Safe Mode: On
BBC REPORTED BUILDING 7 COLLAPSE 20 MINUTES EARLY!!

An astounding video uncovered from the archives today shows the BBC
reporting on the collapse of Salomon building (WTC Building 7) over
twenty minutes before it actually fell at 5:20 pm
on the afternoon of 9/11. The incredible footage shows a BBC reporter
talking about the collapse of the WTC#7 while it remains standing in the
live shot behind her head. The BBC reported that it came down 23
minutes before it actually did! The transmission conveniently gets cut
moments before the building does "collapse". This video demonstrates
that there were people in the know about the controlled demolition that
was to take place and the story was leaked early. ACCORDINGLY TO THIS VIDEO, MEDIA HAD TO BE ADVISED EARLIER ABOUT WHAT TO COVERAGE! NOT ONLY IN UK BUT MAYBE WORLDWIDE. I REMEMBER VERY GOOD THE LIES THEY REPORTED IN GERMAN MEDIA! What comes to my mind first is: WHO HAS THE POWER TO DO THIS?

Loading the player ...
Embed Code
Plays: 360 (Embed: 0)

Added: Oct-10-2012 Occurred On: Sep-11-2012
By: kingloui
In:
Conspiracy
Tags: 9/11
Location: New York, New York, United States (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 1271 | Comments: 45 | Votes: 2 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • 9/11 was a zionist job.

    Posted Oct-10-2012 By 

    (2)

  • Haha, yeah. The BBC was in on it.
    How embarrassing.

    Posted Oct-10-2012 By 

    (1)

  • If I could find the cure for stupid I'd be a gazillionaire.

    Posted Oct-10-2012 By 

    (1)

  • did i miss something? is this goofy video month??

    Posted Oct-10-2012 By 

    (1)

  • I also remember hearing about car bombs.. That day was full of oops and rumors.

    Posted Oct-10-2012 By 

    (1)

  • Yawn

    Posted Oct-10-2012 By 

    (1)

  • Kingloui=king misinformation

    This is not new and has been around for years

    Posted Oct-10-2012 By 

    (1)

  • Firefighters statements that show they knew the building was going to collapse.

    The most important operational decision to be made that afternoon was the collapse had damaged 7 World Trade Center, which is about a 50 story building, at Vesey between West Broadway and Washington Street. It had very heavy fire on many floors and I ordered the evacuation of an area sufficient around to protect our members, so we had to give up some rescue operations that were going on at the time and back the peo More..

    Posted Oct-10-2012 By 

    (1)

    • @barogers619 Excellent post. Thanks.

      Posted Oct-10-2012 By 

      (1)

    • @Triode Yes thanks but I really didnt put too much work into it. I copied and pasted it from a 911myths.com but i do have a video(which I am trying to find) that shows many more firefighters statements showing that they knew 7 was coming down.

      Posted Oct-10-2012 By 

      (0)

  • It's in the back of shot FFS how blind are you?
    Shows they are running off pure hearsay/prompt and not investigating a single thing.

    And barogers/stonepony find a similar sized building of steel and concrete construction, that has totally collapsed due to partial construction/fire/damage. Ever. That's a big box to let you play with too.

    There are none. Even Chinese and incomplete Brazilian skyscrapers withstand being totally engulfed in flames, meanwhile WTC7 suffers a simultaneous collapse wi More..

    Posted Oct-10-2012 By 

    (1)

    • @N4CR "Little to no gravitational potential energy from falling mass was used to collapse"-N4CR

      Wow, this is quite a guess. One, if a mass is falling the energy it posses isnt potential but kinetic energy. Who taught you physics? The potential energy at a height h(47 stories) above that point is equal to the work which would be required to lift the object to that height with no net change in kinetic energy. Since the force required to lift it is equal to its weight, it follows that th More..

      Posted Oct-10-2012 By 

      (2)

    • @barogers619
      Gravitational potential energy was transferred almost wholly into kinetic energy for the main part of collapse, you are right.

      Which means there was effectively no gravitational potential energy converted into work to crush steel and concrete floor supports, office structure and the rest. Or collapse rate would be vastly slower than what was observed. So where did that additional energy come from?

      Posted Oct-10-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @N4CR No, you are a complete moron. You obviously learned physics from the 6th century book and couldn't possibly understand that the construction & design of the WTC buildings were vastly different than today's skyscrapers. In your case 1 + 1 = aardvark.

      Posted Oct-10-2012 By 

      (1)

    • @davidlamb12
      Never said WTC buildings, was referring to topic: WTC7.
      What's so different? Steel and concrete? Oh they could make 'gasp' double height floors in WTC7?
      And this makes them immune to commonly observed experimental and mathematical results, which are often referred to laws of physics?

      Potential energy was clearly not used to crush the building for a large part of collapse, or it would have been much slower, like an actual collapsing building. You are the moronosaur.

      My sister is a More..

      Posted Oct-10-2012 By 

      (1)

    • @N4CR Glad your sister can laugh at the deaths of 3000 people. Haha did you see the building fall? Sad Sad Sad... you and your sister apparently fell from the same tree and hit every stupid branch on the way down.

      Posted Oct-10-2012 By 

      (0)

  • omg!

    Posted Oct-10-2012 By 

    (0)

  • What ever happened to the CNN footage from a helicopter of the second plane making sudden and extremely accurate course corrections, as if done by a computer? Those taliheads must be damn good pilots.....

    Posted Oct-10-2012 By 

    (0)

  • wtf

    Posted Oct-10-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Its always best to report it first before anybody else!

    Posted Oct-10-2012 By 

    (0)

  • This clip went missing from BBC's servers.
    They claim they don't know how.

    They infer that it was a glitch of some sort,
    that erased simply this one clip out of their massive archives that are located on multiple separate servers.

    Posted Oct-10-2012 By 

    (0)

  • LOUI do you believe 9-11 was an inside job?

    Posted Oct-10-2012 By 

    (0)