I recommend an article written this morning by my good friend and ideological brother the Green Arrow, entitled “The BNP are Open for Business”, in which he analyses the outcome of the legal action brought against the BNP by the state funded and quite clearly Stasi inspired quango the Orwellianly named Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC).


Click to view image: '363044b33c42-ehrc.jpg'

I find the Green Arrow's view that the outcome was pre-planned, and that the judge was merely delivering the judgement required of him very compelling. It was an outcome which those behind the EHRC prosecution, and most likely behind the judge himself, believed would throw the BNP into internal turmoil at a time when unity was most vital. It was no coincidence that this case occurred now, weeks before a general election where, following the success in the European poll, the party is expected to make gains.

The BNP have had the same membership rules for almost 30 years, yet it is only now that the establishment noticed they are discriminatory? I think not.

This was a deliberate attempt by the establishment, with their tame judge on side, to drain the party financially and cause internal conflict, so as to damage its chances right before the upcoming vote.

How they misjudged the BNP. One can imagine their disbelieving horror when, as a result of the earlier hearing, the resolution to change the party's constitution in order to admit non-whites as members, was passed almost unopposed. That was supposed to split the party in two and alienate its core supporters. What a miscalculation by the EHRC, who had clearly made the mistake of believing their own propaganda and expected the party to behave like the dimwitted racist thugs they and their chums in the controlled media like to pretend they are.

How they must have panicked when that did not result in blood on the floor and an irreparable schism within the party as they had expected.

You can just imagine little weasel Wadham rushing from shyster lawyer to shyster lawyer patching together a rear guard attack and coming up with the ludicrous claim that it was discriminatory for a political party to expect its member's to support it's aims.

In an honest society nobody would have expected a judge to buy such an argument, however, Britain long ago ceased to be an honest society, and any recently awoken coma patient, who still believes it is has not encountered the likes of the obedient Judge Paul Collins, a man who would no doubt have judged yellow to be pink had his bosses told him to do so.

However, once again the BNP's enemies had underestimated it, they had not expected Nick Griffin to act so decisively and even more so, they had not reckoned with the BNP's supporters who know exactly what they are up to and are not going to play their games.

Certainly there have been some mutterings at the elephant's graveyard otherwise known as the Stormfront forum. However, like the UAF before them, the EHRC would be fools to think that Stormfront is representative of the BNP. There are many on Stormfront who care more about descending to Valhala in fiery glory than they do about winning elections, and, in any event, would would be more likely to vote for George Galloway or even Islam4UK than the BNP merely because there is a greater chance the first two will say something nasty about the Jews.

The average BNP supporter knows what type of enemy we are up against, understand its tricks and are standing firm.

I also agree with the Green Arrow that this judgement may in fact have done the BNP a considerable amount of good. If nothing else it has exposed what is really happening in this country to anyone honest enough to look, and has shown to be true much of what has been dismissed as conspiracy theory.

If you examine this judgement, its malevolence is quite shocking.

The following are the passages from the BNP constitution which the EHRC considered to be discriminatory a view supported by the court who have ordered the BNP that they can not require its members to sign up to:

Section 3.2.1.: Our party is a party of British Nationalism, both ethnic and civic, and we are committed to the principle of national sovereignty in all our British Homeland affairs and of self determination and sovereignty in all Indigenous British affairs.
We are pledged to the continued creation, fostering, maintenance and existence of the unity and of the integrity of the Indigenous British and of the government of the countries of England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, and of Eire, which together, and as further expanded in Schedule 1 (“Interpretation Rules”), are referred to in this, our constitution, as our “British Homeland.”

and

Section 3.2.3. : We are pledged to stemming and reversing the immigration into our British Homeland that has, without the express consent of the Indigenous British, taken place since 1948, and to restoring and maintaining, by legal changes, negotiation and consent, the Indigenous British as the overwhelming majority in the make-up of the population and expression of culture in each part of our British Homeland.


In effect, the law of our land is now saying that it is illegal for a political party to seek to preserve the culture, identity and indeed very existence of the native peoples of these islands, and that it is illegal for a political party to oppose immigration.

That is the message which Friday's judgement sent out to the British people, and when they understand it, which they will, there are many who will not like it.

The widdling little whippet speaking on Sky News on Friday night may find the term “indigenous Briton” offensive, but most Britons do not feel quite the same.

This prosecution and this judgement is the clearest evidence for the British people that the British establishment is determined to destroy them and to replace them. Anyone who does not see that is either mad or deliberately and maliciously blind.

Many will not care, some will never care, but, just maybe there are enough who will care.

So what now?

Many believe that this judgement will enable non-whites to join the party and seek to destroy it from within. Sadly, that is absolutely true, they can indeed seek to do that. However, the threat is actually no greater than it has ever been. Throughout the BNP's history it has had far more white enemies than it has had non-white ones. It has always been possible for the BNPs many many thousands of white enemies to join the party and seek to destroy it from within, many believe some have already tried, yet the party is still here, and it is getting stronger.

Certainly in the short term some will try, and there will inevitably be attempts to claim bias and discrimination, but that is a fact of modern Britain and not exclusive to the BNP.

I do not deny there are downsides to what has happened. However, patriots in a land ruled by traitors must face up to many challenges and this judgement will just add a few more to the many challenges we must, and will, overcome.

However, this court case has also presented the BNP with great opportunities if it is prepared to grasp them.

There are those within Britain's ethnic minorities who wish us well. There are those with the Hindu, Sikh and Chinese communities who have great affection for the British, and who, most importantly, do not seek to take our country from us. If the BNP embrace those who support our cause and wish us no harm, then our enemy's loudest weapons loose their power.

Furthermore in the short term this attack on the BNP has won us publicity, and some sympathy, albeit some of it grudging.

However, there is one unintended consequence of what has happened from the BNP could benefit tremendously and which will last. The one thing this malevolent, vicious and hate fuelled attempt to destroy us has proved is that we were right and that we always have been.

The rulers of our land have briefly lifted a veil and, for a moment, an ugly, snarling face was revealed, many glimpsed the beasts behind the EHRC, and those who understood what they saw will not forget.