Safe Mode: On
Do truthers live under a rock? (Skip to 0:50 to cut to the chase.)

I keep hearing the argument from truthers that it would be impossible for a commercial jet to enter the Pentagon's air space; any planes would be immediately shot down. Therefore they raise the question of how flight 77 "penetrated" this heavily guarded air space and crashed into the Pentagon. (Famous truther Jim Marrs describes it as $40 Billion dollar defense system.)



Three words, Reagan National Airport. Seriously, how much "research" do truthers conduct in their search for truth?


Added: Jul-13-2012 Occurred On: Jul-13-2012
By: khartoba
In: Conspiracy
Tags: September 11, pentagon, WTC, WTC 7, Jim Marrs, Flight 77
Location: United States (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 1100 | Comments: 100 | Votes: 7 | Favorites: 6 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.

  • Release all the video that the F.B.I seized, from all the sites that show the flight path of flight 77. ALL OF IT.

    So simple, show us tinfoil heads what's up.

    Then the flight taking an hour unmolested 1/2 of it wildly of course in strictly controlled airspace wouldn't seem so strange.
    Then the single, minus 2 jet engine holes in the building wouldn't seem so strange.

    Posted Jul-13-2012 By 
    rozza2012 (393.28)  

    (4)

    • @rozza2012 Will NEVER happen..why risk total exposure when they have it safely tucked up their asses along with all the debunkers

      Posted Jul-13-2012 By 
      Wyseguy67 (4033.90)  

      (0)

    • @Wyseguy67 Agreed, actual evidence is too much to ask.

      Posted Jul-13-2012 By 
      rozza2012 (393.28)  

      (1)

    • @rozza2012 it keeps us arguing amongst ourselves.. they don't need to come up with as many distractions to keep us occupied while they shift their pawns into formation.

      Posted Jul-13-2012 By 
      WoE (532.78)

      (0)

    • @rozza2012

      LOL! It takes a special person to believe there are all these security videos that the FBI is holding onto. Where to begin? First, you watched with your own eyes, 2 jets crash into the towers, why would you have any doubt that a 3rd jet wasn’t used at the Pentagon? (Before you say, “Because airplanes couldn’t get that close to the Pentagon, so they had to use a missile.” Push the replay button on this video.) Second, what is the one characteristic about security cameras More..

      Posted Jul-14-2012 By 
      khartoba (137.90)  

      (0)

  • Lol, A little difference between a plane on its planned route and in contact with air traffic control, compared to a hijacked plane not on it's flight path and not in contact for forty-five minutes. The crash occured well over an hour after the first plane hit the towers, plenty of time to alert and to take action.

    Posted Jul-13-2012 By 
    daveporter (323.40)  

    (2)

    • @daveporter

      Plenty of time to alert and take action? Are you suggesting something could have been done to prevent the crash? Oh, right, you’re a truther, so you probably believe there is some type of missile battery air defense at the Pentagon. Yes, I guess to a truther, it makes perfectly good sense to put a surface to air missile battery… RIGHT NEXT TO A GOD DAMNED AIRPORT! There is no air defense around the pentagon. All air defense are tracking outside the borders to protect again More..

      Posted Jul-14-2012 By 
      khartoba (137.90)  

      (1)

  • "Truthers" are DUMB CUNTS that haven't a SINGLE CLUE in their heads. FACT.

    Posted Jul-13-2012 By 
    Tommyr (1033.34)  

    (2)

  • Thats actually pretty funny dude, I wasn't expecting it to get that close. Great video.

    Posted Jul-13-2012 By 
    The Grim (746.90)  

    (1)

  • im still trying to figure out what happened to the 70 or 80 families that were on board that plane when it hit the pentagon. seems like it would be pretty hard to fake their disappearances. has anyone come up with a conspiracy theory for that one yet?

    Posted Jul-13-2012 By 
    uschairforcesgt (545.50)  

    (1)

    • @uschairforcesgt there are several videos here on liveleak showing the process of human cremation in a controlled setting, why don't you take a look at those? you'd see that it takes a lot of heat to turn people into ashes, the fire that day should have left plenty of remains there.

      Posted Jul-13-2012 By 
      saul693 (527.64)  

      (-3)

    • @saul693

      What makes you believe there wasn't plenty of remains? Because the news organizations didn't plaster the carnage over public TV?

      Posted Jul-14-2012 By 
      khartoba (137.90)  

      (0)

    • @saul693 yeah, im not talking about body parts or the lack thereof. im talking about the people that used to be walking around, going to work, going to school, and waving to their neighbors as they left for work every day. where are they? these were real people, with friends and loved ones that miss them now. what happened to them if they didn't die in the plane crash? ever given that any thought?

      have you guys drummed up a theory for that one?

      Posted Jul-14-2012 By 
      uschairforcesgt (545.50)  

      (0)

    • @uschairforcesgt There's been countless mass murders commited by many governments around the world, the US has done it before, wouldn't surprise me if they would do it again.

      Posted Jul-14-2012 By 
      saul693 (527.64)  

      (0)

    • @saul693 ok. lets think this through. the government would have had to round up all of these people who would have been on that flight, who would have been coming from different places, depending on their connecting flights. rounded them up and murdered them. then faked the air traffic control and radar records that showed their prior flights arriving, and this particular flight taking off....all just so they could shoot the pentagon with a missile. oh, then steal the airplane from the airport, More..

      Posted Jul-14-2012 By 
      uschairforcesgt (545.50)  

      (0)

  • Comment of user 'Americanalltheway' has been deleted by author!

  • The truth is there were several military exercises scheduled for that specific day, so you had pilots asking whether it was a drill or not, besides that they had them flying all over the place, except where they were supposed to be at.

    And isn't your camera supposed to be turned off? you could have made the plane crash you doofus!

    Posted Jul-13-2012 By 
    saul693 (527.64)  

    (1)

    • @saul693 Modern phones have a "plane mode" so you can access the games, files, contacts, etc without the worry of transmitting certain frequencies. That is the problem, not just having them on.

      Posted Jul-13-2012 By 
      Sp33dyD3m0n (321.50)  

      (0)

  • Hmmmm it would appear that the Pentagon is right next to the glide path for that runway. So it would look like any other plane coming in. Plus pause the movie when its under, you will see no defenses. If it's next to an airport what defenses would you put on it? Rockets?!

    Posted Jul-13-2012 By 
    Sp33dyD3m0n (321.50)  

    (1)

  • Comment of user 'LBJFRWY' has been deleted by author!

    • @LBJFRWY Did you think 1 time, 2 time maybe 3. This plane has permission. This plane hasn't been hijacked and flown of course. If you were the FBI & this flight was flying like flight 77 you could find multiple videos of this flight & release it to the public in an open investigation.

      Posted Jul-13-2012 By 
      rozza2012 (393.28)  

      (0)

    • @rozza2012

      LOL! It takes a special person to believe there are all these security videos that the FBI is holding onto. Where to begin? First, you watched with your own eyes, 2 jets crash into the towers, why would you have any doubt that a 3rd jet wasn’t used at the Pentagon? (Before you say, “Because airplanes couldn’t get that close to the Pentagon, so they had to use a missile.” Push the replay button on this video.) Second, what is the one characteristic about security cameras More..

      Posted Jul-14-2012 By 
      khartoba (137.90)  

      (0)

  • Keep youtube shit on youtube and stop entertaining Truthers!!!!

    Posted Jul-13-2012 By 
    Donkey (30.20)  

    (1)

  • my only thing about the pentagon was why if its our national security hub were we given the shittiest quality "video" with no images of the plane hitting it. with all those cameras around it and at entrances and security gates the only clip they give us doesnt show a plane hitting it.

    Posted Jul-13-2012 By 
    OnlyLiarsBlock (615.20)  

    (1)

    • @OnlyLiarsBlock Because they confiscated the rest and everything else that is pertinent to this whole ordeal is deemed "classified" and unaccessable unless the government releases it..that won't be anytime soon

      Posted Jul-13-2012 By 
      Wyseguy67 (4033.90)  

      (0)

    • @Wyseguy67

      my thing is if they can release that shitty grainy ass quality video of the explosion they can give us just one angle or some shit of the plane. i am not saying it was a missile or anything but damn you can see all the cameras that building has and you showed us every angle of the towers....show us just one of the plane hitting the pentagon....its not like its top secret that, that shit happened....btw thanks for the thumbs up i would have done the same for you but the mods jacked More..

      Posted Jul-13-2012 By 
      OnlyLiarsBlock (615.20)  

      (1)

    • @OnlyLiarsBlock One of the most fortified buildings in the world with hundreds, HUNDREDS if not more CCTV's internal AND out..that is the best they came up with for the public LOL..sad really

      Posted Jul-13-2012 By 
      Wyseguy67 (4033.90)  

      (0)

    • @OnlyLiarsBlock

      First, you watched with your own eyes, 2 jets crash into the towers, why would you have any doubt that a 3rd jet wasn’t used at the Pentagon? (Before you say, “Because airplanes couldn’t get that close to the Pentagon, so they had to use a missile.” Push the replay button on this video.) Second, what is the one characteristic about security cameras that sets them apart from other cameras? Security cameras are up high, so people can’t tamper with them, and for that More..

      Posted Jul-14-2012 By 
      khartoba (137.90)  

      (-1)

    • @khartoba

      yes i saw on tv 2 jets crash into the towers....they showed me countless angles from media cameras to cellphone camera angles. but the pentagon is the most fortified building in america probably with probably the most security cameras....as for your pointing on the ground......they point level with the lawn and have some pointing at the doors, and the airplane was flying level with the ground. i am pretty sure the cameras on the pentagon catch the entire perimeter of the complex no More..

      Posted Jul-14-2012 By 
      OnlyLiarsBlock (615.20)  

      (0)

  • So true. Besides, our air defense looks for OUTSIDE threats. The system was just not geared for a 9/11 type attack. Hell, I was in the air (spent four days at an airport a thousand miles from my destination hub due to the air space closure) and only heard of two jets scrambled and they were 750 nautical miles from us.

    Posted Jul-13-2012 By 
    DOWNPLANE (729.92)  

    (1)

    • @DOWNPLANE Air traffic controller tend to look 360 degrees son, that's why it air traffic control.

      Posted Jul-13-2012 By 
      rozza2012 (393.28)  

      (-1)

    • @rozza2012

      That is not an air defense system 'son'.
      As an airline pilot, (which you are probably not) I know the system.The US air defense is designed to pick up long range foreign military aircraft entering our airspace illegaly. There are no dozens of fighters on 24/7 alert ready to scramble as entire squadrons. It does not work that way.

      Posted Jul-13-2012 By 
      DOWNPLANE (729.92)  

      (0)

    • @rozza2012

      LOL! Air traffic control operates surface to air missiles I guess?

      Posted Jul-14-2012 By 
      khartoba (137.90)  

      (0)

  • What the hell is that five sided building????

    Posted Jul-13-2012 By 
    Ahahuimamakamakua (136.34)  
    Ahahuimamakamakua
    View Channel
    Send Message

    (1)

    • @Ahahuimamakamakua

      A figment of your imagination....just ask the truthers, they'll tell you all about it.

      Posted Jul-13-2012 By 
      dw573 (55.70)

      (0)

    • @Ahahuimamakamakua

      PS: I was not here, and you did not read this.

      Posted Jul-13-2012 By 
      dw573 (55.70)

      (0)

    • @dw573 Permission to enter restricted airspace?
      Permission to enter cognitive dissonance?

      Posted Jul-13-2012 By 
      rozza2012 (393.28)  

      (1)

    • @rozza2012

      And what’s your point? Are you suggesting something could have been done to prevent the crash? Oh, right, you’re a truther, so you probably believe there is some type of missile battery air defense at the Pentagon. Yes, I guess to a truther, it makes perfectly good sense to put a surface to air missile battery… RIGHT NEXT TO A GOD DAMNED AIRPORT! Fucking moron. There is no air defense around the pentagon. All air defense are tracking outside the borders to protect again More.. More..

      Posted Jul-14-2012 By 
      khartoba (137.90)  

      (0)

    • @khartoba Bizarre why idiots like you still try and defend the flimsy official story.

      Posted Jul-16-2012 By 
      morganson281 (53.90)  

      (0)

  • Truthers will call you a troll or a moron, and they will disregard that video. It's not the evidence they are looking for to prove their crazy conspiracy theories.

    Posted Jul-13-2012 By 
    ufia (94.72)

    (1)

    • @ufia Bollocks, we will call straw-man(taking down a deliberately simplified proposition) & ask for clear evidence, such as all the video of the flight from every camera showing a connected flight path.

      Posted Jul-13-2012 By 
      rozza2012 (393.28)  

      (0)

    • @rozza2012

      LOL! It takes a special person to believe there are all these security videos that the FBI is holding onto. Where to begin? First, you watched with your own eyes, 2 jets crash into the towers, why would you have any doubt that a 3rd jet wasn’t used at the Pentagon? (Before you say, “Because airplanes couldn’t get that close to the Pentagon, so they had to use a missile.” Push the replay button on this video.) Second, what is the one characteristic about security cameras More..

      Posted Jul-14-2012 By 
      khartoba (137.90)  

      (0)

  • Restricted airspace is airspace which aircraft are prohibited from entering without advance permission. Unauthorized entries into the restricted space in Washington, D.C. are common. NORAD officials said there are typically two or three incursions a day, usually by pilots not familiar with the restrictions or who stray from their intended flight paths.

    http://definitions.uslegal.com/r/restricted-airspace/

    According to your LAWS, unauthorized entries are COMMON..end of story

    Posted Jul-13-2012 By 
    Wyseguy67 (4033.90)  

    (1)