Safe Mode: On
Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) says lying about your military service is different if you're a Republican.

Because I know how much Rachel Maddow irks the wingnuts on LL when she points out their own hypocrisy...........


Washingtonpost.com

So Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) introduces an amendment making it a crime to lie about your military service, and just days later, a Republican senate candidate is caught misrepresenting his service.

The question is: Does the bill apply to Rep. Mark Kirk (R-Ill.) in the same way it applied to the original target -- Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal (D)? Would Kirk have committed a crime?

The answer, according to Hatch’s office, is no.

“The amendment’s intent is clear – it would make lying about serving in active duty in the military for the purposes of career advancement a misdemeanor,” Hatch spokesman Antonia Ferrier said.

The language of the amendment, though, is pretty broad, and it seems it could be construed to apply to Kirk’s situation. It reads:

“Whoever knowingly makes a fraudulent statement or representation, verbally or in writing, regarding the person’s record of military service in the United States Armed Forces, including, but not limited to, participation in combat operations, for the purposes of gaining recognition, honorarium, official office, or other position of authority, employment or other benefit or object of value as a result of the statement, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than six months, or both.”
The congressman, who like Blumenthal is running for Senate, misstated an award his unit received by stating that it was bestowed on him alone. He did it while serving in the Navy Reserves.
Basically, Kirk’s misstatement has to qualify as making “a fraudulent statement” regarding his “record of military service,” and it needs to have been intended to get him something – “official office” (i.e. running for Senate). The bill specifically mentions lying about having served in combat, but is broadly written to include other things as well.

In other words, it seems plausible that Kirk could have been fined or served jail time had the Hatch amendment been in place.

--Aaron Blake
Washington Post

Loading the player ...
Embed Code
Plays: 4989 (Embed: 0)

Added: Jun-2-2010 
By: EventHorizon2012
In:
News
Tags: Blumenthal, Kirk, Hatch amendment, military service, lying, fishsticks
Marked as: approved
Views: 6100 | Comments: 40 | Votes: 2 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • Democrat or Republican, if you lie, you lie and should be booted out of office period.

    Posted Jun-2-2010 By 

    (13)

  • This is the age of the internet.. there is no lying anymore if you're in politics. There's video or audio of everything.. and the military keeps records

    Posted Jun-3-2010 By 

    (6)

  • Both of these guys are douches. Orrin Hatch only wants to go after the Democrat and Rachel Maddow only wants to go after the Republican. They're both hypocrites.

    I do think it's a little worse to falsely claim to have served in Vietnam when you didn't, though. Just my opinion.

    Posted Jun-2-2010 By 

    (5)

  • just shows how corrupt all these politicians are.

    Posted Jun-3-2010 By 

    (5)

  • No one "lies" or "says something stupid" anymore.....they all "mis-speak".

    It's double plus ungood....

    Posted Jun-3-2010 By 

    (2)

  • I think some years ago a Navy Admiral committed suicide after it was pointed out that he displayed award ribbons on his uniform he had not been awarded. Today there is no honor, only liars and thieves. This liar won't get my vote. Orin Hatch? Of course he's has now shown his lack of honor in defending his fellow liar/thief.

    Posted Jun-3-2010 By 

    (1)

  • Because I know how much Rachel Maddow irks the wingnuts on LL when she points out their own hypocrisy...........

    maybe but the difference is, the LL lefty's seem to see THEIR own hypocrisy as a virtue.

    Just like when Clinton was exposed as a cheating sexual deviant. the Left of America Treated him like a rockstar.

    Posted Jun-3-2010 By 

    (1)

    • That's not hypocrisy because the left doesn't scream about sexual purity, "family values", or abstanence only education.

      Besides, YOU think getting a blowjob qualifies one as a sexual deviant?

      If he was a republican he'd have probably been found with a gay hooker instead or something

      Posted Jun-3-2010 By 

      (6)

    • "That's not hypocrisy because the left doesn't scream about sexual purity, "family values", or abstanence only education. "

      What about fidelity or respect for the oval office,NO?


      "Besides, YOU think getting a blowjob qualifies one as a sexual deviant?"

      well I remember something about a cigar.Not to mention she was a subordinate to the Married
      President of the United States so that might be a person whose behavior differ from accepted social standards.

      More..

      Posted Jun-3-2010 By 

      (-2)

    • People seem to have this crazy idea that marital fidelity makes someone a good leader. More than half of this country's marriages end in divorce, so I don't think anyone can make that claim.

      If a person from the lefties was gay, there would be no getting caught cheating on their wife with a man because that side doesn't repress themselves to the point they still get married and self-hate makes them snap. Despite every other sexual sin being tolerated and commited by republican politicans, homos More..

      Posted Jun-3-2010 By 

      (3)

    • If a man betrays his own wife.. the one closest to him,why do you think he would be loyal to 310 million strangers?

      Posted Jun-3-2010 By 

      (0)

    • I couldn't stand Clinton and I was 100% behind his impeachment. I think Blumenthal should face some sort of sanctions for lying about his service and I support the amendment to make it a criminal offense to lie about your military service....... no matter which party you belong to.

      Sorry but you're going to have to look somewhere else for that hypocrisy...... I hear Orrin Hatch is a good source, you might want to check there

      Posted Jun-3-2010 By 

      (0)

  • I'm betting that you get a little giddy just hearing the word "cock", period.

    Posted Jun-3-2010 By 

    (1)

  • Comment of user 'jsczerby' has been deleted by author!
  • this is the type of loser that got beat to much in school... what a fukin dork!

    Posted Jun-2-2010 By 

    (0)

  • Comment of user 'jsczerby' has been deleted by author!
  • Comment of user 'jsczerby' has been deleted by author!
  • Is Maddow a muff diver?

    Posted Jun-3-2010 By 

    (-1)

  • I dont get it... ok they are both liars but how does that change the bill presented ? In my mind it doesnt.. however, leave it to the wackos they have to somehow connect the two ! They are both full of shit and Maddow or whatever or however you spell her name is just a moron.

    Posted Jun-3-2010 By 

    (-2)

    • This is really quite simple. The two are connected because both are politicians seeking election and both lied about their military record/service to help get them elected.

      The point of the piece is not which side is lying about this kind of stuff, they obviously both are. The point is the hypocrisy of Orrin Hatch saying it's different when a Republican gets caught doing the exact same thing as the Democrat that he created the entire amendment around.

      Posted Jun-3-2010 By 

      (2)

  • Whats funny about Medow pointing out other's hypocrisy is that it usually puts a spotlight on her own. For instance, she gave the democrat a pass, but is finding ways to make an issue of the Republican. HYPOCRITE.

    Posted Jun-3-2010 By 

    (-2)