Safe Mode: On
DNA encyclopaedia a 'huge breakthrough' - expert.

.
.A New Zealand genetics expert has heralded the Encyclopaedia of DNA Elements as a "huge breakthrough".

The ENCODE Project has discovered that so-called "junk DNA" in the human genome is more useful than previously thought. Rather than useless remnants from our evolutionary past, half or more of human DNA act as "gene switches", researchers found.

The findings are the work of more than 500 scientists worldwide and were yesterday released in 30 papers in three journals.

Genes are not always turned "on", director of genetics at Otago University, associate professor Peter Dearden explained. Different genes are turned on in different cells and tissues, making those cells different from one another.

"If you think about all the cell types that are in the human being ... the differences in those different sorts of cells is about what genes are turned on in those cells, what proteins they're making," Dr Dearden said.

"The difference between a liver cell and a kidney cell isn't what's in the genome - it's what bits of the genome are turned on."

Dr Dearden likened the historic 2001 sequencing of the human genome to a "massive library".

"Now what we have got is at least an index of that information, we've got some idea of where those little bits of the genome are which control that information that we discovered in 2001," he said.

Dr Dearden heralded the findings as a "really important breakthrough".

"It's a huge breakthrough - it really makes an enormous difference that we can point to a piece of DNA and say 'well that piece of DNA controls this particular gene and makes sure it is turned on in neural cells or kidney cells or whatever'."

Scientists say the discovery could have massive impact on research on diseases. For example, most of the DNA changes which make cells turn cancerous occurs in the pieces of DNA which control genes - the switches.

While an exciting breakthrough, Dr Dearden said there was still more work to be done in the area.

"We've got this map of where particular elements are in the genome, [but] we still need to understand better what they do and how they do their job.

"It's like another layer of information. The human genome was great, but it didn't tell us everything we need to know. We're now a little bit further along in understanding what it does. There is still more information to find out what it does, how it does that job and why it is important."

For more on the Encode project, Dr Peter Dearden has written a blog about the breakthrough here.




Source:

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&;objectid=10832430


Added: Sep-8-2012 Occurred On: Sep-8-2012
By: God_Himself
In:
Science and Technology
Tags: DNA, Genetics, Genome, ENCODE Project, Genes, Cells,
Location: New Zealand (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 1597 | Comments: 17 | Votes: 1 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • Genetic switches. One day all the women in the world will have perfect breasts...thats a world I want to live in.

    Posted Sep-8-2012 By 

    (4)

  • Comment of user 'DirtyUncleBerty' has been deleted by author!
    • @DirtyUncleBerty

      Be patient Dirty Uncle, Rome wasn't built in a day ;-)

      By the way, I believe we would have advanced a lot further as humans if religious freaks and politicians didn't put their dick into the mix to stop scientific progress. The latest one was Stem Cell Research ban but the list is massive and goes back hundreds of years ...


      .

      Posted Sep-8-2012 By 

      (6)

    • @God_Himself Truth.

      Posted Sep-8-2012 By 

      (3)

    • @God_Himself

      Amen to that!

      Posted Sep-8-2012 By 

      (3)

    • @DirtyUncleBerty

      That's because you are unaware of the progress made. Still not curing many illnesses, but we are much better now at diagnosing and forecasting several of them, and the lot keeps growing every day.

      Sequencing genomes is like acquiring libraries. It's a great thing, but still someone has to read the books and be clever enough to make some kind of sense out of them. Getting the libraries is the relatively easy thing, reading all of of the books is going to take a bit longer, and More..

      Posted Sep-8-2012 By 

      (3)

    • Comment of user 'DirtyUncleBerty' has been deleted by author!
  • All my switches are in the on position.....Ladies??
    can't dance but can sing and romance!!...hold on...popped a breaker again..damn.

    Posted Sep-8-2012 By 

    (3)

  • It will be a miracle the day they find out which "switch" closes your wives mouth. a miracle indeed.

    Posted Sep-8-2012 By 

    (2)

  • I always though that the term "junk DNA" was arrogant. Something doesn't become "junk" just because you do not understand its function or purpose.

    Posted Sep-8-2012 By 

    (2)

    • @passive_observer

      Yet "junk DNA" is an expression that is becoming ever more relevant nowadays that we design our own synthetic systems. Artificial cloning vectors for example have plenty of junk DNA, bits of remaining genes that have lost any kind of function... And similar bits of inactivated and no longer functional genes are found in all kinds of natural DNA sequences. How to call them other than "junk"?

      Posted Sep-8-2012 By 

      (0)

  • not long to go - a couple of decades maybe but when you are born your DNA will go into a database so they can keep track of everyone....

    Posted Sep-8-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Nature does not deal in junk. I always knew that so-called "junk DNA" must have a purpose. It will take decades to understand the human genome at the systems level. Too late to benefit us, probably, but our children will benefit.

    Posted Sep-8-2012 By 

    (0)

    • @govett

      We already benefit from the knowledge that we have about DNA. Ask for examples if you don't know what I am talking about...

      Posted Sep-8-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @Valerie2007
      But, 'govett' is correct...
      What we see as 'noise' around a subject, is often the adhesive of our existence.

      .., it's not for what we know,

      but,.. for what we are about to ....... Learn.

      Posted Sep-8-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @Donovan301

      "Too late to benefit us" is nevertheless incorrect and people will still pretend that in 10,000 years, if we ever are still around.

      Posted Sep-8-2012 By 

      (0)

  • I bet there is an experiment that will start "The planet Of The Apes" lol .. interesting stuff indeed ;)

    Posted Sep-8-2012 By 

    (0)