Safe Mode: On
Pentagon Launches Desperate Damage Control Over Shocking Panetta Testimony 

The United States has ceded control of its affairs to international bureaucrats

During the hearing yesterday Panetta and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey brazenly admitted that their authority comes not from the U.S. Constitution, but that the United States is subservient to and takes its marching orders from the United Nations and NATO, international bodies over which the American people have no democratic influence.
Panetta was asked by Senator Jeff Sessions, “We spend our time worrying about the U.N., the Arab League, NATO and too little time, in my opinion, worrying about the elected representatives of the United States. As you go forward, will you consult with the United States Congress?”
The Defense Secretary responded “You know, our goal would be to seek international permission. And we would come to the Congress and inform you and determine how best to approach this, whether or not we would want to get permission from the Congress.”
Despite Sessions’ repeated efforts to get Panetta to acknowledge that the United States Congress is supreme to the likes of NATO and the UN, Panetta exalted the power of international bodies over the US legislative branch.
“I’m really baffled by the idea that somehow an international assembly provides a legal basis for the United States military to be deployed in combat,” Sessions said. “I don’t believe it’s close to being correct. They provide no legal authority. The only legal authority that’s required to deploy the United States military is of the Congress and the president and the law and the Constitution.”
Panetta’s assertion that he would seek “international permission” before ‘informing’ Congress about the actions of the US military provoked a firestorm of controversy, prompting the Pentagon to engage in damage control by claiming Panetta’s comments were misinterpreted.

“He was re-emphasizing the need for an international mandate. We are not ceding U.S. decision-making authority to some foreign body,” a defense official told CNN.
However, this is not the first time that the authority of international bodies has been framed as being superior to the US Congress and the Constitution.
In June last year, President Obama arrogantly expressed his hostility to the rule of law when he dismissed the need to get congressional authorization to commit the United States to a military intervention in Libya, churlishly dismissing criticism and remarking, “I don’t even have to get to the Constitutional question.”
Obama tried to legitimize his failure to obtain Congressional approval for military involvement by sending a letter to Speaker of the House John Boehner in which he said the military assault was “authorized by the United Nations (U.N.) Security Council.”
Panetta’s testimony that the US looks to obtain “international permission” before it acts, allied with Obama citing the UN as the supreme authority while trashing the power of Congress, prove that the United States has ceded control over its own affairs to unelected international bureaucrats, just as the countries of the European Union have done likewise.

Loading the player ...
Embed Code
Plays: 2894 (Embed: 0)

Added: Mar-9-2012 Occurred On: Mar-8-2012
By: Tiny Man
In:
World News
Tags: obama, panetta, congress, infowar, control, war, syria
Marked as: approved
Views: 4124 | Comments: 37 | Votes: 2 | Favorites: 2 | Shared: 15 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 3
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • This administration is doing everything they can to go around the Constitution.

    Posted Mar-10-2012 By 

    (5)

  • Comment of user 'Flip500' has been deleted by author!
  • one word, TREASON.

    How are they going to defend the homeland when the new world order has them spread out around the world running errands?

    Answer: They can't. The USA is being destroyed by corrupt assholes and border hoppers but no one is around to stop them.

    Posted Mar-10-2012 By 

    (2)

  • It's hilarious people are acting like it's all Obama's fault as if he was the first one to do this shit. You're all a bunch of fucking tools if you can't see both parties do the same shit.

    Posted Mar-10-2012 By 

    (2)

  • There you have it. Proof that the obummer administration is actively giving US soverignty away to the UN and NATO.
    I believe this bunch of ass clowns would follow a UN mandate to disarm the American public if they think the UN can tell us for what purpose, when and where to deploy our troops.
    This is serious shit! What if the UN decides we need to deploy our troops for some reason inside the US?
    These traitorous bastards MUST be thrown out of office in November!

    Posted Mar-10-2012 By 

    (1)

  • What threat did Libya and Bosnia present to our national security? This is complete bullshit.

    Posted Mar-10-2012 By 

    (1)

  • Comment of user 'Flip500' has been deleted by author!
  • "When posing a threat to the United States" ?? Libya? LMAO

    Posted Mar-10-2012 By 

    (1)

  • It is high time that service members and veterans with service obligations begin to disobey unconstutional orders and stand firm with their oath.

    Thank God I dont work for these fuckers any more

    This to me seems to be all the evidence I need to defy any activation from the IRR, if not I'm hidding out like anne frank........except I wont get caught.

    Posted Mar-10-2012 By 

    (1)

  • Thanks, good post.

    Posted Mar-10-2012 By 

    (0)

  • These people need to be reeled in. This is criminal.

    Posted Mar-10-2012 By 

    (0)

  • holy shite...us military proven to be a private army...lol

    Posted Mar-10-2012 By 

    (0)

  • WTF!!! Generals should not be involved in the political decision-making process. Instead, they should proffer advice regarding the use of the military in achieving policy-makers goals, and as to the probable success of the military outcome. It should be left to the political leaders to decide if the military option should be pursued.
    "Sounds like we have a Rouge Military"
    The title should have said, "US Military commanders overstepping and ignoring Congresses power."

    Posted Mar-10-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Time to start throwing these renegade traitor type generals AND obama in jail for refusing to PROTECT and ABIDE BY our Constitution as per their OATH OF OFFICE.

    Ron Paul 2012!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    NO MORE false flag bullshit to create "reasons" for war, just to line the pockets of the wealthy "elite".

    Posted Mar-10-2012 By 

    (0)

    • Comment of user 'Flip500' has been deleted by author!
  • Bunch of fucking idiots running this country.

    Posted Mar-10-2012 By 

    (0)