Liveleak.com - Redefining the Media

100 Oregon National Guard Leave Home For Afghanistan

DALLAS, Ore. - One hundred Oregon national guard soldiers and 100 families are all preparing for a year-long sacrifice.

It began with a "Call of Duty" ceremony in Dallas Saturday. For some it's a first. For others, this is a familiar feeling.

One can argue that it doesn't get any easier the second time around.

"It will be tough to miss some of the milestones," said Duffy Cavanaugh, More..

Download Video Now
Liveleak requires flash. If you see this message, make sure you have the latest flash player installed. To install the latest version, click HERE

Record This Video

Video Issues? Turbocharge you PC: Scan for Errors Now. FREE!



Added: Nov 1 2009   In: news_politics

Recorded on: Nov 1 2009

By: marinemom  United States

  • Views: 412 |
  • Votes: 0 |
  • Recommendations: 0 |
  • Comments: 12

Comments - sort by newest to oldest

  • This is interesting. When I read "The Three Trillion Dollar War: The True Cost of the Iraq Conflict" by Linda Bilmes and Joseph Stiglitz, they talked about how, when Hurricane Katrina struck New Orleans, the reason for the late response was because of the lack of National Guardsmen, simply because they had been sent to Iraq in the "Surge" due to the lack of ordinary soldiers.

    Posted Nov-1-2009 by "lenovo1" (R) Canada

    Good comment!  Bad comment! (-1)
  • In the end, Katrina cost the US a great deal more than it should have and the only entity that can be blamed is the US administration and the warmongers within it.

    Posted Nov-1-2009 by "lenovo1" (R) Canada

    Good comment!  Bad comment! (-2)
  • I don't support this, we have enough not being "national guarded" at home, like the border for instance.

    Posted Nov-1-2009 by "Harbinder" (R) United States

    Good comment!  Bad comment! (0)
  • Quoted comment by Harbinder: I don't support this, we have enough not being "national guarded" at home, like the border for instance.

    did you read me above comments?

    Posted Nov-1-2009 by "lenovo1" (R) Canada

    Good comment!  Bad comment! (-1)
  • It's not their job. It's called the "national" guard for a reason.

    Time to stop the wars....

    But then the money stops flowing. The media would never let that happen...

    (cough) right GM?

    Posted Nov-1-2009 by "PH-DEE" (R) United States

    Good comment!  Bad comment! (1)
  • Quoted comment by PH-DEE: It's not their job. It's called the "national" guard for a reason.

    Time to stop the wars....

    But then the money stops flowing. The media would never let that happen...

    (cough) right GM?

    Its called "national" guard to differentiate the chain of command that falls under the governor of the state, the Chief of Army can come in if need be. National is just a formality. Each state has their own national guard but ultimately they all fall under POTUS.

    Posted Nov-2-2009 by "JARtoosmall" (R)

    Good comment!  Bad comment! (1)
  • They'll be back, in coffins, but they'll be back.

    Posted Nov-2-2009 by "JohnMcLane2008" (R)

    Good comment!  Bad comment! (-1)
  • clearing roadside bombs! FFS

    Posted Nov-2-2009 by "kiwimcp" (R) New Zealand

    Good comment!  Bad comment! (0)
  • how many will come back ???

    Posted Nov-2-2009 by "betomaz" (R) France

    Good comment!  Bad comment! (0)
  • Quoted comment by lenovo1: This is interesting. When I read "The Three Trillion Dollar War: The True Cost of the Iraq Conflict" by Linda Bilmes and Joseph Stiglitz, they talked about how, when Hurricane Katrina struck New Orleans, the reason for the late response was because of the lack of National Guardsmen, simply because they had been sent to Iraq in the "Surge" due to the lack of ordinary soldiers.


    Katrina hit New Orleans in August, 2005. The "surge" didn't even start until early 2007.

    Posted Nov-11-2009 by "FlibbleDeeFlobble" (R) United States

    Good comment!  Bad comment! (0)
  • Quoted comment by FlibbleDeeFlobble:
    Quoted comment by lenovo1: This is interesting. When I read "The Three Trillion Dollar War: The True Cost of the Iraq Conflict" by Linda Bilmes and Joseph Stiglitz, they talked about how, when Hurricane Katrina struck New Orleans, the reason for the late response was because of the lack of National Guardsmen, simply because they had been sent to Iraq in the "Surge" due to the lack of ordinary soldiers.


    Katrina hit New Orleans in August, 2005. The "surge" didn't even start until early 2007.

    Ok, but you think only reservists were being shipped out before the Surge? Think again!

    Posted 9 days ago by "lenovo1" (R) Canada

    Good comment!  Bad comment! (-1)
  • Quoted comment by lenovo1:
    Quoted comment by FlibbleDeeFlobble:
    Quoted comment by lenovo1: This is interesting. When I read "The Three Trillion Dollar War: The True Cost of the Iraq Conflict" by Linda Bilmes and Joseph Stiglitz, they talked about how, when Hurricane Katrina struck New Orleans, the reason for the late response was because of the lack of National Guardsmen, simply because they had been sent to Iraq in the "Surge" due to the lack of ordinary soldiers.


    Katrina hit New Orleans in August, 2005. The "surge" didn't even start until early 2007.

    Ok, but you think only reservists were being shipped out before the Surge? Think again!

    Like nearly everything you say, that makes no sense. No troops started shipping out for the Surge until January of 2007, which was a year and a half after hurricane Katrina.

    Posted 9 days ago by "FlibbleDeeFlobble" (R) United States

    Good comment!  Bad comment! (0)
« Previous  1  Next »
You need a registered account to make comments!

Advertisers