Liveleak.com - Redefining the Media

9/11, NORAD, 9/11 commission and Terrorism

Question the Authority

Record This Video
Liveleak requires flash. If you see this message, make sure you have the latest flash player installed. To install the latest version, click HERE

Download Video Now

Video Issues? Turbocharge you PC: Scan for Errors Now. FREE!



Added: Sep 6 2007   In:

By: madness8 

  • Views: 958 |
  • Votes: 4 |
  • Recommendations: 3 |
  • Comments: 11

Comments - sort by newest to oldest

  • Interesting clip.

    Posted Sep-6-2007 by "Matamata" (R) Canada

    Good comment!  Bad comment! (0)
  • this documentary is called zeitgeist! get on google video and watch the whole thing! it is highly recommended! =x

    Posted Sep-6-2007 by "ibzmate" (R) Australia

    Good comment!  Bad comment! (0)
  • Thats bullshit.... My brother was stationed at Andrews AFB on 9/11 and said they had planes in the air before the first jet even hit the tower. There main goal was to protect Washington dc. I'll believe him over this bullshit anyday.

    Posted Sep-6-2007 by "razorwired" (R) United States

    Good comment!  Bad comment! (0)
  • another intresting vid .. thank you

    Posted Sep-6-2007 by "muhajiroon" (R) Maldives

    Good comment!  Bad comment! (0)
  • I don't see why so many people have such a difficult time believing how the buildings fell. "controlled demolition" they think. With gravity being such a huge and overwhelming force on the building, how else was it to fall.

    The imperial thing simply floors me. What has the US done that was even slightly imperialistic? That is simply tinfoil stuff there. We even voted not to have permanent military bases in Iraq! Imperialism is the undoing of this whole argument.

    Posted Sep-6-2007 by "driedjello" Premium United States

    Good comment!  Bad comment! (0)
  • Quoted comment by driedjello: I don't see why so many people have such a difficult time believing how the buildings fell. "controlled demolition" they think. With gravity being such a huge and overwhelming force on the building, how else was it to fall.

    The imperial thing simply floors me. What has the US done that was even slightly imperialistic? That is simply tinfoil stuff there. We even voted not to have permanent military bases in Iraq! Imperialism is the undoing of this whole argument.

    hmmm, let's see. what has been imperlialistic(maybe you should look that word up) how do you think the USA has become a superpower in the world if not through imperialism? the u.s. certainly has not been an isolationist country. look up secret wars of the c.i.a.. the government might not be overtly imperialistic but it's foreign policy definently has been to help american business intersts throughout the world. third world=cheap labor=riches, for a few.

    Posted Sep-6-2007 by "triplette" (R) United States

    Good comment!  Bad comment! (0)
  • dj, look for info on Building 7. That building was reported as collapsed 20-30 mins before it fell by both ABC and the BBC. then examine the demolition theory of that.

    Posted Sep-6-2007 by "BabeezMomma" (R) United States

    Good comment!  Bad comment! (0)
  • Quoted comment by triplette:
    Quoted comment by driedjello: I don't see why so many people have such a difficult time believing how the buildings fell. "controlled demolition" they think. With gravity being such a huge and overwhelming force on the building, how else was it to fall.

    The imperial thing simply floors me. What has the US done that was even slightly imperialistic? That is simply tinfoil stuff there. We even voted not to have permanent military bases in Iraq! Imperialism is the undoing of this whole argument.

    hmmm, let's see. what has been imperlialistic(maybe you should look that word up) how do you think the USA has become a superpower in the world if not through imperialism? the u.s. certainly has not been an isolationist country. look up secret wars of the c.i.a.. the government might not be overtly imperialistic but it's foreign policy definently has been to help american business intersts throughout the world. third world=cheap labor=riches, for a few.

    I know goddamn good and well what imperialistic means. Here, I will post the definition for YOUR benefit:

    the policy of extending the rule or authority of an empire or nation over foreign countries, or of acquiring and holding colonies and dependencies.

    How exactly are we imperialistic? What land or government have we acquired and didn't relinquish? Don't presume that you have a better education than me. I am sick of that attitude. You don't defend yourself, so simply insult me by claiming I don't understand a simple definition.

    Posted Sep-6-2007 by "driedjello" Premium United States

    Good comment!  Bad comment! (0)
  • BTW, the United States gained what it has through revolt of Britain, the conquest of land by the displacement of native TRIBES and through legal acquisition of land from other sovereign nations via purchase. Still waiting on your evidence of the US being an imperialist nation.

    Posted Sep-6-2007 by "driedjello" Premium United States

    Good comment!  Bad comment! (0)
  • The claims in this vid are directly and specifically debunked using objective evidence and primary sources in the movie "Screw Loose Change: Not Freakin' Again!" and in the other links below.

    See here:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ssNcZkHVw8

    and here:
    http://screwloosechange.xbehome.com/fst/FST-D1.pdf

    and here:
    http://forums.randi.org/forumdisplay.php?f=64%22rel=nofollow%22

    Posted Sep-6-2007 by "RabidMarsupial" (B) United States

    Good comment!  Bad comment! (0)
« Previous  1  Next »
You need a registered account to make comments!

Advertisers