Politicians in the US Congress have for the first time removed a previously threatened animal from the nation's endangered species list. The move is the culmination of a long dispute that has pitted the wolves' defenders against hunters who said the animals were devastating wild game they wanted for themselves.
At the stroke of a pen, US President Barack Obama on Friday stepped into a bloody fight between two American populations with clout in Washington and a loud voice in the news media - wolves and elk.
Tucked into a budget bill Mr Obama signed on Friday is a provision to remove grey wolves in a wide swath of the American West from the US endangered species list.
The move, sponsored by a bipartisan group of senators from rural western states and one of several policy measures grafted on to the budget, will eventually allow affected states to manage the size of wolf packs and, hunters say, help restore elk herds they say have been ravaged by hungry wolves.
But wildlife conservation groups fear it could set a precedent for political interference in a process that has previously been left to biologists.
The law removes federal protection from grey wolves in Montana, Idaho and parts of three other states. Montana and Idaho have already planned wolf hunts, and the wolves' champions fear the worst.
"We may soon be witnessing the second large-scale extermination of wolves in the West," said Suzanne Stone of Defenders of Wildlife, which has fought vigorously to maintain the wolves' federal protection.
Hunters' groups and state wildlife officials say the wolves have wrought havoc on herds of elk and other wildlife, and killed livestock and even pets.
They say wolf populations have met target recovery goals, and say states need more flexibility to manage the packs through controlled hunts.
"Unmanaged wolves have destroyed jobs, rural economies, and the opportunity for people to put food on their plate," said Don Peay, founder of Sportsmen for Fish and Wildlife, a group of conservation-minded hunters.
Once abundant in the US, grey wolves were virtually wiped out in the 19th and early 20th Centuries. To prevent the wolves from killing livestock as ranchers moved into vast stretches of plain, the US government backed an extensive effort to kill the wolves, with traditional hunting and even poison. By the 1930s they were mostly gone.
In 1973, President Richard Nixon signed the Endangered Species Act, which aimed to prevent the extinction of imperilled animal species and to aid their recovery.
The grey wolf was added to the list the following year, granting it significant protection from private hunters and from state and local government agencies.
In 1987, the government embarked on a wolf recovery plan, and later reintroduced Canadian wolves into the west. Since then the packs have thrived, far exceeding the 1987 goals. Last year, biologists estimated more than 1,600 wolves lived in the northern Rocky Mountains region, up from just over 400 a decade before.
Anti-elk violence
In 2009, the US Department of the Interior deemed the wolf had recovered and removed it from the endangered species list in the northern Rocky Mountain region, but a series of lawsuits by conservation groups halted the move.
At least 20 species - including the bald eagle and the alligator - have been removed from the endangered species list after recovering to healthy levels, but those decisions were made by the US Fish and Wildlife Service, not by politicians in Congress.
The hunters' groups which have pushed for the end of the grey wolf's protection argue the resurgent wolves have overwhelmed herds of elk, the wolves' prey.
Indeed, wildlife biologists in Yellowstone National Park said in January the elk herd there had dropped 72% since the 1995 wolf restoration.
And in Wyoming, wildlife officials said in 2007 that wolves had contributed "significantly" to the decline in elk populations.
Resurgence
Hunters say wolf management would allow elk and other game to thrive, putting meat on hunters' tables and luring big-spending big-game hunters.
"It's a travesty that the grey wolves totally decimated the elk herds," said Byron Bateman, a Utah hunter. "The wolf has eaten itself out of house and home. It's not the wolf's fault, it's the federal government's."
David Mech, a wildlife biologist who has studied wolf populations for more than five decades, said studies had not conclusively determined wolves had caused widespread decline in western elk herds, as drought and aggressive human hunters had also contributed.
But he said he supported the wolf's removal from the endangered species list, in part because wolves had rebounded.
"The public was led to believe that when the wolves reached those recovery levels they would be delisted and management turned over to the states," he said. "And the public feels very violated."
BBC News
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-13086459
Tea Party Members (not explicit connection made, just my personal assumption) Up to their usual 'Blame it on the Government' tricks.
Instead of controlling themselves (here described as aggressive hunters) they resort to killing, government bashing and their short term version of 'job creation'
There are appx 1600 wolves but apparently thats too many, but 12m plus registered hunters have nothing to do with the declining Elk population.
By: ElParcero
In: Regional News
Tags: NRA, Tea Party, hunters, grey wolfe, wolves, endangered
Location: United States (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 5891 | Comments: 19 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 1 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
Advertisement below
|
|
| Liveleak on Facebook | |
|
LIKE Liveleak.com |
-
Pasadena Tea Party - Pia Varma
-
TEA PARTY - PARTICIPATE OR SUFFER
-
Europe for Ron Paul - The Strasbourg Tea Party
-
St. Louis Tea Party Tomorrow
-
2 ex-Dem leaders charged in fake tea party scheme/Impeachable offense: act of war against mexico
-
Texas Tax Day Tea Party
-
Orlando Tea Party Organizers Talk to Beck
-
Cincinnati Tea Party - Obama's Socialism
-
Obama Aides Weigh Bid to Tie the G.O.P. to the Tea Party
-
Orlando 'Tea Party' rally draws more than 4,000
-
The Washington DC Tea Party




Maybe the Elk populations were too high because of the lack of predators and now it's been brought back to a more natural level.
Posted Apr-18-2011 ByPunch_The_Monkey (1156.28) 
Punch_The_Monkey View Channel Send Message
(4)
I can tell you nobody in washington gives a damn about saving animals.
Posted Apr-18-2011 Byjohn_b (358.98) 
john_b View Channel Send Message
(1)
@john_b They already saved them. They've been federally protected since 1973. They will be under state management now.
Posted Apr-18-2011 ByCharley572 (176.44) Charley572 View Channel Send Message
(2)
ahhhhh, the new site fu@king sucks..........................
Posted Apr-18-2011 Bydankmofo (476.64) 
dankmofo View Channel Send Message
(1)
@dankmofo
LOL I know, I'm still figuring it out. Seems like a lot of work to try and follow comments. Guess I'll get used to it.
Posted Apr-18-2011 Bymigs1955 (912.84) 
migs1955 View Channel Send Message
(3)
@migs1955 Yeah I'm not pleased with this.
Posted Apr-18-2011 ByDick Fabulous (681.00) 
Dick Fabulous Send Message
(1)
@migs1955
The only way I can seem to follow comment's is by remembering where the hell I commented last. I'm not happy with it so far.
Posted Apr-18-2011 Bydcmfox (30743.36) 
dcmfox View Channel Send Message
(0)
@migs1955 ok ok , the little pull down tab by registered, but if your readign this youv'e most likely figured it out.........
Posted Apr-19-2011 Bydankmofo (476.64) 
dankmofo View Channel Send Message
(0)
Development on traditional elk habitat is a big factor in declining population, but there is no denying wolves are having a huge impact on elk/deer calf numbers. Typically it costs around $150+ for a license and $500 for elk tags (if you get selected in the lottery). Typical hunter success rate is 20%. It's not the hunters who are reducing the elk population. By the way I checked out Northern Idaho this year and the deer populations are greatly reduced as well.
Posted Apr-18-2011 Bymigs1955 (912.84) 
migs1955 View Channel Send Message
(1)
@migs1955 It seems to me like wolf and elk populations have never had trouble finding equilibrium before. If wolves were really wiping out Elk, they would have done it long before people ever stepped foot in North America.
IMHO.
Posted Apr-18-2011 ByST0N3PONY (4999.72) 
ST0N3PONY View Channel Send Message
(1)
@migs1955
Don't forget for a minute that farmers have alot to do with this.
Posted Apr-18-2011 Bydcmfox (30743.36) 
dcmfox View Channel Send Message
(1)
@dcmfox
I didn't forget which was why I mentioned habitat destruction. It's a biggie. Not just in Idaho, but everywhere. People like me moving into areas that were once good farm land. Farmers have to move to new areas because all the new residents complain about the smells, flies, dust etc. Farmers/ranchers keep moving farther and farther away, but us city folk keep following them like ticks.
Posted Apr-19-2011 Bymigs1955 (912.84) 
migs1955 View Channel Send Message
(0)
@ST0N3PONY
Well mostly due to habitat destruction the wolves and elk are confined to smaller ranges and more competition from other packs. Easier to catch disease too. Just not as much room to roam. It's definitely not hunters- not at 20% average success at a kill.
Posted Apr-19-2011 Bymigs1955 (912.84) 
migs1955 View Channel Send Message
(0)
@migs1955 Yeah, I wouldn't attribute any of the problems to hunting. Organized hunting is the best tool and biggest driving force behind conservation. It's hunters who would miss the elk the most if it went extinct, not greenpeace hippies who have probably never even seen an elk in the wild. On the other hand, I don't buy the alarmism about disappearing deer and elk as an excuse to hunt wolves. Wolves have been on the brink before, and need a lot more protection IMO.
Posted Apr-19-2011 ByST0N3PONY (4999.72) 
ST0N3PONY View Channel Send Message
(0)
And they've cut funding for NPR and for Planned Parenthood. I just hope they increase the budget for defense because there's never enough wars we can get into.
Posted Apr-18-2011 ByDick Fabulous (681.00) 
Dick Fabulous Send Message
(0)
@Dick Fabulous I may be mistaken, but I don't believe this has passed the Senate, has it?
Posted Apr-18-2011 ByCharley572 (176.44) Charley572 View Channel Send Message
(0)
If the elks come back, maybe the forests will once again suffer, as they gobble up the new saplings.
Posted Apr-18-2011 ByTheSanityInspector (5865.62) 
TheSanityInspector View Channel Send Message
(0)