Safe Mode: On
Nuclear Submarine to be inducted in Pakistan's navy by 2015

Who can be on the hit list? India? Israel? .... America? xD

Loading the player ...
Embed Code
Plays: 651 (Embed: 0)

Added: Jun-3-2012 Occurred On: Jun-3-2012
By: Ray Kalm
In: World News
Tags: Pakistan, Navy
Location: Pakistan (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 1072 | Comments: 48 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.

  • Stupid vid description about hit list bullcrap

    Posted Jun-3-2012 By 
    NeRdALeRt (167.30)  

    (2)

  • Imagine the stench inside that thing.
    It's funny that their language doesn't have words for "nuclear submarine".

    Posted Jun-3-2012 By 
    buzzywhumpa (240.42)  

    (1)

  • Why?????

    It's just as easy to crash a suface vessel into a harbor or another ship.

    Posted Jun-3-2012 By 
    smegmabreath (66.50)  

    (1)

  • Pakistan's hit list? You must be joking! Pakistan is failed state, with about half its territory controlled by terrorists. When you defeat the TTP come back and start crowing and maybe we'll listen.

    Posted Jun-3-2012 By 
    kingfordlm (692.36)  
    kingfordlm
    Send Message

    (1)

  • Who exactly is this propaganda supposed to be fooling? According to all these bullshit Pakistan military videos that keep being posted one would think they are soon to take over the world. lol

    Posted Jun-3-2012 By 
    thatRobGuy (49.30)  

    (1)

  • Nuke subs are chiefly to grant a second-strike capability: i.e. let's say India just nuked all your known missile launch sites.

    Something tells me their sub will have a mysterious accident while submerged shortly after it is floated. Such is the way these things are resolved these days :p

    Posted Jun-3-2012 By 
    hellgremlin (763.22)
    hellgremlin
    Send Message

    (1)

  • And we give them Aid money, we dont even have a working aircraft carrier to defend our own shores.

    Posted Jun-3-2012 By 
    vax2002 (115.00)  

    (1)

  • You better be real good, if you wanna play in our little pool.

    Posted Jun-3-2012 By 
    Blue3tar (496.60)  

    (1)

  • The folks on the hit-list are anyone that invades their country or keeps bombing it. Seems reasonable to me.

    Posted Jun-3-2012 By 
    PeterLondon (19.20)  

    (1)

  • The only thing I understood was nuclear submarine

    Posted Jun-3-2012 By 
    Wyseguy67 (4036.00)  

    (0)

  • Who gave it to them? Now you understand why India and Indian get upset with the USA......you got to be fuking nuts to keep supporting thse cock suckers

    Posted Jun-3-2012 By 
    AxisofEvil (574.18)  

    (0)

  • If they were to use a nuke, it would almost certainly be on India.

    They hate each other so much, Pakistan created and still funds the Afghan Taliban to defeat the Soviets (who were friends with the Indians because Pakistan didn't want two hostile nations on other side of them.)

    If the entire Afghan conflict came out of the relationship between Pakistan and India, they would probably use a nuke on one another.

    Posted Jun-3-2012 By 
    cswartz (1163.40)  

    (0)

    • @cswartz

      Nuke war is unlikely, nobody wants Indian Ocean and Afghanistan to be affected by aftermath of the Nukewar(i mean radioactive exposure). Those are major trade routes and such an event is against the interest of Businessmen and investors. Whats happening between India n Pak is espionage/urban warfare. Indian intelligence agencies fund Taliban to carry out strikes against Pak, vice versa. Nukes are just for deterrent..you can say huge dicks created to be virgin forever.

      Posted Jun-4-2012 By 
      fatality09 (892.68)  

      (0)

  • One thing that confuses me about nuclear subs is the radioactive water they make.

    Is it stored into barrels and disposed of correctly, or is it just pumped out into the ocean?

    Posted Jun-3-2012 By 
    sungam (1409.88)  

    (0)

    • @sungam
      Guess.

      Posted Jun-3-2012 By 
      Blue3tar (496.60)  

      (0)

    • @sungam They don't make radioactive water. No nuclear power plant does.

      Posted Jun-3-2012 By 
      kingfordlm (692.36)  
      kingfordlm
      Send Message

      (0)

    • @sungam Do they emit radioactive water? I was under the impression that seawater flowed AROUND the reactor core and never touched anything radioactive? Same way it works in nuke plants.

      Posted Jun-3-2012 By 
      radiofreak (314.96)  

      (0)

    • @kingfordlm Oh really? I was under the impression that water was heated up by the nuclear rods, converted into steam, then that pressure increase runs a generator to create electricity. I thought water in contact or anywhere near the nuclear rods would in turn become radioactive.

      Granted I know fuck all about this. Just a question.

      Posted Jun-3-2012 By 
      sungam (1409.88)  

      (0)

    • @sungam Well I can't pretend I'm a complete expert but my understanding is that they are basically closed systems and water that actually circulates through the reactor core never leaves the reactor, and it in turn is cooled by other water indirectly through heat exchangers, but the two never directly mix.

      Posted Jun-3-2012 By 
      kingfordlm (692.36)  
      kingfordlm
      Send Message

      (0)

  • Pakistan has nukes. Pakistan harbored the terrorist Osama Bin Laden. But Pakistan is our "ally". Right.

    Posted Jun-3-2012 By 
    radiofreak (314.96)  

    (0)

  • They're going with the Polish design. You know - the one with the screen doors?

    Posted Jun-3-2012 By 
    stirgy (2301.30)  

    (0)