Iran May Have Aircraft Carrier Destroying Missile
The Russian state owned arms manufacturing firm Novator Design Bureau in Yekaterinburg was aggressively marketing the “Sizzler” anti ship missile at last month’s IDEX 2007, said Steve Zaloga, a missile analyst with the Teal Group, a Fairfax, Virginia-based defense research organization. The IDEX is the Middle East’s largest weapons exposition.
The Sizzler is a weapon that the US Navy has known about for six years but still has not developed a proven defense system to counter the threat. The Sizzler is a unique highly dangerous missile. Conventional anti ship missiles fly at sub sonic speeds and fly in a straight line. They therefore can be tracked and brought down by multi layed anti missile defense systems deployed on American aircraft carriers.
The Sizzler is a much more capable and dangerous weapon. “This is a carrier-destroying weapon,” said Orville Hanson, who evaluated weapons systems for 38 years with the Navy. “That’s its purpose.”
The Sizzler can be launched from a new class of silent diesel powered submarines. It starts out at subsonic speeds but about ten miles from a target the warhead separates from the projectile and a rocket fires increasing the missiles velocity to three times the speed of sound, about 2,000 miles per hour. As if the high speed didn’t present enough of a challenge to an aircraft carrier’s defense system the Sizzler is capable of sharp high speed evasive maneuvers that makes it highly difficult to defend against.
The Chinese are known to have deployed these missiles. If the Chinese ever decide to invade Taiwan American aircraft carriers at their current level of protection may prove to be defenseless against the Sizzler threat.
The Russians are known to have had talks with the Iranians about selling them Sizzler missiles. With tensions in the Gulf region heating up one would guess that the Iranians would convert some of their oil money into Sizzler missiles. With Sizzler missiles deployed the multi billion dollar United States aircraft carriers with their 5,500 man crews would be extremely vulnerable not only to crippling attacks but to being completely destroyed.
The Sizzler was developed with one thing only as its mission. That is to destroy aircraft carriers. Aircraft carriers are at the heart of any US offensive warfare strategy.
If indeed the carriers safety is gravely endangered by the Sizzler missile, and in the event of a conflict even one US carrier was lost, the prospect of an immediate escalation to nuclear weapons on the part of US naval battle groups would be high. Since the Sizzler is fired from a new class of fast and silent diesel powered submarines a “ring of fire” would likely be laid down by any remaining US aircraft carriers in the area in an effort to “clear” the area of any remaining threats.
The deployment of Sizzler missiles by countries that are potentially hostile to the US is a Pentagon war planners nightmare. No doubt a serious carrier incident in the Straits of Hormuz or in the Straits of Taiwan would have a lasting long term effect on US strategic planning.
The age of multi billion dollar aircraft carrier battle groups being able to quickly project American might into areas of the world defended by Sizzler missiles or perhaps more advanced future missile systems would likely come to an abrupt end.

Click to view image: '62714-IMG_577.jpg'
Advertisement below
|
|
| Liveleak on Facebook | |
|
LIKE Liveleak.com |
-
The Aircraft Carrier! Pt-1/6
-
The Aircraft Carrier! Pt-2/6
-
Navy Names Next Aircraft Carrier USS John F. Kennedy
-
The Aircraft Carrier! Pt-3/6
-
Gerald R. Ford class aircraft carrier
-
HMS Queen Elizabeth, New British aircraft carrier preview.
-
Car Launched Off French Aircraft Carrier
-
The Aircraft Carrier! Pt-6/6
-
The Aircraft Carrier! Pt-5/6
-
The Aircraft Carrier! Pt-4/6
-
Plane gets shot off an Aircraft Carrier



So, if America is worried about these missiles, why are they provoking the holders of said missiles? Are they willing to sacrifice thousands of American sailors so they can unleash the nuclear saber they keep rattling?
This is the kind of drama the world could do without.
Posted Jun-19-2007 Bydrivin98 (11.82) 
drivin98 View Channel Send Message
(2)
Posted Jun-19-2007 Bypersianguyagain2007 (28.06) 
persianguyagain2007 Send Message
(1)
Same goes to Iran so stop talking shit.
Posted May-12-2010 ByAO1JMM (278.20) AO1JMM View Channel Send Message
(1)
Iran need to end capital punishment along with the USA, please
Posted Jun-19-2007 ByAddictiveFZ1 (14.72) 
AddictiveFZ1 View Channel Send Message
(1)
This is the kind of drama the world could do without."
Posted Jun-19-2007 ByGixxer22 (57.16) Gixxer22 View Channel Send Message
(0)
Posted Nov-28-2007 ByTiconderoga (17.90) 
Ticonderoga View Channel Send Message
(0)
If Iran ever sunk a U.S. carrier, you'd have to scrape the remains of the country off the desert floor with a spatula.
Posted Jun-19-2007 Bytoo_much_noise (521.74) 
too_much_noise Send Message
(-2)
The concept of an aircraft carrier is as worthless nowadays as the battleship was during WWII.
The only reason we have been successful with our aircraft carriers is that to date we have never fought an enemy that had any real military capability. its easy to win when you beat up weak 3rd world nations under sanction for over a decade.
Posted Feb-26-2008 Bysavagesteve13 (13.40) 
savagesteve13 View Channel Send Message
(3)
ataking iran would definatlly will be a big mistake
with nasty qusegvcences on bouth sides:)
i would be iran president i would luch about 7 sizles
on each us carries on the first day ,
scuk those bitches:)
last time some rusians flew over oen fo the carriers:)
while they was sctarching there ases at breakfast time:)
Posted May-14-2008 Bymorpheus69 (142.64) morpheus69 Send Message
(1)
I have some issues with this. I'm not discounting the effectiveness of the weapon, but it's fired from a diesel sub. It doesn't matter how "silent" the subs are they still need to surface to charge there batteries. In addition, if the US has the capability to track and stalk the newest generation Russian subs, then they can track, stalk, and attack any diesel sub.
Another question i must rasie is if the US has known about this weapon for six years, do you think the US has been sitting More..
Posted Apr-9-2008 Bydurkadurka420 (15.72) durkadurka420 View Channel Send Message
(0)
Posted Apr-9-2008 Bydurkadurka420 (15.72) durkadurka420 View Channel Send Message
(0)
As for any Iranian reading and responding especially for persianguyagain2007..I hope we blow the living hell out of your country and there is nobody left but sand, oil, and a few camels. I spit on your nation!!! Bush made one big mistake.. not hitting Iran first!
You persians will see your day soon!!!!
Posted Jul-7-2008 ByMarkmaddog (10.12) 
Markmaddog View Channel Send Message
(0)
one nuke fired into your country and you wont have to worry about the usa going in to your country to get the oil, it'll be raining oil for days ha ha ha
Posted Sep-18-2008 Byjustpassingthru (36.10) justpassingthru View Channel Send Message
(0)
The only reason we have been successful with our aircraft carriers is that to date we have never fought an enemy that had any real military capability. its easy to win when you beat up weak 3rd world nations under sanction for over a decade."
over the horizon capability is huge! #1 reason china doesnt scare us......zero carriers.
Posted Mar-19-2008 ByFire37Rescue (12235.60) 
Fire37Rescue View Channel Send Message
(-1)
Unless these missles move faster than the speed of light, Im really not sure how effective they would be. You can't out run a chemical laser.
Posted Jul-9-2008 ByKufar68 (28.54) 
Kufar68 View Channel Send Message
(-1)
haha what a stupid BS write up. I rather tickle my balls then read it.
Posted Jan-11-2008 Byjtcruzzin (35.78) jtcruzzin Send Message
(-2)