Safe Mode: On
Turkey promises 'decisive' action after Syria shoots down its fighter jet



Turkey threatened to take "decisive" action last night after Syria shot down one of its fighter jets, sparking fears that Nato could be drawn into a major confrontation with the Assad regime.

The loss of one of the Turkish Air Force's F-4 Phantom marked the most dangerous development yet in Syria's 15-month uprising and left Western powers scrambling over how to respond.

Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the Turkish prime minister, flew home from Brazil to hold an emergency briefing with his intelligence and military chiefs after radio and radar contact was lost with the aircraft as it conducted a mission close to the Syrian coast.

"Following the evaluation of data provided by our related institutions and the findings of the joint search and reduce efforts with Syria, it is understood that our plane was downed by Syria," his office said in a statement.

Mr Erdogan promised that Turkey's response would be both "decisive" and carried out with "determination". Although he did not divulge what steps he was contemplating, a senior member of his ruling party had earlier declared that if the aircraft was shown to have been shot down by Syria it would amount to a "declaration of war".

Syria confirmed that it had brought down the aircraft, saying in a statement: "Our air defences confronted a target that penetrated our air space over our territorial waters pre-afternoon on Friday and shot it down. It turned out to be a Turkish military plane."

In a sign that it was aware of the gravity of the situation, Syria seemed to be trying to repair the damage, deploying vessels to join a search and rescue operation to locate the aircraft's two pilots in the waters off its coast.

The incident represented the fulfilment of one of the international community's greatest fears after months of predictions that the Syrian conflict could easily burst its borders.

Western powers, and particularly the United States, are likely to come under pressure to support Turkey should it choose to retaliate with military force. Mr Erdogan's government has long warned that it would not tolerate any Syrian challenge to its security.



As a member of Nato, Turkey could potentially invoke Chapter V of the alliance's treaty which states that an attack on one state would be viewed as an attack on all signatories of the alliance.



But because the clause dictates that such an attack must be carried out on European or American soil, Mr Erdogan is unlikely to make such demands of his Western allies.



But he could well invoke Chapter IV of the treaty, which allows a member state to convene an emergency summit of the whole alliance if "the security of any of the parties is threatened".



Turkey came close to doing so in April after Syrian forces opened fire into its territory, wounding two Turkish nationals and two Syrians at a refugee camp close to the borders.



It was persuaded not to do so by the United States, but is likely to be less malleable now. In return for agreeing to allowing Saudi and Qatari funnel weapons to the rebels through its territory, Mr Erdogan sought and received assurances that America would protect Turkey from any Syrian backlash, according to Western officials.



Turkey, which has been at the forefront of regional efforts to oust Mr Assad and has given sanctuary to rebels seeking his overthrow, could also try to revive previous efforts to win international support for a buffer zone in Syria's border regions.The jet incident came as the Syrian government accused its rebel foes of carrying out a "massacre" of Mr Assad's supporters after the emergence of grisly video footage showing more than a dozen bloodied and mutilated corpses.



A pro-opposition human rights group confirmed that rebels were behind the killings, but said that the victims were members of the pro-Assad Shabiha, the feared Alawite militia accused of murdering hundreds of Sunni civilians.Meanwhile, government troops killed at least ten people in the city of Aleppo, according to activists.----

Source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/9350341/Turkey-promises-decisive-action-after-Syria-shoots-down-its-fighter-jet.html

News Report (Yes, RT. Get over it.):

Loading the player ...
Embed Code
Plays: 2433 (Embed: 0)



Added: Jun-22-2012 Occurred On: Jun-22-2012
By: MB-UK
In:
World News, Other Middle East
Tags: turkey, syria, military, confrontation, intervention, plane, jet, shot, down, NATO, yanks, UN
Location: Syria (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 4934 | Comments: 148 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • Now, here's just one of the problems with allowing Turkey, or any Muslim country into NATO. We now are obligated to protect it, which means they can express their machismo bullshit and get all kind of people killed, including their own, and we (the civilized world) will be responsible for it. Might as well have let the Hutus and Tutsis join NATO.

    Posted Jun-22-2012 By 

    (8)

    • @Hunterseeker
      very true

      Posted Jun-22-2012 By 

      (1)

    • Comment of user 'whodat' has been deleted by author!
    • @whodat It was there to simply serve as a land based missile and aircraft carrier for the U.S. and Europe. That is all! Now, Turkey is just a liability to NATO. An unpredictable Muslim country with its loyality to itself and to interests and values that completely contradict what NATO stands for.

      Posted Jun-22-2012 By 

      (1)

    • @Hunterseeker You guys both have avatars based on Star Trek TNG, seems like you should be able to come to agreement.

      Posted Jun-22-2012 By 

      (1)

    • Comment of user 'whodat' has been deleted by author!
  • What the fuck they where doing in syria with one of their fighters
    Anyway
    Muslim killing muslims
    That cant be wrong
    Win Win for civilised world

    Posted Jun-22-2012 By 

    (4)

  • Syria thought it was just a turkey shoot.

    Posted Jun-22-2012 By 

    (4)

  • Syria thought they were dealing with chickens... Turkey is just a wee bit bigger than a chicken ;)

    Posted Jun-22-2012 By 

    (3)

  • F4 - Phantom? That is no longer a "fighter jet". It's almost 50 years old. At most, it's an airborne target.

    Posted Jun-22-2012 By 

    (3)

  • RT: Russian Television should really be RP: Russian Propaganda.

    Posted Jun-23-2012 By 

    (3)

  • Turkey is becoming a brutal Islamic regime under Erdogan. I think the first order of business if Turkey calls a NATO summit is to politely suggest they may no longer merit membership in NATO. They should be asked, Should we not consider that question first, before allowing Turkey to drag the alliance into a war?

    Posted Jun-23-2012 By 

    (2)

  • The plane entered their airspace, and they are surprised it was taken down? Uh, hello, this is how you enter a conflict of war, not prevent it.

    Posted Jun-23-2012 By 

    (2)

    • @masksqueeze Good point. What was the plane doing there and who shot it down? I'm sure Syria is on high alert and expecting a NATO air assault since the NATO backed insurgents are getting nowhere except clogging up LL with their spam. On the other hand the plane may have been downed by a NATO SAM.

      Posted Jun-23-2012 By 

      (0)

  • The president of Zimbabwe stubbed his toe getting out of bed last night. The world is waiting to see how the United States responds.

    Brazil told Venezuela to kiss their ass last night. The world is waiting to see how the United States responds.

    The new President of Hysteria has a nasty boil on his ass. The world is waiting to see how the United States responds.

    Why does everything have to involve the US? Who cares what happened to a Turkish owned F4 that is older than most LiveLeake More..

    Posted Jun-23-2012 By 

    (2)

  • That would really be funny if, after rattling sabres in Israel's general direction for the past couple years, Turkey ends up playing fall guy for a NATO intervention in Syria.

    Posted Jun-22-2012 By 

    (2)

  • Phantom F4's! Those are so 1960's! It must have attracted a missile with it's "historical vehicle" license plate! Was John McCain at the wheel? LOL!

    Posted Jun-22-2012 By 

    (2)

    • @XR400R Still a beautiful and functional plane many countries still use. The plane shot down is not the same as the ones used in the 60s. New tech has changed the capabilities of existing platforms always.

      Posted Jun-23-2012 By 

      (1)

  • Just read a blurb about Turkey's Navy getting revved up for action now. I guess Syria bit the the bait from NATOnow it gets much bigger. WW3 is getting fast tracked.

    Posted Jun-22-2012 By 

    (2)

  • I am shocked. Really quite surprised. Someone besides Iran and maybe Zaire is still flying F4s? Amazing.

    Posted Jun-23-2012 By 

    (2)

  • turkey wont do shit

    Posted Jun-22-2012 By 

    (1)

  • MB-UK, why do you even give credence to RT? Do you subscribe to the Moscow Times, China Daily, Cuban Gazette, and North Korean Bigswingingdongchong Reporter too?

    Truth? Sure, even propaganda contains truth. It's everything else that it missing.

    Posted Jun-22-2012 By 

    (1)

    • Comment of user 'MB-UK' has been deleted by author!
    • @MB-UK

      Okay, roger that.

      Posted Jun-22-2012 By 

      (1)

    • @USA1

      A few days ago you uploaded a Fox interview with John Bolton. The interview was clearly biased and anti-Russian. Was that propaganda too then? No, of course not you would say - "propaganda" is what doesn't conform with your beliefs, it is what the bad guys like the Russians do.

      Posted Jun-22-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @Kris_Kelvin

      Fox News may be biased but it is NOT govt sponsored propaganda like RT is.

      The US govt does a terrible job of insulating its citizens from malicious propaganda designed to undermine its very existence. I guess the US Govt hopes its citizens are smart enough to understand the differences.

      Posted Jun-22-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @USA1

      So if information comes from the government it's called propaganda and if it comes from a Republican party or a corporation then it's just bias but not propaganda? Why is the former propaganda and the latter is not? Isn't it just semantics?

      Posted Jun-22-2012 By 

      (0)