Part of channel(s): UFO (promoted)~ Here I am again, HYPERTECKER (HYPRTCKR) with that UFO video taken in Jerusalem over the Dome of The Rock on 1-28-2011, but this time I tweaked the video so you can see what was not seen after the UFO takes off, as well as what you may have already heard (hover & take-off sounds) from my last related post.
~ From all the overtweaking I've been doing it seems to me there is a message which I plan to decode from the hover & takeoff sounds. Strangely enough the UFO sounds cannot be easily heard just by slowing down the video, it takes more tweaking for that. Additionally, & curiously enough, after the UFO takes off, there can be seen what seems to be texting between sibling ships, in what was previously deemed as unnecessary & wasteful recording of total blackness.
~ There are people who actually believe UFOs are from a distant & remote world from beyond, but I personally do not believe that, per as I believe they are us, our future, our children, our children's future technology, and I behemently am out to prove it.
~ Go to my website so you can see how far I have gotten to proving UFO technology is from our future:
http://www.hyprtckr.com/#HOME
~ Or go to my LiveLeak webpage to see my related uploads:
http://www.liveleak.com/browse?my_items=1
HAPPY FEB. 29, 2012 LEAP YEAR!!
| The poll already expired - voting is no longer possible! | |
| Results: | |
| 1.) YES | |
 |
(29) 27.36% |
| 2.) NO | |
|
(26) 24.53% |
| 3.) MAYBE | |
|
(12) 11.32% |
| 4.) PERHAPS | |
|
(7) 6.6% |
| 5.) UNDECIDED | |
|
(2) 1.89% |
| 6.) IT'LL TAKE MORE CONVINCING FOR ME TO BELIEVE | |
|
(17) 16.04% |
| 7.) OTHER | |
|
(5) 4.72% |
| 8.) N/A (NOT APPLICABLE) | |
|
(8) 7.55% |
| Total Votes | 106 |
| Expiration Date | 4/30/2012 |
By: HYPERTECKER
In: Conspiracy
Tags: UFO, Jerusalem, Dome of The Rock, future, tech, proof, future now, HYPRTCKR, hypertecker, update, hover, UFO take off, texting, tweak
Location: Oxnard, California, United States (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 4670 | Comments: 13 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 2 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
Advertisement below
|
|
| Liveleak on Facebook | |
|
LIKE Liveleak.com |
-
Ride to the Top Of The Rock
-
Muslims performing tawaf at Masjid-al-Haram.
-
REMEMBER THAT DOME OF THE ROCK UFO??? HAD SOME EXTRA TIME, THIS IS WHAT I DID WITH IT
-
Jerusalem Dome of the Rock UFO - New Closer View
-
TIME CAPSULE: Design For Dreaming (1956), a retro view of the future.
-
Jerusalem - Temple Mount UFO - Jan 28 2010
-
UFO Spotted Descending Over Jerusalem's Dome Of The Rock?
-
U.F.O. hovering over the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem.
-
UFO In Jerusalem Over The Dome of the Rock Temple Mount
-
SSgt Barry Sadler, Ballad of the green beret
-
Second video from Dome of the Rock UFO in Jerusalem
-
Temple Mount/Dome of the Rock: Plenty to see for all 3 religions
lol.
Posted Feb-29-2012 ByMAKMAK (2433.90) MAKMAK View Channel Send Message
(2)
So, it has a stuck gear due to malfunctionig clutch.
what else do you want to show us?
Posted Feb-29-2012 Byingasuma (142.30) 
ingasuma View Channel Send Message
(1)
LoL
Posted Feb-29-2012 Bymoefugger (2140.36) 
moefugger View Channel Send Message
(0)
pretty kewl dude
Posted Mar-5-2012 ByRONHELIX (111.82) RONHELIX View Channel Send Message
(0)
Time travel to the past? Nah. If it's not fake then it has to be either secret aircraft developed on earth or an alien observer, or interloper.
Posted Mar-25-2012 ByMurkyFogsFutureLogs (251.00) 
MurkyFogsFutureLogs View Channel Send Message
(0)
one of the 4 vids has been PROVED to be a hoax so it doesnt say much for the others...i dont know which one it was before u ask....
Posted Sep-4-2012 Byharv (120.72) 
harv View Channel Send Message
(0)
What you picked up after the "fly-off" was the camera zoomed into the sky. Whatever was picked up (by you) was darting around because of extreme magnification (the large pixels make that evident) AND the cameraman was unsteady. As for the "UFO"'s sound, how did you isolate that, while the camera guy was talking over the event? I'm sure you put a load of effort into this...but please either don't bother....or just try a lot harder.
Posted Feb-29-2012 ByTerminator (60.20) 
Terminator View Channel Send Message
(-1)
@HYPERTECKER but you fail to explain how by 'tweaking' the video (whatever that really means) you can promote one audio aspect, subsonic though it might be (which already makes no sense) and inaudable in the source vers. - and block out another sound source altogether - all from a digital audio source format.
Not very convincing Hyperfaker....
Posted Mar-5-2012 Byerder (184.68) 
erder View Channel Send Message
(0)