WTC7 - Explained Very Simply
Amazing how many people are in denial . . .
Loading the player ...
Added: Sep-30-2012 Occurred On: Sep-30-2012
By: noxomus
In: Conspiracy
Tags: wtc7, demolition, pancakes,
Location: New York, New York, United States (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 24490 | Comments: 150 | Votes: 7 | Favorites: 6 | Shared: 1242 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
By: noxomus
In: Conspiracy
Tags: wtc7, demolition, pancakes,
Location: New York, New York, United States (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 24490 | Comments: 150 | Votes: 7 | Favorites: 6 | Shared: 1242 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Advertisement below
|
|
| Liveleak on Facebook | |
|
LIKE Liveleak.com |
Items
-
Demolition expert who denounced the official 9/11 story killed in car wreck
-
WTC+BBC Part 3
-
Pillar of Truth
-
Zembla (Dutch TV) Building 7 Demolition Expert
-
EMERGENCY WARNING FOR OFFICE WORKERS (NIST WTC7)
-
The Machines- WTC 7 mysay
-
Fmr. Gov. Jesse Ventura on the Alex Jones Show (4-2-08) - PART 2
-
Former Governor Jesse Ventura: WTC Collapse A Controlled Demolition
-
CD Expert Tells What it Takes to Demo a Building Like WTC7
-
demolition WTC7 water polo man
-
VIDEO: BBC WAS HALF AN HOUR TOO EARLY REPORTING ON WTC7 COLLAPSE
-
EXPOSED,WTC 9/11 Building 7 Demolition,NEW VIEW
Advertisers



The orange could have been a tangerine or a small grapefruit. Dramatic visualization: FAIL.
Posted Oct-1-2012 ByPoosti Malaka (1083.70) 
Poosti Malaka View Channel Send Message
(5)
whats wrong with that apple???
Posted Oct-1-2012 Bydaillest (36.20) 
daillest View Channel Send Message
(4)
@daillest
superb!
Posted Oct-1-2012 ByOhforfoxache (972.58) 
Ohforfoxache View Channel Send Message
(0)
See this is stupid. Most people know it's an orange because they have EXPERIENCE with the Orange. They are TOLD it is an orange in school. Take a Clemintine and ask people what it is.. how many will say it's an Orange? But it's not.. it LOOKS like an Orange. Take a blood Orange without telling people what it is, and ask people what colour the Inside is.. most will say Orange.. but it is in fact red. Visual identification is totally fucked up. You see a man covered in blood with a dead guy next More..
Posted Oct-1-2012 ByAariss (381.92) 
Aariss View Channel Send Message
(4)
Left out the part about how the the front of it had a massive hole in it. Left out the part that the structure had its weight on 3 trusses 2 of which were damaged. Left out the part of the video where the penthouse collapsed(internal collapse) first then about 8 seconds later the rest of the bldg came down. Left out the fact there is ZERO audio of successive blasts associated with a demolition as demonstrated in this video. Many argue they heard explosions but the time one hears them to when th More..
Posted Oct-1-2012 Byaa316 (602.42) aa316 View Channel Send Message
(4)
@aa316 Check these out.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNCRnlKfQXc&feature=plcp sources in description.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2V0WQFztLyg&feature=plcp sources in description.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TNXqkZO3Y1g&feature=plcp sources in description.
...why is not one person reported any MAJOR construction prior to 9/11..."
Like This?
"The building was extensively renovated in 1989 to accommodate the needs of Salomon Brothers. This led to the alternat More..
Posted Oct-2-2012 ByRadioGaGa (9.80) 
RadioGaGa View Channel Send Message
(0)
Fucking Bush!
Posted Oct-1-2012 Bycotoclop (46.00) cotoclop View Channel Send Message
(3)
@cotoclop
I know. There's nothing like a nice Brazilian Waxed chick!
Posted Oct-1-2012 Bycepheus_98 (48.92) cepheus_98 View Channel Send Message
(0)
The British accent totally adds credence to this utter fucking lunacy.
Posted Oct-1-2012 Bydoriedd (48.80) 
doriedd View Channel Send Message
(3)
its sad that even the simplest of explanations can not penetrate the thick skull of the willfully ignorant. Steel framed buildings do not fall down like that unless demo'd. A fire would not have made all of the vertical supports fail like that . . . sorry dummies.
Posted Oct-1-2012 Bynoxomus (1220.42) noxomus View Channel Send Message
(3)
@noxomus if you drop a building on another building, would that be enough to weaken supports? just asking.
Posted Oct-1-2012 ByAariss (381.92) 
Aariss View Channel Send Message
(0)
@noxomus it was not contolled demo. when the other buildings fell down it was like a earthquake,plus the fire that weaken the building and the also you need to remeber that all of those building were built differently
Have you ever seen what it take to demo a building ,,,the cutting of beams ,placing the charges
Posted Oct-1-2012 Byjonnn45321 (129.18) jonnn45321 View Channel Send Message
(0)
@Aariss. Steel deforms before it breaks. That's the beauty of steel.
Posted Oct-1-2012 Bynoxomus (1220.42) noxomus View Channel Send Message
(0)
@noxomus And deforming weakens the steel. makes is susceptible to breaking and heat warping.
Posted Oct-1-2012 ByAariss (381.92) 
Aariss View Channel Send Message
(0)
@Aariss It breaks after it deforms. It never had a chance to reach that stage. The building would have collapsed but not the way it did.
Posted Oct-1-2012 Bynoxomus (1220.42) noxomus View Channel Send Message
(0)
So let me get this straight...
Instead of leaving building 7 be as it was, the sinister government forces behind this attack decided to demolish it for the sole purpose of having to then come up with an explanation of why it fell?
Posted Oct-1-2012 Byworldraven (128.20) 
worldraven View Channel Send Message
(2)
@worldraven one plane never made it to its target. just a thought.
Posted Oct-1-2012 Byaureliusva (532.62) aureliusva View Channel Send Message
(1)
@aureliusva So 2 planes into WTC, 1 into pentagon, and the 4th into a 47 story building that is surrounded by other buildings and covered in smoke?? OK.. So many other targets Capital, White House, any number of memorials, Military bases.. nope gotta make it hard and go after WTC 7?
Posted Oct-1-2012 ByAariss (381.92) 
Aariss View Channel Send Message
(1)
@Aariss not proabable, but still possible.
Posted Oct-1-2012 Byaureliusva (532.62) aureliusva View Channel Send Message
(0)
@worldraven the two planes both hit the same side of the two WTC tower. on the other side of the two towers in the path of the planes was WTC7. it was just a coincident that WTC7 housed a shit ton of dirty CIA and FED laundry and was the only other building to collapse.
Posted Oct-1-2012 Byfha_dynamo (141.80) fha_dynamo View Channel Send Message
(0)
@Aariss Do you know what offices were in WTC7?
Posted Oct-1-2012 Bynewton (254.20) 
newton View Channel Send Message
(0)
Of course it wasn't caused by bombs, missiles or a a controlled explosion... Fire which burned a good part of the day, heated the floor beams near column 79 which expanded and unseated one of the main girders.. It had an offset truss system that re-distributed the weight making it unbalanced when the girder failed...
Posted Oct-1-2012 ByILovePickles (429.36) 
ILovePickles View Channel Send Message
(2)
@ILovePickles
No point in trying, these people are sold on conspiracy, they want to believe, and for believers, evidence just don't come into it, and intial vids of buildings falling look nothing like WTC7, their are multiple explosions clearly visible in the first vids, none visible in WTC7, and the WTC7 collapses in on itself, due to the above explanation
Posted Oct-1-2012 Bytugpilotsmiffy (91.34) 
tugpilotsmiffy View Channel Send Message
(1)
@ILovePickles You are absolutely right. Steel when heated gets soft plus all the weight will bring down a building in a heart beat. By their thinking the government is to blame which is in this case BUSH. In any case those nut bags will blame Obama for that too.
Posted Oct-1-2012 Byklaus123 (197.52) 
klaus123 View Channel Send Message
(1)
@ILovePickles Not to mention how many tons of shit hit the building from the North tower. People like to over complicate shit. Wanna go to war? Why not just slam some aircraft into some buildings. That alone would be enough to go to war... but noooo we need to get super secret agents to place bombs (that could have gone off during the attack) and try to make it LOOK natural. K.I.S.S
Posted Oct-1-2012 ByAariss (381.92) 
Aariss View Channel Send Message
(1)
@klaus123 better call them structural engineers and tell them that all those steel structure buildings they have designed and built fir the last 50 years are unsafe due to a weakness to low temperature fires. you would become a hero for saving millions of lives!
steel=strong
steel+lower temperature fire=weak flimsy steel
structural engineers know > government = government's explanation is correct.
ignore uproar from structural engineers around the world for a proper investigation, because of More..
Posted Oct-1-2012 Byfha_dynamo (141.80) fha_dynamo View Channel Send Message
(-3)
@klaus123 You ever worked with steel? You ever been a certified welder? Have you ever welded anything? Have you even ever cut any steel with an acetylene torch?
Didn't think so.
Posted Oct-1-2012 Bydav1936531 (500.52) 
dav1936531 View Channel Send Message
(1)
WTC 1 + 2 may have been a terrorist attack, but the more I see the WTC7 collapse the more I am convinced it was a controlled demolition.
Both towers falling down in a controlled manner is just coincidence, but WTC7 with all the damage on one side also collapsing in such a neat and tidy manner? Nah, pull the other one, it jingles!
As for why? No idea why it was possibly demolished, but we don't have to know why.
Posted Oct-1-2012 Bybmused55 (112.58) bmused55 View Channel Send Message
(2)
@bmused55 Agree.. WTC looks wierd. WTC1 and 2 were just a design issue, but the traditional design of wtc 7 makes it "look" controlled. We also only see this from 1 side on a 2D image. It could have fallen backwards into the damaged section. Who knows.
Posted Oct-1-2012 ByAariss (381.92) 
Aariss View Channel Send Message
(0)
@bmused55 oh, so two modern steel framed world record setting towers, collapsing exactly the same way into their foot print after taking damage at completely different areas, with completely different levels of damage, is a coincidence. whereas the third is not? wow.
@youpube .. so you really think that office fires can take down a steel framed building?.. and you believe that the damage to WTC7 was enough to take it down symmetrically? you have any idea how easy it would have been to plan all t More..
Posted Oct-1-2012 Byfha_dynamo (141.80) fha_dynamo View Channel Send Message
(0)
@Aariss WTC 1&2 had incredible design! this was not the first time the towers were hit by a plane, much less a bomb. the whole structure was designed to redirect the load to the outer walls, as well as the center columns (48).
the center columns took most of the weight and were 18"x 36", with steel walls 4" thick. how the fuck would office fires for less than 2 hours, heat that enough to make it fail?
as for WTC7, there are multiple videos from different angles, as well is pic More..
Posted Oct-1-2012 Byfha_dynamo (141.80) fha_dynamo View Channel Send Message
(0)
@fha_dynamo The fire traveled both up and down. The floors the firefighters got to were LOWER then the impact zone. Steel that is hit, deforms and becomes weak. It's this weak steel that started the collapse. You need to remember the Buildings were not just on fire, they took a plane hit from an aircraft that weighs up to 350,000 lbs traveling at speeds in the hundreds of MPH. Many people quote stats that deal with the structure not damaged. This IS the first time a plane hit the WTC. They were More..
Posted Oct-1-2012 ByAariss (381.92) 
Aariss View Channel Send Message
(0)
The Orange did it.
Posted Oct-1-2012 Byfotoman4u2 (3383.60) 
fotoman4u2 View Channel Send Message
(2)
@fotoman4u2 ROFL!
Posted Oct-1-2012 ByPoosti Malaka (1083.70) 
Poosti Malaka View Channel Send Message
(-1)
@fotoman4u2 lol its an apple dummy :P
Posted Oct-1-2012 ByRenaultsoleil (167.90) 
Renaultsoleil View Channel Send Message
(0)
@Renaultsoleil apple pie caused collapse cause apple pies weigh so much! causing a collaps from top to bottom D:
Posted Oct-1-2012 ByRenaultsoleil (167.90) 
Renaultsoleil View Channel Send Message
(0)
@Renaultsoleil
JUST READING THE COMMENTS UP TO HERE IS ENOUGH TO NOTICE THE IGNORANCE FROM MORONS BEING FOOLED BY THE MEDIA...LETS KEEP ON BELIEVING THAT THIS WAS DONE BY OTHERS. WHEN ITS OBVIOUS TO MOST UN-OPPRESSED PEOPLE THAT ITS THE BIGGEST ACT OF TREASON-GENOCIDE BY THE US GOVERNMENT IN AMERICAN HISTORY.
Posted Oct-1-2012 Byplaga (49.62) 
plaga View Channel Send Message
(0)
@plaga
WITH THAT SAID...IT IS TRULY UNBELIEVABLE HOW MUCH DENIAL THE AMERICAN PEOPLE LIVE WITH.
Posted Oct-1-2012 Byplaga (49.62) 
plaga View Channel Send Message
(0)
Wow, an orange coloured apple, I never...
Posted Oct-1-2012 Bypauliec17 (948.78)

pauliec17 View Channel Send Message
(2)
Bollox yet again.
The fires weren't extinguished. The Brigades evacuated early in the event. Fires raged uncontrolled fed by the rooftop diesel generator tanks and internal flammable material
It collapsed internally first - see the penthouse disappearing. The facade was dragged down by the core.
Posted Oct-1-2012 ByDEADBEEF (4147.56) 
DEADBEEF View Channel Send Message
(2)
@DEADBEEF
You aren't supposed to explain the truth on LL, we'll be tripping over all the broken egos.
Posted Oct-1-2012 Bydoriedd (48.80) 
doriedd View Channel Send Message
(1)
i didn't hear the explosions that would have been needed to destroy the supports.
Posted Oct-1-2012 Byspbster (67.50) spbster View Channel Send Message
(1)
@spbster
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0YvrKfWkxdw
Is that loud enough for ya?
Posted Oct-1-2012 Bywhatduh (438.36) 
whatduh View Channel Send Message
(2)
@whatduh One explosion? I really don't know what that was that blew up (or when it happened, the video doesn't prove it happened just before the building fell), but there should have been multiple explosions to destroy the supports the way other buildings are brought down. You still haven't convinced me.
Posted Oct-5-2012 Byspbster (67.50) spbster View Channel Send Message
(-1)
I'm finally convinced after all the conspiracy vids about wtc7 on LL ... well done nox....... FAIL
Posted Oct-1-2012 Byggppgg (885.70) 
ggppgg View Channel Send Message
(1)