Safe Mode: On
Delaware "Witch" completely ignorant of the U.S. Constitution

This is one of those wtf-type of uploads where a description isn't necessary

Where: Delaware's Widener Law School [court room]
When: 10/18/2010

Full article: Full article

Loading the player ...
Embed Code
Plays: 4757 (Embed: 0)

Added: Oct-19-2010 
By: Benji1
In: Other
Tags: O'Donnell, Delaware, senator, witch, witchcraft, scary, church, religion, republican, conservative, tea party, wingnut, Amendments, Constitution, evolution, ignorant, science, uneducated, omg, wtf,
Marked as: approved, repost
Views: 6098 | Comments: 56 | Votes: 2 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.

  • We actually have liberal congressmen saying "I don't care what the constitution says"

    Amazing you would even throw a pebble.

    Posted Oct-19-2010 By 
    bigair (531.00)  

    (5)

  • Funny how fake-feminist liberals are happy to call a Conservative woman a witch or a whore. But, when it's Hellen Thomas being called a witch, it's an outrage, suddenly the fake-feminists decide to stand up for women.

    They're children.

    Posted Oct-19-2010 By 
    ST0N3PONY (5034.62)  

    (3)

    • Dude, c'mon now, that's beside the point. This is about the interpretation of the first amendment, right? It's undeniable that it simultaneously protects religion, as well as protecting against the influence of religion.

      Posted Oct-19-2010 By 
      OneEleven111 (288.64)  

      (0)

    • it has nothing to do with her gender.
      what a lot of whatever you guys are calling yourselves today, seem to think is that women will stick up for any woman no matter what she is about.
      do you feel that way about any male that says anything? will you blindly defend them just because they also have boy parts like you?
      so why do you think females think like this?

      Posted Oct-20-2010 By 
      jen8933 (1058.26)

      (1)

    • I'm a feminist, or a masculinist or whatever the analogy for defending males would be. I judge people according to their values and their character.

      And fake-feminist leftists have zero standards, and zero integrity. If Palin and O'donnel were not Conservatives, the fake-feminist left would condemn their treatment. Instead they spew hate worse than anybody.

      Just like liberals with their race-hate for black Conservatives.

      Posted Oct-20-2010 By 
      ST0N3PONY (5034.62)  

      (-1)

    • bullshit

      Posted Oct-20-2010 By 
      jen8933 (1058.26)

      (0)

    • Yeah, whatever you say. Feminism is apolitical, okay... (total deluded fantasy)

      Posted Oct-20-2010 By 
      ST0N3PONY (5034.62)  

      (0)

  • Public schools are funded by the US government and must not advance or inhibit religion. According to the establishment clause in the first amendment, congress cannot have the preference of one religion over the other and no one religion can be made the official religion of the US. Therefore, there is the idea of separation of church and state in the constitution. Furthermore, the supreme court of the US has set precedents and reinforced the idea of the separation of church and state. See McColl More..

    Posted Oct-19-2010 By 
    pigwatcher3 (12.92)

    (3)

  • from the european point of view, it is very amusing and some how scary to follow the political disscusions in the us!
    even the most conservative european politicians (if they are respectable and in the somehow bigger parties) would declare the teapartymovement and affiliates total nutcases!

    and thats where the scary part beginns...what the hell will they do to the world, if they gain some political power?

    Posted Oct-19-2010 By 
    vfh (13.38)

    (2)

  • Comment of user 'AxiomDeusVult' has been deleted by moderator!

  • She laughs with the crowd at 3:00 like she's in on the joke where everyone is laughing at her. Nice try Christine.

    Posted Oct-19-2010 By 
    DarioInfini (208.64)  

    (2)

  • If you will refer to your history the line "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion" is refering to England having an Officaly sanctioned church controled but the government so as to control what the people were being told in church. most of the founding fathers were very religious and congress startes everyday with a prayer offered up by a preist or rabi. Some states had official state sanctioned churches after the constitution was ratified proving that st More..

    Posted Oct-19-2010 By 
    sdavisrt (14.16)

    (2)

    • As a non-religious non-christian individual, I would just like to say this to all you christians out there...you're no different than any other religion on this planet who thinks their beliefs are right and the only true way of thinking. However, I don't want to stop you from believing in those things, nor do I want to stop you from having ceremonies etc, and eating the body of your lord, or playing with rattle snakes, or anything that you might want to do to show your faith to your god. Have a More..

      Posted Oct-20-2010 By 
      stuckinthesouth (65.78)  

      (0)

  • The witch hunt continues. The personal destruction of Kristine O'Donnell is proof that most people don't mean it at all when they declare they don't want professional politicians.

    Posted Oct-19-2010 By 
    john1054 (5125.54)  

    (1)

  • she just laughs when she is completely wrong. The separation of church and state is a paraphrase, but the meaning remains evident in the 1st amendment: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion," wherein law (the state writes/maintains laws) and religion (most come in churches) are separated (by the word 'no' as in shall make no law)

    Posted Oct-20-2010 By 
    Jahnuma (19.40)  

    (1)

    • Comment of user 'Benji1' has been deleted by author!

  • She is a fucking joke,,NEXT !!!!

    Posted Oct-19-2010 By 
    nirvgardengod (32.36)  

    (1)

  • "Separation of Church and State" does not appear in the Constitution anywhere.

    The lady is correct.

    Here is the text of the First Amendment:

    "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

    Posted Oct-19-2010 By 
    FourthGen (17.12)  

    (1)

    • That is the verse.

      It was never intended that the government would ban any religeous events or themes from being in, on or near government (the peoples) property

      Posted Oct-19-2010 By 
      DOWNPLANE (728.62)  

      (1)

    • Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion....

      Posted Oct-19-2010 By 
      polux06 (87.28)

      (2)

    • "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion (federal policy based on religious interpretation of the laws), or prohibiting the free exercise thereof (federal policy prohibiting religious activity)".

      The same sentence of the constitution that protects your rights to practice your religion, protects my rights to be free from it. That's how I interpret it.

      Posted Oct-19-2010 By 
      OneEleven111 (288.64)  

      (2)

    • What is at issue is the phrasing, and O'Donnell is right that "separation of church and state" is nowhere in the Constitution. It's taken from a letter of Jefferson where he talked about a "wall of separation between church and state," but it's not what the law actually says. Liberals who are stringently opposed even to the influence of religion try to interpret the First Amendment to mean a "wall of separation," but that's not actually what it says.

      So in terms More..

      Posted Oct-19-2010 By 
      buzzardist (362.74)  

      (3)

    • The last phrase he recites is "the government shall make no establishment of religion" and she responds "and thats in the first amendment?" It doesn't seem like the media really needs to make up any headlines there.

      Posted Oct-19-2010 By 
      stuckinthesouth (65.78)  

      (-1)

  • Comment of user 'gregory_peckory' has been deleted by author!

  • This is also one of those wtf-type of uploads where a
    liberal,who has never bothered to actually read The Constitution,reaffirms for everyone that they are
    indeed as ignorant as they first appear.Give it a
    quick read(it's not that long)and then check back
    when you find "separation of church and state".We
    will be eagerly awaiting for you to point it out.
    Cheers.

    Posted Oct-19-2010 By 
    gmccuiston (687.08)

    (0)

    • Damn right sir, the crazy part is they were at a law school! Liberals are so nuts, they spit on the founding of our country, and look at the constitution as an obstacle. Her delivery was not good, but she has the facts right. Coons is a baffoon!

      Posted Oct-19-2010 By 
      SOONER3 (352.96)

      (2)

    • Comment of user 'etherealspectre' has been deleted by author!

    • "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;"
      First part means there will be no "state religion" as in England and France at the time. 2nd part means that the Government will not make a law prohibiting you from practicing any certain religious practices you see fit.

      So, in summary..... This seperates state from religion wouldn't you say? It CLEARLY means that government will stay out of religion.

      WTF do you t More..

      Posted Oct-20-2010 By 
      castanza128 (619.82)  

      (0)

    • True,I have never read it but see her point clearly,The liberal media has tried to spin this and the shame is most dems and ignorant voters dont really get it.Separation of church and state is not in the 1st amendment.It does forbid the state from creating a state religion.Thats all.Liberals have wanted it to be other.They are sitting and spinning as we speak.LOL Funny people.

      Posted Oct-20-2010 By 
      cocytan (360.22)  

      (0)

  • Odonell went to Hogwarts school of witchcraft. LOL

    Posted Oct-19-2010 By 
    Flash_Back (651.56)

    (0)

  • OneEleven111 is correct. I will quote it again. Left read it.
    Amendment I
    "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievance."

    Posted Oct-20-2010 By 
    abolish (10.12)  

    (0)