL comment system to maintain the embedded html resources. I was just trying to present the article as originally published with the referenced links.
Now, you and I both know the big O is fully capable of granting illegal amnesty with the stroke of an executive order. Is it such a stretch to believe his administration might be a bit slow on the uptake when it comes to enforcing a law More..
Posted Sep-9-2012 Bycopperdog3 (1040.04) 
copperdog3 View Channel Send Message
(0)
Nothing new here sheeple! Now blame Boosh for something
Posted Sep-9-2012 Byaranger45 (2989.58) 
aranger45 View Channel Send Message
(0)
Surely Obama has not conspired to block votes, sounds a bit conspiracy theory to me.
Is there not an independant body that regulates voting? I would have thought that the military would have some input into this and come up with a rapid answer, how hard can it be?
Posted Sep-9-2012 ByBrian Stewart (166.30) Brian Stewart View Channel Send Message
(0)
All I have to say is if you are being given the short end of the stick, BE SURE TO SPEAK UP!
I have no comment on this particular article.
Posted Sep-9-2012 ByAnti-Authoritaria (114.40) 
Anti-Authoritaria View Channel Send Message
(0)
First order of business: GET COLONEL ALLEN WEST ON EVERY POSSIBLE NEWS PROGRAM TO GET THIS RECTIFIED IMMEDIATELY!!!!!!
Posted Sep-9-2012 ByJohn Coleman (192.70) 
John Coleman View Channel Send Message
(0)
surprised? nah, you're not.
Posted Sep-10-2012 ByAmusing (5229.88) Amusing View Channel Send Message
(0)
American thinker. I posted one a while back from that site and was told by the right wingers on here it wasn't a valid site. Humm.
Btw, this would sink Obama if he did it. I think he is smart enough not to have done it, I sure would think this is a no-brainer.
Seems like the big O is responsible for everything, of course when he gets a win, he didn't do it. If it happens to be a loss he gets the truck load of shit.
Posted Sep-9-2012 Bydcmfox (30991.16) 
dcmfox View Channel Send Message
(-1)
@dcmfox
Yes, American Thinker is decidedly right wing. I freely admit that. And, its an opinion site, commentary on the news rather than the news itself. I wonder sometimes why the libs have such a problem with that.
All that said, I provided all the source links for those opinions as presented in the original column just for comments like yours. Not that I blame you, I was just trying to be prepared.
In this case, you and I both know it is well within the big O's purview to put the execut More..
Posted Sep-10-2012 Bycopperdog3 (1040.04) 
copperdog3 View Channel Send Message
(0)
@copperdog3
Solyndra need not be brought up again. If you want to get into China's Subsidized program to kill the programs abroad, I'm too tired for world econ. Btw though that five hundred billion you whine about bitch is getting old. Sure Obama was doing what any responsible leader of a democracy does, uses some resources for R&D.
So where do we find ourselves?
Let me tell you. Bush/Obama had a hand in Solyndra since the program started in 06 and we spent probably close if not more More..
Posted Sep-10-2012 Bydcmfox (30991.16) 
dcmfox View Channel Send Message
(-1)
@dcmfox
"So where do we find ourselves?"
Hmmm. Let's take a close look at that.
The big O funneled hundreds of millions to Solyndra (and many other friendly companies) against his own financial advice. Are you telling me he can't find $15 to $20 million or so to make MOVE happen? From a law that he signed into being?
"So where do we find ourselves?"
We find ourselves where we've been for the past several, tedious years: blaming Bush. Again.
"So where do we fin More..
Posted Sep-10-2012 Bycopperdog3 (1040.04) 
copperdog3 View Channel Send Message
(0)
@copperdog3
Nice dodge, no we are bleeding cash and weren't up to matching that investment the Chinese made.
The way I look at it we got out cheap, however I hate the Chinese winning on that product.
Posted Sep-10-2012 Bydcmfox (30991.16) 
dcmfox View Channel Send Message
(-1)
@dcmfox
There is no market for those solar panels. Only in niche applications such as charging low-demand batteries and only then when the sun shines. Germany has completely tanked their subsidies for the things. They are not effective on a large, imbedded demand structure like a power grid. They cause more trouble than they are worth.
So yes. We got out cheap (if you consider $536 million cheap) but we could have gotten out cheaper. Now, does that put my "dodge" to rest or sha More..
Posted Sep-10-2012 Bycopperdog3 (1040.04) 
copperdog3 View Channel Send Message
(0)
From long thread, started a new one.
@copperdog3
Windmills yes lets debate that.
But lets do it on a fresh thread so others can indulge.
Hell I'll do the new comment to start the tread.
Question: How is a windmill different from a hydraulic dam?
Posted Sep-10-2012 Bydcmfox (30991.16) 
dcmfox View Channel Send Message
(-1)
@dcmfox
Hydro power is reliable, stable and always on. Wind and solar are not.
Next.
Posted Sep-10-2012 Bycopperdog3 (1040.04) 
copperdog3 View Channel Send Message
(1)
@dcmfox
Oh, one other difference lies in the way greenies treat them. Try building a dam these days and just wait for the environmental howls. Meanwhile, dead birds including endangered eagles are piling up below windmills. A recent post here on LL showed a hapless bird biting the big one at the hands of a windmill blade.
One power source is golden, the other not so much.
Posted Sep-10-2012 Bycopperdog3 (1040.04) 
copperdog3 View Channel Send Message
(0)
@copperdog3
@dcmfox
Hydro power is reliable, stable and always on. Wind and solar are not.
Next.
Bullshit.
Posted Sep-10-2012 Bydcmfox (30991.16) 
dcmfox View Channel Send Message
(-1)
@dcmfox windmills don't kill fish, right?
Posted Sep-10-2012 ByAmusing (5229.88) Amusing View Channel Send Message
(0)
@dcmfox
Soooo, sometimes the water behind a damn just goes away? Oh, I know. Sometimes gravity just doesn't do its job and the water just sits there instead of flowing downhill. We need a presidential commission on that.
Posted Sep-10-2012 Bycopperdog3 (1040.04) 
copperdog3 View Channel Send Message
(0)
LOFL, WHY ARE SOME PEOPLE JUST SO IGNORANT AND BLATANTLY STUPID!. THEY DON'T NEED TO HAVE VOTING BOOTHS AND WHY IS THAT? BECAUSE VOTES TO NOT EXIST! YOUR VOTES ARE JUST DISCARDED LIKE TRASH, LOOK WHAT JUST HAPPENED WITH TAMPA RNC. THAT SHOULD BE ENOUGH TO TELL YOU THAT YOU ARE A FOOL FOR EVEN BELIEVING IN VOTING. THEY JUST CHUCKED WHAT EVER DELEGATES OUT THAT DID NOT GO WITH THE PLAN.
Posted Sep-10-2012 Byvirtualdesires (494.44) virtualdesires View Channel Send Message
(-1)
Please what a joke. The fact is military voters are not requesting absentee ballots this election because republicans are fascist tea baggers so they are staying out of the polls.
http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2012/08/29/military-absentee-voting-looks-weak-this-year/
Posted Sep-10-2012 Byblowmerighty (16.30) blowmerighty View Channel Send Message
(-3)
@blowmerighty
MOVE was designed to make the absentee ballot request more efficient for military personnel overseas and to make it easier for them to vote. Hence, less need for absentee ballots. But, hell. thanks for playing along.
Posted Sep-10-2012 Bycopperdog3 (1040.04) 
copperdog3 View Channel Send Message
(0)
@rafaelcastelar
You have reached the complete radicalization stage. You no longer think as a rational human being. Your thought process is no different than the Taliban's.
Posted Sep-9-2012 ByMartyr_Machine (435.66) Martyr_Machine Send Message
(2)
@rafaelcastelar
You are an asshole. You should find a few of those troops you so enthusiastically deride and give them a hearty thanks for protecting your ability to be said asshole.
Try this crap in Venezuela, China or Iran. Let us know how it works out for you.
Posted Sep-9-2012 Bycopperdog3 (1040.04) 
copperdog3 View Channel Send Message
(2)
What does Obama have to do with this? The President doesn't control voting or the administration of the army.
Bullshit progaganda from an increasingly desperate Republic'nt hillbilly audience.
Posted Sep-9-2012 ByNepean109 (1016.70) 
Nepean109 View Channel Send Message
(-5)
@Nepean109 Exactly. Sad really. When he wins they will say he stole the election.
Posted Sep-10-2012 Byblowmerighty (16.30) blowmerighty View Channel Send Message
(-2)
@Nepean109 He's the head of the military. It has everything to do with him.
Posted Sep-10-2012 Bylonewolf6972 (678.56) lonewolf6972 View Channel Send Message
(1)
@jbobres <face palm>
You must do things differently in Canada.
Posted Sep-10-2012 Bylonewolf6972 (678.56) lonewolf6972 View Channel Send Message
(0)