Safe Mode: On
The Anthrax Attacks Remain Unsolved. The FBI disproved its main theory about how the spores were weaponized.

[Labs unable to replicate silicon coating content of anthrax samples. He wrote some pornographic emails, said some weird things, the emails made public, he overdoses on Tylenol in 2008. Findings made public in 2009.]
http://www.edwardjayepstein.com/

By EDWARD JAY EPSTEIN
The investigation of the 2001 anthrax attacks ended as far as the public knew on July 29, 2008, with the death of Bruce Ivins, a senior biodefense researcher at the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) in Fort Detrick, Md. The cause of death was an overdose of the painkiller Tylenol. No autopsy was performed, and there was no suicide note.

Less than a week after his apparent suicide, the FBI declared Ivins to have been the sole perpetrator of the 2001 Anthrax attacks, and the person who mailed deadly anthrax spores to NBC, the New York Post, and Sens. Tom Daschle and Patrick Leahy. These attacks killed five people, closed down a Senate office building, caused a national panic, and nearly paralyzed the postal system.

The FBI's six-year investigation was the largest inquest in its history, involving 9,000 interviews, 6,000 subpoenas, and the examination of tens of thousands of photocopiers, typewriters, computers and mailboxes. Yet it failed to find a shred of evidence that identified the anthrax killer—or even a witness to the mailings. With the help of a task force of scientists, it found a flask of anthrax that closely matched—through its genetic markers—the anthrax used in the attack.

This flask had been in the custody of Ivins, who had published no fewer than 44 scientific papers over three decades as a microbiologist and who was working on developing vaccines against anthrax. As custodian, he provided samples of it to other scientists at Fort Detrick, the Battelle Memorial Institute in Columbus, Ohio, and other facilities involved in anthrax research.

According to the FBI's reckoning, over 100 scientists had been given access to it. Any of these scientists (or their co-workers) could have stolen a minute quantity of this anthrax and, by mixing it into a media of water and nutrients, used it to grow enough spores to launch the anthrax attacks.

View Full Image

Getty Images
.Consequently, Ivins, who was assisting the FBI with its investigation, as well as all the scientists who had access to the anthrax, became suspects in the investigation. They were intensely questioned, given polygraph examinations, and played off against one another in variations of the prisoner's dilemma game. Their labs, computers, phones, homes and personal effects were scrutinized for possible clues.

As the so-called Amerithrax investigation proceeded, the FBI ran into frustrating dead ends, such as its relentless five-year pursuit of Steven Hatfill, which ended with an apology in 2007 and Mr. Hatfill receiving a $5.8 million settlement from the U.S. government as compensation. Another scientist, Perry Mikesell, became so stressed by the FBI's games that he began to drink heavily and died of a heart attack in October 2002.

Eventually, the FBI zeroed in on Ivins. Not only did he have access to the anthrax, but FBI agents suspected he had subtly misled them into their Hatfill fiasco. A search of his email turned up pornography and bizarre emails which, though unrelated to anthrax, suggested that he was a deeply disturbed individual.

The FBI turned the pressure up on him, isolating him at work and forcing him to spend what little money he had on lawyers to defend himself. He became increasingly stressed. His therapist reported that Ivins seemed obsessed with the notion of revenge and even homicide. Then came his suicide (which, as Eric Nadler and Bob Coen show in their documentary "The Anthrax War," was one of four suicides among American and British biowarfare researchers in past years). Since Ivins's odd behavior closely fit the FBI's profile of the mad scientist it had been hunting, his suicide provided an opportunity to close the case. So it held a congressional briefing in which it all but pronounced Ivins the anthrax killer.

But there was still a vexing problem—silicon.

Silicon was used in the 1960s to weaponize anthrax. Through an elaborate process, anthrax spores were coated with the substance to prevent them from clinging together so as to create a lethal aerosol. But since weaponization was banned by international treaties, research anthrax no longer contains silicon, and the flask at Fort Detrick contained none.

***

Yet the anthrax grown from it had silicon, according to the U.S. Armed Forces Institute of Pathology. This silicon explained why, when the letters to Sens. Leahy and Daschle were opened, the anthrax vaporized into an aerosol. If so, then somehow silicon was added to the anthrax. But Ivins, no matter how weird he may have been, had neither the set of skills nor the means to attach silicon to anthrax spores.

At a minimum, such a process would require highly specialized equipment that did not exist in Ivins's lab—or, for that matter, anywhere at the Fort Detrick facility. As Richard Spertzel, a former biodefense scientist who worked with Ivins, explained in a private briefing on Jan. 7, 2009, the lab didn't even deal with anthrax in powdered form, adding, "I don't think there's anyone there who would have the foggiest idea how to do it." So while Ivins's death provided a convenient fall guy, the silicon content still needed to be explained.

The FBI's answer was that the anthrax contained only traces of silicon, and those, it theorized, could have been accidently absorbed by the spores from the water and nutrient in which they were grown. No such nutrients were ever found in Ivins's lab, nor, for that matter, did anyone ever see Ivins attempt to produce any unauthorized anthrax (a process which would have involved him using scores of flasks.) But since no one knew what nutrients had been used to grow the attack anthrax, it was at least possible that they had traces of silicon in them that accidently contaminated the anthrax.

Natural contamination was an elegant theory that ran into problems after Congressman Jerry Nadler pressed FBI Director Robert Mueller in September 2008 to provide the House Judiciary Committee with a missing piece of data: the precise percentage of silicon contained in the anthrax used in the attacks.

The answer came seven months later on April 17, 2009. According to the FBI lab, 1.4% of the powder in the Leahy letter was silicon. "This is a shockingly high proportion," explained Stuart Jacobson, an expert in small particle chemistry. "It is a number one would expect from the deliberate weaponization of anthrax, but not from any conceivable accidental contamination."

Nevertheless, in an attempt to back up its theory, the FBI contracted scientists at the Lawrence Livermore National Labs in California to conduct experiments in which anthrax is accidently absorbed from a media heavily laced with silicon. When the results were revealed to the National Academy Of Science in September 2009, they effectively blew the FBI's theory out of the water.

The Livermore scientists had tried 56 times to replicate the high silicon content without any success. Even though they added increasingly high amounts of silicon to the media, they never even came close to the 1.4% in the attack anthrax. Most results were an order of magnitude lower, with some as low as .001%.

What these tests inadvertently demonstrated is that the anthrax spores could not have been accidently contaminated by the nutrients in the media. "If there is that much silicon, it had to have been added," Jeffrey Adamovicz, who supervised Ivins's work at Fort Detrick, wrote to me last month. He added that the silicon in the attack anthrax could have been added via a large fermentor—which Battelle and other labs use" but "we did not use a fermentor to grow anthrax at USAMRIID . . . [and] We did not have the capability to add silicon compounds to anthrax spores."

***

If Ivins had neither the equipment or skills to weaponize anthrax with silicon, then some other party with access to the anthrax must have done it. Even before these startling results, Sen. Leahy had told Director Mueller, "I do not believe in any way, shape, or manner that [Ivins] is the only person involved in this attack on Congress."

When I asked a FBI spokesman this month about the Livermore findings, he said the FBI was not commenting on any specifics of the case, other than those discussed in the 2008 briefing (which was about a year before Livermore disclosed its results). He stated: "The Justice Department and the FBI continue working to conclude the investigation into the 2001 anthrax attacks. We anticipate closing the case in the near future."

So, even though the public may be under the impression that the anthrax case had been closed in 2008, the FBI investigation is still open—and, unless it can refute the Livermore findings on the silicon, it is back to square one.

Mr. Epstein is currently completing a book on the 9/11 Commission.


Click to view image: '9b8e44e1e9b5-anthrax.jpg'

Added: Jan-26-2010 
By: HydrogenEconomy
In:
News
Tags: anthrax, fbi, unsolved, weaponized, silicon, alamos
Views: 6132 | Comments: 15 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • Comment of user 'lpankhurst' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
  • its remains unsolved because they want it like this, theres so many "mysteries" around 9/11 and post 9/11 to make a dozens of books about it, then again we will never know the real truth..........

    Can wait until the population revolt against this

    Posted Jan-26-2010 By 

    (2) | Report

    • And what is known is the fact these spores did come from specific labs.
      Those creeps! It just stinks of Neocon Madmen tricks and deception.

      Posted Jan-26-2010 By 

      (0) | Report

    • I wouldn't call it crazy to assume it was an inside job from the highest up in office.
      Rove barely got away with outing a C.I.A agent.
      Bush barely got away with illegally attacking a nation based on pure lies.
      Cheney got away with shooting his friend in the face while intoxicated on a hunting ranch.
      just think of everything else they did that will never be exposed.

      I'm putting my money on the Bush Administration having something to do with all this.

      Posted Jan-27-2010 By 

      (0) | Report

    • Just check out a few of these names, Google them and see what you get:
      David Kelly, the man that just had his death records sealed for 70 years!
      Frank Olsen, when his son exhumed his fathers body it was clear he was murdered. Of course his death was called "an accident" by the feds.
      Bruce Ivins, you already know.

      Many people that have had direct involvement with anthrax have been murdered.

      Then there is Lev Grinberg, never even called by the FBI after the anthrax attacks though he is More..

      Posted Jan-27-2010 By 

      (1) | Report

  • Why would Al Qaida even bother to make them weaponized. What a bunch of nonsense. Only weapon engineers would worry about anthrax not being deadly enough.

    Posted Jan-26-2010 By 

    (0) | Report

  • If USAMRIID is *the* DoD lab to design/counter Bio/Chem attacks on Service personnel (and that's what they claim to be), how could they not have the capability to weaponize anything they wanted in order to test defenses against it? Is USAMRIID suggesting the weaponization never takes place @ Ft. Dietrick - but elsewhere to include the defensive agents testing to combat them?

    Posted Jan-27-2010 By 

    (0) | Report

  • This is what happens when careerist FBI assholes ignore the evidence and simply follow their bullshit PC "profiles". Their profile at the time said the crime was done by a bitter, loner, white male because that's who Hollywood said committed such crimes. Of course, we all know it was very likely a muslim male who did this. But profiles that target non-whites are "racist". Only whites can have their lives turned upside-down by the FBI without a shred of fucking evidence.

    Posted Jan-27-2010 By 

    (-1) | Report

    • Only whites can have their lives turned upside down by the FBI without a shred of evidence??

      Boy do you need to catch up on some history!! That statement is way off base and absolutely pure baloney!!

      Tell that to Lenard Pelier, tell that to the Black Panthers!! Get a clue, you're wrong.

      Posted Jan-27-2010 By 

      (0) | Report

  • The "weaponization" of Anthrax is the process where it is "milled" down to 1 - 20 microns, then bentonite or silica is added to neutralize the electrostatic charge created by the milling process.
    Covertly growing anthrax without having the means to "mill" it down, makes the weapon theory improbable.
    http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1001161,00.html

    Posted Jan-27-2010 By 

    (-1) | Report

  • Interesting post, thanks.

    Posted Jan-26-2010 By 

    (-1) | Report