USS Barry Launches Tomahawk Missile
Libya bound
Loading the player ...
Added: Mar-19-2011 Occurred On: Mar-19-2011
By: ubdumb
In: News
Tags: Libya, Cruise Missiles, Air Defence
Marked as: approved
Views: 4709 | Comments: 13 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 1 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 1 | Times used in channels: 1
By: ubdumb
In: News
Tags: Libya, Cruise Missiles, Air Defence
Marked as: approved
Views: 4709 | Comments: 13 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 1 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 1 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
"USS Barry "
Please tell me we don't have a ship named after our abysmal president
Posted Mar-19-2011 ByZardoz003 (1572.32) 
Zardoz003 View Channel Send Message
(4)
Happy to say it was named after Captain John Barry.
http://www.barry.navy.mil/
Posted Mar-19-2011 Byrman195 (137.72) rman195 View Channel Send Message
(3)
Thanks for that. Got a little worried there...
from your link:
"JOHN BARRY has, aptly and justly, been called "THE FATHER OF THE AMERICAN NAVY." His early, constant and worthy services in defense of our country; his training many of those who became the foremost and most distinguished sons of the sea in our early naval annals makes the title one fitly bestowed."
Posted Mar-20-2011 ByFire37Rescue (12181.30) 
Fire37Rescue View Channel Send Message
(1)
I'd love to have a nickle for evertime a liberal screamed it's Booooooosh's fault.
I'd be cashing in today.
Watch them play their Joker card.
Posted Mar-19-2011 ByArizona_Patriot (3118.66) 
Arizona_Patriot View Channel Send Message
(0)
Great comment. Really describes the trajectory and velocity of this missile. Bravo.
Posted Mar-20-2011 Bycastanza128 (619.82) 
castanza128 View Channel Send Message
(0)
(As of 2001) the BGM-109 Tomahawk missile model has become a significant part of the U.S. naval arsenal. It gives ships and submarines an extremely accurate, long-range, conventional land attack weapon. Each costs about $600,000 U.S.D-
Posted Mar-20-2011 Bycraigery83 (27.10) 
craigery83 View Channel Send Message
(0)
so we already have a winner in this conflict.
Posted Mar-20-2011 By7qGt (21.42) 7qGt View Channel Send Message
(0)
i think it misfired :/
Posted Mar-20-2011 Byfairycake (358.56) fairycake View Channel Send Message
(0)
The Arab League agreed to a `No Fly Zone`. Not this.
Posted Mar-20-2011 ByAlSet-AlOkin (1728.82) AlSet-AlOkin View Channel Send Message
(0)
How would that be instituted in your opinion short of armed conflict?
Posted Mar-20-2011 Byrman195 (137.72) rman195 View Channel Send Message
(-1)
For once let us take the back seat. Sit back, watch and let some other people do the work. We, for some reason, ALWAYS need to get our dick beaters in foreign issues...this will turn out to be just another waste of U.S. resources.
Posted Mar-20-2011 Bybulletsmakepeace (405.66) bulletsmakepeace View Channel Send Message
(1)
Well, i suppose these weapons are vital instruments in destroying radar and AA sites and such . So i was wrong.
Just hope they don`t start hitting Political or Governmental targets. I`m no fan of Gadaffi, but we don`t want to rock the boat with The Arabs or indeed Russia and China.
Posted Mar-20-2011 ByAlSet-AlOkin (1728.82) AlSet-AlOkin View Channel Send Message
(1)
We should have snatched that rat bastard and tried him as the murder he is. Then left the rest of the cavemen in the hell they've asked for. Now watch the rest of the a-rab scum leadership(oxymoron) point the finger at us. They were the ones asking for us to remove him(un-FUCKING-believable).... If it weren't so fucked up I could laugh about it. This wouldn't even make a bad movie. UNREAL. Nice job obummer you clown. Fucking Boy Scouts could outmaneuver you.
Posted Mar-20-2011 Byrman195 (137.72) rman195 View Channel Send Message
(0)