Safe Mode: On
Cowardly Dutch Army Runs Away and Surrenders Positions, Allows Genocidal Slaughter Of Women and Children In Bosnia...Pathetic. War Crime.

Everyone involved, down the last private should have been rounded up and charged with war crimes...pathetic, miserable, cowardly dutch...a stain on NATO.

http://uaport.net/en/news/ua/t/1107/06/223438
Dutch state failed to prevent Srebrenica deaths: court (5)
Azeri-Press agency 2011.07.06 04:13Font size : a
A

Baku APA. The Dutch state is responsible for the deaths of three Muslim men
after the fall of Srebrenica during the Bosnian war, a Dutch appeals court
ruled on Tuesday, opening the door to compensation claims, APA reports
quoting Reuters.
The ruling will touch a raw nerve with the Dutch, whose troops were in
charge of the U.N.

Loading the player ...
Embed Code
Plays: 1790 (Embed: 0)

Added: May-24-2012 Occurred On: May-24-2012
By: VikingRapeSquad
In:
World News
Tags: dutch, coward, army, srebrencia, massacre, genocide, retreat, pussies
Marked as: approved
Views: 2296 | Comments: 38 | Votes: 2 | Favorites: 1 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • To my way of thinking the killers were the ones responsible The Dutch and Nato may have been guilty of some thing, but not responsible. Just as we shouldn't blame society for peoples crimes, nor should we the Dutch.

    Posted May-24-2012 By 

    (6)

  • Armed with only small arms and a poor UN mandate against heavy artillery, outnumbered and no back up from other UN nations when situation became critical there was no other choice. The bosnian leaders like Mladic are responsible for the genocide massacre, not the Dutch.

    Posted May-24-2012 By 

    (5)

  • Never ever judge about this so called withdraw if you don't know the exact circumstances and the way we were let down by other nations who were part of the UN-forces over there. We asked for close air support moretimes, but didn't get it for still unclearified reason. We asked our government beforehand to allow our troops to carry the right weapons to have a strong defense, but didn't get this allowance. And last but not least, international intelligence had seen the movements of Mladics' army d More..

    Posted May-24-2012 By 

    (4)

  • Whats the big deal here...muzzies 6 feet below is great news. Should light up the grill,have some juicy steaks with ice cold beer.

    Posted May-24-2012 By 

    (3)

  • Was interested until I read muslims died, then didnt care..mission accomplished.

    Posted May-24-2012 By 

    (3)

  • Eh, it's not so much cowardice as realism. They could have stood in the way, and been killed with the rest, or they could've stepped aside.

    Recall the genocide of Rwanda - we had UN troops there too, under Canadian General Romeo Dallaire - he did everything he could, but in the end couldn't do much to stop the slaughter. A number of UN peacekeepers died in Rwanda because they tried to intervene.

    Posted May-24-2012 By 

    (3)

  • For two years islamist fanatics have used Srebrenica as safe zone for retreat after operations in which they killed thousands of Serbs in nearby villages, but that was not reported by western media. And you can google reports from Dutch commander in Srebrenica that he did see groups of armed man leaving Srebrenica, and returning after night...

    Posted May-24-2012 By 

    (3)

  • Bullshit. They were not Dutch troops, but U.N. troops at the time. Secondly, they had no choice. Thirdly, you can't blame the soldiers for the decisions of the upper ranks - they followed orders.

    And, of course, being responsible for three deas muslims doesn't mean they were responsible for all killed muslims in Srebenica. If you ask me, aks Milsoevic, Radic and the Serbs who is responsible for the killed muslims.

    Maybe the dutch contingent of the U.N. failed to protect the Srebrenica muslims; More..

    Posted May-24-2012 By 

    (2)

  • @ the original poster of this vid..NATO had very limited powers of engagement in this conflict. Furthermore, if you equate the deaths of THREE Muslim men to the amount of MURDERS commited by Al-Qaeda and their offshoots then i have one thing to say to you ..GET FUCKED TWAT!

    Posted May-24-2012 By 

    (2)

    • @777 True.

      The rules of engagement were ridiculously strict. The only military guy that said 'fuck the rules' was Lt Col Bob Stewart, British army. When Bosnian scumbags opened fire on his convoy of Warrior armoured vehicles, he sent them all to hell with the 25mm guns.

      Posted May-24-2012 By 

      (0)

  • Good. Fuck Muslums. Hahahaha

    Posted May-24-2012 By 

    (1)

  • it was Bill Clinton who saved the Bosnians from extermination, muslims should remember that before they try to call america evil

    Posted May-24-2012 By 

    (1)

  • No reason Dutch children should be forced to die for a bunch of Muzzies.

    Posted May-25-2012 By 

    (1)

  • Comment of user 'Rollerswartz' has been deleted by author!
  • "a stain on NATO"

    NATO has stained itself worse since then.

    Posted May-24-2012 By 

    (1)

  • The legacy of poor leadership leads to indecision. This incident proved it is better to make a reasoned decision that to make no decision.

    Posted May-24-2012 By 

    (0)