Indian Constitution anti-Muslim? (Part-1)
-DR. ABDUL RUFF
The way the leading national parties in India Congress and BJP, both have
been ruing the nation alternatively, misused the ongoing anti-corruption
Lokpal issue and mixed up the threads wrongly by saying that
Muslims cannot be incorporated on the Lokpal commission as and when - and if at
all - the bill sees the light of the day and only Hindus, SC
and ST and other backward classes could be represented because the India
Constitution has no provision for giving representation or
reservation to insulted and injured Muslims and other minorities.
Many Indian parliamentarians, among others, have out-rightly opposed
inclusion of Muslims on the Lokpal commission as if Indian
constitution, prepared by Dr. Ambedkar under the "able guidance” of them
Indian premier J. Nehru and his cabinet companions (gangs?) police
minister Patel and military minister Menon, et al, and they mean to say
the constitution is deadly anti-Muslim. this could be erroneous.
Ambedkar had made use of the services of many big jurists from the imperialist nations
like USA and UK in drafting the constitution and they possibly
did not think the Muslims in essentially anti-Muslim, growingly fanatic India require special
constitutional security so that their future is blocked by the whims of the
rulers, bureaucrats, and politicians. Ambedkar
failed to foresee what kind of nation India would generate into in 50
years or so when Muslims are denied their basis rights and they become the
target of Hindutva fanatics and related terrorists. .
Constitution may have omitted the relevance of uplifting the Muslims who
are under the majority control primarily because Muslims then after the
trauma of partition were terrorized by the regime and media and they did not
care about any provisions in the Constitution to protect their
rights. Rather, the chief worry of Muslims then was to somehow exist in
the country. In fact this concern has not changed even today. In fact, the position
of Muslims in this era of bogus post-Sept state terrorism is much worse now. .
However, Indian Constitution has not said anywhere that Muslims should not
promoted or included in commissions or committees. The Constitution speaks just
speaks about "preferential treatment" to Muslims as a
majority, but who cares - the Congress or BJP?
If the Constitution does not give special status to Muslims, if they think so,
why cannot they, the parliamentarians who say they are the supreme in India, to amend
the Constitution to let it declare a new an inclusive secularist nation- if not
democracy - now?
n the Indian constitution it is said that Muslims in or in any India-occupied-nation
should be persecuted. But it has become an almost pass time for Hindus to insult,
injure, terrorize, kill Muslims. How can they do such crimes it without constitutional
Is Indian Constitution anti-Muslim? (Part-2)
The root-cause of all evils in India
now is obviously the Indian Congress party that has ruled maximum years
1947. By ably manipulating the Hindu mindset and other global
trends like anti-Islamism, anti-Americanism, terrorism, anti-Pakistanism,
etc, Congress party its secret ally BJP have been maneuvering every
possible thing in the country. Both silently promoted not only
devilish state terrorism but also rampant corruption and related crimes. .
Congress plays caste-religious politics and involves BJP through provocative
gestures. It has taken the support of bulks of Muslims for granted by
generating fears of anti-Muslim Hindutva forces and it uses the extra
communal BJP to make Muslims antagonize it and come to Congress fold only
to be fully controlled. .
The path of India to reach as one of most
corrupt nations on earth is not known to even the innocent Hindus themselves.
As soon as India got freedom
from UK colonizers, the new
regime in New Delhi
under Nehru leadership had undertook some "bold' steps indoors and
abroad. Bogus Nehru wanted to show to Hindus that now on India would
exist only for Hindus and Hindus are free to do whatever they want and job of
the regime would be to shield, legitimize and support all anti-Muslim actions of Hindus.
Colonial invasion, illegal occupation and brutalities in
neighboring Jammu Kashmir;
Occupation and destruction of Babri Mosque;
Control the Muslims (and perhaps other minorities) in all
possible ways, by keeping their leaders on their finger tips, denying
them social status, political say, economic strength, and any honor of
or unofficial policy of India
is very similar to Zionist treatment of Palestinians.
Is Indian Constitution
When the pressure of
people's leaders led by Anna Hazare insisted on promulgation of the Lokpal bill
by the parliament and regime increased, the Congress led Indian regime decided
to play dirty caste-religious politics by deleting the inclusion of
Muslims from the probable members of the proposed Lokpal. Why should the regime
include Muslims first and then remove them? Is it a mistake? – No! It is deliberate attempt
c to fool the nation.
Congress decision to play
this usual dirty game may have several calculations like state elections,
but the major cause is to somehow kill the bill any how by confusing the
Parliamentarians and others.
Having ensured the bulks
of Muslim vote bank arranged through Muslim agents in the party and government Congress
party has, in removing Muslims from the Lokpal, wanted to send a unmistakable signal
to Hindu voters that this party stands firmly with Hindus and can kick Muslims more
forcefully if they vote for the party, show that they are anti-Muslims and
Hindus must vote for them. .
Both Congress party and
BJP vie for majority Hindu votes and more these votes would ensure their victory.
Muslim votes only marginally decide the fate of the government.
Like Congress wanting to retain
power at the center, BJP as the ultra Hindutva extremist political outfit
claiming champions of Hindu causes by opposing even genuine interests of Muslims
also is eager to come back to power. Public insults hurled on Muslims and Islam
is the core policy of the BJP and its communal allies. Congress party, a soft
Hindutva party pretends to be friendly with Muslims only for their vote bank and
employs the BJP against Muslims though their parental Hindutva organization
Congress party openly cannot
harm Muslims but uses others to do their “job”
Secret nexus between
Congress and BJP has enormously harmed the ordinary Muslims. It is this
hidden anti-Muslim link between these parties which ultimately destroyed the Babri
Mosque in 1992 when the Congress government allowed the Hindu terrorists to go on rampage over
the defenseless Babri Mosque - an Islamic
cultural heritage, after a sustained anti-Islamic national campaign,
also though the mass media like TV, generating hatred towards Muslims
and Islam. That Babri Mosque was built on a temple ruins is a fake
argument by a few criminal-minded Hindutva ideologists.
Yes, the Indian state shields
crimes by the majorities against Muslims and their properties, though Constitution
does not instruct them to do.
Since they do
not expect many Muslim votes, the official extremist Hindutva
wing, BJP took that as a threat to their Hindu vote bank.But congress
wants to increase the share of Hindu votes so that it could make a
government on its own.
But why should these criminalized political outfits use the besieged Muslims as sacrifice goats?
د. عبد راف
Dr. Abdul Ruff, Specialist
on State Terrorism; Educationalist;Chancellor-Founder of Centor for International
Affairs(CIA); Independent Analyst;Chronicler of Foreign
occupations & Freedom movements(Palestine,Kashmir, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Xinjiang, Chechnya, etc); Anti-Muslimism
and anti-Islamism are more dangerous than "terrorism" Anti-Islamic
forces & terrorists are using criminal elements for terrorizing the
world and they in disguise are harming genuine interests of ordinary
Muslims. Global media today, even in Muslim nations, are controlled by CIA & other anti-Islamic agencies. Former university Teacher;/website:abdulruff.wordpress.com/ 91-9961868309/91-9961868309
|Liveleak on Facebook|