Safe Mode: On
Kagan: OK to ban books, OK to ban foods.

Shocking and painful-to-hear testimony.

Coburn on sotomayor: "2 areas of very distinct testimony which it has been demonstrated she did not live up to" (2 most recent cases, 1 on the Second Amendment).

http://www.frugal-cafe.com/public_html/frugal-blog/frugal-cafe-blogzone/2010/06/28/scotus-nominee-kagan-its-fine-if-the-law-bans-books-because-government-wont-really-enforce-it-video/

SCOTUS Nominee Kagan: “It’s Fine if the Law Bans Books Because Government Won’t Really Enforce It” (video)
Posted By Vicki McClure Davidson on June 28, 2010

Obama’s left-wing extremist SCOTUS nominee Elena Kagan, back in 2009, chipping away at Americans’ constitutional rights… she believes it’s fine if the law bans books because “government won’t really enforce it.”

What the heck? They “won’t” enforce a book-banning law until they find it advantageous to suddenly e

Loading the player ...
Embed CodeSwitch Player
Plays: 3971 (Embed: 0)

Added: Jul-5-2010 
By: HydrogenEconomy
In:
LiveLeaks
Tags: kagan, scotus, ok, ban, books, foods
Views: 5323 | Comments: 9 | Votes: 1 | Favorites: 1 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • No bitch, act in support of the declaration of independance and our constitution and bill of rights, like he said. When she argues that and makes a distinction between those things and what her idea of "law" is; she is telling us all plainly that she doesn't give a fuck about our Bill of Rights, or our other constitutional protections. Fuck that bitch and Obama.

    Posted Jul-6-2010 By 

    (5) | Report

  • Good post Hydro, interesting stuff as well.

    Talk about avoiding straight answers. As far as laws and everything goes in courts or on the streets, they tend to mean nothing, or could be applied as will by police and prosecutors - If the documents such as the constitution ceases to enforce and secure the fundamental rights of individuals. And those documents seem to have been hollowed out, simply by having been overlooked and not paid attention to in alot of instances of late.

    Kagan seems to be More..

    Posted Jul-6-2010 By 

    (5) | Report

  • He is absolutely correct. We ARE losing our freedoms! And she will do absolutely nothing to change that, likely she will increase our losses. It was kind of obvious listening to her that she was saying just that. Plus, he didn't say much about it but she was dodging questions and using ambiguous wording; and sometimes just saying she would do what she was going to do and screw what you think.

    Posted Jul-6-2010 By 

    (4) | Report

  • People who are for this bho choice are like my misinformed friend from canada who think there is
    no problem with the mexican drug gangs on the border.
    They think the enemy are the citizens who dont have the same political view. Please wake up people,we are running out of time and freedom!

    Posted Jul-6-2010 By 

    (3) | Report

  • For the love of God, keep this well-meaning but misguided fascist swine out of the Supreme Court! Obama's appointees are fucking us up so bad we may never recover - once a freedom is lost, taken away or given up, is it possible to ever get it back? There are 750,000 signatures on the "Impeach Obama" website, that may be exactly what we need to do i think, this country may not survive another 2 years of this disastrous regime.

    Posted Jul-6-2010 By 

    (1) | Report

  • ditch the bitch.

    Posted Jul-6-2010 By 

    (1) | Report

  • Go back to sleep everyone, nothing to see here.

    Posted Jul-6-2010 By 

    (1) | Report

  • First of all, her job as Solicitor General requires her to defend the policies of the US Government before the Supreme Court, even if she personally disagrees with them.

    Second: isn't that how the Supreme Court works in our system of checks and balances? If an unconstitutional law is passed by congress, _and_ it's enforced by the executive branch, then it can be overturned.

    Posted Jul-6-2010 By 

    (0) | Report

  • she will be confirmed, the other face of the progressive beast (repubs) will pull the trigger

    Posted Jul-6-2010 By 

    (0) | Report