Safe Mode: On
What 6 years of Democrat Control Produces

Democrats have controlled at least 2/3 of Washington D.C. since Pelosi won the 2006 mid terms and Obama had 2 full years of a filibuster proof super majority as president.



It is time for a change!

Vote out the liberals that made this mess!

Romney 2012








Added: May-6-2012 Occurred On: May-6-2012
By: menderman
In:
Politics
Tags: obama, democrats, republicans, pelosi, reid, 2012, Menderman
Location: United States (load item map)
Views: 558 | Comments: 96 | Votes: 2 | Favorites: 2 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
'
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • Bush = Obama = Romney. Nothing will change.

    Posted May-6-2012 By 

    (2) | Report

  • Comment of user 'Alpha1' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
  • More Obummer lies. No surprises here.

    Posted May-6-2012 By 

    (2) | Report

  • Obama has to go but isn't Mitt the guy who used to buy troubled companies to break them up and sell them off in pieces? RP!

    Posted May-6-2012 By 

    (1) | Report

  • This entire election will be about Obama, Obama's promises, Obama's performance, Obama's economy, and Obama's plans. He cannot and will not blame the Iraq war or former President Bush. This means he will suffer a resounding loss, as we are always going to be a center-right, Christian nation. Sarkozy just got tossed from France, which is sliding into the socialist shit tank, so I'd head on over across the pond all of you socialist progressive libs.

    Vive le France!!

    Posted May-6-2012 By 

    (1) | Report

  • Comment of user 'esauistheend' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
  • What did 6 years of Republican control produce? What's the difference?

    Posted May-6-2012 By 

    (0) | Report

  • re: "vote out the liberals (who) made (the) mess"

    Bush43 admin was liberal?

    Posted May-6-2012 By 

    (0) | Report

    • @Santorum_2012

      Bush 43's spending was very liberal, and all the liberals screamed bloody murder about how his 1/2 trillion deficit would bankrupt the USA and now you libs think Obama's spending is good for America...so which is it?

      Posted May-6-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

  • Comment of user 'nomadlife' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
    • @nomadlife

      So, since GWB doubled the deficit and it was bad, BHO should double GWB's deficit and that is good? and you call me an "ignorant prick"...

      What would you suggest the USA replace capitalism with and what made our capitalism stop working?

      Please enlighten me.

      Posted May-6-2012 By 

      (3) | Report

    • @nomadlife lmfao - mightnot work for you - the shit has been kicking ass for people like me, who work and make the world "do-able" instead of free loading their whole lives and looking for 'free jobs" to be given to them.

      I am earning more and working more right now than I have in my life. In the past year I have created over 20 full time positions for people in the states and started two new company/service related firms. I think you believe too much euro-tabloid/socialism crap More..

      Posted May-6-2012 By 

      (3) | Report

    • @nomadlife
      Bush doubled it by adding 4 trillion. Obama doubled it again by 8 Trillion in half the time. Its not capitalism, its government spending. How do you attribute the growth of the deficit to capitalism? I really want to hear your rationale.

      Posted May-6-2012 By 

      (2) | Report

    • @nomadlife Some places aren't out of work but I'm not naming names because I'm in one right now. $16.50 + tips for waiters and can't find enough help.

      Posted May-6-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • Comment of user 'nomadlife' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
  • lol. Good luck Republicans. Romney doesn't have the women voters, the Latino voters, and even the Religious block have given him a tepid reception because he's Mormon. Your purity shit standards have ruled out anyone with a decent shot at winning the general.

    I think the best slogan for Romney right now is "meh... he's not Obama." Hell of a campaign slogan.

    Posted May-6-2012 By 

    (-1) | Report

  • Right: When you have the crazy republicans giving away millions to their corporate buddies, and cutting back services for the poor, you have a recipe for revolt.

    Posted May-6-2012 By 

    (-2) | Report

    • @markand

      Obama is just as corporately inclined.

      Obamacare, for example, will only benefit the government and insurance companies. Your average Joe will see their healthcare costs skyrocket.

      Posted May-6-2012 By 

      (4) | Report

    • Comment of user 'nomadlife' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
    • @nomadlife

      You know that guns require bullets, right?

      Go figure that a department who use guns would need bullets.

      Posted May-6-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • Comment of user 'Alpha1' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
  • Teabagger whiner.

    Posted May-6-2012 By 

    (-6) | Report

    • @gonow321

      So you approve of annual $2 trillion deficit spending?

      Posted May-6-2012 By 

      (3) | Report

    • @menderman For my part, I don't approve of ANY deficit spending. Bush II averaged over 1 tril. now Bohama's let it get even worse. I know it wasn't all either of their faults entirely, but somewhere, gathering dust, there's a big rubber stamp with the word "Veto" on it. Maybe someone should ask Clinton what he did with it. Maybe he took it as a souvenir.

      Posted May-6-2012 By 

      (1) | Report

    • @menderman
      Of course he does, he gets more 'Obama money'!

      Posted May-6-2012 By 

      (2) | Report

    • @TMoray1
      Totally wrong! GW Bush averaged 270 Billion per year! Obama averages 1.3 Trillion. Do some research!

      Clinton was restrained by a republican congress from '94 on. Bush actually kept our deficit under 300 billion despite 2 wars, even after the house and senate turned democrat. Then in '09, Obama, Pelosi and Reed decided to go on a massive borrowing and spending spree courtesy of the next generation!

      Posted May-6-2012 By 

      (2) | Report

    • @TMoray1

      The percent of Debt to GDP is what counts, which is a rough measure our ability to pay it.

      "2000 to 2008 debt held by the public rose from 35% to 40%" *

      It is now over 100%

      * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_United_States_public_debt

      Posted May-6-2012 By 

      (0) | Report