Safe Mode: On
fake liberal media

I alway hear how the media is liberal but never see it.


Added: Jun-24-2012 Occurred On: Jun-24-2012
By: thoth1
In:
Politics
Tags: idiotic, liberal, media.
Location: United States (load item map)
Views: 2352 | Comments: 166 | Votes: 4 | Favorites: 2 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • Comment of user 'LBJFRWY' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
  • load of crap. If your not smart enough to know bias when you see it, your probably an idiot leftist to begin with.

    Posted Jun-24-2012 By 

    (5) | Report

  • lol@Noam Chumpsky
    Seriously?
    The most discredited and debunked far left anarchist around.
    Some of Noam's best fuckups:
    Chomsky credits the Khmer Rouge dictatorship with saving up to a million lives.
    Chomsky suggests that Khmer Rouge atrocities have been inflated by “a factor of 1,000.”
    “I see no antisemitic implications in denial of the existence of gas chambers, or even denial of the holocaust.”

    ON 9/11...“for the first time in history the victims are returning the blow to the moth More..

    Posted Jun-24-2012 By 

    (5) | Report

  • Myth? MSM gave more coverage to the 40th anniversary of the Republican burglary scandal Watergate than the unfolding Obama debacle Fast and Furious where the results are several hundred murder victims as a direct result of the Obama administrations surreptitious and criminal actions. The New York Times and NBC just recently started covering the story after a complete coverage blackout.
    Tell me again how the liberal media conspiracy is a myth ? You are gonna tell people to believe a Noam Cho More..

    Posted Jun-24-2012 By 

    (5) | Report

    • @RoccoSantoro ...Nixon was cheating on your national elections ... compared to a botched police sting operation. Get some perspective, man.

      Posted Jun-24-2012 By 

      (-3) | Report

    • @Nepean109
      300 dead mexicans and a dead Border Patrol agent all the while Obama is perpetrating widespread voter fraud by sending his bitch Eric Holder to stop dead Obama voters from being removed from election rolls. YOU GET SOME PERSPECTIVE and get a god damn clue about what you're talking about. The stupidity of Obama loyalists never ceases to amaze me.

      Posted Jun-24-2012 By 

      (1) | Report

    • @RoccoSantoro Maybe some. But the same can be said for people who think George bush was awesome.

      Neither has done this country much good. The only difference is that bush gave the world a war based on lies...which opened up a second front with our enemy, for no good reason. This benefits nothing no one but our enemy. All the while it's being fought under the 'war on terror'. Well, that part of the war on terror just bred a million more people who want to do the west more harm.

      I'll take Obam More..

      Posted Jun-24-2012 By 

      (-1) | Report

    • @Nepean109 Perspective? Something that happened 40 years ago versus something happening now. You're a moron.

      Posted Jun-24-2012 By 

      (3) | Report

    • @yourboss
      This post was about the posters feelings that a liberal media bias is non existent in their view. I commented on that, I don't know what you're commenting on but it has nothing to do with the post.

      Posted Jun-24-2012 By 

      (1) | Report

  • LOL libs telling us how the news is not liberal. And i suppose the NYTimes is not liberal or msnbc or cnn or abc cbs and nbc.

    How come we don't hear daily death counts in Afganistan?
    None of them covered fast and furious until holder is getting taken to the wood shed.

    What the do is not report things on dems but over report over and over to get out an agenda against the republicans.

    I remember when Bush was elected and was watching cnn those fools looked like they started crying.

    What a sel More..

    Posted Jun-24-2012 By 

    (4) | Report

  • Really? Ever watch..NBC, MSNBC, Bill Maher, NPR, CNBC, CNN, BBC, or the Daily Show? Just to name a few.

    Posted Jun-24-2012 By 

    (3) | Report

  • You never see it? I guess your cable provider doesn't include MSNBC in your channel lineup.

    Posted Jun-24-2012 By 

    (3) | Report

  • I agree the media is not liberal. I find it to be Maxist/Communist.

    Posted Jun-24-2012 By 

    (3) | Report

  • sorry about your blindness. born that way? apparently you are deaf also?

    Posted Jun-24-2012 By 

    (3) | Report

  • At the end of the day it is all about how you define "liberal". If you define "liberal" as one who favors government as a solution to all problems that plague the world and mankind then yes, the media has a Liberal agenda...if you define "liberal" in the more classic sense of the word as one that advocates limited government, constitutionalism, rule of law, due process, individual liberties - then no the media is far from "liberal".

    Posted Jun-24-2012 By 

    (2) | Report

    • @mdscorpio71 exactly right, liberalism or modern progressivism is only semantically different from Communism and Marxism

      Posted Jun-24-2012 By 

      (3) | Report

    • @mdscorpio71 ...so you believe what - the world will just save itself if there is no gov't, no police, no army, . . . how?

      Posted Jun-24-2012 By 

      (-1) | Report

    • @Nepean109 I said "limited" government, not "no" government. If you are looking for a utopian solution better check out some other planet because you will not find one here and there is no such thing no matter what the politician promises you.

      Posted Jun-24-2012 By 

      (3) | Report

    • @Nepean109
      So you see the choice as an overblown Obama govt. that tripled in size or no government. You seem really bright.

      Posted Jun-25-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

  • The news is OBVIOUSLY beholden to its sponsors, CEOs and shareholders.

    Posted Jun-24-2012 By 

    (2) | Report

  • Comment of user 'MB-UK' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
  • This is hysterical. Propaganda denying the existence of propaganda. What would be the need to denounce such "common myths" unless they were true? This entire video was discredited at the point he says "entirely no proof" Less than one month ago a major network news channel admitted that they spliced the 911 call Zimmerman made the night he shot T.Martin. The end result was it made Zimmerman appear to have said "He's black" followed immediately by "These a-holes More..

    Posted Jun-24-2012 By 

    (2) | Report

    • Comment of user 'MR tommygun' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
    • @Ax7 The need to denounce common myths is because they are common "myths".

      Posted Jun-25-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @Tongueboy Your non biased media NBC got in trouble today again for splicing the video edit of the Sandusky interview to make him appear to hesitate before he answered a question of whether or not he is sexually attracted to boys. It now may lead to a mistrial. Good job liberals!

      Posted Jun-25-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @Ax7 And you see that as a liberal thing??????????????????

      Posted Jun-25-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

  • Comment of user 'MR tommygun' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
    • @MR tommygun

      What is so ironic about today, is that although we're experiencing a revolution in information and transfer of data, there are more people in the world that are clueless and ignorant about what is happening around them.

      Posted Jun-25-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • Comment of user 'MR tommygun' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
    • @MR tommygun

      At lot of what Wikileaks posts is bullshit.

      Posted Jun-25-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • Comment of user 'MR tommygun' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
  • The left vs right paradigm is false. It is part of a divide and conquer strategy. I think Noam Chomsky should back up a bit further and question the paradigm itself, but then he is a player in it. I figure him to be a very sly public relations expert, playing his part.

    Posted Jun-24-2012 By 

    (1) | Report

    • @TheGlenn

      America's Littlefinger.

      Posted Jun-24-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @TheGlenn ...he is just a teacher of semantics - why would you see him as a "very sly PR expert"? PR for who? If you can't say, then what good is his PR work then?

      Posted Jun-24-2012 By 

      (1) | Report

    • @TheGlenn
      And what would he get out of it?

      Posted Jun-24-2012 By 

      (1) | Report

    • @Nepean109 For whoever is in control, directly or indirectly. The City of London? The Vatican?
      His PR work helps to keep people misdirected. There are many people doing the same thing to their respective audiences. Their job is to turn back or hinder those who would look to alternative media for information. It is a smoke screen for you to get lost in. Pick an alternative media hero, and research them. Take their message with a grain of salt, and study the messenger. If they have an agenda, asi More..

      Posted Jun-24-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

  • I don't know that fluff and sensationalist garbage really leans one direction or the other. They just air whatever gets the most viewers, so it tends to be sensationalized crap, or outright lies if they can get away with it, which they usually do, but it can't be so extreme that it offends their sponsors or shareholders. So you wind up with a nice blend of paranoia inducing bullshit and trite fluff, all of which is pretty much certain to rot your brain. And so the people who watch it tend to More..

    Posted Jun-25-2012 By 

    (1) | Report

    • @Intellectual Well said and well thought.
      They ALL make money off controversy and sensationalism.
      Our world is actually far more boring than the "news" would have you believe.
      Another point,
      We all hear about the millions and billions being spent on the campaigns, especially after the deeply flawed citizens united case.
      Where do you think they are spending these millions and billions????????????
      The media.
      On both sides.
      Those who own the media hold the true power.
      For now.
      The MSM isn More..

      Posted Jun-25-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @Tongueboy I guess people think the politicians only spend the money on advertisements, but when a TV show is sponsored by a politician they have to be careful not to say anything too contrary to the politician's position. So really the money buys so much more than just the advertisement spots.

      Posted Jun-25-2012 By 

      (1) | Report

    • @Intellectual It buys power.
      Most people want it, few can afford it.
      Those that want it and can afford it are very, very dangerous.

      Posted Jun-25-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @Tongueboy

      One of the few times I agree with you. What you said, I actually witnessed this last week in front of my own eyes. The media manipulates their own news and specially when is to protect their own interests or take care of their own "Chickens".

      Posted Jun-25-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @Tongueboy Anybody who thinks that 95% of the MSM isn't pushing a leftist agenda, is a fucking idiot.

      Posted Jun-25-2012 By 

      (-2) | Report

  • Bring forth the counter claims, that would tend to prove the proposition.

    Posted Jun-24-2012 By 

    (1) | Report

  • Im not sure why the editor of this video chose these loons but being that they are all from Massachussetts anything seen on the television is certianly right wing to them.

    Posted Jun-25-2012 By 

    (1) | Report

  • "The media is not biased. I can tell because I agree with everything they report."
    -a liberal

    Posted Jun-24-2012 By 

    (1) | Report

    • Comment of user 'Zardoz003' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
  • Comment of user 'Zardoz003' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
    • @Zardoz003 There is no right, and left. There is more government, or less, more freedom, or less.

      Posted Jun-24-2012 By 

      (1) | Report

    • @Zardoz003 They do love playing the victim.
      There used to be strong conservatives who played offense.
      Now it's all victim defense and few if any conservatives in the republican party.

      Posted Jun-25-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @dog64 But there is a divide on what more government and less government should look like so yes, there is a right and left even in the more versus less government debate.

      Posted Jun-25-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @Tongueboy

      I think what dog is saying is that the right is no longer the right. The right used to be about small government period, whereas now we simply have liberals who like controlling the economy and liberals who like controlling your personal choices.

      The right used to be for freedom, they weren't always people who thought government was a way of taking out their anger, towards gays, muslims, and the poor, that is derived from their own insecurities.

      Posted Jun-25-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @86mang75 I assumed what he was doing is the same thing leftists are often accused of doing.
      Imagining a utopian world where left and right does not exist and it is only about the amount of government that all our issues fall on.
      But reality is not so clean cut.
      There are divides.
      Do you care for your village, i.e. feed the poor and take care of the infirm and elderly to make yourself a stronger village, or do you give everything to the Lords of the land and trust them to make the right decision More..

      Posted Jun-25-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

  • Chomsky has been saying basically the same thing , since 1975 , longer then most of his fan boys have been alive . Since Pinker overthrew his theory of the innate sense of language , I would have thought he would return to linguistics .

    Posted Jun-24-2012 By 

    (1) | Report

  • The opening few lines set the agenda. Democracy.

    AMERICA is not (was not) a democracy.
    America (used to be) is a constitutional Republic.

    Democracy is socialism.

    Posted Jun-24-2012 By 

    (1) | Report

    • @Rebel_Radius ...Americans have been forcing Democracy onto the world for a century and now, .... you say its socialism. Someone is bending you around their little finger, man.

      Posted Jun-24-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @Rebel_Radius
      So for all these decades of promoting democracy we were only promoting socialism?
      kill yourself

      Posted Jun-24-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @thoth1 ....so you now think that in Korea, Viet Nam, Granada, Iraq and Afghanistan . . . your gov't has been promoting socialism? Wow. You really have been bent over and ... by some bastard.

      Posted Jun-24-2012 By 

      (1) | Report

    • @Nepean109
      read the comment that I was responding to. It usually starts with the username of the one I was responding to. check to see if it was your username that I was responding to.

      Posted Jun-24-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @thoth1 What is democracy thoth?

      Posted Jun-25-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

  • Call it what you will, the Media is biased. Objective journalism is a rare find these days.

    Posted Jun-24-2012 By 

    (1) | Report

    • @Megadeth
      I agree but to hear sheep tell it you would think all of media are liberal and there is one conservative station called fox that all the big bad liberal outlets want to destroy.

      Posted Jun-24-2012 By 

      (-1) | Report

    • @thoth1 Despite the press, it is more disturbing that people with voter cards get their news and opinion from Comedy Central, MTV or HBO. Worse yet, they vote with no reasoning other than basic blind party affiliation.

      Posted Jun-24-2012 By 

      (1) | Report

  • Comment of user 'HorsePipe' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
    • @HorsePipe
      Oh STFU you gay, black, gypsy, socialist, latino muslim.

      Posted Jun-24-2012 By 

      (-1) | Report

    • @HorsePipe I think I am blocked by 99% of them.
      Saves me time as I simply skip their vids and the loads of crap that are in them.

      Posted Jun-25-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @HorsePipe

      Chomsky is great Linguistics academic, but in regards to politics, economics and actual facts he's far from reality. His "syndicated anarchism", in pratice it would be complete disaster for society and for this country. He reminds me of my history professor, that although has a very extensive knowledge and smart, politically he's a rabid liberal but he's conservative in some social issues. He's political ideas are not tune in with reality.

      Besides, what I find the most ir More..

      Posted Jun-25-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

  • i get more sex now because i got rid of all my electronics

    Posted Jun-24-2012 By 

    (1) | Report