Safe Mode: On
In rare public rebuke, UN chief tells Iranian leaders to tone down rhetoric against Israel

In an extraordinary but little-noticed public rebuke, U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon has condemned Iran’s supreme religious leader and president for “threatening Israel’s existence” in “offensive and inflammatory” comments about the Jewish state.

Ban’s rare public criticism on Friday did not noticeably cool the increasingly hostile public exchanges between Tehran and Jerusalem. On Tuesday, Iran’s mission to the United Nations complained about the “irony” of the U.N. leader’s failure to condemn Israeli officials for employing similar rhetoric. In Friday’s statement, Ban singled out Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad for their recent comments.

"The Secretary-General is dismayed by the remarks threatening Israel’s existence attributed over the last two days to the Supreme Leader and the President of the Islamic Republic of Iran," Ban wrote. "The Secretary-General condemns these offensive and inflammatory statements.

"The Secretary-General believes that all leaders in the region should use their voices at this time to lower, rather than to escalate, tensions. In accordance with the United Nations Charter, all members must refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State."

The condemnation, which didn't get much attention, went beyond any statement by Ban or previous secretaries-general on the tensions between Israel and Iran, an indication, say U.S. officials, that the U.N is taking Iran's anti-Israeli rhetoric seriously.

Apparently stung by the criticism, Iran on Tuesday wrote to the U.N. Security Council that Israeli officials have recently threatened to bomb Iran's nuclear program. It also states that the U.N. Security Council and "other relevant organs of the United Nations" have had "no reaction" to Israeli threats and in some cases have "aligned themselves with such statements."

The diplomatic equivalent of a shouting match began Thursday with comments by Khamenei on Quds Day, when Iran annually pledges solidarity with Palestinian groups and demands an end to Israeli control of Jerusalem.

"The light of hope will shine on the Palestinian issue, and this Islamic land will certainly be returned to the Palestinian nation, and the superfluous and fake Zionist [regime] will disappear from the landscape," the 72-year-old cleric was quoted as saying.

On the same day, Defense Minister Ehud Barak said that while "there are risks” in an Israeli attack on Iran, “It's infinitely more dangerous, complicated, complex and costly in human lives and resources to deal with a nuclear Iran in the future.” His comments echoed those of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who suggested on Aug. 1 that a military strike against Iran’s nuclear program may be imminent. "Time to resolve this issue peacefully is running out," he said.

On Friday, Ahmadinejad, speaking on Iranian television, made some of his most extreme comments about Israel since becoming president of the Islamic Republic.

“The Zionist regime and the Zionists are a cancerous tumor. Even if one cell of them is left in one inch of (Palestinian) land, in the future this story (of Israel’s existence) will repeat,” Ahmadinejad said. "The nations of the region will soon finish off the usurpers in the Palestinian land."

In responding to Ban’s statement on Tuesday, Iran's deputy ambassador to the U.N., Eshagh Al Habib, wrote to the U.N. Security Council to complain that Israel has repeatedly made threatening comments against Iran without being subjected to similar condemnation.

"The Islamic Republic of Iran expresses, once again, its deep concern over, and strong condemnation of. such a provocative, unwarranted and irresponsible statement by (the Israeli) Prime Minister and Defense Minister as well as other officials of (the) Israeli regime (who) frequently threaten Iran with military strike," wrote Habib.

He closed with a subtle but apparent slap at Ban: "The irony is that there has been no reaction on the part of Western leaders and/or relevant organs of the United Nations, including the United Nations Security Council, vis-a-vis the inflammatory remarks and baseless allegations leveled against Iran's peaceful nuclear program,” Habib wrote. “Rather some even spare no occasion to align themselves with such statements."

Diplomatic sources say that the rhetoric is likely to increase despite Ban's condemnation. They note that Ahmadinejad is likely to condemn Israel even more forcibly next month when he is expected in New York for the annual meeting of the U.N. General Assembly. It will be the Iranian president's last speech to the General Assembly as Iran's president before his term runs out in June.

Robert Windrem is a senior investigative producer for NBC News.











https://whyweprotest.net/community/threads/in-rare-public-rebuke-un-chief-tells-iranian-leaders-to-tone-down-rhetoric.104672/







http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4274764,00.html


Added: Aug-29-2012 Occurred On: Aug-29-2012
By: aydeo
In:
World News, Iran, Other Middle East
Tags: UN chief, Iranian leaders, Tone down, Rhetoric, Israel
Marked as: approved
Views: 1718 | Comments: 30 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • Dear U.N.,

    Get out of my country.

    Sincerly,

    Bigair

    Posted Aug-29-2012 By 

    (2)

  • Perhaps this dumbass should also send the same message to the Israeli's.

    Posted Aug-29-2012 By 

    (2)

    • @MrG

      You see this is where brain power comes into play and you are just not equipt. Isreal never once has said they want to blow Iran off the map. Now... do you see the difference and do you understand or are you still working with digits and the alphebet is later?

      Posted Aug-29-2012 By 

      (1)

    • @bigair

      You see this is where you need to pay attention and your attention span is quite deficient unfortunately. I never said or implied that Israel was threatening to wipe Iran off the map but the Israelis are as guilty as the Iranians when it comes to their rhetoric. They threaten to attack Iran all the time, granted they use better language than their Iranian opponents but it's still threatening rhetoric. This Ban Ki-Moon character needs to send the same message to the Israelis and basical More..

      Posted Aug-29-2012 By 

      (1)

    • @MrG Why should Israel shut the fuck up when Iran wishes to wipe it of the map...and why is your anus under your nose?

      Posted Aug-30-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @funkyyaya

      Iran does not have the capability to wipe any country of the map. Even if they did have such capability Israel will return the favor and wipe them out as well. Both side need to tone down the rhetoric but I will say it again Ban ki-moon needs send the same message to the Israeli's to settle the fuck down. Now get your head out of your ass and stop asking stupid questions.

      Posted Aug-30-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @MrG Ive had a doctor up my arse with good results,but i cant agree with your comment it reminds me of rockets from Gaza...if you understand my meaning...BFN.

      Posted Aug-30-2012 By 

      (0)

  • Ahmadinejad and these other idiots need too shut their mouths. They want israel to attack us. So the people will rally behind the regime. Because they're hated.

    Posted Aug-29-2012 By 

    (2)

    • @Ali187
      I said it a decade ago;
      They don't need to attack Iran in order to hurt Iran as ks so evident with Irans staunchest allie in the arab world.

      Posted Aug-29-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @Airedale Sanctions are hurting the poor not the government. This won't slow down the nuclear program.

      Posted Aug-29-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @Ali187
      Syria is the taget Israel chose to attack Iran from two years ago. They didn't even have to put "boots on the ground" in Syria.
      oBama's arab spring was the domino and oBama's martyrs brigades camps in africa are the 'freedom fighters' of "alla" doing the will of Israel.

      Think not ?
      ok.

      Posted Aug-29-2012 By 

      (1)

    • @Airedale I agree actually. The arab spring is doing the will of israel.

      Posted Aug-29-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @Ali187

      Your first comment I actually like- Exactly as was written in Israel Haartez this week: Both Iranian regiem (talking against Israel) and Israel current leaders (talking against Iran) needs each other badly in order to survive.

      They actually helps each other out..

      Posted Aug-30-2012 By 

      (0)

  • Anyone who doesn't think the UN is shitting its collective pants because now a decade of anti-Israel vitriol is now motivating the Israelis to man up for serious war against the raghead horde doesn't understand the basic cowardice and dishonesty that permeates the mind of your average raghead scumbag. They're all tough talking when convinces pathetic dumbasses to blow themselves up in cafes and school yards, but when it comes down to actually getting their own asses kicked, they piss they're pa More..

    Posted Aug-29-2012 By 

    (1)

  • The United Nations are like a male porno stud. He's good looking, sounds the part, and dresses to the nines. However, when the chicks are in the bed and it's time to perform, he drops his drawers to reveal that he has no dick.

    Posted Aug-29-2012 By 

    (1)

  • Yes, Israel leaders also use ussless rhetoric against Iran, but there is a solid difference between: “It's infinitely more dangerous, complicated, complex and costly in human lives and resources to deal with a nuclear Iran in the future,Time to resolve this issue peacefully is running out," (Dm Barak few days ago)

    And: 'On Friday, Ahmadinejad, speaking on Iranian television, made some of his most extreme comments about Israel since becoming president of the Islamic Republic.

    “The Z More..

    Posted Aug-29-2012 By 

    (0)

    • @aydeo

      Yes so you guys must be special to be labeled as cancerous tumor, I remember you use to be god chosen people. I wonder what happened? ;)

      Posted Aug-29-2012 By 

      (0)

    • Comment of user 'EMAG-K' has been deleted by author!
    • Comment of user 'MB-UK' has been deleted by author!
    • @MB-UK

      we're not all that bad

      Posted Aug-29-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @MB-UK

      In Iran (just like all Israel haters tend to do) they hardly use the term 'Israelis', and simply use the word 'Zionists'- When they are talking about the 'Zionists' in all your quoats they simply reffer to "Israeli people".

      Posted Aug-30-2012 By 

      (0)

  • Iranians have boots on the ground in Syria already but they will fail to keep Assad in power if they intend to do some "mission from alla" against Israeli soil that is easily within striking distance from the Golan hts.

    Oh
    as if that's something Moon isn't aware of so late in the end game.

    Posted Aug-29-2012 By 

    (0)

  • a pig just flew by the window, damn!!!

    Posted Aug-30-2012 By 

    (0)

  • holy fuck we truly live in a backwards Orwellian world.... 95% if not all the rhetoric is coming from Israel or the US, reminds me of the school yard bully that beats up smaller kids while telling them "stop hitting yourself" repeatedly..SMFH

    Posted Aug-30-2012 By 

    (0)

    • @daillest utter horseshit.. Amhedina-dickhead has been saying this "we must destroy israel to the very last Microbe" crap since he was elected!!

      Posted Aug-30-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @daillest
      I could not have said it any better. It just amazes me how people are so blind to something this obvious.

      Posted Aug-30-2012 By 

      (0)

  • what your pet monkey-ragheads won't perform as trained anymore?
    What a shame, UN!!

    Posted Aug-30-2012 By 

    (0)

  • It wasn't a rebuke. The U.N. would simply rather its' hatred of Israel be obfuscated, not broadcast clearly, as Ahmadinejad does.

    Posted Aug-30-2012 By 

    (0)