Follow latest updates at http://twitter.com/rt_com and http://www.facebook.com/RTnews
Vladimir Putin has called the UN resolution authorising action in Libya "flawed", saying it resembles medieval calls for a Crusade. Russia's Prime Minister says foreign forces should not protect one side in what he described as a political conflict.
"Libyan regime does not meet the criteria of a democratic country by any parameters. Its obvious. I can't add more. But of course, its a complicated country, based on relations between tribes. It needs special regulation. The Situation in the country collapsed into military conflict. But it doesn't mean you or anyone can interfere by defending one side. About the UN resolution, which gives grounds for the present military intervention. This resolution is defective. If we look at what is written there, it becomes obvious that it allows everybody to take any action against a sovereign state. And it reminds me of Medieval call for a Crusade - when countries call on eachother to go out and liberate something. Now concerning the core of events. By the way Russia didn't vote for this resolution. Its obvious that this is military interference from the outside. But you know, I don't worry more about this military intervention - there are a lot of military conflicts going on - and unfortunately will unfold in future. I'm worried more about the ease with which decisions are being made to use force in international affairs nowadays. For example it has become a steady trend in U.S. policy. During Clinton's era they bombed Yugoslavia and Belgrade. Bush invaded Afghanistan. Iraq was invaded under far-fetched false pretences, Liquidating an entire administration, including Sadam's children. And now its Libya's turn. It opens with a pretext to defend civilians. But its the civilians who die under the bombs during air strikes. Where is the logic and conscience here?! Both are absent. There are already victims among the civilians. What I want to say here is that we want and we plan to live in peace with everybody. We desire not to quarrel with anyone and more-so to be at war. But current developments in Libya confirm Russia's policy of building up its defenses is correct."
By: Xenophon
In: Iraq, Afghanistan, News
Tags: Russia, Libya, war, america, force, army, military, conflict, foreign, policy, Iraq, Afghanistan, civilians, bombs, weapons, air, strikes, peace, defence,
Marked as: approved
Views: 5604 | Comments: 28 | Votes: 1 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
Advertisement below
|
|
| Liveleak on Facebook | |
|
LIKE Liveleak.com |
-
'America's Army - Dead in Iraq'
-
Libya war driven by O.I.L.
-
SAM missiles intercept simulated air strikes in NW Russia
-
A sequel to America's Army
-
Tribute to the US Army iraq/afghanistan
-
Missile Copter! Pt-2/3
-
Wow: America’s Top Military Officer Won’t Rule out Shooting Down Israeli Aircraft if They Launch Strike on Iran…
-
Nicolas Sarkozy to urge 'targeted air strikes' in Libya
-
Missile Copter! Pt-3/3
-
Missile Copter! Pt-1/3
-
"Airstrikes in Libya did not take place” – Russian military - Air Strikes In Libya | Nothing Detected By Russian Military Satellites



Russia abstained from the UN Security Council vote on a no-fly zone over Libya when they could have vetoed the measure.
Posted Mar-21-2011 Byjohn1054 (5064.54)

john1054 View Channel Send Message
(4)
you have a point. hadn't crossed my mind. they may have a motive. we keep pouring our resources and money into other countries, pissing away our military personnel and equipment abroad until we get to a point there is nothing left at home. russia is wise and witty. they can sit back and watch the show as America collapses.
Posted Mar-21-2011 ByAmusing (5208.28) Amusing View Channel Send Message
(5)
I heard they have some experience in over extending their military presence.
Posted Mar-21-2011 ByRedbeardB (9.42) 
RedbeardB View Channel Send Message
(2)
Bamdizzle!
Posted Mar-21-2011 Byboomersooner (2092.74) 
boomersooner View Channel Send Message
(0)
Well, no. It makes him a hypocrite for condemning the resolution without ordering a veto on it.
Posted Mar-21-2011 Byjohn1054 (5064.54)

john1054 View Channel Send Message
(0)
I saw this earlier today and didn't post it. Glad you did. No clear mission except saying to protect civilians that is like me shooting at your house to keep you safe from being killed.
Either you go into kick arse or you go into it to make Qaddaffi look like a HERO.
Posted Mar-21-2011 Byubdumb (9067.16) ubdumb View Channel Send Message
(2)
he's got a point and his last words are telling...russia could find itself on the receiving end on a UN resolution...dang
Posted Mar-21-2011 Bysp0ke (420.36) sp0ke View Channel Send Message
(1)
sounds to me like he is too shit scared of the Islamic issue on his doorstep.......maybe im jst wrong though............hmmmmmm.
Posted Mar-21-2011 By777 (100.42) 
777 View Channel Send Message
(-1)
Putin is right
as usual
Posted Mar-21-2011 Bydestroygbiv (45.00) 
destroygbiv View Channel Send Message
(1)
lol
Posted Mar-21-2011 By777 (100.42) 
777 View Channel Send Message
(-1)
Umm then why didn't he VETO the resolution, Russia has the power.
Posted Mar-21-2011 Byzindo (781.22) zindo View Channel Send Message
(1)
he wants to test out his weapons
Posted Mar-21-2011 ByOwenHiggins (1641.04) OwenHiggins View Channel Send Message
(-2)
putin is right, the speed that the UN approved the use of military force against a sovereign state due to an internal affair would be a cause of concern for all nations.
the willingness of many nations like qatar to contribute to the lybian bombing campaign is less about liberating the lybians and more of a training exercise for their pilots.
but then again russia and china abstained from the vote instead of vetoing it, suggesting if a similar situation developed near them they would not hes More..
Posted Mar-22-2011 Byfludblud (175.30) fludblud View Channel Send Message
(1)
with putin saying 'crusade' may just cause a lot more instability..the arab allies will second guess themselves and the arabs populace will start a frenzy
Posted Mar-21-2011 Bysp0ke (420.36) sp0ke View Channel Send Message
(0)
LOL Like it.
Posted Mar-21-2011 Bymigs1955 (912.84) 
migs1955 View Channel Send Message
(-1)
son of a bitch is talking about invasion..
what did they do with afganistan? and also in georgia or that little shity country :P
Posted Mar-21-2011 Bysvensk_hassan (18.80) svensk_hassan View Channel Send Message
(0)
True,
True,
good point.. well made!
Posted Mar-21-2011 Byfigatomek (12163.88) 
figatomek View Channel Send Message
(1)
yep.fact!
Posted Mar-21-2011 By777 (100.42) 
777 View Channel Send Message
(-1)
Wasn't Afghanistan attacked by the Soviet Union? That does not exist anymore. And Georgia started their war by starting ethnic cleansing and also killing Russian soldiers. Can't blame anyone for defending themselves, right?
The thing with Libya is that, they are NOT telling us the real reason for this police action. If you listen to what the british prime minister and Obama have said, they said it is in the interest of Britain and America, respectively. They wrapped it in "we-are-the-ligh More..
Posted Mar-21-2011 Bywellybub (346.08) 
wellybub View Channel Send Message
(2)
haha whine and whine cause america doesn't step in .... oil more important then protester i think is the title of that ... U.N led by the U.S steps in to stop the massacre , now america has "invaded" and started another Iraq... stupid people just enjoy be able to complain .... literally why don't people just STFU
Posted Mar-21-2011 ByAkolade (1391.00) Akolade View Channel Send Message
(0)
i can't believe we are there personally...
oh yeah, mr. commander in chief is a big fat liar.
i hope we have a damn good reason to be wasting our shit over there, let me know...
Posted Mar-21-2011 Byrongravy (274.84) rongravy View Channel Send Message
(-1)
remember what that guy said, "they didn't want us in tripoli"
they got the 100 billion, now its a civil war of sorts.
Posted Feb-22-2012 ByOwenHiggins (1641.04) OwenHiggins View Channel Send Message
(0)